AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis

, Volume 93, Issue 1, pp 23–47 | Cite as

Estimators in capture–recapture studies with two sources

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper investigates the applications of capture–recapture methods to human populations. Capture–recapture methods are commonly used in estimating the size of wildlife populations but can also be used in epidemiology and social sciences, for estimating prevalence of a particular disease or the size of the homeless population in a certain area. Here we focus on estimating the prevalence of infectious diseases. Several estimators of population size are considered: the Lincoln–Petersen estimator and its modified version, the Chapman estimator, Chao’s lower bound estimator, the Zelterman’s estimator, McKendrick’s moment estimator and the maximum likelihood estimator. In order to evaluate these estimators, they are applied to real, three-source, capture-recapture data. By conditioning on each of the sources of three source data, we have been able to compare the estimators with the true value that they are estimating. The Chapman and Chao estimators were compared in terms of their relative bias. A variance formula derived through conditioning is suggested for Chao’s estimator, and normal 95% confidence intervals are calculated for this and the Chapman estimator. We then compare the coverage of the respective confidence intervals. Furthermore, a simulation study is included to compare Chao’s and Chapman’s estimator. Results indicate that Chao’s estimator is less biased than Chapman’s estimator unless both sources are independent. Chao’s estimator has also the smaller mean squared error. Finally, the implications and limitations of the above methods are discussed, with suggestions for further development.

Keywords

Estimators of Chapman Chao Lincoln–Petersen McKendrick Zelterman Covariate adjustment Variance estimators 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Böhning, D.: A simple variance formula for population size by conditioning. Stat. Methodol. 5, 410–423 (2008) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borchers, D.L., Buckland, S.T., Zucchini, W.: Estimating Animal Abundance. Springer, Berlin (2002) MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Brittain, S., Böhning, D.: Supplementary material for ‘Estimators in capture–recapture studies with two sources’ (2007, unpublished) Google Scholar
  4. Carrao, G., Bagnardi, V., Vittadini, G., Favilli, S.: Capture–recapture methods to size alcohol related problems in a population. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 54, 603–610 (2000) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chao, A.: Estimating the population size for capture–recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 43, 783–791 (1987) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Chao, A.: Estimating population size for sparse data in capture–recapture experiments. Biometrics 45, 427–438 (1989) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Chao, A., Tsay, P.K., Lin, S.H., Shau, W.Y., Chao, D.Y.: Tutorial in Biostatistics: The applications of capture–recapture models to epidemiological data. Stat. Med. 20, 3123–3157 (2001) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gallay, A., Vaillant, V., Bouvet, P., Grimont, P., Desenclos, J.C.: How many foodborne outbreaks of salmonella infection occurred in France in 1995? Application of the capture–recapture method to three surveillance systems. Am. J. Epidemiol. 152, 171–177 (2000) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hook, E.B., Regal, R.R.: Capture–recapture methods in epidemiology: methods and limitations. Epidemiol. Rev. 17, 243–264 (1995) Google Scholar
  10. International Working Group for Disease Monitoring and Forecasting: Capture–recapture and multiple-record systems estimation I: history and theoretical development. Am. J. Epidemiol. 142, 1047–1058 (1995) Google Scholar
  11. Kolmogorov, A.N., Formin, S.V.: Metric spaces. In: Silverman, R.A. (ed.) Introductory Real Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1970) Google Scholar
  12. Roberts, J.M., Brewer, D.D.: Estimating the Prevalence of male clients of prostitute women in Vancouver with a simple capture–recapture method. J. R. Stat. Soc. (Ser. A) 169, 745–756 (2006) CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Seber, G.A.F.: The effects of trap response on tag recapture estimates. Biometrics 26, 13–22 (1970) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Seber, G.A.F.: Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters. Blackburn, Caldwell (2002) Google Scholar
  15. Smit, F., Reinking, D., Reijerse, M.: Estimating the number of people eligible for health service use. Eval. Program. Plan. 25, 101–105 (2002) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Van der Heijden, P., Bustami, R., Cruyff, M.J., Engbersan, G., van Houwelingen, H.C.: Point and interval estimation of population size using the truncated Poisson regression model. Stat. Model. Int. J. 3, 305–322 (2003) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Van Hest, N.H.A., Grant, A.D., Smit, F., Story, A., Richardus, J.H.: Estimating infectious diseases incidence: validity of capture–recapture analysis and truncated models for incomplete count data. Epidemiol. Infect. 136, 14–22 (2007) Google Scholar
  18. Verstraeten, T., Baughman, A.L., Cadwell, B., Zanardi, L., Haber, P., Chen, R.T., The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System Team: Enhancing vaccine safety surveillance: a capture–recapture analysis of itussusception after rotavirus vaccination. Am. J. Epidemiol. 154, 1006–1012 (2001) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zelterman, D.: Robust estimation in truncated discrete distributions with applications to capture–recapture experiments. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 18, 225–237 (1988) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Quantitative Biology and Applied Statistics, School of Biological SciencesUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations