The European Journal of Health Economics

, Volume 18, Issue 8, pp 1013–1030 | Cite as

Junior doctors’ medical specialty and practice location choice: simulating policies to overcome regional inequalities

  • Pedro Ramos
  • Hélio Alves
  • Paulo Guimarães
  • Maria A. Ferreira
Original Paper

Abstract

There are nowadays over 1 million Portuguese who lack a primary care physician. By applying a discrete choice experiment to a large representative sample of Portuguese junior doctors (N = 503) in 2014, we provide an indication that this shortage may be addressed with a careful policy design that mixes pecuniary and non-pecuniary incentives for these junior physicians. According to our simulations, a policy that includes such incentives may increase uptake of general practitioners (GPs) in rural areas from 18% to 30%. Marginal wages estimated from our model are realistic and close to market prices: an extra hour of work would require an hourly wage of 16.5€; moving to an inland rural setting would involve an increase in monthly income of 1.150€ (almost doubling residents’ current income); a shift to a GP career would imply an 849€ increase in monthly income. Additional opportunities to work outside the National Health Service overcome an income reduction of 433€. Our simulation predicts that an income increase of 350€ would lead to a 3 percentage point increase in choice probability, which implies an income elasticity of 3.37, a higher estimation compared to previous studies.

Keywords

Medical specialty choice Discrete choice experiment Location decision Rural uptake policies Portugal 

JEL Classification

I18 J3 

Supplementary material

10198_2016_846_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 17 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Newhouse, J.P.: Geographic access to physician services. Annu. Rev. Public Health 11(1), 207–230 (1990). doi:10.1146/annurev.pu.11.050190.001231 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gachter, M., Schwazer, P., Theurl, E., Winner, H.: Physician density in a two-tiered health care system. Health Policy 106(3), 257–268 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.04.012 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kristiansen, I.S., Forde, O.H.: Medical specialists’ choice of location: the role of geographical attachment in Norway. Soc. Sci. Med. (1982) 34(1), 57–62 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nicholson, S.: Physician specialty choice under uncertainty. J. Labor Econ. 20(4), 816–847 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baumgardner, J.R.: The division of labor, local markets, and worker organization. J. Political Econ. 96(3), 509–527 (1988)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Theodorakis, P., Mantzavinis, G., Rrumbullaku, L., Lionis, C., Trell, E.: Measuring health inequalities in Albania: a focus on the distribution of general practitioners. Hum. Resour. Health 4(1), 5 (2006)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Unal, E.: How the government intervention affects the distribution of physicians in Turkey between 1965 and 2000. Int. J. Equity Health 14(1), 1 (2015). doi:10.1186/s12939-014-0131-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Póvoa, L., Andrade, M.V.: Distribuição geográfica dos médicos no Brasil: uma análise a partir de um modelo de escolha locacional. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 22, 1555–1564 (2006)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mantzavinis, G., Theodorakis, P.N., Lionis, C., Trell, E.: Geographical inequalities in the distribution of general practitioners in Sweden. Lakartidningen 100(51–52), 4294–4297 (2003)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gravelle, H., Sutton, M.: Inequality in the geographical distribution of general practitioners in England and Wales 1974–1995. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 6(1), 6–13 (2001)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bodenheimer, T., Pham, H.H.: Primary care: current problems and proposed solutions. Health Aff. (Project Hope) 29(5), 799–805 (2010). doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ono, T., Schoenstein, M., Buchan, J.: Geographic imbalances in doctor supply and policy responses. OECD Publishing, Paris (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nigenda, G.: The regional distribution of doctors in Mexico, 1930–1990: a policy assessment. Health Policy 39(2), 107–122 (1997). doi:10.1016/S0168-8510(96)00864-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Matsumoto, M., Inoue, K., Bowman, R., Noguchi, S., Kajii, E.: Physician scarcity is a predictor of further scarcity in US, and a predictor of concentration in Japan. Health Policy 95(2–3), 129–136 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grobler, L., Marais, B.J., Mabunda, S.A., Marindi, P.N., Reuter, H., Volmink, J.: Interventions for increasing the proportion of health professionals practising in rural and other underserved areas. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (2009). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005314.pub2 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Santana, P., Peixoto, H., Loureiro, A., Costa, C., Nunes, C., Duarte, N.: Estudo de evolução prospectiva de médicos no Sistema Nacional de Saúde. Ordem dos Médicos, Lisboa (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Santana, P., Peixoto, H., Duarte, N.: Demography of physicians in Portugal: prospective analysis. Acta Médica Portuguesa. 27(2) 246–251 (2014)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Correia, I., Veiga, P.: Geographic distribution of physicians in Portugal. Eur. J. Health Econ. HEPAC Health Econ. Prev. Care 11(4), 383–393 (2010). doi:10.1007/s10198-009-0208-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Decree-Law 101/2015. In: Health, M. (ed.). LisbonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ministerial Order 54/2010. In: Health, M. (ed.). LisbonGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roeger, L.S., Reed, R.L., Smith, B.P.: Equity of access in the spatial distribution of GPs within an Australian metropolitan city. Aust. J. Prim. Health 16(4), 284–290 (2010). doi:10.1071/py10021 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    ADHA: Australia’s medical workforce. In: Ageing, A.D.O.H.A. (ed.). Australia (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    García-Pérez, M.Á., Amaya, C., López-Giménez, M.R., Otero, Á.: Distribución geográfica de los médicos en España y su evolución temporal durante el período 1998–2007. Revista Española de Salud Pública 83, 243–255 (2009)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wanzenried, G., Nocera, S.: The evolution of physician density in Switzerland. Swiss J. Econ. Stat. (SJES) 144(II), 247–282 (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goddard, M., Gravelle, H., Hole, A., Marini, G.: Where did all the GPs go? Increasing supply and geographical equity in England and Scotland. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 15(1), 28–35 (2010). doi:10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Günther, O.H., Kürstein, B., Riedel-Heller, S.G., König, H.-H.: The role of monetary and nonmonetary incentives on the choice of practice establishment: a stated preference study of young physicians in Germany. Health Serv. Res. 45(1), 212–229 (2010). doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01045.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gagné, R., Léger, P.T.: Determinants of physicians’ decisions to specialize. Health Econ. 14(7), 721–735 (2005). doi:10.1002/hec.970 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thornton, J., Esposto, F.: How important are economic factors in choice of medical specialty? Health Econ. 12(1), 67–73 (2003). doi:10.1002/hec.682 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Scott, A.: Eliciting GPs’ preferences for pecuniary and non-pecuniary job characteristics. J. Health Econ. 20(3), 329–347 (2001)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Scott, A., Witt, J., Humphreys, J., Joyce, C., Kalb, G., Jeon, S.-H., McGrail, M.: Getting doctors into the bush: general practitioners’ preferences for rural location. Soc. Sci. Med. 96, 33–44 (2013)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ubach, C., Scott, A., French, F., Awramenko, M., Needham, G.: What do hospital consultants value about their jobs? A discrete choice experiment. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 326(7404), 1432 (2003). doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1432 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sivey, P., Scott, A., Witt, J., Joyce, C., Humphreys, J.: Junior doctors’ preferences for specialty choice. J. Health Econ. 31(6), 813–823 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.07.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hancock, C., Steinbach, A., Nesbitt, T.S., Adler, S.R., Auerswald, C.L.: Why doctors choose small towns: a developmental model of rural physician recruitment and retention. Soc. Sci. Med. (1982) 69(9), 1368–1376 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Steele, M.T., Schwab, R.A., McNamara, R.M., Watson, W.A.: Emergency medicine resident choice of practice location. Ann. Emerg. Med. 31(3), 351–357 (1998). doi:10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70346-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jarman, B.T., Cogbill, T.H., Mathiason, M.A., O’Heron, C.T., Foley, E.F., Martin, R.F., Weigelt, J.A., Brasel, K.J., Webb, T.P.: Factors correlated with surgery resident choice to practice general surgery in a rural area. J. Surg. Educ. 66(6), 319–324 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2009.06.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Holte, J.H., Kjaer, T., Abelsen, B., Olsen, J.A.: The impact of pecuniary and non-pecuniary incentives for attracting young doctors to rural general practice. Soc. Sci. Med. 1982(128), 1–9 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kolstad, J.R.: How to make rural jobs more attractive to health workers. Findings from a discrete choice experiment in Tanzania. Health Econ. 20(2), 196–211 (2011). doi:10.1002/hec.1581 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Barros, P.P., Machado, S.R., Simoes Jde, A.: Portugal. Health system review. Health Syst. Transit 13(4), 1–156 (2011)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Crabbe, M., Vandebroek, M.: Using appropriate prior information to eliminate choice sets with a dominant alternative from D-efficient designs. J. Choice Model. 5(1), 22–45 (2012). doi:10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70046-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kuhfeld, W.F., Tobias, R.D., Garratt, M.: Efficient experimental design with marketing research applications. J. Mark. Res. 545–557 31(4), (1994)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Decree-Law 68/2008. In: Government, P. (ed.). LisbonGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Comission Regulation (EU) No 31/2011. In: EU (ed.). BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hole, A.R.: Modelling heterogeneity in patients’ preferences for the attributes of a general practitioner appointment. J. Health Econ. 27(4), 1078–1094 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.11.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hole, A.R., Kolstad, J.R.: Mixed logit estimation of willingness to pay distributions: a comparison of models in preference and WTP space using data from a health-related choice experiment. Empir. Econ. 42(2), 445–469 (2011). doi:10.1007/s00181-011-0500-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fiebig, D.G., Knox, S., Viney, R., Haas, M., Street, D.J.: Preferences for new and existing contraceptive products. Health Econ. 20(Suppl 1), 35–52 (2011). doi:10.1002/hec.1686 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fiebig, D.G., Keane, M.P., Louviere, J., Wasi, N.: The generalized multinomial logit model: accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Mark. Sci. 29(3), 393–421 (2010). doi:10.1287/mksc.1090.0508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gu, Y., Hole, A.R., Knox, S.: Fitting the generalized multinomial logit model in Stata. Stata J. 13(2), 382–397 (2013)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hole, A.R.: A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures. Health Econ. 16(8), 827–840 (2007). doi:10.1002/hec.1197 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    De Souza, J.C., Sardinha, A.M., Sanchez, J.P.Y., Melo, M., Ribas, M.J.: Os cuidados de saúde primários e a medicina geral e familiar em Portugal. Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Pública 2, 63–74 (2001)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Grol, R., Giesen, P., van Uden, C.: After-hours care in the United Kingdom, Denmark, and The Netherlands: new models. Health Aff. 25(6), 1733–1737 (2006). doi:10.1377/hlthaff.25.6.1733 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Smits, M., Huibers, L., Oude Bos, A., Giesen, P.: Patient satisfaction with out-of-hours GP cooperatives: a longitudinal study. Scand. J. Prim. Health Care 30(4), 206–213 (2012). doi:10.3109/02813432.2012.735553 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lagarde, M., Pagaiya, N., Tangcharoensathian, V., Blaauw, D.: One size does not fit all: investigating doctors’ stated preference heterogeneity for job incentives to inform policy in Thailand. Health Econ. 22(12), 1452–1469 (2013). doi:10.1002/hec.2897 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wong, S.F., Norman, R., Dunning, T.L., Ashley, D.M., Lorgelly, P.K.: A protocol for a discrete choice experiment: understanding preferences of patients with cancer towards their cancer care across metropolitan and rural regions in Australia. BMJ Open 4(10), 1–9 (2014). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006661 Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Reed Johnson, F., Lancsar, E., Marshall, D., Kilambi, V., Mühlbacher, A., Regier, D.A., Bresnahan, B.W., Kanninen, B., Bridges, J.F.P.: Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force. Value Health 16(1), 3–13 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Li, J., Scott, A., McGrail, M., Humphreys, J., Witt, J.: Retaining rural doctors: doctors’ preferences for rural medical workforce incentives. Soc. Sci. Med. 121, 56–64 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.053 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1. Medical Director Office, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São PauloUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Faculty of Medicine of the University of PortoUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  3. 3.Bank of PortugalPortoPortugal
  4. 4.Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations