Advertisement

The role of arrival time to the breeding grounds in the song development of juvenile pied flycatchers

  • Lydia J. M. Fong
  • Antonieta Labra
  • Helene M. LampeEmail author
Short Communication

Abstract

Few studies on song learning have been conducted in the field. Male pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) seem to learn song syllables in the breeding grounds. Adult males arrive first to the breeding grounds and sing more complex songs until they have paired. Early arriving juveniles may have more opportunities to learn new syllables from adult neighbours and develop more complex songs than later arriving juveniles. However, results suggest that arrival time is not important in song complexity development, but that males develop greater song complexity (repertoire size and song versatility) regardless as they age.

Keywords

Song complexity Learning Ficedula hypoleuca Repertoire size Age 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Luis Cadahia for his statistical support, and to Kristian Aandstad, Anders Herland, and all former field assistants for their help with the data collection during the field season.

References

  1. Baptista LF, Morton ML (1988) Song learning in montane white-crowned sparrows: from whom and when. Anim Behav 36:1753–1764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brenowitz EA, Beecher MD (2005) Song learning in birds: diversity and plasticity, opportunities and challenges. Trends Neurosci 28:127–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Byers BE, Kroodsma DE (2009) Female mate choice and songbird song repertoires. Anim Behav 77:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cadahía L, Labra A, Knudsen E, Nilsson A, Lamp HM, Slagsvold T, Stenseth NC (2017) Advancement of spring arrival in a long-term study of a passerine bird: sex, age and environmental effects. Oecologia 184:917–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (2008) Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Creanza N, Fogarty L, Feldman MW (2016) Cultural niche construction of repertoire size and learning strategies in songbirds. Evol Ecol 30:285–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eriksen A, Lampe HM, Slagsvold T (2009) Interspecific cross-fostering affects song acquisition but not mate choice in pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim Behav 78:857–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eriksen A, Slagsvold T, Lampe HM (2011) Vocal plasticity - are pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca, open-ended learners? Ethology 117:188–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Espmark YO, Lampe HM (1993) Variations in the song of the pied flycatcher within and between breeding seasons. Bioacoustics 5:33–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garamszegi LZ, Török J, Hegyi G, Szöllõsi E, Rosivall B, Eens M (2007) Age-dependent expression of song in the collared flycatcher, Ficedula albicollis. Ethology 113:246–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gil D, Gahr M (2002) The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Ecol Evol 17:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gottlander K (1987) Variation in the song rate of the male pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca: causes and consequences. Anim Behav 35:1037–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hultsch H, Todt D (1992) The serial order effect on the song acquisition of birds: relevance of exposure frequency to song models. Anim Behav 44:590–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kipper S, Kiefer S (2010) Age-related changes in birds' singing styles: on fresh tunes and fading voices? Adv Study Behav 41:77–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kroodsma DE (1982) Learning and the ontogeny of sound signals in birds. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Acoustic communication in birds, vol 2. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–23Google Scholar
  16. Labra A, Lampe HM (2018) The songs of male pied flycatchers: exploring the legacy of the fathers. PeerJ 6:e5397.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5397 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lampe HM, Espmark YO (1994) Song structure reflects male quality in pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim Behav 47:869–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lampe HM, Espmark YO (2003) Mate choice in pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca: can females use song to find high-quality males and territories? Ibis 145(online):E24–E33.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1474-919x.2003.00144.x Google Scholar
  19. Lampe HM, Larsen ON, Pedersen SB, Dabelsteen T (2007) Song degradation in the hole-nesting pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca: implications for polyterritorial behaviour in contrasting habitat-types. Behaviour 144:1161–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lundberg A, Alatalo RV (1992) The pied flycatcher. T & AD Poyser Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Motes-Rodrigo A, Labra A, Lampe HM (2017) Breeding experience and not age modulates the song development of pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca). Ethology 123:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nottebohm F (1984) Birdsong as a model in which to study brain processes related to learning. Condor 86:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ouwehand J, Ahola MP, Ausems A, Bridge ES, Burgess M, Hahn S, Hewson CM, Klaassen RHG, Laaksonen T, Lampe HM, Velmala W, Both C (2016) Light-level geolocators reveal migratory connectivity in European populations of pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca. J Avian Biol 47:69–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pärt T (1991) Is dawn singing related to paternity insurance? The case of the collared flycatcher. Anim Behav 41:451–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Searcy WA, Andersson M (1986) Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:507–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Soma M, Garamszegi LZ (2011) Rethinking birdsong evolution: meta-analysis of the relationship between song complexity and reproductive success. Behav Ecol 22:363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Svensson L (1992) Identification guide to European passerines. Fingraf AB, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  28. Vabishchevich AP (2011) Dawn singing in pied flycatchers: mated males sing highly versatile songs in the early morning. Ann Zool Fenn 48:376–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wheatcroft D, Qvarnström A (2017) Genetic divergence of early song discrimination between two young songbird species. Nat Ecol Evol 1:0192.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biosciences, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES)University of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations