Advertisement

Journal of Ethology

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 83–92 | Cite as

Brood parasitism of rosefinches by cuckoos: suitable host or accidental parasitism?

  • Jianping Liu
  • Canchao Yang
  • Wei LiangEmail author
Article

Abstract

The arms race between avian brood parasites and their hosts is a classic model of co-evolution. Parasitic breeding by the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) in the nests of the Chinese beautiful rosefinch (Carpodacus davidianus) was found from May to July 2017 in Saihanba National Forest Park, Heibei, China. To understand whether the rosefinch is a suitable host species for the common cuckoo, egg recognition, chick recognition, brood rearing, and brood diets were studied. The results showed that rosefinches fully accepted non-mimetic white model eggs and parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus) eggs, and also did not reject the similar-looking eggs of cinereous tits (Parus cinereus). Chinese beautiful rosefinches did not demonstrate any ability to recognize or discriminate between parasitic eggs or nestlings, and provisioned nestlings of cinereous tit, coal tit (Periparus ater), dusky warbler (Phylloscopus fuscatus), and common cuckoo within their nests. However, Chinese beautiful rosefinches were unable to rear the parasitic nestlings; dissections of deceased nestlings revealed that the food provided by Chinese beautiful rosefinch parents was largely composed of plant seeds and young plant shoot materials. This suggested that the high cross-fostered nestling mortality was due to unsuitable food provisioning from the host parents to the parasitic chicks. Therefore, we concluded that the Chinese beautiful rosefinch is not a suitable host for the common cuckoo, and this parasitic breeding system does not represent a co-evolutionary relationship.

Keywords

Coevolution Common cuckoo Chick discrimination Nestling diet Egg recognition Rosefinch 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Dr. Lu Dong from Beijing Normal University kindly helped us perform molecular phylogeny with cuckoo nestling samples. We are grateful to Dr. Tomas Grim and one anonymous referee for their helpful comments. We would like to thank Saihanba National Forest Park, Hebei Province, China, for permission to undertake this study.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31672303 to CY, 31472013 and 31772453 to WL), and Hainan Graduate Student Innovation Research Project (Hyb2018-28 to JL).

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical standards

The experiments comply with the current laws of China. Experimental procedures were in agreement with the Animal Research Ethics Committee of Hainan Provincial Education Centre for Ecology and Environment, Hainan Normal University (permit no. HNECEE-2012-003).

Conflict of interest

We declare that all authors have no competing interests.

