Journal of Ethology

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 331–336 | Cite as

Alternative reproductive modes of Atlantic forest frogs

  • Luís Felipe Toledo
  • Michel V. Garey
  • Thais R. N. Costa
  • Ricardo Lourenço-de-Moraes
  • Marília T. Hartmann
  • Célio F. B. Haddad
Short Communication


Diversity in reproductive modes is well known in amphibians, mainly among anurans, which are characterized by a diversity in breeding biology that exceeds that of any other tetrapod. Currently, 39 reproductive modes are recognized among anurans and some species display more than one mode. The breeding biology of some Brazilian Atlantic forest anurans was investigated for this study. We observed unreported reproductive modes for six species, variability in the reproductive modes of individuals of the same species (whereby some individuals of a given population displayed unusual reproductive modes when the physical conditions of the breeding site were suboptimal), and variations within the modes. These observations suggest possible evolutionary steps for the reproductive modes. Anuran breeding biology seems to be more diverse than previously reported, and a character matrix could be constructed to describe the total range of variation of the anuran reproductive modes.


Reproduction Amphibian Anura Behavioral variation Egg-deposition site 



Two anonymous reviewers provided insightful suggestions in earlier versions of the manuscript. Rogério P. Bastos, José J. Pombal Jr., Tomaz Fumio Takeuchi, and Diogo B. Provete helped with the fieldwork. Ivan Sazima provided unpublished information on Bokermannohyla sp. (aff. circumdata). David Rodriguez helped with English corrections. MVG acknowledges Fundação O Boticário de Proteção à Natureza (convênio FBPN-UFPR 623) for financial support and FAPESP for a fellowship (process: 2008/50575-1). IBAMA provided collecting permits (no. 107/06-RAN). MTH acknowledges Capes and CNPq for fellowships. TRNC thanks Capes for a scholarship. LFT thanks FAPESP (2008/50325-5) for Grants and a scholarship (2008/52847-9). RLM thanks Capes for a scholarship. CFBH thanks FAPESP and CNPq for financial support.


  1. Bastos RP, Pombal JP Jr (1996) A new species Hyla (Anura: Hylidae) from eastern Brazil. Amphibia Reptilia 17:325–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Begon M, Townsend CR, Harper JL (2006) Ecology: from individuals to ecosystems. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchacher CO (1993) Field studies on the small Surinam toad, Pipa arrabali, near Manaus, Brazil. Amphibia Reptilia 14:59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crump ML (2009) Amphibian diversity and life history. In: Dodd CK Jr (ed) Amphibian ecology and conservation: a handbook of techniques. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 3–20Google Scholar
  5. Cruz CAG, Peixoto OL (1985) About the spawn of Physalaemus in an unusual site (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae). Arq Univ Rural Rio Janeiro 8:103–105Google Scholar
  6. Faivovich J (2002) A cladistic analysis of Scinax (Anura: Hylidae). Cladistics 18:367–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frost DR (2011) Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. V 5.5. Available at: American Museum of Natural History, New York. Accessed on 31 January 2011
  8. Haddad CFB, Pombal JP Jr (1998) Redescription of Physalaemus spiniger (Anura: Leptodactylidae) and description of two new reproductive modes. J Herpetol 32:557–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haddad CBF, Prado CPA (2005) Reproductive modes in frogs and their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic forest of Brazil. Bioscience 55:207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haddad CFB, Toledo LF, Prado CPA (2008) Atlantic forest amphibians. Editora Neotropica, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  11. Heyer WR (1969) The adaptive ecology of the species groups of the genus Leptodactylus (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Evolution 23:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leonard JL (2010) Introduction: celebrating and understanding reproductive diversity. In: Leonard JL, Córdoba-Aguilar A (eds) The evolution of primary sexual characters in animals. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  13. Magnusson WE, Hero JM (1991) Predation and the evolution of complex oviposition behaviour in Amazon rainforest frogs. Oecologia 86:310–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miranda DB, Garey MV, Monteiro-Filho ELA, Hartmann MT (2008) Visual signaling and reproductive biology of Dendropsophus werneri (Anura: Hylidae) in an area of Atlantic forest in the state of Paraná, Brazil. Pap Av Zool 48:335–343Google Scholar
  15. Moura MR, Motta AP, Feio RN (2011) An unusual reproductive mode in Hypsiboas (Anura: Hylidae). Zoologia 28:142–144Google Scholar
  16. Pombal JP Jr, Gordo M (1991) Two new species of Hyla from the Atlantic forest in the state of São Paulo (Amphibia, Anura). Mem Inst Butantan 53:135–144Google Scholar
  17. Pupin NC, Gasparini JL, Bastos RP, Haddad CFB, Prado CPA (2010) Reproductive biology of an endemic Physalaemus of the Brazilian Atlantic forest, and the trade-off between clutch and egg size in terrestrial breeders of the P. signifer group. Herpetol J 20:147–156Google Scholar
  18. Salthe SN, Duellman WE (1973) Quantitative constraints associated with reproductive mode in anurans. In: Vial JL (ed) Evolutionary biology of the anurans. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, pp 229–249Google Scholar
  19. Taborsky M, Brockmann HJ (2010) Alternative reproductive tactics and life history phenotypes. In: Kappeler P (ed) Animal behaviour: evolution and mechanisms. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 537–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Taborsky M, Oliveira RF, Brockmann HJ (2008) The evolution of alternative reproductive tactics: concepts and questions. In: Oliveira RF, Taborsky M, Brockmann HJ (eds) Alternative reproductive tactics: an integrative approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Toledo LF, Haddad CFB (2005) Reproductive biology of Scinax fuscomarginatus (Anura, Hylidae) in south-eastern Brazil. J Nat Hist 39:3029–3037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Touchon JC, Warkentin KM (2008) Reproductive mode plasticity: aquatic and terrestrial oviposition in a treefrog. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:7495–7499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society and Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luís Felipe Toledo
    • 1
  • Michel V. Garey
    • 2
    • 3
  • Thais R. N. Costa
    • 2
  • Ricardo Lourenço-de-Moraes
    • 4
  • Marília T. Hartmann
    • 5
  • Célio F. B. Haddad
    • 6
  1. 1.Museu de Zoologia “Prof. Adão José Cardoso”Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP-IB)São PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e ConservaçãoUniversidade Federal do Paraná. Setor de Ciências BiológicasCuritibaBrazil
  3. 3.Departamento de Zoologia e BotânicaUniversidade Estadual PaulistaSão José do Rio PretoBrazil
  4. 4.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da BiodiversidadeUniversidade Estadual de Santa CruzIlhéusBrazil
  5. 5.Universidade Federal do PampaSão GabrielBrazil
  6. 6.Departamento de Zoologia, I.BUniversidade Estadual Paulista, UNESPRio ClaroBrazil

Personalised recommendations