Journal of Ethology

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 255–259 | Cite as

Seismic communication in demon African mole rat Tachyoryctes daemon from Tanzania

  • Ema Hrouzková
  • Veronika Dvořáková
  • Petr Jedlička
  • Radim ŠumberaEmail author


We describe the production of substrate-borne vibrations in a subterranean mole rat of the genus Tachyoryctes for the first time. These signals with a supposed communication function were recorded using two approaches. Firstly, we recorded the production of spontaneous substrate-borne vibrations of individual test animals in artificial tunnels simulating a mole rat burrow system. Secondly, we recorded substrate-borne vibrations in individuals with interconnected home systems divided by a barrier. We found that Tachyoryctes produces these seismic signals by striking its head against the ceiling of the tunnel. Two types of seismic signals differing in physical parameters were identified. A slow signal (inter-pulse distance 0.12 s, inter-bout distance 3.89 s, number of pulses within each bout 9.53) was produced in both experiments, whereas a fast signal (inter-pulse distance 0.05 s, inter-bout distance 18.44 s, number of pulses within each bout 22.54) was produced mainly in close proximity to another individual. Our results indicate that fast signals are probably individually specific, because the success rate of classification according to discriminant function analysis was 70.4 % for the three tested individuals.


Seismic communication Tachyoryctes Substrate-borne vibration Subterranean mammal 



We would like to thank Simona Poláková for her help with statistical analysis, Chris Steer for correction of English and two reviewers for their comments. The research was supported by GAČR 31-P506/11/1512.


  1. Bednářová R, Hrouzková-Knotková E, Burda H, Sedláček F, Šumbera R (2013) Vocalization of the giant mole-rat (Fukomys mechowii), subterranean rodent with the richest vocal repertoire. Bioacoustics. doi: 10.1080/09524622.2012.712749 Google Scholar
  2. Beolchini F, Corti M (2004) The taxonomy of the genus Tachyoryctes: a geometric morphometric approach. Ital J Zool 71:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burda H, Bruns V, Müller M (1990) Sensory adaptations in subterranean mammals. In: Nevo E, Reig OA (eds) Evolution of subterranean mammals at the organismal and molecular levels. Alan R.Liss, Inc., New York, pp 269–293Google Scholar
  4. Francescoli G (2000) Sensory capabilities and communication in subterranean rodents. In: Patton JL, Cameron GN, Lacey EA (eds) Life underground. The biology of subterranean rodents. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 111–144Google Scholar
  5. Giannoni SM, Marquez R, Borghi CE (1997) Airborne and substrate-borne communications of Microtus (Terricola) gerbei and M. (T.) duodecimcostatus. Acta Theriol 42:123–141Google Scholar
  6. Heth G, Frankenberg E, Nevo E (1986) Adaptive optimal sound for vocal communication in tunnels of a subterranean mammal (Spalax ehrenbergi). Experientia 42:1287–1289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heth G, Frankenberg E, Raz A, Nevo E (1987) Vibrational communication in subterranean mole rats (Spalax ehrenbergi). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:31–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heth G, Frankenberg E, Pratt H, Nevo E (1991) Seismic communication in the blind subterranean mole rat: patterns of head thumping and of their detection in the Spalax ehrenbergi superspecies in Israel. J Zool 224:633–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hill PSM (2008) Vibrational communication in animals. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Jarvis JUM (1969) Some aspects of the biology of East African mole-rats. University of East Africa, Nairobi (unpublished PhD thesis)Google Scholar
  11. Jarvis JUM, Bennett NC (1991) Ecology and behaviour of the family Bathyergidae. In: Sherman PW, Jarvis JUM, Alexander RD (eds) The biology of the naked mole-rat. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, pp 66–96Google Scholar
  12. Jarvis JUM, Sale JB (1971) Burrowing and burrow patterns of East African mole-rats Tachyoryctes, Heliophobius and Heterocephalus. J Zool 163:451–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kimchi T, Reshef M, Terkel J (2005) Evidence for the use of reflected self-generated seismic waves for spatial orientation in a blind subterranean mammal. J Exp Biol 208:647–659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kokiso A, Bekele A (2008) Ecology of mole rats Tachyoryctes splendens and its impact on farmlands at Angacha, Central Ethiopia. Acta Zool Sin 54:30–35Google Scholar
  15. Lange S, Burda H, Wegner RE, Dammann P, Begall S, Kawalika M (2007) Living in a stethoscope: burrow-acoustics promotes auditory specializations in subterranean rodents. Naturwissenschaften 94:134–138Google Scholar
  16. Li JG, Wang TZ, He JP, Min YJ (2001) Seismic communication in subterranean Gansu zokor (Myospalax cansus). Acta Theriol Sin 21:153–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mason MJ, Lai FWS, Li JG, Nevo E (2010) Middle ear structure and bone conduction in Spalax, Eospalax and Tachyoryctes mole-rats (Rodentia: Spalacidae). J Morphol 271:462–472PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Musser GG, Carleton MD (2005) Superfamily Muroidea. In: Wilson E, Reeder DAM (eds) Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 894–1534Google Scholar
  19. Narins PN, Reichman OJ, Jarvis JUM, Lewis ER (1992) Seismic signal transmission between burrows of the Cape mole-rat, Georychus capensis. J Comp Physiol A 170:13–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Narins PM, Lewis ER, Jarvis JUM, O′Riain J (1997) The use of seismic signals by fossorial southern African mammals: a neuroethological gold mine. Brain Res Bull 44:641–646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nowak RM (1999) Walker’s mammals of the world. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, pp 1637–1639Google Scholar
  22. Rado R, Levi N, Hauser H, Witcher J, Alder N, Intrator N, Wollberg Z, Terkel J (1987) Seismic signalling as a means of communication in a subterranean mammal. Anim Behav 35:1249–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Randall JA (1984) Territorial defence and advertisement by footdrumming in banner-tailed kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spectabilis) at high and low population densities. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Randall JA (1989) Territorial defence interactions with neighbors and strangers in banner-tailed kangaroo rats. J Mammal 70:308–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Randall JA (1994) Discrimination of footdrumming signatures by kangaroo rats; Dipodomys spectabilis. Anim Behav 47:263–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Randall JA (1997) Species-specific footdrumming in kangaroo rats: Dipodomys ingens, D. deserti, D. spectabilis. Anim Behav 54:1167–1175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Randall JA (2001) Evolution and function of drumming as communication in mammals. Am Zool 41:1143–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Randall JA, Rogovin KA, Shier DM (2000) Antipredator behaviour of a social desert rodent: footdrumming and alarm calling in the great gerbil, Rhombomys opimus. Beh Ecol Sociobiol 48:110–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sillero-Zubiri C, Tattersall FH, Macdonald DW (1995) Habitat selection and daily activity of giant mole rats (Tachyoryctes macrocephalus): significance to the Ethiopian wolf (Canis simensis) in the Afroalpine ecosystem. Biol Conserv 72:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Šklíba J, Šumbera R, Chitaukali WN (2008) Reactions to disturbances in the context of antipredatory behaviour in a solitary subterranean rodent. J Ethol 26:249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. StatSoft, Inc. (2010) STATISTICA for Windows (Computer program manual). Tulsa, OKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society and Springer Japan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ema Hrouzková
    • 1
  • Veronika Dvořáková
    • 1
  • Petr Jedlička
    • 2
  • Radim Šumbera
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of ScienceUniversity of South BohemiaČeské BudějoviceCzech Republic
  2. 2.Institute of Geophysics ASCRPrague 4Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations