The European Journal of Health Economics

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 238–246 | Cite as

Cost effectiveness of preventive home visits to the elderly

Economic evaluation alongside randomized controlled study
  • Christian Kronborg
  • Mikkel Vass
  • Jørgen Lauridsen
  • Kirsten Avlund
Original Papers

Abstract

We evaluated the cost effectiveness of preventive home visits to elderly persons in Denmark alongside a 3-year randomized controlled study. The main outcome measure was incremental costs per active life-year gained. The number of active life-years was defined as those during which the person is able independently to transfer, walk indoors, go outdoors, walk outdoors in both pleasant and poor weather, and climb stairs. In 17 of 34 municipalities health visitors and general practitioners were offered geriatric training, which focused on early signs of disability, physical activity, and interdisciplinary follow-up. The remaining 17 municipalities offered preventive home visits as usual. Outcomes were measured in 4,034 persons aged 75 or 80 years old and dwelling at home. The difference in mean total costs between the intervention and the control group discounted at 3% was €−856 (95% CI −2,455 to 744) in 75-year-olds and €694 (−2,684 to 4,071) in 80-year-olds. The discounted difference in mean active life-years was 0.034 (−0.058 to 0.125) and 0.197 (0.013 to 0.380), respectively. The study did not provide conclusive evidence on the cost effectiveness of the programs under consideration.

Keywords

Elderly Preventive home visits Assessment Functional ability Community intervention 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants form the Danish Medical Research Council, Research Foundation for General Practice and Primary Care, Eastern Danish Research Forum, County Value-Added Tax Foundation, and Ministry of Social Affairs. We thank Eva Jepsen, Lisbeth Willemoes Sørensen, and Annette Johannesen for help in following up the questionnaires, and all participating municipalities. We are indebted to Christian Cato Holm for data management and development of the municipality registration software. The study was approved by the regional scientific ethics committees and by the Danish Data Protection Agency.

Conflict of interest

No information supplied.

Reference

  1. 1.
    McNamee P, Gregson BA, Wright K et al. (1998) Estimation of a multiproduct cost function for physically frail older people. Health Econ 7: 701–710CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stuck AE, Egger M, Hammer A et al. (2002) Home visits to prevent nursing home admission and functional decline in elderly people: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. JAMA 287: 1022–1028CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Elkan R, Kendrick D, Dewey M et al. (2001) Effectiveness of home based support for older people: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 323: 719–725CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vass M, Avlund K, Hendriksen C et al. (2002) Preventive home visits to older people in Denmark: methodology of a randomized controlled study. Aging Clin Exp Res 14: 509–515PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vass M, Avlund K, Kvist K et al. (2004) Structured home visits to older people. Are they only of benefit for women? A randomised controlled trial. Scand J Prim Health Care 22: 106–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ministy of Health (2001) Takstsystem 2002 – vejledning [Hospital charges 2002 (in Danish)]. Copenhagen: SundhedsministerietGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brouwer WB, Rutten F, Koopmanschap M (2001) Costing in economic evaluations. In: Drummond M, McGuire A (eds) Economic evaluation in health care. Merging theory with practice. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    National Board of Health (2005) Takstsystem 2005 – Vejledning [Hospital charges 2005 (in Danish)]. Copenhagen: SundhedsstyrelsenGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    The National Health Insurance Service (2002) Den offentlige sygesikring. Sygesikringens administrative vejledning – takster [The National Health Insurance Service—Charges (in Danish)]. CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dranove D (1996) Measuring costs. In: Sloan FA (ed) Valuing health care. Costs, benefits, and effectiveness of pharmaceuticals and other medical technologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 61–76Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Danmarks Statistik (2005) LON41: Fortjeneste for kommunalt ansatte efter uddannelse, lønmål og køn [Earnings for local government employees by education components and sex (in Danish)]. Statistikbanken Available at: http://www.statistikbanken.dk/statbank5a/default.asp?w=1024
  12. 12.
    Kommunernes Landsforening (2001) Tal på tid – tale om tid. Standard for tidsregistrering i hjemmeplejen [Standard for registration of time use in community care. (in Danish)]. Copenhagen: Kommunernes Landsforenings ForlagGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kommunernes Landsforening (2003) Frit valg og kvalitet – afregingsmodeller på de kommunale serviceområder. Copenhagen: FinansministerietGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Drummond MF, O’Brien B, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (1997) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 2 edn. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Avlund K, Kreiner S, Schultz-Larsen K (1996) Functional ability scales for the elderly. A validation study. Eur J Public Health 6: 35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Avlund K, Thudium D, Davidsen M, Fuglsang-Sørensen B (1995) Are self-ratings of functional ability reliable. Scand J Public Health 12: 10–16Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kerry SM, Bland JM (1998) Trials which randomize practices. I How should they be analysed? Fam Pract 15: 80–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Briggs AH (2001) Handling uncertainty in economic evaluation and presenting results. In: Drummond M, McGuire A (eds) Economic evaluation in health care. Merging theory with practice. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gyrd-Hansen D, Holund B, Andersen P (1995) A cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical cancer screening: health policy implications. Health Policy 34: 35–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gyrd-Hansen D (1997) Is it cost effective to introduce screening programmes for colorectal cancer? Illustrating the principles of optimal resource allocation. Health Policy 41: 189–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gyrd-Hansen D (1998) Modelling the cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in Denmark. Applications and issues of methodology. Thesis, Odense UniversityGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Andersen TF, Madsen M, Jorgensen J et al. (1999) The Danish National Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences. Dan Med Bull 46: 263–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Olivarius NF, Hollnagel H, Krasnik A et al. (1997) The Danish National Health Service Register. A tool for primary health care research. Dan Med Bull 44: 449–453PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gaist D, Sorensen HT, Hallas J (1997) The Danish prescription registries. Dan Med Bull 44: 445–448PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hallas J (2001) Conducting pharmacoepidemiologic research in Denmark. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 10: 619–623CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Luce B, Manning W, Siegel J, Lipscomb J (1996) Estimating costs in cost-effectiveness analysis. In: Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russel LB, Weinstein MC (eds) Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 176–213Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brouwer WB, van Exel NJ, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF (1999) The valuation of informal care in economic appraisal. A consideration of individual choice and societal costs of time. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 15: 147–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Richardson G, Manca A (2004) Calculation of quality adjusted life years in the published literature: a review of methodology and transparency. Health Econ 13: 1203–1210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Robertson MC, Gardner MM, Devlin N et al. (2001) Effectiveness and economic evaluation of a nurse delivered home exercise programme to prevent falls. II. Controlled trial in multiple centres. BMJ 322: 701–704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Robertson MC, Devlin N, Gardner MM, Campbell AJ (2001) Effectiveness and economic evaluation of a nurse delivered home exercise programme to prevent falls. I. Randomised controlled trial. BMJ 322: 697–701CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Smith RD, Widiatmoko D (1998) The cost-effectiveness of home assessment and modification to reduce falls in the elderly. Aust N Z J Public Health 22: 436–440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rizzo JA, Baker DI, McAvay G, Tinetti ME (1996) The cost-effectiveness of a multifactorial targeted prevention program for falls among community elderly persons. Med Care 34: 954–869CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rossum E van, Frederiks CM, Philipsen H et al. (1993) Effects of preventive home visits to elderly people. BMJ 307: 27–32PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Kronborg
    • 1
    • 4
  • Mikkel Vass
    • 2
  • Jørgen Lauridsen
    • 3
  • Kirsten Avlund
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Public HealthUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
  2. 2.Institute of Public HealthUniversity of CopenhagenDenmark
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
  4. 4.Health Economics, Institute of Public HealthUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense CDenmark

Personalised recommendations