Social/economic costs and quality of life in patients with haemophilia in Europe
- 842 Downloads
The aim of this study was to determine the economic burden from a societal perspective and the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with haemophilia in Europe.
We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with haemophilia from Bulgaria, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Spain Sweden and the UK. Data on demographic characteristics, health resource utilisation, informal care, loss of labour productivity and HRQOL were collected from the questionnaires completed by patients or their caregivers. HRQOL was measured with the EuroQol 5-domain (EQ-5D) questionnaire. The costs have been estimated from a societal perspective adopting a bottom-up approach.
A total of 401 questionnaires were included in the study, of which 339 were collected from patients with haemophilia and 62 from caregivers. The lowest average annual cost per person was reported in Bulgaria (€6,660) and the highest in Germany (€194,490). Our results demonstrate both a large difference from country to country in the average annual cost per patient in 2012 and the driving role of drugs in costs. Drugs represent nearly 90 % of direct healthcare costs in a majority of the countries analysed (Hungary, Italy, Spain and Germany). In Bulgaria, France and Sweden, however, healthcare services (visits, tests and hospitalisations) prevail. Costs are also shown to differ between children and adults. The mean EQ-5D index score for adult patients was 0.69 and mean EQ-5D VAS was 66.6. The mean EQ-5D index score for carers was 0.87 and mean EQ-5D VAS was 75.5. In the disability score, 60 % showed no disability and measuring caregiver burden with the Zarit Index produced an overall mean score of 25.3.
We have shown that haemophilia is associated with a substantial economic burden and impaired HRQOL. Studies on cost of illness and HRQOL are important for haemophilia as the future of this disease is likely to change with the development of new innovative treatments. The introduction of these treatments will most likely impact future costs related to haemophilia.
KeywordsRare diseases Haemophilia Health related quality of life Societal costs Social burden
The authors wish to thank: National Alliance of People with Rare Diseases (NAPRD), Bulgaria; Alliance Maladies Rares, France; ACHSE, Germany; Hungarian Federation of People with Rare and Congenital Diseases (RIROSZ), Hungary; Federazione Italiana Malattie Rare (UNIAMO), Italy; the Consulta Nazionale delle Malattie Rare, Italy; Rare Diseases Sweden; Federación Española de Efermedades Raras (FEDER), Spain; Rare Disease UK and Rare Diseases Europe (EURORDIS); Bulgarian Haemophilia Society; Association française des hémophiles, France; Interessengemeinschaft Hämophiler e.V., Germany; Magyar Hemofília Egyesület, Hungary; FEDEMO—Federazione delle Associazioni Emofilici ONLUS and A.E.L.—Associazione emofilici del Lazio, Italy; Swedish Hemophilia Society, Sweden; Asociación Andaluza de Hemofilia Canf Cocemfe and Asociaciónde Hemofilia de la Comunidad de Madrid, Spain; Haemophilia Society, UK.
Compliance with ethical standards
Supported by the Social/Economic Burden and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Rare Diseases in Europe Project, which received funding from the European Union within the framework of the Health Programme (grant A101205). The Executive Agency of the European Union is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained herein.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 1.Rosendal, F.R., Briet, E.: The increasing prevalence of haemophilia. Thromb. Haemostasis 63, 145 (1990)Google Scholar
- 2.World Federation of Hemophilia (2012) Report on the Annual Global Survey 2012, December http://www1.wfh.org/publications/files/pdf-1574.pdf. Accessed 17 Aug 2015
- 11.National Hemophilia foundation (2007) MASAC (Medical and Scientific Advisory Council) Recommendation 179: MASAC recommendation concerning prophylaxis (regular administration of clotting factor concentrate to prevent bleeding). https://www.hemophilia.org/sites/default/files/document/files/masac179.pdf Accessed 23 Dec 2014
- 13.Santagostino, E., Lents, S.R., Busk, A.K., Regnault, A., Iorio, A.: Assessment of the impact of treatment on quality of life of patients with haemophilia A at different ages: insights from two clinical trials on turoctocog alfa. Haemophilia 20, 527–534 (2014)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Valentino, L.A., Mamonov, V., Hellmann, A., Prophylaxis Study Group, et al.: A randomized comparison of two prophylaxis regimens and a paired comparison of on-demand and prophylaxis treatments in hemophilia A management. J. Thromb. Haemost. 10, 359–367 (2012)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 23.Brown, S.A., Aledort, L.M.: The Round Table Group: economic challenges in haemophilia. Haemophilia 10(Suppl. 1), 44–49 (2004)Google Scholar
- 27.Royal, S., Schramm, W., Berntorp, E., Giangrande, P., Gringeri, A., Ludlam, C., Kroner, B., Szucs, T., European haemophilia economics study group: Quality-of-life differences between prophylactic and on-demand factor replacement therapy in European haemophilia patients. Haemophilia 8, 44–50 (2002)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Drummond, M.F., O’Brien, B., Stoddart, G.L., Torrance, G.W.: Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997)Google Scholar
- 40.Szende, A., Janssen, B., Cabases, J. (eds.): Self-reported population health: an international perspective based on EQ-5D. Springer, Netherlands (2014)Google Scholar
- 41.Mahoney, F.I., Barthel, D.W.: Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md. State Med. 14, 61–65 (1965)Google Scholar
- 48.Drummond, M., Sculpher, M.J., Torrance, G.W., et al.: Methods for economic evaluation of health care programmes, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
- 50.Taruscio, D., Gentile, A.E., Evangelista, T., Frazzica, R.G., Bushby, K.: Centres of Expertise and European Reference Networks: key issues in the field of rare diseases. The EUCERD recommendations. Blood Transfus. Suppl 3, 621–625 (2014)Google Scholar