Comparison of general practitioner records and patient self-report questionnaires for estimation of costs
- 148 Downloads
This study compared resource use data and estimated costs over a 12-month period, based on patient self-report questionnaires and general practitioner records. The level of agreement was measured by weighted κ. Differences in total costs were plotted against mean total costs. Of 324 patients with complete GP records for the period only 85 (26.2%) had complete self-report data. The recorded number of contacts per patient was higher for patient questionnaires than GP records (17.20 vs. 12.64), and the level of agreement between the two sources was moderate (κw=0.465). The plots of differences in total costs showed a slight downward bias, suggesting that estimation of total cost from GP records is lower than patient questionnaires. The incompleteness of patient questionnaires forces reliance on GP records as the main source of information for economic evaluations.
KeywordsGeneral practitioner medical records Patient self-report questionnaires Agreement Accuracy Costs
We acknowledge the important contribution of the patients, the health professionals and the rest of the AHEAD team involved with the trial. The original research was funded by the NHS R&D Health Technology Assessment Programme (project number 96/61/11). Support to the Health Economics Research Group for this methodological study was part of a Programme Grant from the Department of Health Policy Research Programme. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Health.
- 1.Johnston K, Buxton M, Jones D, Fitzpatrick R (1999) Assessing the costs of healthcare technologies in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 3 (6)Google Scholar
- 3.Peveler R, Kendrick T, Buxton M et al. (2005) Randomised controlled trial to compare the cost-effectiveness of tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and lofepramine. Health Technol Assess 9:1–148Google Scholar
- 4.Kendrick T, Peveler R, Longworth L et al. (2005) Randomised controlled trial to compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and lofepramine: the Assessing Health Economics of Antidepressants (AHEAD) study. Br J Psychiatry (in press)Google Scholar
- 9.Zhu K, McKnight B, Stergachis A et al. (1999) Comparison of self-report data and medical records data: results from a case-control study on prostate cancer. Int J Epidemiol 28:409–417Google Scholar
- 12.McGee MA, Howie DW, Ryan P et al. (2002) Comparison of patient and doctor responses to a total hip arthroplasty clinical evaluation questionnaire. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:1745–1752Google Scholar