Journal of Ethology

, 27:185 | Cite as

How does parental role influence the activity and movements of breeding wolves?

  • Hiroshi Tsunoda
  • Roman GulaEmail author
  • Jörn Theuerkauf
  • Sophie Rouys
  • Stephan Radler
  • Bartosz Pirga
  • Julia Eggermann
  • Barbara Brzezowska
Short Communication


We studied the activity and movements of a male and a female wolf during breeding in the Bieszczady Mountains, Poland. The female was less active and mobile and on average closer to the den than the male. The male was less active and mobile when the pack size was seven compared to a year when the pack consisted only of the breeding pair. We conclude that the roles played by breeding males and females rearing pups influence their activity, and that breeding males in larger packs move less during the nursing period because of help by other pack members.


Bieszczady Mountains Canis lupus Feeding helpers Poland Reproduction 



This study was part of the Bieszczady Wolf Project and was funded by the Polish National Committee for Scientific Research (KBN 6P04F 006), and the Museum and Institute of Zoology of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Fellowships were provided by the Japan Student Services Organization (to HT), the German Donors’ Association for the Promotion of Sciences and Humanities (to JT), and the German Academic Exchange Service (to JE). We thank N. Maruyama and K. Perzanowski for their cooperation and L. Aubry, M. Barreteau, M. Carruthers, M. Diemert, S. Drevet, M. Januszczak, S. Kiener, K. Lahongre, M. Le Peutrec, K. Mayer, N. Schmidt, M-C. Schultz, M. Skuban and W. Schwimmer for their help during field work, as well as two anonymous reviewers for useful comments.


  1. Asa CS, Mech LD, Seal US, Plotka ED (1990) The influence of social and endocrine factors on urine-marking by captive wolves (Canis lupus). Horm Behav 24:497–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballard WB, Ayres LA, Gardner CL, Foster JW (1991) Den site activity patterns of gray wolves, Canis lupus, in southcentral Alaska. Can Field Nat 105:497–504Google Scholar
  3. Bernal JF, Packard JM (1997) Differences in winter activity, courtship, and social behavior of two captive family groups of Mexican wolves (Canis lupus baileyi). Zoo Biol 16:435–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ciucci P, Boitani L, Francisci F, Andreoli G (1997) Home range, activity and movements of a wolf pack in central Italy. J Zool 243:803–819Google Scholar
  5. Eggermann J, Gula R, Pirga B, Theuerkauf J, Tsunoda H, Brzezowska B, Rouys S, Radler S (2008) Daily and seasonal variation in wolf activity in the Bieszczady Mountains, SE Poland. Mammal Biol. doi: 10.1016/j.mambio.2008.05.010
  6. Gula R (2008) Wolf depredation on domestic animals in the Polish Carpathian Mountains. J Wildl Manage 72:283–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harrington FH, Mech LD (1982) Patterns of homesite attendance in two Minnesota wolf packs. In: Harrington FH, Paquet PC (eds) Wolves of the world. Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, pp 81–105Google Scholar
  8. Harrington FH, Mech LD, Fritts SH (1983) Pack size and wolf pup survival: their relationship under varying ecological conditions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 13:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jędrzejewski W, Schmidt K, Theuerkauf J, Jędrzejewska B, Okarma H (2001) Daily movements and territory use by radio-collared wolves (Canis lupus) in Białowieża Primeval Forest in Poland. Can J Zool 79:1993–2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaartinen S, Kojola I, Colpaert A (2005) Finnish wolves avoid roads and settlements. Ann Zool Fenn 42:523–532Google Scholar
  11. Kusak J, Skrbinsek AM, Hurber D (2005) Home ranges, movements, and activity of wolves (Canis lupus) in the Dalmatian part of Dinarids, Croatia. Eur J Wildl Res 51:254–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mech LD (1999) Alpha status, dominance, and division of labor in wolf pack. Can J Zool 77:1196–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mech LD, Boitani L (2003) Wolf social ecology. In: Mech D, Boitani L (eds) Wolves: behavior, ecology and conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 1–34Google Scholar
  14. Mech LD, Harper EK (2002) Differential use of a wolf, Canis lupus, pack territory edge and core. Can Field Nat 116:315–316Google Scholar
  15. Mech LD, Philips MK, Smith DW, Kreeger TJ (1995) Denning behavior of non-gravid wolves. Can Field Nat 110:343–345Google Scholar
  16. Mech LD, Wolf PC, Packard JM (1999) Regurgitative food transfer among wild wolves. Can J Zool 77:1192–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Messier F (1985) Solitary living and extraterritorial movements of wolves in relation to social status and prey abundance. Can J Zool 63:239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Packard J (2003) Wolf behavior: reproductive, social and intelligent. In: Mech LD, Boitani L (eds) Wolves: behavior, ecology and conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 35–65Google Scholar
  19. Potvin MJ, Peterson RO, Vucetich JA (2004) Wolf homesite attendance patterns. Can J Zool 82:1512–1518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmidt K, Jędrzejewski W, Theuerkauf J, Kowalczyk R, Okarma H, Jędrzejewska B (2008) Reproductive behaviour of wild-living wolves in Białowieża Primeval Forest (Poland). J Ethol 26:69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Theuerkauf J, Jędrzejewski W (2002) Accuracy of radiotelemetry to estimate wolf activity and locations. J Wildl Manage 66:859–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Theuerkauf J, Jędrzejewski W, Schmidt K, Okarma H, Ruczyński I, Śnieżko S, Gula R (2003a) Daily patterns and duration of wolf activity in the Białowieża forest, Poland. J Mammal 84:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Theuerkauf J, Jędrzejewski W, Schmidt K, Gula R (2003b) Spatiotemporal segregation of wolves from humans in the Białowieża Forest (Poland). J Wildl Manage 67:706–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Theuerkauf J, Gula R, Pirga B, Tsunoda H, Eggermann J, Brzezowska B, Rouys S, Radler S (2007) Human impact on wolf activity in the Bieszczady Mountains, SE Poland. Ann Zool Fenn 44:225–231Google Scholar
  25. Vilà C, Urios V, Castroviejo J (1995) Observations on the daily activity patterns in the Iberian wolf. In: Carbyn LN, Fritts SH, Seip DR (eds) Ecology and conservation of wolves in a changing world (occasional publication series no. 35). Canadian Circumpolar Institute, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada, pp 335–340Google Scholar
  26. Walton LR, Cluff HD, Paquet PC, Ramsay MA (2001) Movement patterns of barren-ground wolves in the central Canadian Arctic. J Mammal 82:867–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ziemen E (1982) A wolf pack sociogram. In: Harrington FH, Paquet PC (eds) Wolves of the world. Noyes Publishers, Park Ridge, NJ, pp 282–322Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society and Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroshi Tsunoda
    • 1
    • 2
  • Roman Gula
    • 3
    • 8
    Email author
  • Jörn Theuerkauf
    • 3
  • Sophie Rouys
    • 4
  • Stephan Radler
    • 5
  • Bartosz Pirga
    • 3
  • Julia Eggermann
    • 6
  • Barbara Brzezowska
    • 7
  1. 1.Wildlife Conservation Laboratory, Graduate School of AgricultureTokyo University of Agriculture and TechnologyTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Laboratory of Water Resource Planning, United Graduate School of Agricultural SciencesTokyo University of Agriculture and TechnologyTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of SciencesWarsawPoland
  4. 4.Conservation Research New CaledoniaNoumeaNew Caledonia
  5. 5.University of Applied Forest Sciences RottenburgRottenburgGermany
  6. 6.Faculty of Biology and BiotechnologyRuhr University BochumBochumGermany
  7. 7.Department of Animal EcologyInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian UniversityKrakowPoland
  8. 8.NoumeaNew Caledonia

Personalised recommendations