Journal of Ethology

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 115–120 | Cite as

Can the parthenogenetic marbled crayfish Marmorkrebs compete with other crayfish species in fights?

  • Stephanie A. Jimenez
  • Zen Faulkes


The parthenogenetic marbled crayfish, Marmorkrebs, has no known wild population, but has been introduced into natural ecosystems in two continents. Interactions with native crayfish, particularly through fighting, could affect the ecological impact of Marmorkrebs introductions. Marmorkrebs have been characterized anecdotally as having low levels of aggression, which could mitigate their potential to compete with native species. We isolated Marmorkrebs and Louisiana red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii), then conducted size-matched intra and interspecific pairings. Marmorkrebs were as likely to win a fight as P. clarkii, although contests between P. clarkii and Marmorkrebs began significantly faster than contests between two Marmorkrebs. These results suggest that Marmorkrebs have the potential to compete with other species on the same level as P. clarkii, which is itself a highly successful introduced species around the world.


Aggression Crayfish Competition Invasive species Marbled crayfish Marmorkrebs Louisiana red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii 



The project was supported by the National Science Foundation Small Grant for Exploratory Research (award IOS-0813581) and Research Experience for Undergraduates program (award DBI-0649273, supporting S.A.J.). We thank Steffen Harzsch and Silvia Sintoni (Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology) for the gift of Marmorkrebs that started the Faulkes laboratory Marmorkrebs research colony.


  1. Back BS (1995) Replacement of the native crayfish Astacus astacus by the introduced species Pacifastacus leniusculus in a Swedish lake: possible causes and mechanisms. Freshwater Biol 33:291–304. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1995.tb01168.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baird HP, Patullo BW, Macmillan DL (2006) Reducing aggression between freshwater crayfish (Cherax destructor Clark: Decapoda, Parastacidae) by increasing habitat complexity. Aquat Res 37:1419–1428. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2006.01575.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergman DA, Moore PA (2005) Prolonged exposure to social odours alters subsequent social interactions in crayfish (Orconectes rusticus). Anim Behav 70:311–318. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.10.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergman DA, Martin AL, Moore PA (2005) Control of information flow through the influence of mechanical and chemical signals during agonistic encounters by the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. Anim Behav 70:485. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.11.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanke D, Schulz H (2003) Situation des Edelkrebses (Astacus astacus L.) sowie weiterer Flusskrebsarten in Niedersachsen. In: Tagungsbericht der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Limnologie (DGL), Braunschweig, 2002. Werder, DGL, pp 385–389Google Scholar
  6. Bovbjerg RV (1956) Some factors affecting aggressive behavior in crayfish. Physiol Zool 29:127–136Google Scholar
  7. Braband A, Kawai T, Scholtz G (2006) The phylogenetic position of the East Asian freshwater crayfish Cambaroides within the Northern Hemisphere Astacoidea (Crustacea, Decapoda, Astacida) based on molecular data. J Zool Syst Evol Res 44:17–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0469.2005.00338.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breithaupt T, Eger P (2002) Urine makes the difference: chemical communication in fighting crayfish made visible. J Exp Biol 205:1221–1231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Daws AG, Grills J, Konzen K, Moore PA (2002) Previous experiences alter the outcome of aggressive interactions between males in the crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 35:139–148. doi: 10.1080/1023624021000014725 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farca Luna AJ, Hurtado-Zavala JI, Reischig T, Heinrich R (2009) Circadian regulation of agonistic behavior in groups of parthenogenetic marbled crayfish, Procambarus sp. J Biol Rhythm 24:64–72. doi: 10.1177/0748730408328933 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Figler MH, Cheverton HM, Blank GS (1999) Shelter competition in juvenile red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii): the influences of sex differences, relative size, and prior residence. Aquaculture 178:63–75. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00114-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garvey JE, Stein RA, Thomas HM (1994) Assessing how fish predation and interspecific prey competition influence a crayfish assemblage. Ecology 75:532–547. doi: 10.2307/1939556 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gherardi F (2006) Crayfish invading Europe: the case study of Procambarus clarkii. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 39:175–191. doi: 10.1080/10236240600869702 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gherardi F, Daniels WH (2004) Agonism and shelter competition between invasive and indigenous crayfish species. Can J Zool 82:1923–1932. doi: 10.1139/z04-185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gherardi F, Holdich DM (eds) (1999) Crayfish in Europe as alien species: how to make the best of a bad situation? A. A. Belkema, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  16. Graham ME, Herberholz J (2008) Stability of dominance relationships in crayfish depends on social context. Anim Behav 77:195–199. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.09.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guiaşu RC, Dunham DW (1997) Initiation and outcome of agonistic contests in male form I Cambarus robustus Girard, 1852 crayfish (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Crustaceana 70:480–496. doi: 10.1163/156854097X00069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guiaşu RC, Dunham DW (1999) Agonistic contests in male form I Cambarus bartonii bartonii (Fabricius, 1798) (Decapoda, Cambaridae) crayfish and a comparison with contests of the same type in Cambarus robustus Girard, 1852. Crustaceana 72:1079–1091. doi: 10.1163/156854099504031
  19. Hazlett BA, Lawler S, Edney G (2008) Agonistic behavior of the crayfish Euastacus armatus and Cherax destructor. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 40:257–266. doi: 10.1080/10236240701562412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hemsworth R, Villareal W, Patullo BW, Macmillan DL (2007) Crustacean social behavioral changes in response to isolation. Biol Bull 213:187–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Herberholz J, McCurdy C, Edwards DH (2007) Direct benefits of social dominance in juvenile crayfish. Biol Bull 213:21–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hobbs HH Jr (1984) On the distribution of the crayfish genus Procambarus (Decapoda: Cambaridae). J Crust Biol 4:12–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holdich DM, Pöckl M (2007) Invasive crustaceans in European inland waters. In: Gherardi F (ed) Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles. Distribution and threats. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 29–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huber R, Delago A (1998) Serotonin alters decisions to withdraw in fighting crayfish, Astacus astacus: the motivational concept revisited. J Comp Physiol A 182:573–583. doi: 10.1007/s003590050204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huber R, Smith K, Delago A, Isaksson K, Kravitz EA (1997) Serotonin and aggressive motivation in crustaceans: altering the decision to retreat. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 94:5939–5942CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jimenez SA, Faulkes Z (2009) Assessing threat of introduction of the parthenogenetic marbled crayfish Marmorkrebs into North American waters. In: 94th ESA Annual Meeting, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Accessed 5 July 2010
  27. Jimenez SA, Faulkes Z (2010) Establishment and care of a laboratory colony of parthenogenetic marbled crayfish, Marmokrebs. Invert Rearing 1:10–18Google Scholar
  28. Jones JPG, Rasamy JR, Harvey A, Toon A, Oidtmann B, Randrianarison MH, Raminosoa N, Ravoahangimalala OR (2009) The perfect invader: a parthenogenic crayfish poses a new threat to Madagascar’s freshwater biodiversity. Biol Invasions 11:1475–1482. doi: 10.1007/s10530-008-9334-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kawai T, Scholtz G, Morioka S, Ramanamandimby F, Lukhaup C, Hanamura Y (2009) Parthenogenetic alien crayfish (Decapoda: cambaridae) spreading in Madagascar. J Crust Biol 29:562–567. doi: 10.1651/08-3125.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klocker CA, Strayer DL (2004) Interactions among an invasive crayfish (Orconectes rusticus), a native crayfish (Orconectes limosus), and native bivalves (Sphaeriidae and Unionidae). Northeast Nat 11:167–178. doi: 10.1656/1092-6194(2004)011[0167%3AIAAICO]2.0.CO%3B2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lindqvist OV, Huner JV (1999) Life history characteristics of crayfish: what makes some of them good colonizers? In: Gherardi F, Holdich DM (eds) Crayfish in Europe as Alien Species. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 23–30Google Scholar
  32. Lynas J, Storey AW, Knott B (2007) Aggressive interactions between three species of freshwater crayfish of the genus Cherax (Decapoda: Parastacidae). Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 40:105–116. doi: 10.1080/10236240701245539 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marten M, Werth C, Marten D (2004) Der Marmorkrebs (Cambaridae, Decapoda) in Deutschland—ein weiteres Neozoon im Rheineinzugsgebiet. Lauterbornia 50:17–23Google Scholar
  34. Martin P, Kohlmann K, Scholtz G (2007) The parthenogenetic Marmorkrebs (marbled crayfish) produces genetically uniform offspring. Naturwissenschaften 94:843–846. doi: 10.1007/s00114-007-0260-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Marzano FN, Scalici M, Chiesa S, Gherardi F, Piccinini A, Gibertini G (2009) The first record of the marbled crayfish adds further threats to fresh waters in Italy. Aquat Invasions 4:401–404. doi: 10.3391/ai.2009.4.2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moore PA, Bergman DA (2005) The smell of success and failure: The role of intrinsic and extrinsic chemical signals on the social behavior of crayfish. Integr Comp Biol 45:650–657. doi: 10.1093/icb/45.4.650 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Padilla DK, Williams SL (2004) Beyond ballast water: aquarium and ornamental trades as sources of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 2:131–138. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0131:BBWAAO]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pavey CR, Fielder DR (1996) The influence of size differential on agonistic behaviour in the freshwater crayfish Cherax cuspidatus. J Zool 238:445–457. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1996.tb05405.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Robbins M (2009) Owning clones. Tropical Fish Hobbyist 57:72–74Google Scholar
  40. Rubenstein DI, Hazlett BA (1974) Examination of the agonistic behaviour of the crayfish Orconectes virilis by character analysis. Behaviour 50:193–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rutherford PL, Dunham DW, Allison V (1995) Winning agonistic encounters by male crayfish Orconectes rusticus (Girard) (Decapoda, Cambaridae): Chela size matters but chela symmetry does not. Crustaceana 68:526–529. doi: 10.1163/156854095X00764 Google Scholar
  42. Scholtz G, Braband A, Tolley L, Reimann A, Mittmann B, Lukhaup C, Steuerwald F, Vogt G (2003) Parthenogenesis in an outsider crayfish. Nature 421:806-806 doi: 10.1038/421806a Google Scholar
  43. Schroeder L, Huber R (2001) Fight strategies differ with size and allometric growth of claws in crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. Behaviour 138:1437–1449. doi: 10.1163/156853901317367681 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Snedden WA (1990) Determinants of male mating success in the temperate crayfish Orconectes rusticus: Chela size and sperm competition. Behaviour 115:100–113. doi: 10.1163/156853990X00301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stocker AM, Huber R (2001) Fighting strategies in crayfish Orconectes rusticus (Decapoda, Cambaridae) differ with hunger state and the presence of food cues. Ethology 107:727–736. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00705.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tierney AJ, Godleski MS, Massanari JR (2000) Comparative analysis of agonistic behavior in four crayfish species. J Crust Biol 20:54–66. doi: 10.1651/0278-0372(2000)020[0054%3ACAOABI]2.0.CO%3B2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Usio N, Konishi M, Nakano S (2001) Species displacement between an introduced and a ‘vulnerable’ crayfish: The role of aggressive interactions and shelter competition. Biol Invasions 3:179–185. doi: 10.1023/A:1014573915464 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vogt G (2008) The marbled crayfish: a new model organism for research on development, epigenetics and evolutionary biology. J Zool 276:1–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00473.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vogt G, Tolley L, Scholtz G (2004) Life stages and reproductive components of the Marmorkrebs (marbled crayfish), the first parthenogenetic decapod crustacean. J Morphol 261:286–311. doi: 10.1002/jmor.10250 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Vorgurger C, Ribi G (1999) Aggression and competition for shelter between a native and an introduced crayfish in Europe. Freshw Biol 42:111–119. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00465.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zulandt Schneider RA, Schneider RWS, Moore PA (1999) Recognition of dominance status by chemoreception in the red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. J Chem Ecol 25:781–794. doi: 10.1023/A:1020888532513 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zulandt Schneider RA, Huber R, Moore PA (2001) Individual and status recognition in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus: the effects of urine release on fight dynamics. Behaviour 138:137–153. doi: 10.1163/15685390151074348 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zulandt T, Zulandt-Schneider RA, Moore PA (2008) Observing agonistic interactions alters subsequent fighting dynamics in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. Anim Behav 75:13–20. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.04.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society and Springer 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyThe University of Texas-Pan AmericanEdinburgUSA

Personalised recommendations