References

  1. Antonov A, Avilés JM, Stokke BG, Spasova V, Vikan JR, Moksnes A, Yang C, Liang W, Røskaft E (2011) Egg discrimination in an open nesting passerine under dim light conditions. Ethology 117:1128–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avilés JM, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Åsmul M, Møller AP (2006) Rapid increase in cuckoo egg matching in a recently parasitized reed warbler population. J Evol Biol 19:1901–1910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banks AJ, Martin TE (2001) Host activity and the risk of nest parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds. Behav Ecol 12:31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooke MDL, Davies NB (1988) Egg mimicry by cuckoos Cuculus canorus in relation to discrimination by hosts. Nature 335:630–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chance EP (1940) The truth about the cuckoo. Country Life, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Crook JHA (1963) Comparative analysis of nest structure in the weaver birds (Ploceinae). Ibis 105:238–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. T. and A D Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies NB (2011) Cuckoo adaptations: trickery and tuning. J Zool 284:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies NB (2015) Cuckoo: cheating by nature. Bloomsbury, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Davies NB, Brooke MDL (1989) An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. I. Host egg discrimination. J Anim Ecol 58:207–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies NB, Welbergen JA (2008) Cuckoo–hawk mimicry? An experimental test. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 275:1817–1822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davies NB, Welbergen JA (2009) Social transmission of a host defense against cuckoo parasitism. Science 324:1318–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dawkins R, Krebs JR (1979) Arms races between and within species. Proc R Soc Lond 205:489–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Expósito-Granados M, Parejo D, Martínez JG, Precioso M, Molina-Morales M, Avilés JM (2017) Host nest site choice depends on risk of cuckoo parasitism in magpie hosts. Behav Ecol 28:1492–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman S (1988) Egg variability and conspecific nest parasitism in the Ploceus weaverbirds. Ostrich 59:49–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gluckman TL, Mundy NI (2013) Cuckoos in raptors’ clothing: barred plumage illuminates a fundamental principle of Batesian mimicry. Anim Behav 86:1165–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grim T (2016) Are cavity nesters really unsuitable hosts for the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus)? An experiment with the blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus) and collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). Sylvia 52:53–66Google Scholar
  18. Grim T (2017) Host defences against brood parasite nestlings: theoretical expectations and empirical evidence. In: Soler M (ed) Avian brood parasitism: behaviour, ecology, evolution and coevolution. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 539–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grim T, Samaš P (2016) Growth performance of nestling cuckoos Cuculus canorus in cavity nesting hosts. Acta Ornithologica 51:175–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grim T, Kleven O, Mikulica O (2003) Nestling discrimination without recognition: a possible defence mechanism for hosts towards cuckoo parasitism? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:S73–S75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grim T, Samaš P, Moskát C, Kleven O, Honza M, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Stokke BG (2011) Constraints on host choice: why do parasitic birds rarely exploit some common potential hosts? J Anim Ecol 80:508–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grim T, Samas P, Procházka P, Rutila J (2014) Are tits really unsuitable hosts for the common cuckoo? Ornis Fennica 91:166–177Google Scholar
  23. Grim T, Tyller Z, Samaš P (2017) Unusual diet of brood parasitic nestlings and its fitness consequences. Auk 134:732–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnsgard PA (1997) The avian brood parasites: deception at the nest. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Kattan GH (1997) Shiny cowbirds follow the ‘shotgun’ strategy of brood parasitism. Anim Behav 53:647–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kozlovic DR, Knapton RW, Barlow JC (1996) Unsuitability of the house finch as a host of the brown-headed cowbird. Condor 98:253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krüger O (2007) Cuckoos, cowbirds and hosts: adaptations, trade-offs and constraints. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 362:1873–1886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ladin ZS, D’Amico V, Jaisi DP, Shriver WG (2015) Is brood parasitism related to host nestling diet and nutrition? Auk 132:717–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Langmore NE, Hunt S, Kilner RM (2003) Escalation of a co-evolutionary arms race through host rejection of brood parasitic young. Nature 422:157–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Langmore NE, Cockburn A, Russell AF, Kilner RM (2009) Flexible cuckoo chick-rejection rules in the superb fairy-wren. Behav Ecol 20:978–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Langmore NE, Stevens M, Maurer G, Heinsohn R, Hall ML, Peters A, Kilner RM (2011) Visual mimicry of host nestlings by cuckoos. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 278:2455–2463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li D, Wei H, Zhang Z, Liang W, Stokke BG (2015) Oriental reed warbler (Acrocephalus orientalis) nest defence behaviour towards brood parasites and nest predators. Behaviour 152:1601–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liang W (2017) Crafty cuckoo calls. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1427–1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liang W, Møller AP (2015) Hawk mimicry in cuckoos and anti-parasitic aggressive behavior of barn swallows in Denmark and China. J Avian Biol 46:216–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liang W, Møller AP, Stokke BG, Yang CC, Kovařík P, Wang HT, Yao CT, Ding P, Lu X, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Grim T (2016) Geographic variation in egg ejection rate by great tits across 2 continents. Behav Ecol 27:1405–1412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu J, Ma L, Zhang Z, Gu D, Wang J, Li J, Gao L, Hou J (2017) Maximum frequency of songs reflects body size among male dusky warblers Phylloscopus fuscatus (Passeriformes: Phylloscopidae). Eur Zool J 84:186–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lu X, Gong G, Ma X (2011) Niche segregation between two alpine rosefinches: to coexist in extreme environments. Evol Biol 38:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Martín-Gálvez D, Soler M, Soler JJ, Martín-Vivaldi M, Palomino JJ (2005) Food acquisition by common cuckoo chicks in rufous bush robin nests and the advantage of eviction behaviour. Anim Behav 70:1313–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Middleton ALA (1977) Effect of cowbird parasitism on American goldfinch nesting. Auk 94:304–307Google Scholar
  40. Molnár B (1944) The cuckoo in the Hungarian plain. Aquila 51:100–112Google Scholar
  41. Moskát C, Honza M (2000) Effect of nest and nest site characteristics on the risk of cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism in the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Ecography 23:335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Muñoz AR, Altamirano M, Takasu F, Nakamura H (2007) Nest light environment and the potential risk of common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) parasitism. Auk 124:619–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rasmussen PC, Anderton JC (2005) Birds of south Asia: the Ripley guide. Smithsonian Institution and Lynx Edicions, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  44. Ricklefs RE (1968) Patterns of growth in birds. Ibis 110:419–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rothstein SI (1975) Evolutionary rates and host defenses against avian brood parasitism. Am Nat 109:161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rothstein SI (1976) Cowbird parasitism of the cedar waxwing and its evolutionary implications. Auk 93:498–509Google Scholar
  47. Samaš P, Polačiková L, Hauber ME, Cassey P, Grim T (2012) Egg rejection behaviour and clutch characteristics of the European greenfinch introduced to New Zealand. Chin Birds 3:330–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Samaš P, Rutila J, Grim T (2016) The common redstart as a suitable model to study cuckoo-host coevolution in a unique ecological context. BMC Evol Biol 16:255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sato NJ, Tokue K, Noske RA, Mikami OK, Ueda K (2010) Evicting cuckoo nestlings from the nest: a new anti-parasitism behaviour. Biol Lett 6:67–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Saunders CA, Arcese P, O’Connor KD (2003) Nest site characteristics in the song sparrow and parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds. Wilson Bull 115:24–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schulze-Hagen K, Stokke BG, Birkhead TR (2009) Reproductive biology of the European cuckoo Cuculus canorus: early insights, persistent errors and the acquisition of knowledge. J Ornithol 150:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Seel DC, Davis PRK (1981) Cuckoos reared by unusual hosts in Britain. Bird Study 28:242–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Soler M (2014) Long-term coevolution between avian brood parasites and their hosts. Biol Rev 89:688–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Soler JJ, Møller AP, Soler M (1999) A comparative study of host selection in the European cuckoo Cuculus canorus. Oecologia 118:265–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stoddard MC, Stevens M (2010) Pattern mimicry of host eggs by the common cuckoo, as seen through a bird’s eye. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 277:1383–1393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stokke BG, Ratikainen II, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Schulze-Hagen K, Leech DI, Anders Pape Møller AP, Fossøy F (2018) Characteristics determining host suitability for a generalist parasite. Sci Rep 8:6285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Takasu F (2005) A theoretical consideration on co-evolutionary interactions between avian brood parasites and their hosts. Ornithological Science 4:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thorogood R, Davies NB (2013) Hawk mimicry and the evolution of polymorphic cuckoos. Chin Birds 4:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Trnka A, Grim T (2013) Color plumage polymorphism and predator mimicry in brood parasites. Front Zool 10:25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tyller Z, Kysučan M, Grim T (2018) Postfledging behavior of the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) attended by the chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs): a comprehensive approach to study the least known stage of brood parasite-host coevolution. Wilson J Ornithol 130:536–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wang L, Yang C, Møller AP, Liang W, Lu X (2015) Multiple mechanisms of egg recognition in a cuckoo host. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:1761–1767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Welbergen JA, Davies NB (2011) A parasite in wolf’s clothing: hawk mimicry reduces mobbing of cuckoos by hosts. Behav Ecol 22:574–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yang C, Liang W, Cai Y, Shi S, Takasu F, Møller AP, Antonov A, Fossøy F, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Stokke BG (2010) Coevolution in action: disruptive selection on egg colour in an avian brood parasite and its host. PLoS One 5:e10816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yang C, Cai Y, Liang W (2012) Species identification of sympatric cuckoo nestlings in a multiple-cuckoo system, China. Chin Birds 3:108–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yang C, Stokke BG, Antonov A, Cai Y, Shi S, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Møller AP, Liang W, Grim T (2013) Host selection in parasitic birds: are open-cup nesting insectivorous passerines always suitable cuckoo hosts? J Avian Biol 44:216–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yang C, Wang L, Cheng SJ, Hsu YC, Liang W, Møller AP (2014) Nest defenses and egg recognition of yellow-bellied prinia against cuckoo parasitism. Naturwissenschaften 101:727–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yang C, Huang Q, Wang L, Jiang A, Stokke BG, Fossøy F, Tunheim OH, Røskaft E, Liang W, Møller AP (2015a) Plaintive cuckoos do not select tailorbird hosts that match the phenotypes of their own eggs. Behav Ecol 27:835–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yang C, Wang L, Chen M, Liang W, Møller AP (2015b) Nestling recognition in red-rumped and barn swallows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. York JE, Davies NB (2017) Female cuckoo calls misdirect host defences towards the wrong enemy. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1520–1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zheng G (2017) A checklist on the classification and distribution of the birds of China, 3rd edn. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, College of Life SciencesHainan Normal UniversityHaikouChina

Personalised recommendations