Journal of Ethology

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 203–211 | Cite as

Inconsistency between salinity preference and habitat salinity in euryhaline gobiid fishes in the Isazu River, northern Kyoto Prefecture

  • Yumeki Oto
  • Masahiro Nakamura
  • Hiroaki Murakami
  • Reiji Masuda
Article

Abstract

Adults of three amphidromous gobiid fishes, Tridentiger brevispinis, Rhinogobius similis, and Gymnogobius petschiliensis, are euryhaline and generally found in both freshwater (FW) and brackish water (BW) areas. The determining factors for their choice of habitat with different salinity have never been explored. In this study, a salinity-choice experiment was conducted using the above species captured in the FW region of the Isazu River, northern Kyoto Prefecture. For comparison, the fluvial goby Rhinogobius flumineus and BW-acclimated G. petschiliensis were also tested. We found that the three euryhaline species, including BW-acclimated G. petschiliensis, preferred BW to FW, whereas R. flumineus preferred FW. These results suggest that salinity preference did not determine habitat in these euryhaline gobiids, which were found in FW. Surveys were also conducted focusing on competitors and predators in their potential habitats. Thus, net sampling captured many other gobiid species, and an environmental DNA method detected Japanese temperate bass, a voracious predator, in the estuarine areas, suggesting that biotic factors are major determinants in the distribution of euryhaline species.

Keywords

Euryhaline goby Biotic environment Environmental DNA Osmoregulation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to K. Sakemi for helping with fish sampling and A. Tanimoto for supporting the water collection. Y. Kumagai (Kyoto University) provided unpublished data of the fish visual survey on the Isazu River, and T. Fuji (Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency) informed us about the ecology of Japanese sea bass. Comments from H. Nakagawa (Kyoto University) and two anonymous reviewers on the manuscript and advice from members of the laboratory during the research were also greatly appreciated. This study was supported by the CREST program of the Japan Science and Technology Agency.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

References

  1. Akihito Sakamoto K, Ikeda Y, Aizawa M (2013) Gobiidae. In: Nakabo T (ed) Fishes of Japan with pictorial keys to the species, 3rd edn. Tokai University Press, Hadano, pp 1361–1541 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  2. Alcaraz C, Bisazza A, García-Berthou E (2008) Salinity mediates the competitive interactions between invasive mosquitofish and an endangered fish. Oecologia 155:205–213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anni ISA, Bianchini A, Barcarolli IF, Junior ASV, Robaldo RB, Tesser MB, Sampaio LA (2016) Salinity influence on growth, osmoregulation and energy turnover in juvenile pompano Trachinotus marginatus Cuvier 1832. Aquaculture 455:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Betancur-R R, Ortí G, Stein AM, Marceniuk AP, Alexander Pyron R (2012) Apparent signal of competition limiting diversification after ecological transitions from marine to freshwater habitats. Ecol Lett 15:822–830CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown JS, Kotler BP (2004) Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation. Ecol Lett 7:999–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ficetola GF, Miaud C, Pompanon F, Taberlet P (2008) Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biol Lett 4:423–425CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Fuji T, Kasai A, Ueno M, Yamashita Y (2014) Growth and migration patterns of juvenile temperate seabass Lateolabrax japonicus in the Yura River estuary, Japan—combination of stable isotope ratio and otolith microstructure analyses. Environ Biol Fish 97:1221–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Funakoshi S (1993) Characteristics of the food habits of the main fishes in and around Ise Bay and Mikawa Bay. Summer–autumn phase. Bull Aichi Fish Res Inst 1:1–18 (in Japanese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  9. Goto A, Nakanishi T, Utoh H, Hamada K (1978) A preliminary study of the freshwater fish fauna of rivers in Southern Hokkaido. Bull Fac Fish Hokkaido Univ 29:118–130 (in Japanese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  10. Hatama T, Ohhashi Y (2009) Distributions of fishes and decapod crustaceans in the inland water in Yamaguchi Prefecture (I). Bull Yamaguchi Pref Fish Res Ctr 7:19–61 (in Japanese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  11. Hatanaka M, Sekino K (1962) Ecological studies on the Japanese sea bass, Lateolabrax japonicus. I. Feeding habit. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 28:851–856 (in Japanese with English abstract) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hatooka K (2013) Lateolabracidae. In: Nakabo T (ed) Fishes of Japan with pictorial keys to the species, 3rd edn. Tokai University Press, Hadano, p 748Google Scholar
  13. Hibino M, Ohta T, Isoda T, Nakayama K, Tanaka M (2007) Distribution of Japanese temperate bass, Lateolabrax japonicus, eggs and pelagic larvae in Ariake Bay. Ichthyol Res 54:367–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirai N, Tagawa M, Kaneko T, Seikai T, Tanaka M (1999) Distributional changes in branchial chloride cells during freshwater adaptation in Japanese sea bass Lateolabrax japonicus. Zool Sci 16:43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hogan JD, Blum MJ, Gilliam JF, Bickford N, McIntyre PB (2014) Consequences of alternative dispersal strategies in a putatively amphidromous fish. Ecology 95:2397–2408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hwang P-P, Lee T-H, Lin L-Y (2011) Ion regulation in fish gills: recent progress in the cellular and molecular mechanisms. Am J Physiol 301:28–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ishino K, Tsuji K, Iwata A, Suzuki T, Mizuno N, Koshikawa T, Kishi Y, Sawara Y, Takahashi S (2005) Gobiidae. In: Kawanabe H, Mizuno N, Hosoya K (eds) Freshwater fishes of Japan, 3rd edn. Yama-to-keikoku-sha, Tokyo, pp 585–623 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  18. Islam MS, Hibino M, Tanaka M (2006) Distribution and diets of larval and juvenile fishes: influence of salinity gradient and turbidity maximum in a temperate estuary in upper Ariake Bay, Japan. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 68:62–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iwatsuki Y, Tashiro K, Hamasaki T (1993) Distribution and fluctuations in occurrence of the Japanese centropomid fish, Lates japonicus. Jpn J Ichthyol 40:327–332Google Scholar
  20. Jung D, Sato JD, Shaw JR, Stanton BA (2012) Expression of aquaporin 3 in gills of the Atlantic killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus): effects of seawater acclimation. Mol Integr Physiol 161:320–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kani T (1970) Ecology of torrent-inhabiting insects. Works of Kani Tokichi. Shisakusha, Tokyo, pp 3–91 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  22. Kawamura K (2005) Lateolabrax japonicus. In: Kawanabe H, Mizuno N, Hosoya K (eds) Freshwater fishes of Japan, 3rd edn. Yama-to-keikoku-sha, Tokyo, p 485Google Scholar
  23. Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lorenz OT, Riccobono SA, Smith P (2015) Effects of salinity on the survival and aggression of the invasive Rio Grande cichlid (Herichthys cyanoguttatus). Mar Freshwater Behav Physiol 49:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matsui S, Inui R, Kai Y (2014) Annotated checklist of gobioid fishes (Perciformes, Gobioidei) from Wakasa Bay, Sea of Japan. Bull Osaka Mus Nat Hist 68:1–25Google Scholar
  26. Miyata N, Mori T, Kagehira M, Miyazaki N, Suzuki M, Sato K (2016) Micro CTD data logger reveals short-term excursions of Japanese sea bass from seawater to freshwater. Aquat Biol 25:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miyazaki Y, Terui A (2016) Difference in habitat use between the two related goby species of Gymnogobius opperiens and Gymnogobius urotaenia: a case study in the Shubuto River System, Hokkaido, Japan. Ichthyol Res 63:317–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mizuno N, Uehara S, Maki M (1979) Studies on a freshwater fish, Rhinogobius brunneus (Gobiidae). IV. Habitat segregation among sympatric populations of 4 colour types. Jpn J Ecol 29:137–147 (in Japanese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  29. Mont’Alverne R, Jardine TD, Pereyra PER, Oliveira MCLM, Medeiros RS, Sampaio LA, Tesser MB, Garcia AM (2016) Elemental turnover rates and isotopic discrimination in a euryhaline fish reared under different salinities: implications for movement studies. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 480:36–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mukai T (2001) Hybridization and introgression in the speciation process of fishes. Jpn J Ichthyol 48:1–18 (in Japanese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  31. Mukai T, Sato T, Morisawa M (2000) Natural hybridization and gene flow between two Tridentiger gobies in Lake Hinuma (Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan). Ichthyol Res 47:175–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nakamura M, Masuda R, Tsukamoto K, Otake T (2016) Narrowed temperature adaptability in non-natal osmotic environments of two euryhaline wanderers, dace and black porgy: implications for seasonal habitat changes. Fish Sci 82:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nakane Y, Suda Y, Sano M (2010) Food habits of fishes on an exposed sandy beach at Fukiagehama, South–West Kyushu Island, Japan. Helgol Mar Res 65:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nakanishi T (1978) Comparison of ecological and geographical distributions among the three types of Chaenogobius annularis Gill. Bull Fac Fish Hokkaido Univ 29:233–242 (in Japanese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  35. Nip THM, Ho W-Y, Wong CK (2003) Feeding ecology of larval and juvenile black seabream (Acanthopagrus schlegeli) and Japanese seaperch (Lateolabrax japonicus) in Tolo Harbour, Hong Kong. Environ Biol Fishes 66:197–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parry G (1966) Osmotic adaptation in fishes. Biol Rev 41:392–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org
  38. Sakai H (1995) Life-histories and genetic divergence in three species of Triborodon (Cypriniodae). Mem Fac Fish Hokkaido Univ 42:1–98Google Scholar
  39. Schofield PJ (2003) Habitat selection of two gobies (Microgobius gulosus, Gobiosoma robustum): influence of structural complexity, competitive interactions and presence of a predator. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 288:125–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schultz ET, McCormick SD (2013) Euryhalinity in an evolutionary context. In: McCormick SD, Farrell AP, Brauner CJ (eds) Euryhaline fishes. Academic Press, New York, pp 477–533Google Scholar
  41. Seno H (2004) Review article. In: Seno H (ed) A photographic guide to the gobioid fishes of Japan. Heibon-sha, Tokyo, pp 12–15 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  42. Sone S, Inoue M, Yanagisawa Y (2001) Habitat use and diet of two stream gobies of the genus Rhinogobius in south-western Shikoku, Japan. Ecol Res 16:205–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sone S, Inoue M, Yanagisawa Y (2006) Competition between two congeneric stream gobies for habitat in southwestern Shikoku, Japan. Ichthyol Res 53:19–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Takahara T, Minamoto T, Doi H (2013) Using environmental DNA to estimate the distribution of an invasive fish species in ponds. PLoS One 8:e56584CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Tipsmark CK, Madsen SS, Seidelin M, Christensen AS, Cutler CP, Cramb G (2002) Dynamics of Na+, K+, 2Cl cotransporter and Na+, K+-ATPase expression in the branchial epithelium of brown trout (Salmo trutta) and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). J Exp Zool 293:106–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Tsuji K (2015) Fish fauna of the Iwamatsu River system in Ehime Prefecture, Japan. Bull Tokushima Pref Mus 25:1–24Google Scholar
  47. Tsukamoto K, Nakai I, Tesch WV (1998) Do all freshwater eels migrate? Nature 396:635–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yamamoto S, Minami K, Fukaya K, Takahashi K, Sawada H et al (2016) Environmental DNA as a ‘snapshot’ of fish distribution: a case study of Japanese jack mackerel in Maizuru Bay Sea of Japan. PLoS One 11:e0149786CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Yamanaka H, Minamoto T (2016) The use of environmental DNA of fishes as an efficient method of determining habitat connectivity. Ecol Indic 62:147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yokogawa K (2002) Genus Lateolabrax distributed in the East Asian coastal water. In: Tanaka M, Kinoshita I (eds) Temperate bass and biodiversity—new perspective for fisheries biology. Koseisha-kouseikaku, Tokyo, pp 114–126 (in Japanese) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society and Springer Japan 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Agriculture and Life SciencesUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Maizuru Fisheries Research Station, Field Science Education and Research CenterKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  4. 4.Department of Zoology, Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of ScienceKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  5. 5.National Research Institute of Fisheries and Environment of Inland SeaFisheries Research AgencyImabariJapan

Personalised recommendations