Advertisement

Acta Endoscopica

, Volume 47, Issue 5, pp 252–257 | Cite as

Amélioration des performances de la coloscopie : quels sont les outils réellement utiles?

  • G. RahmiEmail author
  • G. Perrod
  • C. Cellier
Videodigest
  • 57 Downloads

Improvement of performance during colonoscopy: Which tools are really useful?

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. 1.
    Shaukat A, Mongin SJ, Geisser MS, et al. Long-term mortality after screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1106–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, et al. Long-term colorectalcancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1095–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997;112:24–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of backto-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy 2008;40:284–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2533–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee TJ, Blanks RG, Rees CJ, et al. Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England. Endoscopy 2013;45:20–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Subramanian V, Mannath J, Hawkey CJ, Ragunath K. High definition colonoscopy vs. standard video endoscopy for the detection of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2011;43:499–505.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bond A, O’Toole P, Fisher G, et al. New-Generation High-Definition Colonoscopes Increase Adenoma Detection when Screening a Moderate-Risk Population for Colorectal Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2017;16:44–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jrebi NY, Hefty M, Jalouta T, et al. High-definition colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate. Surg Endosc 2017;31:78–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pioche M, Zimmermann-Fraedrich K, Andrisani G, et al. It Takes Two Colonoscope Generations to Significantly Reduce Adenoma Miss Rates:Results from a Prospective Randomized Tandem Study. UEGW 2016.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pohl J, Schneider A, Vogell H, et al. Pancolonic chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine versus standard colonoscopy for detection of neoplastic lesions: a randomised two-centre trial. Gut 2011;60:485–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pasha SF, Leighton JA, Das A, et al. Comparison of the yield and miss rate of narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy in patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:363–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dinesen L, Chua TJ, Kaffes AJ. Meta-analysis of narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:604–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rastogi A, Keighley J, Singh V, et al. High accuracy of narrow band imaging without magnification for the real-time characterization of polyp histology and its comparison with high-definition white light colonoscopy: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:2422–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rex DK, Kahi C, O’Brien M, et al. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:419–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kuruvilla N, Paramsothy R, Gill R, Selby WS, Remedios ML, Kaffes AJ. A prospective dual-center proof-of-principle study evaluating the incremental benefit of narrow-band imaging with a fixed zoom function in real-time prediction of polyp histology. Can we resect and discard? Gastrointest Endosc 2015;82:362–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gralnek IM, Siersema PD, Halpern Z, et al. Standard forward-viewing colonoscopy versus full-spectrum endoscopy: an international, multicentre, randomised, tandem colonoscopy trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:353–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hassan C, Senore C, Radaelli F, et al. Full-spectrum (FUSE) versus standard forward-viewing colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme. Gut 2016;[in press].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Papanikolaou IS, Apostolopoulos P, Tziatzios G, et al. Lower adenoma miss rate with FUSE vs. conventional colonoscopy with proximal retroflexion: a randomized back-to-back trial. Endoscopy 2017;49:468–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Adler A, Aminalai A, Aschenbeck J, et al. Latest generation, wide-angle, high-definition colonoscopes increase adenoma detection rate. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;10:155–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leufkens AM, DeMarco DC, Rastogi A, et al. Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:480–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cohen J, Grunwald D, Grossberg LB, Sawhney MS. The Effect of Right Colon Retroflexion on Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2016; [in press].Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ng SC, Tsoi KK, Hirai HW, et al. The efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in polyp detection and cecal intubation: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:1165–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Floer M, Biecker E, Fitzlaff R, et al. Higher adenoma detection rates with endocuff-assisted colonoscopy- a randomized controlled multicenter trial. PloS One 2014;9:e114267.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Biecker E, Floer M, Heinecke A, et al. Novel endocuff-assisted colonoscopy significantly increases the polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Gastroenterol 2015;49:413–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    van Doorn SC, van der Vlugt M, Depla A, et al. Adenoma detection with Endocuff colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Gut 2015;[in press].Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    De Palma GD, Giglio MC, Bruzzese D, et al. Cap cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; [in press].Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bhattacharyya R, Chedgy F, Kandiah K, et al. Endocuff-assisted vs. standard colonoscopy in the fecal occult blood test-based UK Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (E-cap study): a randomized trial. Endoscopy 2017;[in press]Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chin M, Karnes W, Jamal MM, et al. Use of the Endocuff during routine colonoscopy examination improves adenoma detection: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:9642–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dik VK, Gralnek IM, Segol O, et al. Multicenter, randomized, tandem evaluation of EndoRings colonoscopy—results of the CLEVER study. Endoscopy 2015;47:1151–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Leung CW, Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R, et al. Water immersion versus standard colonoscopy insertion technique: randomized trial shows promise for minimal sedation. Endoscopy 2010;42:557–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hafner S, Zolk K, Radaelli F, et al. Water infusion versus air insufflation for colonoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (5):CD009863.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cadoni S, Falt P, Rondonotti E, et al. Water exchange for screening colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2017;49:456–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hsieh YH, Tseng CW, Hu CT, et al. Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy using water exchange, water immersion, and air insufflation. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;86:192–201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lesne A, Rouquette O, Touzet S, et al. Adenoma detection with blue-water infusion colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Endoscopy 2017;[in press].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Lavoisier 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Service d’hépatogastroentérologie et endoscopiehôpital Européen Georges PompidouParisFrance

Personalised recommendations