Modern Rheumatology

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 273–278 | Cite as

Comparison of in-office magnetic resonance imaging versus conventional radiography in detecting changes in erosions after one year of infliximab therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

  • Norman B. Gaylis
  • Steven D. Needell
  • Daniel Rudensky
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare standard hand radiographs with in-office 0.2 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in monitoring response to therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were receiving infliximab, to evaluate the frequency and location of erosions, and to determine if there were differences in outcome based on disease duration at baseline. Patients who satisfied the American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA and were receiving infliximab therapy were evaluated with a baseline and 1-year follow-up MRI. Magnetic resonance images were interpreted by two blinded, board-certified radiologists. Bone erosions were identified as well-defined defects extending through the cortical margin. The mean age of the 48 patients was 58.5 years. The median infliximab dosage was 4 mg/kg. Baseline data showed that 41 patients had abnormal MRIs. The mean time between the baseline and follow-up MRI examinations was 10.5 months. Follow-up MRI revealed regression in 11 patients. Thirty-one patients had both MRIs and radiographs. Magnetic resonance imaging was approximately twice as sensitive as radiography in detecting erosions at baseline. In-office MRI was useful in monitoring disease response after the initiation of infliximab treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging is potentially a very valuable diagnostic tool and prognostic indicator for use in patients with RA.

Key words

Erosion Infliximab Magnetic resonance imaging Radiography Rheumatoid arthritis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lindqvist, E, Jonsson, K, Saxne, T, Eberhardt, K 2003Course of radiographic damage over 10 years in a cohort with early rheumatoid arthritisAnn Rheum Dis626116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Toussirot, E, Wendling, D 2004The use of TNF-alpha blocking agents in rheumatoid arthritis: an overviewExpert Opin Pharmacother558194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Breedveld, FC, Emery, P, Keystone, E, Patel, K, Furst, DE, Kalden, JR,  et al. 2004Infliximab in active early rheumatoid arthritisAnn Rheum Dis6314955PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Breedveld, FC, Han, C, Bala, M, van der Heijde, D, Baker, D, Kavanaugh, AF,  et al. 2005Association between baseline radiographic damage and improvement in physical function after treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritisAnn Rheum Dis64525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lipsky, PE, van der Heijde, DM, St Clair, EW, Furst, DE, Breedveld, FC, Kalden, JR,  et al. 2000Infliximab and methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritisN Engl J Med3431594602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maini, R, St Clair, EW, Breedveld, F, Furst, D, Kalden, J, Weisman, M,  et al. 1999Infliximab (chimeric anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody) versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving concomitant methotrexate: a randomised phase III trialLancet35419329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Devauchelle-Pensec, V, Saraux, A, Alapetite, S, Colin, D, Le Goff, P 2002Diagnostic value of radiographs of the hands and feet in early rheumatoid arthritisJoint Bone Spine6943441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scott, DL 2004Radiological progression in established rheumatoid arthritisJ Rheumatol Suppl695565PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Strand, V, Sharp, JT 2003Radiographic data from recent randomized controlled trials in rheumatoi d arthritis: what have we learned?Arthritis Rheum482134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crues, JV, Shellock, FG, Dardashti, S, James, TW, Troum, OM 2004Identification of wrist and metacarpophalangeal joint erosions using a portable magnetic resonance imaging system compared to conventional radiographsJ Rheumatol3167685PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Foley-Nolan, D, Stack, JP, Ryan, M, Redmond, U, Barry, C, Ennis, J,  et al. 1991Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis–a comparison with plain film radiographsBr J Rheumatol301016PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoving, JL, Buchbinder, R, Hall, S, Lawler, G, Coombs, P, McNealy, S,  et al. 2004A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, sonography, and radiography of the hand in patients with early rheumatoid arthritisJ Rheumatol3166375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jorgensen, C, Cyteval, C, Anaya, JM, Baron, MP, Lamarque, JL, Sany, J 1993Sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in very early rheumatoid arthritisClin Exp Rheumatol111638PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arnett, FC, Edworthy, SM, Bloch, DA, McShane, DJ, Fries, JF, Cooper, NS,  et al. 1988The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritisArthritis Rheum3131524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peterfy, CG 2004Is there a role for extremity magnetic resonance imaging in routine clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis?J Rheumatol316404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guermazi, A, Taouli, B, Lynch, JA, Peterfy, CG 2004Imaging of bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritisSemin Musculoskelet Radiol826985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McQueen, FM 2000Magnetic resonance imaging in early inflammatory arthritis: what is its role?Rheumatology (Oxford)397006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ostergaard, M, Duer, A, Moller, U, Ejbjerg, B 2004Magnetic resonance imaging of peripheral joints in rheumatic diseasesBest Pract Res Clin Rheumatol1886179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ejbjerg, BJ, Narvestad, E, Jacobsen, S, Thomsen, HS, Ostergaard, M 2005Optimised, low cost, low field dedicated extremity MRI is highly specific and sensitive for synovitis and bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis wrist and finger joints: comparison with conventional high field MRI and radiographyAnn Rheum Dis6412807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maini, RN, Breedveld, FC, Kalden, JR, Smolen, JS, Davis, D, Macfarlane, JD,  et al. 1998Therapeutic efficacy of multiple intravenous infusions of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody combined with low-dose weekly methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritisArthritis Rheum41155263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maini, RN, Breedveld, FC, Kalden, JR, Smolen, JS, Furst, D, Weisman, MH,  et al. 2004Sustained improvement over two years in physical function, structural damage, and signs and symptoms among patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab and methotrexateArthritis Rheum50105165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Quinn, MA, Conaghan, PG, O'Connor, PJ, Karim, Z, Greenstein, A, Brown, A,  et al. 2005Very early treatment with infliximab in addition to methotrexate in early, poor-prognosis rheumatoid arthritis reduces magnetic resonance imaging evidence of synovitis and damage, with sustained benefit after infliximab withdrawal: results from a twelve-month randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trialArthritis Rheum522735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Argyropoulou, MI, Glatzouni, A, Voulgari, PV, Xydis, VG, Nikas, SN, Efremidis, SC,  et al. 2005Magnetic resonance imaging quantification of hand synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximabJoint Bone Spine7255761PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peterfy, CG 2001Magnetic resonance imaging of rheumatoid arthritis: the evolution of clinical applications through clinical trialsSemin Arthritis Rheum3037596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ejbjerg, B, Narvestad, E, Rostrup, E, Szkudlarek, M, Jacobsen, S, Thomsen, HS,  et al. 2004Magnetic resonance imaging of wrist and finger joints in healthy subjects occasionally shows changes resembling erosions and synovitis as seen in rheumatoid arthritisArthritis Rheum501097106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McGonagle, D, Gibbon, W, O'Connor, P, Blythe, D, Wakefield, R, Green, M,  et al. 1999A preliminary study of ultrasound aspiration of bone erosion in early rheumatoid arthritisRheumatology (Oxford)3832931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ostendorf, B, Peters, R, Dann, P, Becker, A, Scherer, A, Wedekind, F,  et al. 2001Magnetic resonance imaging and miniarthroscopy of metacarpophalangeal joints: sensitive detection of morphologic changes in rheumatoid arthritisArthritis Rheum442492502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McQueen, FM, Benton, N, Crabbe, J, Robinson, E, Yeoman, S, McLean, L,  et al. 2001What is the fate of erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis? Tracking individual lesions using x rays and magnetic resonance imaging over the first two years of diseaseAnn Rheum Dis6085968PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gaylis, NB, Needell, S 2006Comparison of two different in-office 0.2T magnetic resonance imaging systems and standard radiographs in an outpatient rheumatoid arthritis patient populationAnn Rheum Dis65628Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan College of Rheumatology 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norman B. Gaylis
    • 1
  • Steven D. Needell
    • 2
  • Daniel Rudensky
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of RheumatologyArthritis and Rheumatic Disease SpecialtiesAventuraUSA
  2. 2.Boca Radiology GroupBoca RatonUSA

Personalised recommendations