Estimating rural households’ willingness to pay for health insurance

  • Ali Asgary
  • Ken Willis
  • Ali Akbar Taghvaei
  • Mojtaba Rafeian
Original Paper

Abstract

In many developing countries limited health budgets are a serious problem. Innovative ways to raise funds for the provision of health services, for example, through health care insurance, have a high priority. Health care insurance for rural households shields such patients from unexpected high costs of care. However, there are questions about whether, and how much, rural households are willing to pay to purchase such insurance, as well as the factors determining willingness to pay. In recent years the Iranian government has tried to improve health and medical services to rural areas through a health insurance program. This study was conducted to estimate rural households’ demand and willingness to pay for health insurance. A contingent valuation method (CVM) was applied using an iterative bidding game technique. Data has been collected from a sample of 2,139 households across the country.

Keywords

Health insurance Contingent valuation method Iran, rural health Willingness to pay 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the Health Care Insurance Organization of Iran and was carried out at the Economic Research Institute at Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

Conflict of interest:

No information supplied.

References

  1. 1.
    Brook RH (1991) Health, health insurance, and the uninsured. JAMA 265:2998–3002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akin BV, Rucker L, Hubell A, Cygan RW, Waitzkin H (1987) Access to medical care in a medically indigent population. J Gen Intern Med 4:216–220Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McLaughlin CG, Zellers WK (1994) Small business and health care reform. University of Michigan: Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arrow KJ (1963) Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Am Econ Rev 53:941–973Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feldstein M (1973) The welfare loss of excess health insurance. J Political Econ 81:251–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yoder R (1989) Are people willing and able to pay for health services? Social Sci Med 29:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hopkins S, Kidd MP (1996) The determinants of the demand for private health insurance under Medicare. Appl Econ 28:1623–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Propper C (1989) An econometric analysis of the demand for private health insurance in England and Wales. Appl Econ 21:777–792Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van de Ven WP, van Praag B (1981) The demand for deductibles in health insurance. J Econometrics 17:229–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liljas B (1998) The demand for health with uncertainty and insurance. J Health Econ 17:153–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kreps D (1990) A course in microeconomic theory. Princeton University Press: PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Besley T, Hall J, Preston I (1999) The demand for private health insurance: do waiting lists matter. J Public Econ 72:155–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chernew M, Frick K, McLaughlin CG (1997) The demand for health insurance coverage by low income workers: can reduce premiums achieve full coverage? Health Service Res 32:453–470Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dardanoni V, Wagstaff A (1987) Uncertainty, inequalities in health and the demand for the health. J Health Econ 6:283– 290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hopkins S, Kidd MP (1996) The determinants of the demand for private health insurance under Medicare. Appl Econ 28:1623–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liljas B (1998) The demand for health, life-time income, and imperfect financial markets. Studies in Health Economics 25, Department of Community Medicine and the Institute of Economic Research. Lund University, LundGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Manning WJ, Newhouse, Duan N, Keeler E, Leibowitz A, Marquis S (1987) Health insurance and the demand for medical care: evidence from a randomized experiment. Am Econ Rev 77:251– 277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shackley P, Dixon S (2000) Using contingent valuation to elicit public, preferences for water, fluoration. Appl Econ 32:777–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zarkin GA, Bala MV, Cates SC (2000) Estimating the willingness to pay for drug abuse treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat 18:149–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krieger DJ (1999) The economic value of reducing environmental health risks. J Environ Manage 56:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Diener A, O’Brien B, Gafni A (1998) Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature. Health Econ 7:313–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Brien B, Viramontes JL (1993) Willingness to pay: a valid and reliable measure of health state preference? Med Dec Making 14:289–297Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mitchell RC, Carson RT (1989) Using survey to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future: WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    NOAA (1993) Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Resources for the Future: WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Morrison GC, Gyldmark M (1992) Appraising the use of contingent valuation. Health Econ 1:233–243PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    O’Brien B, Gafni A (1996) When do the ‘dollars’ make sense? Toward a conceptual framework for contingent valuation studies in health care. Med Dec Making 16:288–299Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Asgary
    • 1
    • 4
  • Ken Willis
    • 2
  • Ali Akbar Taghvaei
    • 3
  • Mojtaba Rafeian
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Applied Disaster and Emergency StudiesBrandon UniversityBrandonCanada
  2. 2.School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape University of Newcastle upon TyneUK
  3. 3.Department of Urban and Regional PlanningTarbiat Modarres UniversityTehranIran
  4. 4.Department of Applied Disaster and Emergency Studies, Faculty of ScienceBrandon UniversityBrandonCanada

Personalised recommendations