How does parental role influence the activity and movements of breeding wolves?
- 270 Downloads
We studied the activity and movements of a male and a female wolf during breeding in the Bieszczady Mountains, Poland. The female was less active and mobile and on average closer to the den than the male. The male was less active and mobile when the pack size was seven compared to a year when the pack consisted only of the breeding pair. We conclude that the roles played by breeding males and females rearing pups influence their activity, and that breeding males in larger packs move less during the nursing period because of help by other pack members.
KeywordsBieszczady Mountains Canis lupus Feeding helpers Poland Reproduction
This study was part of the Bieszczady Wolf Project and was funded by the Polish National Committee for Scientific Research (KBN 6P04F 006), and the Museum and Institute of Zoology of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Fellowships were provided by the Japan Student Services Organization (to HT), the German Donors’ Association for the Promotion of Sciences and Humanities (to JT), and the German Academic Exchange Service (to JE). We thank N. Maruyama and K. Perzanowski for their cooperation and L. Aubry, M. Barreteau, M. Carruthers, M. Diemert, S. Drevet, M. Januszczak, S. Kiener, K. Lahongre, M. Le Peutrec, K. Mayer, N. Schmidt, M-C. Schultz, M. Skuban and W. Schwimmer for their help during field work, as well as two anonymous reviewers for useful comments.
- Ballard WB, Ayres LA, Gardner CL, Foster JW (1991) Den site activity patterns of gray wolves, Canis lupus, in southcentral Alaska. Can Field Nat 105:497–504Google Scholar
- Ciucci P, Boitani L, Francisci F, Andreoli G (1997) Home range, activity and movements of a wolf pack in central Italy. J Zool 243:803–819Google Scholar
- Eggermann J, Gula R, Pirga B, Theuerkauf J, Tsunoda H, Brzezowska B, Rouys S, Radler S (2008) Daily and seasonal variation in wolf activity in the Bieszczady Mountains, SE Poland. Mammal Biol. doi: 10.1016/j.mambio.2008.05.010
- Harrington FH, Mech LD (1982) Patterns of homesite attendance in two Minnesota wolf packs. In: Harrington FH, Paquet PC (eds) Wolves of the world. Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, pp 81–105Google Scholar
- Kaartinen S, Kojola I, Colpaert A (2005) Finnish wolves avoid roads and settlements. Ann Zool Fenn 42:523–532Google Scholar
- Mech LD, Boitani L (2003) Wolf social ecology. In: Mech D, Boitani L (eds) Wolves: behavior, ecology and conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 1–34Google Scholar
- Mech LD, Harper EK (2002) Differential use of a wolf, Canis lupus, pack territory edge and core. Can Field Nat 116:315–316Google Scholar
- Mech LD, Philips MK, Smith DW, Kreeger TJ (1995) Denning behavior of non-gravid wolves. Can Field Nat 110:343–345Google Scholar
- Packard J (2003) Wolf behavior: reproductive, social and intelligent. In: Mech LD, Boitani L (eds) Wolves: behavior, ecology and conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 35–65Google Scholar
- Theuerkauf J, Gula R, Pirga B, Tsunoda H, Eggermann J, Brzezowska B, Rouys S, Radler S (2007) Human impact on wolf activity in the Bieszczady Mountains, SE Poland. Ann Zool Fenn 44:225–231Google Scholar
- Vilà C, Urios V, Castroviejo J (1995) Observations on the daily activity patterns in the Iberian wolf. In: Carbyn LN, Fritts SH, Seip DR (eds) Ecology and conservation of wolves in a changing world (occasional publication series no. 35). Canadian Circumpolar Institute, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada, pp 335–340Google Scholar
- Ziemen E (1982) A wolf pack sociogram. In: Harrington FH, Paquet PC (eds) Wolves of the world. Noyes Publishers, Park Ridge, NJ, pp 282–322Google Scholar