Recommandations et consensus: quel bilan, quel avenir à l’heure du P4P ou P4Q ?

December 2011, Volume 41, Issue 6, pp 329–332 | Cite as

Point de Vue de L’Expert / Expert’s Point of View

First Online: 24 October 2011

Recommendations and consensus: which summary report, which direction to take for the P4P and P4Q time?

This is a preview of subscription content, to check access.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

1.
[Anonymous] ASGE Guidelines for clinical application. Methods of privileging for new technology in gastrointestinal endoscopy. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;50:899–900.Google Scholar
2.
[Anonymous] Quality improvement of gastrointestinal endoscopy: guidelines for clinical application. From the ASGE. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49:842–844.Google Scholar
3.
Rey JR, Axon A, Budzynska A, Kruse A, Nowak A. Guidelines of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) antibiotic prophylaxis for gastrointestinal endoscopy. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Endoscopy 1998;30:318–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar