Statistical modelling of individual animal movement: an overview of key methods and a discussion of practical challenges

  • Toby A. Patterson
  • Alison Parton
  • Roland Langrock
  • Paul G. Blackwell
  • Len Thomas
  • Ruth King
Original Paper

Abstract

With the influx of complex and detailed tracking data gathered from electronic tracking devices, the analysis of animal movement data has recently emerged as a cottage industry among biostatisticians. New approaches of ever greater complexity are continue to be added to the literature. In this paper, we review what we believe to be some of the most popular and most useful classes of statistical models used to analyse individual animal movement data. Specifically, we consider discrete-time hidden Markov models, more general state-space models and diffusion processes. We argue that these models should be core components in the toolbox for quantitative researchers working on stochastic modelling of individual animal movement. The paper concludes by offering some general observations on the direction of statistical analysis of animal movement. There is a trend in movement ecology towards what are arguably overly complex modelling approaches which are inaccessible to ecologists, unwieldy with large data sets or not based on mainstream statistical practice. Additionally, some analysis methods developed within the ecological community ignore fundamental properties of movement data, potentially leading to misleading conclusions about animal movement. Corresponding approaches, e.g. based on Lévy walk-type models, continue to be popular despite having been largely discredited. We contend that there is a need for an appropriate balance between the extremes of either being overly complex or being overly simplistic, whereby the discipline relies on models of intermediate complexity that are usable by general ecologists, but grounded in well-developed statistical practice and efficient to fit to large data sets.

Keywords

Hidden Markov model Measurement error Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process State-space model Stochastic differential equation Time series 

References

  1. Albertsen, C.M., Whoriskey, K., Yurkowski, D., Nielsen, A., Mills, J.: Fast fitting of non-gaussian state-space models to animal movement data via template model builder. Ecology 96, 2598–2604 (2015). doi:10.1890/14-2101.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, T., Stephens, M.: The continuous and discrete Brownian bridges: representations and applications. Technical report, Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California (1996)Google Scholar
  3. Andersen, K., Nielsen, A., Thygesen, U., Hinrichsen, H.-H., Neuenfeldt, S.: Using the particle filter to geolocate atlantic cod (gadus morhua) in the baltic sea, with special emphasis on determining uncertainty. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 64, 618–627 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrieu, C., Doucet, A., Holenstein, R.: Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. B 62, 269–342 (2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Arulampalam, S., Maskell, S., Gordon, N., Clapp, T.: A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-gaussian bayesian tracking. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 10, 174–188 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bidder, O., Arandjelović, O., Almutairi, F., Shepard, E., Lambertucci, S., Qasem, L., Wilson, R.: A risky business or a safe bet? A fuzzy set event tree for estimating hazard in biotelemetry studies. Anim. Behav. 93, 143–150 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blackwell, P.G.: Random diffusion models for animal movement. Ecol. Model. 100(1–3), 87–102 (1997). doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(97)00153-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blackwell, P.G.: Bayesian inference for Markov processes with diffusion and discrete components. Biometrika 90(3), 613–627 (2003). doi:10.1093/biomet/90.3.613 MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Blackwell, P.G., Niu, N., Lambert, C., LaPoint, S.: Exact Bayesian inference for animal movement in continuous time. Methods Ecol. Evolut. (2015). doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12460 Google Scholar
  10. Börger, L., Dalziel, B., Fryxell, J.: Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research. Ecol. Lett. 11(6), 637–650 (2008). doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01182.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Breed, G.A., Costa, D.P., Goebel, M.E., Robinson, P.W.: Electronic tracking tag programming is critical to data collection for behavioral time-series analysis. Ecosphere 2(1), art10 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brillinger, D., Stewart, B.: Elephant-seal movements: modelling migration. Can. J. Stat. 26(3), 431–443 (1998). doi:10.2307/3315767 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Brillinger, D., Preisler, H., Ager, A., Kie, J., Stewart, B.: Employing stochastic differential equations to model wildlife motion. Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. 33(3), 385–408 (2002). doi:10.1007/s005740200021 MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Cappé, O., Moulines, E., Rydén, T.: Inference in Hidden Markov Models. Springer, New York (2009)MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooke, S., Hinch, S., Wikelski, M., Andrews, R., Kuchel, T., Wolcott, L.J., Butler, P.: Biotelemetry: a mechanistic approach to ecology. Trends Ecol. Evolut. 19(6), 334–343 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooke, S., Midwood, J., Thiem, J., Klimley, P., Lucas, M., Thorstad, E., Eiler, J., Holbrook, C., Ebner, B.: Tracking animals in freshwater with electronic tags: past, present and future. Anim. Biotelem. 1(1), 1–1 (2013). doi:10.1186/2050-3385-1-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Jager, M., Weissing, F.J., Herman, P.M., Nolet, B.A., van de Koppel, J.: Lévy walks evolve through interaction between movement and environmental complexity. Science 332(6037), 1551–1553 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DeRuiter, S., Langrock, R., Skirbutas, T., Goldbogen, J., Calambokidis, J., Friedlaender, A., Southall, B.: A multivariate mixed hmm for analyzing the effect of sonar exposure on the behavioural state-switching dynamics of blue whales. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1602.06570 (2016)
  19. Doucet, A., Godsill, S., Andrieu, C.: On sequential monte carlo sampling methods for bayesian filtering. Stat. Comput. 10, 197–208 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doucet, A., de Freitas, N., Gordon, N. (eds.): An introduction to sequential monte carlo methods. In: Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice, pp. 582. Springer, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  21. Dowd, M., Joy, R.: Estimating behavioural parameters in animal movement models using a state-augmented particle filter. Ecology 92, 568–575 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunn, J., Gipson, P.: Analysis of radio telemetry data in studies of home range. Biometrics 33(1), 85–101 (1977). doi:10.2307/2529305 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Edwards, A.: Revisiting lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses, bumblebees and deer. Nature 449, 1044–1048 (2007). doi:10.1038/nature06199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Edwards, A.: Overturning conclusions of lévy flight movement patterns by fishing boats and foraging animals. Ecology 92(6), 1247–1257 (2011). doi:10.1890/10-1182.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Edwards, A.M., Freeman, M.P., Breed, G.A., Jonsen, I.D.: Incorrect likelihood methods were used to infer scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour. PLoS ONE 7(10), e45174–e45174 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eveson, J.P., Basson, M., Hobday, A.J.: Using electronic tag data to improve mortality and movement estimates in a tag-based spatial fisheries assessment model. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 69(5), 869–883 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fearnhead, P.: Mcmc for state-space models. In: Brooks, S.P., Gelman, A., Jones, G.L., Meng, X. (eds.) Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo, Handbook of Modern Statistical Methods, pp. 513–529. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2011)Google Scholar
  28. Fournier, D.A., Skaug, H.J., Ancheta, J., Ianelli, J., Magnusson, A., Maunder, M.N., Nielsen, A., Sibert, J.: Ad model builder: using automatic differentiation for statistical inference of highly parameterized complex nonlinear models. Optim. Methods Softw. 27(2), 233–249 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Franke, A., Caelli, T., Hudson, R.: Analysis of movements and behavior of caribou (Rangifer tarandus) using hidden Markov models. Ecol. Model. 173(2–3), 259–270 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guttorp, P.: Stochastic Modelling of Scientific Data. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (1995)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Harris, K.J., Blackwell, P.G.: Flexible continuous-time modelling for heterogeneous animal movement. Ecol. Model. 255, 29–37 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.01.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harvey, A.: Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Holzmann, H., Munk, A., Suster, M., Zucchini, W.: Hidden markov models for circular and linear-circular time series. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 13(3), 325–347 (2006). doi:10.1007/s10651-006-0015-7 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Horne, J., Garton, E., Krone, S., Lewis, J.: Analyzing animal movements using Brownian bridges. Ecology 88(9), 2354–2363 (2007). doi:10.1890/06-0957.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Humphries, N.E., Queiroz, N., Dyer, J.R., Pade, N.G., Musyl, M.K., Schaefer, K.M., Fuller, D.W., Brunnschweiler, J.M., Doyle, T.K., Houghton, J.D., et al.: Environmental context explains lévy and brownian movement patterns of marine predators. Nature 465(7301), 1066–1069 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jackson, C., Sharples, L.: Hidden markov models for the onset and progression of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome in lung transplant recipients. Stat. Med. 21(1), 113–128 (2002). doi:10.1002/sim.886 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jennrich, R., Turner, F.: Measurement of non-circular home range. J. Theor. Biol. 22(2), 227–237 (1969). doi:10.1016/0022-5193(69)90002-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Johnson, D., London, J., Lea, M., Durban, J.: Continuous-time correlated random walk model for animal telemetry data. Ecology 89(5), 1208–1215 (2008). doi:10.1890/07-1032.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jonsen, I., Flemming, J., Myers, R.: Robust state-space modeling of animal movement data. Ecology 86(11), 2874–2880 (2005). doi:10.1890/04-1852 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jonsen, I., Myers, R., James, M.: Robust hierarchical state-space models reveal diel variation in travel rates of migrating leatherback turtles. J. Anim. Ecol. 75(5), 1046–1057 (2006). doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01129.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jonsen, I., Basson, M., Bestley, S., Bravington, M., Patterson, T., Pedersen, M., Thomson, R., Thygesen, U., Wotherspoon, S.: State-space models for bio-loggers: a methodological road map. Deep Sea Res. II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 88–89, 34–46 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2012.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kalman, R.: A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. J. Basic Eng. 82(1), 35–45 (1960). doi:10.1115/1.3662552 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kantas, N., Doucet, A., Singh, S., Maciejowski, J., Chopin, N.: On particle methods for parameter estimation in state-space models. Stat. Sci. 30, 328–351 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. Kuhn, C., Johnson, D., Ream, R., Gelatt, T.: Advances in the tracking of marine species: using GPS locations to evaluate satellite track data and a continuous-time movement model. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 393, 97–109 (2009). doi:10.3354/meps08229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Langrock, R., King, R., Matthiopoulos, J., Thomas, L., Fortin, D., Morales, J.: Flexible and practical modeling of animal telemetry data: hidden Markov models and extensions. Ecology 93(11), 2336–2342 (2012). doi:10.1890/11-2241.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Langrock, R., Hopcraft, J., Blackwell, P., Goodall, V., King, R., Niu, M., Patterson, T., Pedersen, M., Skarin, A., Schick, R.: Modelling group dynamic animal movement. Methods Ecol. Evolut. 5(2), 190–199 (2014). doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Laplanche, C., Marques, T.A., Thomas, L.: Tracking marine mammals in 3D using electronic tag data. Methods Ecol. Evolut. 6(9), 987–996 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Leos-Barajas, V., Photopoulou, T., Langrock, R., Patterson, T.A., Watanabe, Y., Murgatroyd, M., Papastamatiou, Y.: Analysis of animal accelerometer data using hidden Markov models. Methods Ecol. Evolut. (2016). doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12657 Google Scholar
  49. Liu, J.S.: Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing. Springer, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lopez, R., Malarde, J.-P., Royer, F., Gaspar, P.: Improving argos doppler location using multiple-model kalman filtering. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 52(8), 4744–4755 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lunn, D., Thomas, A., Best, N., Spiegelhalter, D.: WinBUGS-a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat. Comput. 10(4), 325–337 (2000). doi:10.1023/A:1008929526011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. MacDonald, I.: Numerical maximisation of likelihood: a neglected alternative to em? Int. Stat. Rev. 82(2), 296–308 (2014). doi:10.1111/insr.12041 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Madon, B., Hingrat, Y.: Deciphering behavioral changes in animal movement with a ‘multiple change point algorithm-classification tree’ framework. Front. Ecol. Evolut. 2, 30 (2014)Google Scholar
  54. Marsh, L., Jones, R.: The form and consequences of random walk movement models. J. Theor. Biol. 133(1), 113–131 (1988). doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(88)80028-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Maunder, M.N., Schnute, J.T., Ianelli, J.: Computers in fisheries population dynamics. In: Megrey, B.A., Moksness, E. (eds.) Computers in Fisheries Research, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  56. McClintock, B., King, R., Thomas, L., Matthiopoulos, J., McConnell, B., Morales, J.: A general discrete-time modeling framework for animal movement using multistate random walks. Ecol. Monogr. 82(3), 335–349 (2012). doi:10.1890/11-0326.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McClintock, B., Johnson, D., Hooten, M., Ver Hoef, J., Morales, J.: When to be discrete: the importance of time formulation in understanding animal movement. Mov. Ecol. 2(1), 1–21 (2014). doi:10.1186/s40462-014-0021-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McGowan, J., Beger, M., Lewison, R.L., Harcourt, R., Campbell, H., Priest, M., Dwyer, R.G., Lin, H.-Y., Lentini, P., Dudgeon, C., et al.: Integrating research using animal-borne telemetry with the needs of conservation management. J. Appl. Ecol. 54(2), 423–429 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McKellar, A., Langrock, R., Walters, J., Kesler, D.: Using mixed hidden Markov models to examine behavioral states in a cooperatively breeding bird. Behav. Ecol. 26(1), 148–157 (2015). doi:10.1093/beheco/aru171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Meinhold, R.J., Singpurwalla, N.D.: Robustification of kalman filter models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 84(406), 479–486 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Michelot, T., Langrock, R., Patterson, T.A.: moveHMM: an R package for analysing animal movement data using hidden markov models. Methods Ecol. Evolut. 7, 1308–1315 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Morales, J., Haydon, D., Frair, J., Holsiner, K., Fryxell, J.: Extracting more out of relocation data: building movement models as mixtures of random walks. Ecology 85(9), 2436–2445 (2004). doi:10.1890/03-0269 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Musyl, M., Domeier, M., Nasby-Lucas, N., Brill, R., McNaughton, L., Swimmer, J., Lutcavage, M., Wilson, S., Galuardi, B., Liddle, J.: Performance of pop-up satellite archival tags. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 433, 1–28 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nielsen, A., Sibert, J.R.: State-space model for light-based tracking of marine animals. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 64(8), 1055–1068 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nielsen, A., Bigelow, K.A., Musyl, M.K., Sibert, J.R.: Improving light-based geolocation by including sea surface temperature. Fish. Oceanogr. 15(4), 314–325 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Niu, M., Blackwell, P.G., Skarin, A.: Modeling interdependent animal movement in continuous time. Biometrics 72, 315–324 (2016). doi:10.1111/biom.12454 MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  67. Pagendam, D., Ross, J., Chan, F., Marinova, D., Anderssen, R.: Optimal GPS tracking for estimating species movements. In: International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (19th: 2011: Perth, Australia) (2011)Google Scholar
  68. Parton, A., Blackwell, P., Skarin, A.: Bayesian inference for continuous time animal movement based on steps and turns. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1608.05583 (2016)
  69. Patterson, T.A., Hartmann, K.: Designing satellite tagging studies: estimating and optimizing data recovery. Fish. Oceanogr. 20(6), 449–461 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Patterson, T., Thomas, L., Wilcox, C., Ovaskainen, O., Matthiopoulos, J.: State-space models of individual animal movement. Trends Ecol. Evolut. 23(2), 87–94 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Patterson, T., Basson, M., Bravington, M., Gunn, J.: Classifying movement behaviour in relation to environmental conditions using hidden Markov models. J. Anim. Ecol. 78(6), 1113–1123 (2009). doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01583.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Patterson, T., McConnell, B., Fedak, M., Bravington, M., Hindell, M.: Using GPS data to evaluate the accuracy of state-space methods for correction of Argos satellite telemetry error. Ecology 91(1), 273–285 (2010). doi:10.1890/08-1480.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pedersen, M.W., Righton, D., Thygesen, U.H., Andersen, K.H., Madsen, H.: Geolocation of North Sea cod (Gadus morhua) using hidden markov models and behavioural switching. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 65(11), 2367–2377 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pedersen, M., Patterson, T., Thygesen, U., Madsen, H.: Estimating animal behaviour and residency from movement data. Oikos 120(9), 1281–1290 (2011). doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19044.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Pedersen, M.W., Berg, C.W., Thygesen, U.H., Nielsen, A., Madsen, H.: Estimation methods for nonlinear state-space models in ecology. Ecol. Model. 222(8), 1394–1400 (2011b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Plummer, M.: JAGS: a program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing (2003)Google Scholar
  77. Preisler, H., Ager, A., Johnson, B., Kie, J.: Modeling animal movements using stochastic differential equations. Environmetrics 15(7), 643–657 (2004). doi:10.1002/env.636 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Preisler, H., Ager, A., Wisdom, M.: Analyzing animal movement patterns using potential functions. Ecosphere 4(3), art32 (2013). doi:10.1890/ES12-00286.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pyke, G.: Understanding movements of organisms: it’s time to abandon the lévy foraging hypothesis. Methods Ecol. Evolut. 6(1), 1–16 (2015). doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Russell, J.C., Hanks, E.M., Haran, M.: Dynamic models of animal movement with spatial point process interactions. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 21(1), 22–40 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  81. Rutz, C., Hays, G.: New frontiers in biologging science. Biol. Lett. 5(3), 289–292 (2009). doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Scharf, H.R., Hooten, M.B., Fosdick, B.K., Johnson, D.S., London, J.M., Durban, J.W.: Dynamic social networks based on movement. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1512.07607 (2015)
  83. Sibert, J.R., Musyl, M.K., Brill, R.W.: Horizontal movements of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) near hawaii determined by Kalman filter analysis of archival tagging data. Fish. Oceanogr. 12(3), 141–151 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sims, D.W., Southall, E.J., Humphries, N.E., Hays, G.C., Bradshaw, C.J., Pitchford, J.W., James, A., Ahmed, M.Z., Brierley, A.S., Hindell, M.A., et al.: Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour. Nature 451(7182), 1098–1102 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sippel, T., Eveson, J.P., Galuardi, B., Lam, C., Hoyle, S., Maunder, M., Kleiber, P., Carvalho, F., Tsontos, V., Teo, S.L., et al.: Using movement data from electronic tags in fisheries stock assessment: a review of models, technology and experimental design. Fish. Res. 163, 152–160 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Stepanov, S.S.: Stochastic World. Springer, New York (2013)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  87. Sur, M., Skidmore, A.K., Exo, K.-M., Wang, T., Ens, B.J., Toxopeus, A.: Change detection in animal movement using discrete wavelet analysis. Ecol. Inform. 20, 47–57 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Thygesen, U.H., Pedersen, M.W., Madsen, H.: Geolocating fish using hidden markov models and data storage tags. In: Nielsen, J.L., Arrizabalaga, H., Fragoso, N., Hobday, A., Lutcavage, M., Sibert, J. (eds.) Tagging and Tracking of Marine Animals with Electronic Devices, pp. 277–293. Springer, Netherlands (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Towner, A., Leos-Barajas, V., Langrock, R., Schick, R., Smale, M., Jewell, O., Kaschke, T., Papastamatiou, Y.: Sex-specific and individual preferences for hunting strategies in white sharks. Funct. Ecol. 30, 1397–1407 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Uhlenbeck, G., Ornstein, L.: On the theory of the Brownian motion. Phys. Rev. 36(5), 0823–0841 (1930). doi:10.1103/PhysRev.36.823 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. van de Kerk, M., Onorato, D., Criffield, M., Bolker, B., Augustine, B., McKinley, S., Oli, M.: Hidden semi-markov models reveal multiphasic movement of the endangered florida panther. J. Anim. Ecol. 84(2), 576–585 (2015). doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Viswanathan, G., Buldyrev, S.V., Havlin, S., Da Luz, M., Raposo, E., Stanley, H.E.: Optimizing the success of random searches. Nature 401(6756), 911–914 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wikle, C.K., Berliner, L.M.: A bayesian tutorial for data assimilation. Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom. 230(1), 1–16 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  94. Wilmers, C., Nickel, B., Bryce, C., Smith, J., Wheat, R., Yovovich, V.: The golden age of bio-logging: how animal-borne sensors are advancing the frontiers of ecology. Ecology 96(7), 1741–1753 (2015). doi:10.1890/14-1401.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zhang, J., O’Reilly, K.M., Perry, G.L., Taylor, G.A., Dennis, T.E.: Extending the functionality of behavioural change-point analysis with k-means clustering: a case study with the little penguin (Eudyptula minor). PLoS ONE 10, e0122811 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Zucchini, W., MacDonald, I., Langrock, R.: Hidden Markov Models for Time Series: An Introduction Using R, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2016)MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Crown Copyright 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toby A. Patterson
    • 1
  • Alison Parton
    • 2
  • Roland Langrock
    • 3
  • Paul G. Blackwell
    • 2
  • Len Thomas
    • 4
  • Ruth King
    • 5
  1. 1.CSIRO Oceans and AtmosphereHobartAustralia
  2. 2.School of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  3. 3.Department of Business Administration and EconomicsBielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany
  4. 4.School of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK
  5. 5.School of MathematicsUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations