Determinants of healthcare system’s efficiency in OECD countries
- 2.5k Downloads
Firstly, to compare healthcare systems’ efficiency (HSE) using two models: one incorporating mostly inputs that are considered to be within the discretionary control of the healthcare system (i.e., physicians’ density, inpatient bed density, and health expenditure), and another, including mostly inputs beyond healthcare systems’ control (i.e., GDP, fruit and vegetables consumption, and health expenditure). Secondly, analyze whether institutional arrangements, population behavior, and socioeconomic or environmental determinants are associated with HSE.
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) was utilized to calculate OECD countries’ HSE. Life expectancy and infant survival rate were considered as outputs in both models. Healthcare systems’ rankings according to the super-efficiency and the cross-efficiency ranking methods were used to analyze determinants associated with efficiency.
(1) Healthcare systems in nine countries with large and stable economies were defined as efficient in model I, but were found to be inefficient in model II; (2) Gatekeeping and the presence of multiple insurers were associated with a lower efficiency; and (3) The association between socioeconomic and environmental indicators was found to be ambiguous.
Countries striving to improve their HSE should aim to impact population behavior and welfare rather than only ensure adequate medical care. In addition, they may consider avoiding specific institutional arrangements, namely gatekeeping and the presence of multiple insurers. Finally, the ambiguous association found between socioeconomic and environmental indicators, and a country’s HSE necessitates caution when interpreting different ranking techniques in a cross-country efficiency evaluation and needs further exploration.
KeywordsHealthcare system efficiency (HSE) Data envelopment analysis (DEA) Ranking methods OECD countries
The authors would like to express gratitude for the contribution of The European Journal of Health Economics anonymous referees for their constructive and helpful comments to the paper. Their comments and remarks truly assisted in enhancing the readability and the quality of this paper.
- 2.OECD. OECD Health Data: health expenditure and financing, OECD Health Statistics (database). (2010)Google Scholar
- 12.Hadad, Y., Ben-Yair, A., Friedman, L., Sinuany-Stern, Z.: Measuring efficiency of hospitals using the data envelopment analysis model: an application for ranking Israeli hospitals. Commun Dependability Qual. Manag. 9, 22–31 (2006)Google Scholar
- 14.Chernichovsky, D., Friedman, L., Sinuany-Stern, Z., Hadad, Y.: The efficiency of general hospitals in Israel according Data Envelope Analysis. Econ. Q. 56, 119–139 (2009)Google Scholar
- 15.Dimas, G., Goula, A., Soulis, S.: Productive performance and its components in Greek public hospitals. Oper. Res. (2010). doi: 10.1007/s12351-010-0082-2
- 16.Schwellnus, C.: Achieving higher performance: enhancing spending efficiency in health and education in Mexico. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 732. (2009). doi: 10.1787/220731242856
- 17.Economou, C., Giorno, C.: Improving the performance of the public health care system in Greece. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 722. (2009). doi: 10.1787/221250170007
- 20.Afonso, A., St Aubyn, M.: Non-parametric approaches to education and health efficiency in OECD countries. J. Appl. Econ. 8, 227–246 (2005)Google Scholar
- 24.Seiford, L.M., Thrall, R.M.: Recent developments in DEA: the mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis. J. Econ. 46, 7–38 (1990)Google Scholar
- 31.Sexton, T.R., Silkman, R.H., Hogan, A.J.: Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. In: Silkman, R.H. (ed.) Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, pp. 73–105. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1986)Google Scholar
- 32.United Nations Statistics Division: Social Indicators. Available at http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/socind/health.htm Accessed 8 August 2011
- 34.Department of Health and Human Services: Healthy people 2010, Reproductive health. Available at http://www.hhs.gov/opa/pubs/hp2010/hp2010_rh.pdf (2001). Accessed 8 August 2011
- 35.OECD. OECD Glossary of statistical terms. Available at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/glossaries (2008). Accessed 8 August 2011
- 36.OECD. OECD Health Data: Health status, OECD Health Statistics (database). (2010)Google Scholar
- 37.World Health Organization: Global health observatory data repository. Available at http://apps.who.int/ghodata/# Accessed 20 February 2011
- 38.OECD. OECD Health Data: Health care resources, OECD Health Statistics (database). (2010)Google Scholar
- 39.OECD. OECD Health Data: economic references, OECD Health Statistics (database). (2010)Google Scholar
- 40.OECD. OECD Health Data: non-medical determinants of health, OECD Health Statistics (database). (2010)Google Scholar
- 41.OECD. OECD Factbook Statistics 2010: Country Indicators, OECD Factbook Statistics (database). (2010)Google Scholar
- 42.Central Intelligence Agency, USA: The world Factbook. Available at https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2172.html Accessed 20 February 2011
- 43.Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy (YCELP) and Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University, with the World Economic Forum, and Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission: 2008 Environmental Performance Index. Available at http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/es/epi/ (2008). Accessed 20 February 2011
- 44.Paris, V., Devaux, M., Wei, L.: Health Systems Institutional Characteristics. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 50. (2010). doi: 10.1787/5kmfxfq9qbnr-en
- 46.House, J.S., Williams, D.R.: Understanding and reducing socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities in health. In: Smedley, B.D., Syme, S.L. (eds.) Promoting Health: Intervention Strategies From Social and Behavioral Research, pp. 81–124. National Academy Press, Washington (2000)Google Scholar
- 47.Robert, S.A., House, J.S.: Socioeconomic inequalities in health: Integrating individual-, community-, and societal-level theory and research. In: Albrecht, G., Fitzpatrick, R., Scrimshaw, S. (eds.) Handbook of Social Studies in Health and Medicine, pp. 115–135. Sage Publications Ltd, London (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.Rosner, B.: Fundamentals of Biostatistics. Books/Cole, Boston (2010)Google Scholar
- 51.Laaksonen, M., Mcalister, A.L., Laatikainen, T., Drygas, W., Morava, E., Nūssel, E., Oganov, R., Pardell, H., Uhanov, M., Puska, P.: Do health behaviour and psychosocial risk factors explain the European East-West gap in health status? Eur J Public Health 11, 65–73 (2001)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 53.Hollingsworth, B., Peacock, S.: Efficiency Measurement in Health and Health Care. Routledge, New York (2008)Google Scholar
- 55.Hurley, J.: An overview of the normative economics of the health sector. In: Culyer, A.J., Newhouse, J.P. (eds.) Handbook of health economics, pp. 55–118. Elsevier, New-York (2000)Google Scholar