In many developing countries limited health budgets are a serious problem. Innovative ways to raise funds for the provision of health services, for example, through health care insurance, have a high priority. Health care insurance for rural households shields such patients from unexpected high costs of care. However, there are questions about whether, and how much, rural households are willing to pay to purchase such insurance, as well as the factors determining willingness to pay. In recent years the Iranian government has tried to improve health and medical services to rural areas through a health insurance program. This study was conducted to estimate rural households’ demand and willingness to pay for health insurance. A contingent valuation method (CVM) was applied using an iterative bidding game technique. Data has been collected from a sample of 2,139 households across the country.
Health insurance Contingent valuation method Iran, rural health Willingness to pay
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This study was financially supported by the Health Care Insurance Organization of Iran and was carried out at the Economic Research Institute at Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Kreps D (1990) A course in microeconomic theory. Princeton University Press: PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Besley T, Hall J, Preston I (1999) The demand for private health insurance: do waiting lists matter. J Public Econ 72:155–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernew M, Frick K, McLaughlin CG (1997) The demand for health insurance coverage by low income workers: can reduce premiums achieve full coverage? Health Service Res 32:453–470Google Scholar
Dardanoni V, Wagstaff A (1987) Uncertainty, inequalities in health and the demand for the health. J Health Econ 6:283– 290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Hopkins S, Kidd MP (1996) The determinants of the demand for private health insurance under Medicare. Appl Econ 28:1623–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liljas B (1998) The demand for health, life-time income, and imperfect financial markets. Studies in Health Economics 25, Department of Community Medicine and the Institute of Economic Research. Lund University, LundGoogle Scholar
Manning WJ, Newhouse, Duan N, Keeler E, Leibowitz A, Marquis S (1987) Health insurance and the demand for medical care: evidence from a randomized experiment. Am Econ Rev 77:251– 277PubMedGoogle Scholar
Shackley P, Dixon S (2000) Using contingent valuation to elicit public, preferences for water, fluoration. Appl Econ 32:777–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarkin GA, Bala MV, Cates SC (2000) Estimating the willingness to pay for drug abuse treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat 18:149–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Krieger DJ (1999) The economic value of reducing environmental health risks. J Environ Manage 56:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diener A, O’Brien B, Gafni A (1998) Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature. Health Econ 7:313–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
O’Brien B, Viramontes JL (1993) Willingness to pay: a valid and reliable measure of health state preference? Med Dec Making 14:289–297Google Scholar
Mitchell RC, Carson RT (1989) Using survey to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future: WashingtonGoogle Scholar
NOAA (1993) Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Resources for the Future: WashingtonGoogle Scholar
Morrison GC, Gyldmark M (1992) Appraising the use of contingent valuation. Health Econ 1:233–243PubMedGoogle Scholar
O’Brien B, Gafni A (1996) When do the ‘dollars’ make sense? Toward a conceptual framework for contingent valuation studies in health care. Med Dec Making 16:288–299Google Scholar