Interspecific responses of wild African carnivores to odour of 3-mercapto-3-methylbutanol, a component of wildcat and leopard urine
- 356 Downloads
The scent of 3-mercapto-3-methylbutanol (3-M-3-MB), a volatile component of leopard (Panthera pardus) and domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus) urine, released at about 10 ng/s from slow-release dispensers, elicited scent-marking from African civet (Civettictis civetta), small-spotted genet (Genetta genetta) and slender mongoose (Galerella sanguinea), as well as African wildcat (F. s. cafra). A female leopard was apparently repelled by the scent. The scent-marking and scent-rubbing by species other than African wildcats and leopards were unexpected and have important implications for the design of studies to investigate chemical communication between wild mammals and the use of camera traps to estimate animal numbers. Videos showing the behaviours referred to in this article are available at; http://www.momo-p.com/showdetail-e.php?movieid=momo161223fs01a; http://www.momo-p.com/showdetail-e.php?movieid=momo161223gs01a; http://www.momo-p.com/showdetail-e.php?movieid=momo161223gg01a.
KeywordsChemical communication Pheromone Mammal Semiochemical Tomcat thiol CAS 34300-94-2 Felis silvestris Panthera pardus
This work was part of the Botswana Predator Conservation Trust’s Bioboundary project, which was set up with funding from the Paul G. Allen Family Foundation. Running expenses for this work were provided by private donors through Wild Entrust International and Tusk Trust. We are grateful for permission to carry out research in Botswana granted by the Botswana Department of Wildlife and National Parks, Ministry of Environment, Wildlife and Tourism and the President’s Office under research permit number 8/36/4 XXIV (205).
Compliance with ethical standards
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Conflict of interest
None of the authors declared a conflict of interest.
- Apps PJ (2012) Smithers’ Mammals of Southern Africa. A field guide. 4th edn. Struik Nature, Cape Town, pp 320–323Google Scholar
- Bothma J du P, Coertze RJ (2004) Scent-marking frequency in southern Kalahari leopards. S Afr J Wildl Res 34:163–169Google Scholar
- Coe J (2004) Mixed species rotation exhibits. In: 2004 ARAZPA Conference Proceedings, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Do Linh San E, Somers MJ (2013) Editorial African small carnivores: the ‘forgotten Eden’. Small Carnivore Conservation, the Journal of the IUCN SSC Small Carnivore Specialist Group 48 July 2013 1–2Google Scholar
- Estes RD (1991) The behavior guide to African mammals. University of California Press, Berkeley, p 297Google Scholar
- Hendriks WH, Rutherfurd-Markwick KJ, Weidgraaf K, Ugarte C, Rogers QR (2008) Testosterone increases urinary free felinine, N-acetylfelinine and ethylbutanolglutathione excretion in cats (Felis catus). J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 92:53–62Google Scholar
- Herbst M (2009) Behavioural ecology and population genetics of the African wild cat, Felis silvestris Forster 1870, in the southern Kalahari. Doctoral dissertation, University of PretoriaGoogle Scholar
- Kingdon J, Hoffmann M (eds) (2013) Mammals of Africa, vol 5. Carnivores, Pangolins, Equids and Rhinoceroses. Bloomsbury Publishing, London, pp 224–225, 232–233, 318 Google Scholar
- Linklater WL, Greenwood D, Keyzers RA, Duckworth JA, Banks P, MacKay JWB, Stockum C (2013) Pied-pipers wanted: the search for super-lures of New Zealand mammal pests. N Z Sci Rev 70:31–36Google Scholar
- Marnewick KA, Bothma J, Verdoorn GH (2006) Using camera-trapping to investigate the use of a tree as a scent-marking post by cheetahs in the Thabazimbi district. S Afr J Wildl Res 36:139–145Google Scholar
- McTavish C, Gibeau M (2010) How animals send “tree mail”. Remote imaging reveals forest communication. Wildl Prof Summer 2010:66–68Google Scholar
- Rieger I (1979) Scent rubbing in carnivores. Carnivore 2:17–25Google Scholar
- Rovero F, Zimmermann F, Berzi D, Meek P (2013) “Which camera trap type and how many do I need?” A review of camera features and study designs for a range of wildlife research applications. Hystrix 24:148–156Google Scholar
- Thomas P, Balme G, Hunter L, McCabe-Parodi J (2005) Using scent attractants to non-invasively collect hair samples from cheetahs, leopards and lions. Animal Keep Forum 7:342–384Google Scholar