Advertisement

Journal of Ethology

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 153–159 | Cite as

Interspecific responses of wild African carnivores to odour of 3-mercapto-3-methylbutanol, a component of wildcat and leopard urine

  • Peter Apps
  • Megan Claase
  • Ben Yexley
  • J. Weldon McNutt
Video Article

Abstract

The scent of 3-mercapto-3-methylbutanol (3-M-3-MB), a volatile component of leopard (Panthera pardus) and domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus) urine, released at about 10 ng/s from slow-release dispensers, elicited scent-marking from African civet (Civettictis civetta), small-spotted genet (Genetta genetta) and slender mongoose (Galerella sanguinea), as well as African wildcat (F. s. cafra). A female leopard was apparently repelled by the scent. The scent-marking and scent-rubbing by species other than African wildcats and leopards were unexpected and have important implications for the design of studies to investigate chemical communication between wild mammals and the use of camera traps to estimate animal numbers. Videos showing the behaviours referred to in this article are available at; http://www.momo-p.com/showdetail-e.php?movieid=momo161223fs01a; http://www.momo-p.com/showdetail-e.php?movieid=momo161223gs01a; http://www.momo-p.com/showdetail-e.php?movieid=momo161223gg01a.

Keywords

Chemical communication Pheromone Mammal Semiochemical Tomcat thiol CAS 34300-94-2 Felis silvestris Panthera pardus 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was part of the Botswana Predator Conservation Trust’s Bioboundary project, which was set up with funding from the Paul G. Allen Family Foundation. Running expenses for this work were provided by private donors through Wild Entrust International and Tusk Trust. We are grateful for permission to carry out research in Botswana granted by the Botswana Department of Wildlife and National Parks, Ministry of Environment, Wildlife and Tourism and the President’s Office under research permit number 8/36/4 XXIV (205).

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors declared a conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10164_2016_503_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 17 kb)

References

  1. Allen ML, Wallace CF, Wilmers CC (2015) Patterns in bobcat (Lynx rufus) scent marking and communication behaviors. J Ethol 33:9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen ML, Gunther MS, Wilmers CC (2017) The scent of your enemy is my friend? The acquisition of large carnivore scent by a smaller carnivore. J Ethol 35:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apps PJ (2012) Smithers’ Mammals of Southern Africa. A field guide. 4th edn. Struik Nature, Cape Town, pp 320–323Google Scholar
  4. Apps PJ (2013) Are mammal chemical signals hiding right under our noses? Naturwissenschaften 100:487–506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Apps P, Mmualefe L, McNutt JW (2012) Identification of volatiles from the secretions and excretions of African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus). J Chem Ecol 38:1450–1461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Apps P, Mmualefe L, Jordan NR, Golabek KA, McNutt JW (2014) The “tomcat compound” 3-mercapto-3-methylbutanol occurs in the urine of free-ranging leopards but not in African lions or cheetahs. Biochem Syst Ecol 53:17–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Apps PJ, Weldon PJ, Kramer M (2015) Chemical signals in terrestrial vertebrates: search for design features. Nat Prod Rep 32(7):1131–1153  CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Banks PB, Daly A, Bytheway JP (2016) Predator odours attract other predators, creating an olfactory web of information. Biol Lett 12:20151053CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Begg CM, Begg KS, Du Toit JT, Mills MGL (2003) Scent-marking behaviour of the honey badger, Mellivora capensis (Mustelidae), in the southern Kalahari. Anim Behav 66:917–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bothma J du P, Coertze RJ (2004) Scent-marking frequency in southern Kalahari leopards. S Afr J Wildl Res 34:163–169Google Scholar
  11. Clark F, King AJ (2008) A critical review of zoo-based olfactory enrichment. In: Hurst JL, Beynon RJ, Roberts SC, Wyatt TD (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates 11. Springer, New York, pp 391–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coe J (2004) Mixed species rotation exhibits. In: 2004 ARAZPA Conference Proceedings, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  13. Dehnhard M (2011) Mammal semiochemicals: understanding pheromones and signature mixtures for better zoo-animal husbandry and conservation. Int Zoo Yb 45:55–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Do Linh San E, Somers MJ (2013) Editorial African small carnivores: the ‘forgotten Eden’. Small Carnivore Conservation, the Journal of the IUCN SSC Small Carnivore Specialist Group 48 July 2013 1–2Google Scholar
  15. Donadio E, Buskirk SW (2006) Diet, morphology, and interspecific killing in carnivora. Amer Nat 67:524–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erlinge S, Sandell M (1988) Coexistence of stoat, Mustela erminea, and weasel, M. nivalis: social dominance, scent communication, and reciprocal distribution. Oikos 53:242–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Estes RD (1991) The behavior guide to African mammals. University of California Press, Berkeley, p 297Google Scholar
  18. Garvey PM, Glen AS, Pech RP (2016) Dominant predator odour triggers caution and eavesdropping behaviour in a mammalian mesopredator. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:481–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gosling LM, McKay HV (1990) Scent-rubbing and status signalling by male mammals. Chemoecology 1:92–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harrington LA, Harrington AL, Macdonald DW (2009) The smell of new competitors: the response of American mink, Mustela vison, to the odours of otter, Lutra lutra and polecat, M. putorius. Ethology 115:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hayward MW, Hayward GJ (2010) Potential amplification of territorial advertisement markings by black-backed jackals (Canis mesomelas). Behaviour 147:979–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hendriks WH, Tarttelin MF, Moughan PJ (1995) Twenty-four hour felinine excretion patterns in entire and castrated cats. Physiol Behav 58:467–469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hendriks WH, Rutherfurd-Markwick KJ, Weidgraaf K, Ugarte C, Rogers QR (2008) Testosterone increases urinary free felinine, N-acetylfelinine and ethylbutanolglutathione excretion in cats (Felis catus). J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 92:53–62Google Scholar
  24. Herbst M (2009) Behavioural ecology and population genetics of the African wild cat, Felis silvestris Forster 1870, in the southern Kalahari. Doctoral dissertation, University of PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  25. Howard ME, Zuercher GL, Gipson PS, Livingston TR (2002) Efficacy of feces as an attractant for mammalian carnivores. Southwest Nat 47:348–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hulsman A, Dalerum F, Swanepoel L, Ganswindt A, Sutherland C, Paris M (2010) Patterns of scat deposition by brown hyaenas Hyena brunnea in a mountain savannah region of South Africa. Wildl Biol 16:445–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kimball BA, Mason JR, Blom FS, Johnson JJ, Zemlicka DE (2000) Development and testing of seven new synthetic coyote attractants. J Agric Food Chem 48:1892–1897CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. King TW, Salom-Pérez R, Shipley LA, Quigley HB, Thornton DH (2016) Ocelot latrines: communication centers for Neotropical mammals. J Mammal. doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyw174 Google Scholar
  29. Kingdon J, Hoffmann M (eds) (2013) Mammals of Africa, vol 5. Carnivores, Pangolins, Equids and Rhinoceroses. Bloomsbury Publishing, London, pp 224–225, 232–233, 318 Google Scholar
  30. Krasnov B, Khokhlova I (1996) Discrimination of midday jird’s odour by house mice. Anim Behav 52:659–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leo V, Reading RP, Letnic M (2015) Interference competition: odours of an apex predator and conspecifics influence resource acquisition by red foxes. Oecologia 179:1033–1040CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Linklater WL, Greenwood D, Keyzers RA, Duckworth JA, Banks P, MacKay JWB, Stockum C (2013) Pied-pipers wanted: the search for super-lures of New Zealand mammal pests. N Z Sci Rev 70:31–36Google Scholar
  33. MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Royle JA, Langtimm CA (2002) Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83:2248–2255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marnewick KA, Bothma J, Verdoorn GH (2006) Using camera-trapping to investigate the use of a tree as a scent-marking post by cheetahs in the Thabazimbi district. S Afr J Wildl Res 36:139–145Google Scholar
  35. McNutt JW (1996) Sex-biased dispersal in African wild dogs, Lycaon pictus. Anim Behav 52:1067–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McTavish C, Gibeau M (2010) How animals send “tree mail”. Remote imaging reveals forest communication. Wildl Prof Summer 2010:66–68Google Scholar
  37. Miyazaki M, Yamashita T, Suzuki Y, Saito Y, Soeta S, Taira H, Suzuki A (2006) A major urinary protein of the domestic cat regulates the production of felinine, a putative pheromone precursor. Chem Biol 13:1071–1079CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Newey S, Davidson P, Nazir S, Fairhurst G, Verdicchio F, Irvine RJ, Van der Wal R (2015) Limitations of recreational camera traps for wildlife management and conservation research: a practitioner’s perspective. Ambio 44(Suppl. 4):S624–S635. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0713-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Palomares F, Caro TM (1999) Interspecific killing among mammalian carnivores. Amer Nat 153:492–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paquet PC (1991) Scent-marking behavior of sympatric wolves (Canis lupus) and coyotes (C. latrans) in Riding Mountain National Park. Can J Zoolog 69:1721–1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Randall RM (1979) Perineal gland marking by free-ranging African civets, Civettictis civetta. J Mammal 60:622–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rieger I (1979) Scent rubbing in carnivores. Carnivore 2:17–25Google Scholar
  43. Roeder J (1980) Marking behaviour and olfactory recognition in genets (Genetta genetta L., Carnivora-Viverridae). Behaviour 72:200–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rovero F, Zimmermann F, Berzi D, Meek P (2013) “Which camera trap type and how many do I need?” A review of camera features and study designs for a range of wildlife research applications. Hystrix 24:148–156Google Scholar
  45. Rowcliffe JM, Kays R, Carbone C, Jansen PA (2013) Clarifying assumptions behind the estimation of animal density from camera trap rates. J Wildl Manag 77:876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schuette P, Wagner AP, Wagner ME, Creel S (2013) Occupancy patterns and niche partitioning within a diverse carnivore community exposed to anthropogenic pressures. Biol Conserv 158:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Starkenmann C, Niclass Y, Cayeux I, Brauchli R, Gagnon A-C (2014) Odorant volatile sulfur compounds in cat urine: occurrence of (±)-3,7-dimethyloct-3-sulfanyl-6-en-1-ol and its cysteine conjugate precursor. Flavour Frag J 30:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thomas P, Balme G, Hunter L, McCabe-Parodi J (2005) Using scent attractants to non-invasively collect hair samples from cheetahs, leopards and lions. Animal Keep Forum 7:342–384Google Scholar
  49. Vanak AT, Fortin D, Thaker M, Ogden M, Owen C, Greatwood S, Slotow R (2013) Moving to stay in place: behavioral mechanisms for coexistence of African large carnivores. Ecology 94:2619–2631CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Whitten WK, Wilson MC, Wilson SR, Jorgenson JW, Novotny M, Carmack M (1980) Induction of marking behavior in wild red foxes (Vulpes vulpes L.) by synthetic urinary constituents. J Chem Ecol 6:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society and Springer Japan 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Botswana Predator Conservation TrustMaunBotswana

Personalised recommendations