Advertisement

The economic costs of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) disease: prospective cohort study of infants with GBS disease in England

  • Elizabeth-Ann SchroederEmail author
  • Stavros Petrou
  • Gail Balfour
  • Oya Edamma
  • Paul T. Heath
  • on behalf of the Health Protection Agency Group B Streptococcus Working Group
Original Paper

Abstract

The objective of this study was to estimate the economic costs over the first 2 years of life of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) disease occurring in infants less than 90 days of age. A cost analysis was conducted using a prospective cohort of children born between 2000 and 2003 in the Greater London, Oxford, Portsmouth and Bristol areas of England. Unit costs were applied to estimates of the health and social resource use made by 138 infants diagnosed with GBS disease and 305 non-GBS controls matched for birth weight and hospital stay and time of birth. The health and social care costs for infants exposed to GBS disease were analysed in a multiple linear regression model. The mean health and social care cost over the first 2 years of life was estimated at £11,968.9 for infants with GBS, compared to £6,260.7 for the non-GBS controls; a mean cost difference of £5,708.1 (bootstrap 95% CI £2,977.1, £8,391.2, P = 0.03). After adjusting for gestational age and other potential confounders in a multiple linear regression, mean societal costs was £6,144.7 higher among GBS cases than among non-GBS controls (P < 0.001). This study shows that the health and social care costs for infants with GBS disease is, on average, two-fold higher during the first 2 years of life than for infants without GBS disease. These data should be used to inform policy decisions regarding the cost-effectiveness of prevention and treatment strategies for GBS disease during early childhood.

Keywords

Cohort study Cost analysis Group B Streptococcus Health economics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of the Group B Streptococcus Working Group, chaired by Dr. Christine McCartney. The members of the Working Group are: Albert Mifsud, Alison Bedford-Russell, Androulla Efstratiou, Arlene Reynolds, Christine McCartney, Elizabeth Price, Liz Schroeder, Paul Heath, Rhona Hughes, Roy Fey, Stavros Petrou and Theresa Lamagni. The study was funded by a programme grant from the Meningitis Research Foundation. The sponsor had no role in study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

References

  1. 1.
    van den Akker-van Marle, M.E., Rijnders, M.E.B., Fekkes, M., Amelink-Verburg, M.P., van Dommelen, P., Verkerk, P.H.: Cost-effectiveness of different treatment strategies with intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent early onset group B streptococcal disease. Health Econ. 1, 85–92 (1992). doi: 10.1002/hec.4730010202
  2. 2.
    Colbourn, T., Asseburg, C., Bojke, L., Philips, Z., Welton, N., Claxton, K., et al.: Preventive strategies for group B streptococcal and other bacterial infections in early infancy: cost effectiveness and value of information analyses. BMJ 335, 655 (2007). doi: 10.1136/bmj.39325.681806.AD CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stan, C., Boulvain, M., Bovier, P.A., Aukenthaler Berner, M., Irion, O.: Choosing a strategy to prevent early onset group B streptococcal sepsis: economic evaluation. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 108, 840–847 (2001). doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00201.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Law, M.R., Palmomaki, G., Alfirevic, Z., Gilbert, R., Heath, P., McCartney, C., et al.: The prevention of neonatal group B streptococcal disease. J. Med. Screen. 12(2), 60–68 (2005). doi: 10.1258/0969141053908366 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Early Onset Group B Strep Infection in Newborns: Prevention and prophylaxis. Clinical Bulletin no. 2 January. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9358702&dopt=Abstract (1997). Accessed 16 Sept 2004
  6. 6.
    Health Protection Agency: Group B Streptococcus. http://www.hpa.org.uk/infections/topics_az/strepto/pyogenic/GroupB_Strep_FAQ.htm. Accessed 5 July 2006
  7. 7.
    Oddie, S., Emberton, N.D.: Risk factors for early onset group B streptococcal sepsis: case–control study. BMJ 325, 308 (2002). doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7359.308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Group B Strep Support Group. http://www.gbss.org.uk/. Accessed 17 Nov 2006
  9. 9.
    Heath, P., Balfour, G., Weisner, A.M., Efstratiou, A., Lamagni, T.L., Tighe, H., et al.: Group B streptococcal disease in UK and Irish infants younger than 90 days. Lancet 363, 292–293 (2004). doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15389-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Easmon, C.S., Hastings, M.J., Clare, A.J., Bloxham, B., Marwood, R., Rivers, R.P., et al.: Nosocomial transmission of group B streptococci. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.). 283(6289), 459–461 (1981)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists: Prevention of early onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease. Guideline no. 36. http://www.rcog.org.uk/resources/public/pdf/neonatal_summary_050207a.pdf (2003). Accessed 19 Dec 2007
  12. 12.
    Early-Onset and Late-Onset Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Disease—United States, 1996–2004: Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 2. 54(47), 1205–1208 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nicoll, A., Heath, P.T.: Group B streptococcal infection. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal. Neonatal. Ed. 82, F207 (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. NICE, London (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Drummond, M.F.: Cost-effectiveness guidelines for reimbursement of pharmaceutical: is economic evaluation ready for its enhanced status? Health Econ. 1, 85–92 (1992). doi: 10.1002/hec.4730010202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Drummond, M.F., Jefferson, T.O.: Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ economic evaluation working party. BMJ 313, 275–283 (1996)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Drummond, M.F., O’Brien, B., Stoddart, G.L., Torrance, G.W.: Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Netten, A., Curtis, L.: Unit costs of health and social care. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Allen, C., Beecham, J.: Costing services: ideals and reality. In: Netten, A., Beecham, J. (eds.) Costing Community Care: Theory and Practice, pp. 25–42. Ashgate, Aldershot (1995)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain: British National Formulary (September). BMJ Books and Pharmaceutical Press, London (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Treasury, H.M.: Value for Money Assessment Guidance. HM Treasury, London (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Briggs, A., Clark, T., Wolstenholme, J., Clarke, P.: Missing… presumed at random: cost-analysis of incomplete data. Health Econ. 12(5), 377–392 (2003). doi: 10.1002/hec.766 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thompson, S.G., Barber, J.A.: How should cost data in pragmatic randomized trials be analyzed? BMJ 320, 1197–1200 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dixon, P.M.: The bootstrap and the jackknife: describing the precision of ecological indices. In: Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments, pp. 290–318. Chapman and Hall, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Briggs, A.H., Wonderling, D.E., et al.: Pulling cost-effectiveness up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation. Health Econ. 6(4), 327–340 (1997). doi :10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199707)6:4<327::AID-HEC282>3.0.CO;2-WCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tucker, J., Tarnow-Mordi, W., Gould, C., et al.: UK neonatal intensive care services in 1996. On behalf of the UK Neonatal Staffing Study Collaborative Group. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal. Neonatal. Ed. 80, F233–F234 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    National Statistics Standard Occupational Classification 2000-SOC2000. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/methods_quality/ns_sec/soc2000.asp. Accessed 8 July 2002
  28. 28.
    Phares, C.R., Lynfield, R., Farley, M.M., Mohle-Boetani, J., et al.: Epidemiology of invasive Group B Streptococcal disease in the United States, 1999–2005. JAMA 299(17), 2056–2065 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Department for Education and Skills: National Statistics Bulletin. Statistics of Education: education and training expenditure since 1993–1994. Available at: http://www.dfes.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SBU/b000406/index.shtml. Accessed 24 August 2002
  30. 30.
    Sinha, A., Lieu, T.A., Paoletti, L.C., Weinstein, M.C., Platt, R.: The projected health benefits of maternal group B streptococcal vaccination in the era of chemoprophylaxis. Vaccine 23, 3187–3195 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.12.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Petrou, S., Kupek, E., Hockley, C., Goldacre, M.: Social class inequalities in childhood mortality and morbidity in an English population. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 20, 14–23 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth-Ann Schroeder
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stavros Petrou
    • 1
  • Gail Balfour
    • 2
  • Oya Edamma
    • 1
  • Paul T. Heath
    • 2
  • on behalf of the Health Protection Agency Group B Streptococcus Working Group
  1. 1.National Perinatal Epidemiology UnitUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Division of Child HealthSt George’s, University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations