Advertisement

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 177–181 | Cite as

Supracondylar nailing of periprosthetic fractures above total knee arthroplasties

  • A. Kumar
  • M. Catre
  • P. Weiler
  • S. Butt
Original

Abstract

Supracondylar nailing was performed in 10 patients who sustained periprosthetic fractures above total knee arthroplasties. The fractures occurred in women with an average age of 67.4 years (range, 42–92 years). All fractures healed in a satisfactory alignment in an average duration of 13.2 weeks (range, 12–18 weeks). None of the fractures needed bone grafting. There were no cases of wound infections, nonunion or delayed union. All patients achieved satisfactory range of movement of the knee joint and preoperative functional status. Main complications included loosening of a distal screw in one patient and fracture above the short nail following a second injury in another patient. Use of a longer nail where possible and a condylar bolt for distal locking can easily avoid these complications. We conclude that supracondylar nailing, despite some limitations, is a satisfactory method of treatment for a majority of displaced periprosthetic fractures above well-fixed total knee arthroplasties.

Key words

Periprosthetic fractures Total knee arthroplasty Supracondylar nailing 

References

  1. 1.
    Culp RW, Schmidt RG, Hanks G, Mak A, Esterhai JL, Heppenstall RB (1987) Supracondylar fracture of the femur following prosthetic knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 222:212–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Merkel KD, Johnson EW (1986) Supracondylar fracture of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:29–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Delport PH, Van Audekercke R, Martens M, Mulier JC (1984) Conservative treatment of ipsilateral supracondylar femoral fracture after total knee arthroplasty. J Trauma 24:846–849PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Healy WL, Siliski JM, Incavo SJ (1993) Operative treatment of distal femoral fractures proximal to total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:27–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Short WH, Hootnick DR, Murray DG (1981) Ipsilateral supracondylar femur fractures following knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 158:111–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kregor PJ, Hughes JL, Cole PA (2001) Fixation of distal femoral fractures above total knee arthroplasty utilizing the less invasive stabilization system (L.I.S.S.). Injury 32[Suppl 3]:64–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raab GE, Davis CM (2005) Early healing with locked condylar plating of periprosthetic fractures around the knee. J Arthroplasty 20:984–989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ricci WM, Loftus T, Cox C, Borrelli J (2006) Locked plates combined with minimally invasive insertion technique for the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Trauma 20:190–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jabczenski FF, Crawford M (1995) Retrograde intramedullary nailing of supracondylar femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty. A preliminary report of four cases. J Arthroplasty 10:95–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murrell GAC, Nunley JA (1995) Interlocked supracondylar intramedullary nails for supracondylar fractures after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:37–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rolston LR, Christ DJ, Halpern A, O’Connor PL, Ryan TG, Uggen WM (1995) Treatment of supracondylar fractures of the femur proximal to a total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:924–931PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weber D, Pomeroy DL, Schaper LA, Badenhausen WE, Curry JI, Smith MW, Suthers KE (2000) Supracondylar nailing of distal periprosthetic femoral fractures. Int Orthop 24:33–35PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gliatis J, Megas P, Panagiotopoulos E, Lambiris E (2005) Midterm results of treatment with a retrograde nail for supracondylar periprosthetic fractures of the femur following total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Trauma 19:164–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cordeiro EN, Costa RC, Carazzato JG, Silva JDS (1990) Periprosthetic fractures in patients with total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 252:182–189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Srinivasan K, Macdonald DA, Tzioupis CC, Giannoudis PV (2005) Role of long stem revision knee prosthesis in periprosthetic and complex distal femoral fractures: a review of eight patients. Injury 36:1094–1102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kassab M, Zalzal P, Azores GMS, Pressman A, Liberman B, Gross AE (2004) Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures after total knee arthroplasty using a distal femoral allograft. J Arthroplasty 19:361–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Springer BD, Sim FH, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG (2004) The modular segmental kinematic rotating hinge for nonneoplastic limb salvage. Clin Orthop 421:181–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Figgie MP, Goldberg VM, Figgie HE, Sobel M (1990) The results of treatment of supracondylar fracture above total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 5:267–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bong MR, Egol KA, Koval KJ, Kummer FJ, Su ET, Iesaka K, Bayer J, Di Cesare PE (2002) Comparison of the LISS and a retrograde-inserted supracondylar intramedullary nail for fixation of a periprosthetic distal femur fracture proximal to a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:876–881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CheshireUK
  2. 2.Department of OrthopaedicsToronto East General HospitalTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of OrthopaedicsRussells Hall HospitalDudley, West MidlandsUK

Personalised recommendations