Junior doctors’ medical specialty and practice location choice: simulating policies to overcome regional inequalities
There are nowadays over 1 million Portuguese who lack a primary care physician. By applying a discrete choice experiment to a large representative sample of Portuguese junior doctors (N = 503) in 2014, we provide an indication that this shortage may be addressed with a careful policy design that mixes pecuniary and non-pecuniary incentives for these junior physicians. According to our simulations, a policy that includes such incentives may increase uptake of general practitioners (GPs) in rural areas from 18% to 30%. Marginal wages estimated from our model are realistic and close to market prices: an extra hour of work would require an hourly wage of 16.5€; moving to an inland rural setting would involve an increase in monthly income of 1.150€ (almost doubling residents’ current income); a shift to a GP career would imply an 849€ increase in monthly income. Additional opportunities to work outside the National Health Service overcome an income reduction of 433€. Our simulation predicts that an income increase of 350€ would lead to a 3 percentage point increase in choice probability, which implies an income elasticity of 3.37, a higher estimation compared to previous studies.
KeywordsMedical specialty choice Discrete choice experiment Location decision Rural uptake policies Portugal
JEL ClassificationI18 J3
We are deeply indebted to our colleagues and friends at several medical schools and hospitals across the country for helping us with the logistics for distributing and collecting the questionnaires, particularly to the following MDs: Ana Rita Ramos, André Graça, André Tojal, Bernardo Matias, Carina Mendonça, Carolina Cardoso, Carolina Carneiro, Diogo Dias, Eduardo Palha Fernandes, Elisabete Ribeiro, Flávio Costa, João Felgueiras, João Lopes, João Neves, João Rego, João Sousa, José Pedro Pinto, Luís Coutinho, Luís Magalhães, Luísa Graça, Manuel Abecasis, Margarida Bernardo, Mariana Carrapatoso, Nélson Cunha, Nídia Ramos, Nuno China, Nuno Morais, Ricardo Reis, Ricardo Veiga, Rita Ferreira, Rui Coelho, Rui Malheiro, Rui Lopes. We are also thankful to Antonio Monforte for his initial guidance with the SAS algorithm, and to Professor Rita Gaio for the help with the model analysis. We are also grateful to ACSS, I.P. for valuable statistics of the population of junior doctors our sample represented. We acknowledge valuable feedback from the participants at the 14th Health Economics’ Portuguese Conference and at the European Health Economics Association conference (EuHEA 2016).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
We have no conflict of interest to declare.
- 5.Baumgardner, J.R.: The division of labor, local markets, and worker organization. J. Political Econ. 96(3), 509–527 (1988)Google Scholar
- 16.Santana, P., Peixoto, H., Loureiro, A., Costa, C., Nunes, C., Duarte, N.: Estudo de evolução prospectiva de médicos no Sistema Nacional de Saúde. Ordem dos Médicos, Lisboa (2013)Google Scholar
- 19.Decree-Law 101/2015. In: Health, M. (ed.). LisbonGoogle Scholar
- 20.Ministerial Order 54/2010. In: Health, M. (ed.). LisbonGoogle Scholar
- 22.ADHA: Australia’s medical workforce. In: Ageing, A.D.O.H.A. (ed.). Australia (2005)Google Scholar
- 24.Wanzenried, G., Nocera, S.: The evolution of physician density in Switzerland. Swiss J. Econ. Stat. (SJES) 144(II), 247–282 (2008)Google Scholar
- 26.Günther, O.H., Kürstein, B., Riedel-Heller, S.G., König, H.-H.: The role of monetary and nonmonetary incentives on the choice of practice establishment: a stated preference study of young physicians in Germany. Health Serv. Res. 45(1), 212–229 (2010). doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01045.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 35.Jarman, B.T., Cogbill, T.H., Mathiason, M.A., O’Heron, C.T., Foley, E.F., Martin, R.F., Weigelt, J.A., Brasel, K.J., Webb, T.P.: Factors correlated with surgery resident choice to practice general surgery in a rural area. J. Surg. Educ. 66(6), 319–324 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2009.06.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.Kuhfeld, W.F., Tobias, R.D., Garratt, M.: Efficient experimental design with marketing research applications. J. Mark. Res. 545–557 31(4), (1994)Google Scholar
- 41.Decree-Law 68/2008. In: Government, P. (ed.). LisbonGoogle Scholar
- 42.Comission Regulation (EU) No 31/2011. In: EU (ed.). BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- 47.Gu, Y., Hole, A.R., Knox, S.: Fitting the generalized multinomial logit model in Stata. Stata J. 13(2), 382–397 (2013)Google Scholar
- 49.De Souza, J.C., Sardinha, A.M., Sanchez, J.P.Y., Melo, M., Ribas, M.J.: Os cuidados de saúde primários e a medicina geral e familiar em Portugal. Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Pública 2, 63–74 (2001)Google Scholar
- 53.Wong, S.F., Norman, R., Dunning, T.L., Ashley, D.M., Lorgelly, P.K.: A protocol for a discrete choice experiment: understanding preferences of patients with cancer towards their cancer care across metropolitan and rural regions in Australia. BMJ Open 4(10), 1–9 (2014). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006661 Google Scholar
- 54.Reed Johnson, F., Lancsar, E., Marshall, D., Kilambi, V., Mühlbacher, A., Regier, D.A., Bresnahan, B.W., Kanninen, B., Bridges, J.F.P.: Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force. Value Health 16(1), 3–13 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar