Contingency checking and self-directed behaviors in giant manta rays: Do elasmobranchs have self-awareness?
Elaborate cognitive skills arose independently in different taxonomic groups. Self-recognition is conventionally identified by the understanding that one’s own mirror reflection does not represent another individual but oneself, which has never been proven in any elasmobranch species to date. Manta rays have a high encephalization quotient, similar to those species that have passed the mirror self-recognition test, and possess the largest brain of all fish species. In this study, mirror exposure experiments were conducted on two captive giant manta rays to document their response to their mirror image. The manta rays did not show signs of social interaction with their mirror image. However, frequent unusual and repetitive movements in front of the mirror suggested contingency checking; in addition, unusual self-directed behaviors could be identified when the manta rays were exposed to the mirror. The present study shows evidence for behavioral responses to a mirror that are prerequisite of self-awareness and which has been used to confirm self-recognition in apes.
KeywordsSelf-recognition Mirror test Comparative cognition Mobulidae Cognition
Movie 1: Manta ray is swimming through the OA in control conditions without the mirror. (WMV 3509 kb)
Movie 2: Manta ray is swimming through the OA in control conditions after the mirror has been removed. (WMV 2666 kb)
Movie 3: Manta rays perform repetitive turning, circling in front of the mirror. This behavior was performed for 6 min continously during this session. (WMV 4081 kb)
Movie 4: Manta ray rolls cephalic fin and slows down when passing in front of the mirror (9–13 s). (WMV 4840 kb)
Movie 5: Manta ray rolls cephalic fin in front of the mirror (1–3 s). Bubble blowing behavior is presented front of the mirror while displaying the ventral side and staying visually oriented (22–24 s). (WMV 4832 kb)
- Ari C (2009) On the brain of cartilaginous fishes: cerebralization, astroglial architecture and blood-brain barrier composition. Lambert, SaarbrückenGoogle Scholar
- Balzarini V, Taborsky M, Wanner S, Koch F, Frommen J (2014) Mirror, mirror on the wall: the predictive value of mirror tests for measuring aggression in fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:871–878Google Scholar
- Dawkins MS (2001) Who needs consciousness? Anim Welfare 10(Suppl1):19–29Google Scholar
- Marino L, Reiss D, Gallup G (1994) Mirror self-recognition in bottlenose dolphins: Implications for comparative investigations of highly dissimilar species. In: Parker S, Boccia M, Mitchell R (eds) Self-awareness in animals and humans: Developmental perspectives. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 273–290Google Scholar
- Reiss D (2012) The dolphin in the mirror: exploring dolphin minds and saving dolphin lives. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Sarko D, Marino L, Reiss D (2002) A bottlenose dolphin’s (Tursiops truncatus) responses to Its mirror image: further analysis. Int J Comp Psychol 15(1):69–76Google Scholar
- Shettleworth SJ (2010) Cognition, evolution, and behaviour, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Suddendorf T, Butler DL (2013) The nature of visual self-recognition. Trends Cogn Sci 17:121–127Google Scholar