Advertisement

The European Journal of Health Economics

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 267–276 | Cite as

Organisational determinants of production and efficiency in general practice: a population-based study

  • Kim Rose Olsen
  • Dorte Gyrd-Hansen
  • Torben Højmark Sørensen
  • Troels Kristensen
  • Peter Vedsted
  • Andrew Street
Original Paper

Abstract

Objective

Shortage of general practitioners (GPs) and an increased political focus on primary care have enforced the interest in efficiency analysis in the Danish primary care sector. This paper assesses the association between organisational factors of general practices and production and efficiency.

Methods

We assume that production and efficiency can be modelled using a behavioural production function. We apply the Battese and Coelli (Empir Econ 20:325–332, 1995) estimator to accomplish a decomposition of exogenous variables to determine the production frontier and variables determining the individual GPs distance to this frontier. Two different measures of practice outputs (number of office visits and total production) were applied and the results compared.

Results

The results indicate that nurses do not substitute GPs in the production. The production function exhibited constant returns to scale. The mean level of efficiency was between 0.79 and 0.84, and list size was the most important determinant of variation in efficiency levels.

Conclusions

Nurses are currently undertaking other tasks than GPs, and larger practices do not lead to increased production per GP. However, a relative increase in list size increased the efficiency. This indicates that organisational changes aiming to increase capacity in general practice should be carefully designed and tested.

Keywords

General practice Efficiency Stochastic frontier analysis Economies of scale Input substitution 

JEL Classification

I12 C31 D22 

References

  1. 1.
    Ackerberg, D., Benkard, L., Berry, S., Pakes, A.: Econometric tools for analyzing market outcomes. In: Heckman, J.J., Leamer, E. (eds.) Handbook of econometrics, vol. 6. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andersen, L.B., Serritzlew, S.: Økonomiske incitamenter, professionelle normer og effentlig service: taxameterstyring i teori og praksis. Politica 38(4), 410–425 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Battese, G., Coelli, T.J.: A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empir. Econ. 20, 325–332 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bech, M., Lauridsen, J.T.; Becker Hansen, B.; Sørensen, T. Udbudspåvirkning af forbruget i almen lægepraksis: supplier induced demand in general practice. Norsk Økonomisk Tidsskrift. 122(2), 20–35 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Billings, J., Zeitel, L., Lukomnik, J., Carey, T.S., Blank, A.E., Newman, L.: Impact of socioeconomic status on hospital use in New York City. Health Aff. 12, 162–173 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Champers, R.G.: Applied Production Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coelli, T.J.: A guide to FRONTIER Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Function Estimation. Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia, 7/96 (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Conrad, D.A., Sales, A., Liang, S.Y., Chaudhuri, A., Maynard, C., Pieper, L., Weinstein, L., Gans, D., Piland, N.: The impact of financial incentives on physician productivity in medical groups. Health Serv. Res. 37(4), 885–906 (2002)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cordero-Ferrera, J.M., Crespo-Cebada, E., Murillo-Zamorano, L.R.: Measuring technical efficiency in primary health care: the effect of exogenous variables on results. J. Med. Syst. 35(4), 545–554 (2011)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dusheiko, M., Gravelle, H., Jacobs, R., Smith, P.: The effect of financial incentives on gatekeeping doctors: evidence from a natural experiment. J. Health Econ. 25(3), 449–478 (2006)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Escarce, J.J., Pauly, M.V.: Physician opportunity costs in physician practice cost functions. J. Health Econ. 17(2), 129–151 (1998)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gaynor, M., Gertler, P.: Moral hazard and risk spreading in partnerships. Rand J. Econ. 26(4), 591–613 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gaynor, M., Pauly, M.V.: Compensation and productive efficiency in partnerships: evidence from medical group practice. J. Polit. Econ. 98(3), 544–573 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Giuffrida, A.: Productivity and efficiency changes in primary care: a Malmquist index approach. Health Care Manag. Sci. 2(1), 11–26 (1999)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gunning, T.S., Sickles, R.C.: A multi-product cost function for physician private practices. J. Prod. Anal. 35(2), 119–128 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hansen, J., Madsen, M. H., Kjellberg, P.K.: Effektiv Organisering af Almen Praksis. Dansk Sundhedsinstitut (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hicks, J.R.: Elasticities of substitution again: substitutes and complements. Oxf. Econ. Papers 20, 289–296 (1970)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Iversen, T.: The effects of a patient shortage on general practitioners’ future income and list of patients. J. Health Econ. 23(4), 673–694 (2004)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jacobs, R., Smith, P.C., Street, A.: Measuring Efficiency in Health Care. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jarman, B.: Underprivileged areas: validation and distribution od scores. Br. Med. J. 289(6458), 1587–1592 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kumbhakar, S.C., Lovell, C.A.K.: Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Laurant, M., Reeves, D., Hermens, R., Braspenning, J., Grol, R., Sibbald, B.: Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care. Cochrane. Database. Syst.Rev. 2, CD001271 (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lippi Bruni, M., Nobilio, L., Ugilini, C.: Economic incentives in general practice: the impact of pay-for-compliance programmes on diabetes care. Health Policy (in press) (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ministeriet for Sundhed og Forebyggelse: Almen Praksis’ rolle i fremtidens sundhedsvæsen, Ministeriet for Sundhed og Forebyggelse (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Murillo-Zamorano, L.R., Petraglia, C.: Technical efficiency in primary health care: does quality matter? Euro. J. Health Econ. 12(2), 115–125 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Naylor, M.D., Kurtzman, E.T.: The role of nurse practitioners in reinventing primary care. Health Aff. 29(5), 893–899 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Newhouse, J.P.: The economics of group practice. J Human Resour 8(Winter), 37–56 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Olsen, K.R., Sørensen, T.H., Gyrd-Hansen, D.: Sammenhæng mellem produktivitet, listestørrelsen, patient og praksiskarakteristika i Almen Praksis. Dan. Med. Bull. 172(16), 1224 (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Praktiserende Lægers Organisation: Praksistælling 2005. PLO, København (2006)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reinhardt, U.E.: A production function for physician services. Rev. Econ. Stat. 54, 55–66 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reinhardt, U.E., Pauly, M.V., Held, P.J.: Financial Incentives and the economics performance of group practitioners. In: Held, P.J., Reinhardt, U.E. (eds.) Analysis of Economic Performance in Medical Group Practices. Mathematica Policy Res., Princeton (1979)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sarma, S., Devlin, R.A., Hogg, W.: Physician’s production of primary care in Ontario, Canada. Health Econ. 19(1), 14–30 (2009)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Scott, A.: Economics of general practice. In: Culyer, A.J., Newhouse, J.P. (eds.) Handbook of Health Economics, pp. 1175–1200. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam (2000)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Serritzlew, S., Andersen, L.B.: Økonomiske incitamenter i praksissektoren: Lægens tre fristelser. Politica 38(4), 392–409 (2006)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Smith, P.C., Street, A.: Concepts and challenges in measuring the performance of health care systems. In: Jones, A. (ed.) The Elgar Companion to Health Economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2006)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sorensen, T.H., Olsen, K.R., Vedsted, P.: Association between general practice referral rates and patients’ socioeconomic status and access to specialised health care a population-based nationwide study. Health Policy 92(2–3), 180–186 (2009)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sørensen, T.H., et al.: Differences in general practice initiated expenditures across Danish local health authorities—a multilevel analysis. Health Policy 92(1), 35–42 (2009)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Staat, M.: The efficiency of treatment strategies of general practitioners. Malmquist index approach. Eur. J. Health Econ. 4(3), 232–238 (2003)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Staat, M.: Efficiency of hospitals in Germany: A DEA-bootstrap approach. Appl. Econ. 38, 2255–2263 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Staat, M.: Estimating the efficiency of general practitioners controlling for case mix and outlier effects. Empir. Econ. 40(2), 321–342 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Thurston, N.K., Libby, A.M.: A production function for physician services revisited. Rev. Econ. Stat. 84(1), 184–191 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vedsted, P., Sorensen, T.H.: Praksisscore på DADI baseret på praksispopulationer i 2006—model I og model II, Unpublished (2009)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wensing, M., Van den, H.P., Akkermans, R., Van, D.J., Grol, R.: Physician workload in primary care: what is the optimal size of practices? A cross-sectional study. Health Policy 77(3), 260–267 (2006)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wyke, S., Mays, N., Street, A., Bevan, G., McLeod, H., Goodwin, N.: Should general practitioners purchase health care for their patients? The total purchasing experiment in Britain. Health Policy 65(3), 243–259 (2003)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim Rose Olsen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Dorte Gyrd-Hansen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Torben Højmark Sørensen
    • 1
  • Troels Kristensen
    • 2
    • 3
  • Peter Vedsted
    • 5
  • Andrew Street
    • 4
  1. 1.Danish Institute for Health Services ResearchCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Research Unit of Health EconomicsUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
  3. 3.Research Unit of General PracticeUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
  4. 4.Center for Health EconomicsUniversity of YorkYorkUK
  5. 5.Research Unit of General PracticeAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations