Advertisement

Journal of Ethology

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 117–124 | Cite as

Consistent individual behavior: evidence of personality in black bears

  • Patrick J. Myers
  • Julie K. YoungEmail author
Article

Abstract

Personality is defined as consistency in individual differences in organismal behavior across time or context, a phenomenon of interest within behavioral and evolutionary ecology. Empirical data have revealed an ever-increasing number and diversity of taxa that display these phenotypic patterns in both wild and captive settings. Moreover, these behavioral traits are frequently linked to wild behavior, life history strategies, and measures of individual fitness. Understanding personality is of particular importance for some animals, such as large carnivores, which may express maladaptive behavior that can lead to conflict with humans. To date, few studies of personality exist on large carnivores and none have investigated the presence of personality in black bears (Ursus americanus). Through focal animal sampling, and open field, novel object, and startle object tests, we investigate the potential for personality in captive black bear cubs. Results indicate the presence of personality, with consistency in behavior across five metrics for the bold-shy axis, and eight sampling events measuring responses for the activity axis. Information presented here reveals the presence of personality in black bear cubs, and may provide a framework for future investigations into relationships of personality with ecology and life history.

Keywords

Novel object Open field Repeatability Ursus americanus Captive Startle object Activity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources for allowing us to conduct this study and for their technical support. We thank S. Brummer, E. Stevenson, J. Schultz, N. Floyd, and M. Davis at the USDA NWRC Predator Research Facility for their assistance. Earlier drafts of this manuscript were reviewed by F. Howe, K. Jordan, and two anonymous reviewers. Funding was provided by the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, the Department of Wildland Resources at Utah State University, and the USDA National Wildlife Resource Center. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights statement

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. Captive care and handling was administered through NWRC-SOP no. ACUT-006.00, with research permitted under NWRC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) permit QA-2354 and Utah State University IACUC permit #2434. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Adriaenssens B, Johnsson JI (2010) Shy trout grow faster: exploring links between personality and fitness-related traits in the wild. Behav Ecol 22(1):135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49(3):227–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateman PW, Fleming PA (2012) Big city life: carnivores in urban environments. J Zool 287(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beckmann JP, Berger J (2003) Rapid ecological and behavioural changes in carnivores: the responses of black bears (Ursus americanus) to altered food. J Zool 261(2):207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beecham JJ, Ramanathan A (2007) Proceedings, 2007 International Workshop on the Rehabilitation Release and Monitoring of Orphan Bear Cubs. Bubonitsy, Russia, pp 23–31Google Scholar
  6. Bell AM, Sih A (2007) Exposure to predation generates personality in three spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Ecol Lett 10(9):828–834CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell AM, Hankison SJ, Laskowski KL (2009) The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Anim Behav 77(4):771–783CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Benson-Amram S, Dantzer B, Stricker G, Swanson EM, Holekamp KE (2016) Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(9):2532–2537CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Biro PA (2012) Do rapid assays predict repeatability in labile (behavioural) traits? Anim Behav 83(5):1295–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boon AK, Réale D, Boutin S (2007) The interaction between personality, offspring fitness and food abundance in North American red squirrels. Ecol Lett 10(11):1094–1104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Boyer N, Réale D, Marmet J, Pisanu B, Chapuis JL (2010) Personality, space use and tick load in an introduced population of Siberian chipmunks Tamias sibiricus. J Anim Ecol 79(3):538–547CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bremner-Harrison S, Prodohl PA, Elwood RW (2004) Behavioural trait assessment as a release criterion: boldness predicts early death in a reintroduction programme of captive-bred swift fox (Vulpes velox). Anim Conserv 7(03):313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brydges NM, Colegrave N, Heathcote RJ, Braithwaite VA (2008) Habitat stability and predation pressure affect temperament behaviours in populations of three-spined sticklebacks. J Anim Ecol 77(2):229–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Burns JG (2008) The validity of three tests of temperament in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). J Comp Psychol 122(4):344–356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Butler SJ, Whittingham MJ, Quinn JL, Cresswell W (2006) Time in captivity, individual differences and foraging behaviour in wild-caught chaffinches. Behaviour 143(4):535–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Can ÖE, D’Cruze N, Garshelis DL, Beecham J, Macdonald DW (2014) Resolving human-bear conflict: a global survey of countries, experts, and key factors. Conserv Lett 7(6):501–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Careau V, Thomas D, Humphries MM, Réale D (2008) Energy metabolism and animal personality. Oikos 117(5):641–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Caspi A, Roberts BW, Shiner RL (2005) Personality development: stability and change. Annu Rev Psychol 56:453–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cavigelli SA, McClintock MK (2003) Fear of novelty in infant rats predicts adult corticosterone dynamics and an early death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(26):16131–16136CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Chapman BB, Morrell LJ, Krause J (2010) Unpredictability in food supply during early life influences boldness in fish. Behav Ecol 21(3):501–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cole EF, Quinn JL (2014) Shy birds play it safe: personality in captivity predicts risk responsiveness during reproduction in the wild. Biol Lett 10(5):20140178CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Coleman K, Wilson DS (1998) Shyness and boldness in pumpkinseed sunfish: individual differences are context-specific. Anim Behav 56(4):927–936CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Cote J, Clobert J (2007) Social personalities influence natal dispersal in a lizard. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 274(1608):383–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cote J, Clobert J, Brodin T, Fogarty S, Sih A (2010) Personality-dependent dispersal: characterization, ontogeny and consequences for spatially structured populations. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 365(1560):4065–4076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dammhahn M (2012) Are personality differences in a small iteroparous mammal maintained by a life-history trade-off? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol (published online).  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0212) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Darwin C (1861) On the origin of species, 3rd edn. Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Dingemanse NJ, Réale D (2005) Natural selection and animal personality. Behaviour 142(9–10):1159–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dingemanse NJ, Both C, Van Noordwijk AJ, Rutten AL, Drent PJ (2003) Natal dispersal and personalities in great tits (Parus major). Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 270(1516):741–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dingemanse NJ, Kazem AJ, Réale D, Wright J (2010) Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. Trend Ecol Evol 25(2):81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fagen R, Fagen JM (1996) Individual distinctiveness in brown bears, Ursus arctos L. Ethology 102(2):212–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fraser DF, Gilliam JF, Daley MJ, Le AN, Skalski GT (2001) Explaining leptokurtic movement distributions: intrapopulation variation in boldness and exploration. Am Nat 158(2):124–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Gamer M, Lemon J, Fellows I, Singh P (2012) irr: various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement. R package version 0.84Google Scholar
  33. Gosling SD (1998) Personality dimensions in spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta). J Comp Psychol 112(2):107–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gosling SD (2001) From mice to men: what can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychol Bull 127(1):45–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Groothuis TG, Trillmich F (2011) Unfolding personalities: the importance of studying ontogeny. Dev Psychobiol 53(6):641–655CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Herde A, Eccard JA (2013) Consistency in boldness, activity and exploration at different stages of life. BMC Ecol 13(1):49CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Hostetler JA, McCown JW, Garrison EP, Neils AM, Barrett MA, Sunquist ME, Simek SL, Oli MK (2009) Demographic consequences of anthropogenic influences: Florida black bears in north-central Florida. Biol Conserv 142(11):2456–2463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Huntingford FA (1976) The relationship between anti-predator behaviour and aggression among conspecifics in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Anim Behav 24(2):245–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Johnson JC, Sih A (2005) Precopulatory sexual cannibalism in fishing spiders (Dolomedes triton): a role for behavioral syndromes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58(4):390–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnson HE, Breck SW, Baruch-Mordo S, Lewis DL, Lackey CW, Wilson KR, Broderick J, Mao JS, Beckmann JP (2015) Shifting perceptions of risk and reward: dynamic selection for human development by black bears in the western United States. Biol Conserv 187:164–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Johnson-Ulrich Z, Vonk J, Humbyrd M, Crowley M, Wojtkowski E, Yates F, Allard S (2016) Picture object recognition in an American black bear (Ursus americanus). Anim Cogn 19(6):1237–1242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kaiser HF (1991) Coefficient alpha for a principal component and the Kaiser–Guttman rule. Psychol Rep 68:855–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kallai J, Makany T, Csatho A, Karadi K, Horvath D, Kovacs-Labadi B, Jarai R, Nadel L, Jacobs JW (2007) Cognitive and affective aspects of thigmotaxis strategy in humans. Behav Neurosci 121(1):21–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Koolhaas JM, Korte SM, De Boer SF, Van Der Vegt BJ, Van Reenen CG, Hopster H, De Jong IC, Ruis MAW, Blokhuis HJ (1999) Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 23(7):925–935CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Kortet R, Hedrick ANN (2007) A behavioural syndrome in the field cricket Gryllus integer: intrasexual aggression is correlated with activity in a novel environment. Biol J Linn Soc 91(3):475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lantová P, Šíchová K, Sedláček F, Lanta V (2011) Determining behavioural syndromes in voles—the effects of social environment. Ethology 117(2):124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Larivière S (2001) Ursus americanus. Mamm Species 647:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lessells CM, Boag PT (1987) Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104:116–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lindström J (1999) Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol Evol 14(9):343–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Linnell JD, Odden J, Smith ME, Aanes R, Swenson JE (1999) Large carnivores that kill livestock: do “problem individuals” really exist? Wildl Soc Bull 27(3):698–705Google Scholar
  51. MacDonald K (1983) Stability of individual differences in behavior in a litter of wolf cubs (Canis lupus). J Comp Psychol 97(2):99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McCall RB, Lester ML, Corter CM (1969) Caretaker effect in rats. Dev Psychol 1(6):750–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McDougall PT, Réale D, Sol D, Reader SM (2006) Wildlife conservation and animal temperament: causes and consequences of evolutionary change for captive, reintroduced, and wild populations. Anim Conserv 9(1):39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Meehan CL, Mench JA (2002) Environmental enrichment affects the fear and exploratory responses to novelty of young Amazon parrots. Appl Anim Behav Sci 79(1):75–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mettke-Hofmann C, Winkler H, Leisler B (2002) The significance of ecological factors for exploration and neophobia in parrots. Ethology 108(3):249–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Minderman J, Reid JM, Hughes M, Denny MJ, Hogg S, Evans PG, Whittingham MJ (2010) Novel environment exploration and home range size in starlings Sturnus vulgaris. Behav Ecol 21(6):1321–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed Oct 2017
  58. Réale D, Reader SM, Sol D, McDougall PT, Dingemanse NJ (2007) Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol Rev 82(2):291–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Réale D, Martin J, Coltman DW, Poissant J, Festa-Bianchet M (2009) Male personality, life-history strategies and reproductive success in a promiscuous mammal. J Evol Biol 22(8):1599–1607CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Réale D, Dingemanse NJ, Kazem AJ, Wright J (2010) Evolutionary and ecological approaches to the study of personality. Philos Trans R Soc B 365(1560):3937–3946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reinhold K (2002) Maternal effects and the evolution of behavioral and morphological characters: a literature review indicates the importance of extended maternal care. J Hered 93(6):400–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Renner MJ (1990) Neglected aspects of exploratory and investigatory behavior. Psychobiology 18(1):16–22Google Scholar
  63. Rieucau G, Blanchard P, Martin JG, Favreau FR, Goldizen AW, Pays O (2012) Investigating differences in vigilance tactic use within and between the sexes in eastern grey kangaroos. PLoS One 7(9):e44801CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Seyfarth RM, Silk JB, Cheney DL (2012) Variation in personality and fitness in wild female baboons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(42):16980–16985CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Sharma S, Coombs S, Patton P, de Perera TB (2009) The function of wall-following behaviors in the Mexican blind cavefish and a sighted relative, the Mexican tetra (Astyanax). J Comp Physiol A 195(3):225–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sih A, Bell AM (2008) Insights for behavioral ecology from behavioral syndromes. Adv Study Behav 38:227–281CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC (2004) Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol 19(7):372–378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Smith BR, Blumstein DT (2008) Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis. Behav Ecol 19(2):448–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stamps J, Groothuis TG (2010) The development of animal personality: relevance, concepts and perspectives. Biol Rev 85(2):301–325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Stirling I, Derocher AE (1990) Factors affecting the evolution and behavioral ecology of the modern bears. Int C Bear 8:189–204Google Scholar
  71. Stoinski TS, Beck BB, Bloomsmith MA, Maple TL (2003) A behavioral comparison of captive-born, reintroduced golden lion tamarins and their wild-born offspring. Behaviour 140(2):137–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Treit D, Fundytus M (1988) Thigmotaxis as a test for anxiolytic activity in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 31(4):959–962CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Treves A, Karanth KU (2003) Human-carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide. Conserv Biol 17(6):1491–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Valle FP (1970) Effects of strain, sex, and illumination on open-field behavior of rats. Am J Psychol 83(1):103–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Van Oers K, Drent PJ, De Goede P, Van Noordwijk AJ (2004) Realized heritability and repeatability of risk-taking behaviour in relation to avian personalities. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 271(1534):65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vonk J, Jett SE, Mosteller KW (2012) Concept formation in American black bears, Ursus americanus. Anim Behav 84(4):953–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Walsh RN, Cummins RA (1976) The open-field test: a critical review. Psychol Bull 83(3):482–504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Ward AJ, Webster MM, Hart PJ (2007) Social recognition in wild fish populations. Proc Soc Lond B Biol 274(1613):1071–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. West-Eberhard MJ (1989) Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:249–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Whittier JL, McReynolds P (1965) Persisting odors as a biasing factor in open-field research with mice. Can J Psychol 19(3):224–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E (1998) Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48(8):607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wilson DS, Clark AB, Coleman K, Dearstyne T (1994) Shyness and boldness in humans and other animals. Trends Ecol Evol 9(11):442–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wolf M, Weissing FJ (2012) Animal personalities: consequences for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 27(8):452–461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Wildland ResourcesUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  2. 2.USDA National Wildlife Research Center, Predator Research Facility, Department of Wildland ResourcesUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations