Advertisement

The European Journal of Health Economics

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 161–170 | Cite as

Self-control and support for anti-smoking policies among smokers, ex smokers, and never smokers

  • Lourdes Badillo Amador
  • Ángel López NicolásEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

In this paper, we sustain that non-smokers who might be at risk of starting to smoke or relapsing can benefit from anti-smoking policies such as tax hikes and smoking bans because these are mechanisms that enhance their self-control with regard to tobacco consumption. We formalize this conjecture by proposing a model where starting/relapsing might result from time inconsistent preferences in a way that mirrors the inability of some smokers to carry out the decision to quit. Subsequently, we specify econometric models that allow us to test the implications of such conjecture using information on smoking behavior at the individual level from the Catalan Health Survey of 2006. The empirical results support our conjecture and suggest that the welfare gains derived from the reinforcement of self-control caused by tax hikes and smoking bans will accrue not only to smokers but also to the rest of the population.

Keywords

Time inconsistencies Smoking bans Tobacco taxes Spain 

JEL Classification

C35 C36 H39 I12 I18 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Support from Ministerio de Educación project ECO2008-06395-C05-04, co-funded by European Regional Development Fund, and from Fundación Séneca through project 08646/PHCS/08 is gratefully acknowledged. We also thank two anonymous referees for useful comments and suggestions. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

  1. 1.
    Becker, G., Murphy, K.: A theory of rational addiction. J. Polit. Econ. 96, 675–700 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernheim, D., Rangel, A.: Behavioural public economics: welfare and policy analysis with nonstandard decision markers. In: Dianmond, P., Vartiannen, H. (eds.) Behavioural economics and its applications. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Strotz, R.H.: Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econ. Stud. 23, 165–180 (1956)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Phelps, E.S., Pollak, R.A.: On second best national saving and game—theoretic growth. Rev. Econ. Stud. 35, 185–199 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Laibson, D.: Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Q. J. Econ. 112, 443–477 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O’Donoghue, T., Rabin, M.: Addiction and self-control. In: Elster, J. (ed.) Addiction: entries and exits, pp. 169–206. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gruber, J., Köszegi, B.: Is addiction “rational”? Theory and evidence. Q. J. Econ. 116, 1261–1303 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gruber, J., Köszegi, B.: A theory of government regulation of addictive bads: optimal tax levels and tax incidence for cigarette taxation. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 8777 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gruber, J., Köszegi, B.: Tax incidence when individuals are time-inconsistent: the case of cigarette excise taxes. J. Public Econ. 88, 1959–1987 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herscht, J.: Smoking restrictions as a self-control mechanism. J. Risk Uncertain. 31, 5–21 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kan, K.: Cigarette smoking and self-control. J. Health Econ. 26, 61–81 (2007)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gruber, J., Mullainathan, S.: Do cigarette taxes make smokers happier? Adv. Econ. Anal. Policy 5(1), Article 4 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Orphanides, A., Zervos, D.: Rational addiction with learning and regret. J. Polit. Econ. 103, 739–758 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang, R.: The optimal consumption and the quitting of harmful addictive goods. B.E. J. Econ. Anal. Policy 7(1), article 15 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Villalbí, J.R., Baranda, L., Lopez, M.J., Nebot, M.: El tabaco en los establecimientos de restauración y hostelería: estudio observacional en Barcelona. Gac. Sanit. 24(1), 72–74 (2010)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grupo de trabajo sobre tabaquismo de la Sociedad Española de Epidemiología: Evaluación del impacto de la Ley de medidas sanitarias frente al tabaquismo. Prodisa, Barcelona (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bernheim, D., Rangel, A.: Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes. Am. Econ. Rev. 94(5), 1558–1590 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sloan, F.A., Ostermann, J., Conover, C., Taylor, Jr., D.H., Picone, G.: The price of smoking. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lourdes Badillo Amador
    • 1
  • Ángel López Nicolás
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Departamento de EconomíaUniversidad Politécnica de CartagenaCartagenaSpain
  2. 2.Centre de Recerca en Economia i SalutUniversitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations