Advertisement

The European Journal of Health Economics

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 875–885 | Cite as

Patients’ access to biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison between Portugal and other European countries

  • P. A. LairesEmail author
  • F. Exposto
  • R. Mesquita
  • A. P. Martins
  • L. Cunha-Miranda
  • J. E. Fonseca
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Despite the widespread availability of biologics across Europe, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients’ access to these drugs differs significantly among countries.

Objectives

To compare the proportion of RA patients treated with biologics across Europe and investigate the factors that most influence it, with focus on the Portuguese case, reportedly with low access rates to biologics.

Methods

The biologics’ market was characterized for 15 selected European countries. Variables potentially influencing patients’ access to biologics (PAB) in RA were also collected, including demographic, disease, economic, funding and biologics’ market-related data. A multivariable regression model identified the factors that best explain PAB. Based on these determinants, a cluster analysis was performed to group the countries with most similar behaviour regarding PAB allowing the evaluation of Portugal’s relative position among these countries.

Results

The regression model (R 2 = 0.953) indicated that PAB in selected countries is explained mostly by its gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, the usage of methotrexate (MTX) and the biologics’ distribution channel. Current MTX usage in Portugal shows similarity with practice from UK, France, Germany or Spain 5 years before, explaining why PAB in Portugal stood at 7 % in 2010, 12 percentage points below the average of selected countries.

Conclusions

Variations in RA PAB were found across selected countries with Portugal showing the lowest proportion. GDP per capita, biologics distribution channel and consumption of MTX appear to be the best explanatory factors for these fluctuations in European countries.

Keywords

Rheumatoid arthritis Treatment access Biologics Portugal 

JEL Classification

I11 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Luís Veloso for critical review of this paper. The study was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme.

References

  1. 1.
    Chen, Y.F., Jobanputra, P., Barton, P., et al.: A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults and an economic evaluation of their cost-effectiveness. Health Technol. Assess. 10(42), 3–4 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kvien, T.K.: Epidemiology and burden of illness of rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacoeconomics 22, 1–12 (2004)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Matos, A.A., Branco, J.C., Canas Silva, J., Viana Queiroz, M., Pádua, F.: Inquérito epidemiológico de doenças reumáticas numa amostra da população portuguesa (resultados preliminares). Acta Reumatol. Port. 16(1), 98 (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Rheumatoid arthritis—National clinical guideline for management and treatment in adults. NICE, London (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Singh, J.A., Christensen, R., Wells, G.A., et al.: Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: an overview of Cochrane reviews (Review). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (4) (2009). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007848.pub2
  6. 6.
    Smolen, J.S., Landewé, R., Breedveld, F.C., et al.: EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 69(6), 964–975 (2010). doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.126532 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jönsson, B., Kobelt, G., Smolen, J.: The burden of rheumatoid arthritis and access to treatment: uptake of new therapies. Eur. J. Health Econ. 8, 61–86 (2008). doi: 10.1007/s10198-007-0089-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kobelt, G., Kasteng, F.: Access to innovative treatments in rheumatoid arthritis in Europe. A report prepared for the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). http://www.lif.se/default.aspx?id=44400 (2009). Accessed December 2011
  9. 9.
    Miltenburger, C., Gunther, O., Justo, N., et al.: A survey of barriers to treatment access in rheumatoid arthritis in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK (2009). Accessed December 2011Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Emery, P., Van Vollenhoven, R., Ostergaard, M., et al.: Guidelines for initiation of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: similarities and differences across Europe. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 68(4), 456–459 (2009). doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.100362 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cruz, M., Fonseca, J.E., Branco, J.C.: Artrite reumatóide: paradigma das doenças reumáticas crónicas. Tecnologia Médica 2, 2–11 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cruz, M., Fonseca, J.E., Branco, J.C.: Três anos de administração de etanercept e infliximab a doentes com artrite reumatóide refractária—avaliação clínica e radiográfica e segurança. Acta Reumatol. Port. 29, 21–32 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barcelos, A., Salvador, M.J., da Silva, J.A., et al.: Indução de auto anticorpos durante tratamento prolongado com infliximab em doentes com artrite reumatóide. Acta Reumatol. Port. 29, 161–167 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grupo de Estudos de Artrite Reumatóide da Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia: Análise de 376 doentes com Artrite Reumatóide submetidos a terapêutica biológica registados na base de dados de agentes biológicos da Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia. Acta Reumatol. Port. 30, 63–71 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Canhão, H., Faustino, A., Martins, F., et al.: Reuma.pt—the rheumatic diseases portuguese register. Acta Reumatol. Port. 36(1), 45–56 (2011)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology: WHODD guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2010. Norwegian Institute of Public Health. http://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index (2010). Accessed January 2011
  17. 17.
    United Nations Development Programme: Human Development Report 2007/2008. http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/indicators/default.html (2007)
  18. 18.
    United Nations Development Programme: Human Development Report 2010. http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2010/chapters/ (2010)
  19. 19.
    Eurostat database Directorate-General (DG) of the European Commission. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu (1953)
  20. 20.
    World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011. International Monetary Fund. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2011/01/weodata/weoselgr.aspx (2011). Accessed April 2011
  21. 21.
    Observatório Do Medicamento e Produtos de Saúde: Consumo de Medicamentos em meio hospitalar. In. INFARMED (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    MIDAS Database. IMS Health. Accessed January 2011Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Orlewska, E., Ancuta, I., Anic, B., et al.: Access to biologic treatment for rheumatoid arthritis in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. Med. Sci. Monit. 17(4), SR1–SR13 (2011)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rousseeuw, P.J.: Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Computational and applied mathematics. J. Comput. Appl. Math. (1987). doi: 10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Associação Nacional dos Doentes com Artrite Reumatóide: Impacto dos medicamentos biológicos na qualidade de vida dos doentes. Paper presented at the Plataforma Mais Saúde, INFARMED, Portugal, 22 Nov 2011Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cunha-Miranda, L., Santos, H., Ferreira, J., et al.: Finding Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact on Life (FRAIL Study): economic burden. Acta Reumatol. Port. (37), 134–142 (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gulácsi, L.: Future challenges for health economics and health technology assessment of biological drugs. Eur. J. Health Econ. 11(3), 235–238 (2010). doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0246-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ramiro, S., Canhão, H., Branco, J.C.: EpiReumaPt protocol—Portuguese epidemiologic study of the rheumatic diseases. Acta Reumatol. Port. 35(3), 384–390 (2010)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Drosos, A.A., Lanchbury, J.S., Panayi, G.S., et al.: Rheumatoid arthritis in greek and british patients. A comparative clinical, radiologic, and serologic study. Arthritis Rheum. 35(7), 745–748 (1992). doi: 10.1002/art.1780350705 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Salvarani, C., Macchioni, P.L., Mantovani, W., et al.: HLA-DRB1 alleles associated with rheumatoid arthritis in northern Italy: correlation with disease severity. Br. J. Rheumatol. 37, 165–169 (1998)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ronda, E., Ruiz, M.T., Pascual, E., et al.: Differences between Spanish and British patients in the severity of rheumatoid arthritis: comment on the article by Drosos et al. Arthritis Rheum. 37(1), 147–148 (1994). doi: 10.1002/art.1780370125 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Benazet, J.F., Reviron, D., Mercier, D., et al.: HLADRB1 alleles associated with rheumatoid arthritis in southern France: absence of extraarticular disease despite expression of the shared epitope. J. Rheumatol. 22, 607–610 (1995)PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. A. Laires
    • 1
    Email author
  • F. Exposto
    • 2
  • R. Mesquita
    • 3
  • A. P. Martins
    • 1
  • L. Cunha-Miranda
    • 4
  • J. E. Fonseca
    • 5
  1. 1.Outcomes ResearchMerck Sharp & DohmePaço de ArcosPortugal
  2. 2.IMS HealthOeirasPortugal
  3. 3.Medical AffairsMerck Sharp & DohmeOeirasPortugal
  4. 4.Department of RheumatologyInstituto Português de ReumatologiaLisbonPortugal
  5. 5.Rheumatology Research UnitInstituto de Medicina Molecular da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations