Advertisement

Journal of Ethology

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 157–163 | Cite as

Discrimination of chemical stimuli in conspecific fecal pellets by a visually adept iguanid lizard, Crotaphytus collaris

  • Dustin J. WilgersEmail author
  • Eva A. Horne
Article

Abstract

Iguanid lizards are known for visual acuity and a diminished vomeronasal organ, which has led to mixed conclusions on whether iguanids use chemical cues. The collared lizard, Crotaphytus collaris, is a territorial iguanid that lives in open rocky habitats. Fecal pellets placed prominently on open rocky perches may provide an ideal mechanism for intraspecific chemical signaling. In order to determine whether collared lizards can discriminate between chemical stimuli found in conspecific fecal pellets, we collected 24 males and 25 females to analyze sex-specific behavioral responses via tongue-flicks and a newly observed behavior for the species, gular pumps, to cotton swabs containing water, cologne, chemical stimuli from conspecific male and female fecal pellets, and the lizard’s own fecal pellet. Both sexes were able to discriminate chemical stimuli from water via at least one behavior. Male collared lizards exhibited greater rates of response (tongue-flick and gular pumps) toward male fecal pellets when compared to the negative water control. Our results also suggest individuals may be able to discriminate between fecal pellets, as indicated by generally greater (but non-significant) counts of male tongue-flick responses to male fecal pellets when compared to their own. Collared lizard chemical discrimination appears to utilize tongue-flick and gular pump behaviors, possibly associated with distinct chemosensory modes (vomerolfaction and olfaction). Based on this study, we suggest that chemical signals may play a greater role in intraspecific communication than previously thought in this highly visual lizard.

Keywords

Chemoreception Vomerolfaction Olfaction Tongue-flick Gular pump 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by Kansas State University. Collecting and housing of individuals was conducted under Kansas State University IACUC protocol 2297 and Kansas Wildlife and Parks collecting permits SC-073-2004 and SC-085-2005. Thanks to M. Williamson, S. Tolve, and A. Wilgers for assistance in collection of individuals. Thanks to E. Hebets, R. Willemart, R. Santer, A. Rundus, K. Fowler-Finn, S. Schwartz, M. Adams, and two anonymous reviewers for comments on early versions of the manuscript.

References

  1. Alberts AC (1990) Chemical properties of femoral gland secretions in the desert iguana, Dipsosaurus dorsalis. J Chem Ecol 16:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberts AC (1992) Pheromonal self-recognition in desert iguanas. Copeia 1992:229–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alberts AC, Phillips JA, Werner DI (1993) Sources of intraspecific variability in the protein composition of lizard femoral gland secretions. Copeia 1993:775–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anthony CD (1993) Recognition of conspecific odors by Plethodon caddoensis and P. ouachitae. Copeia 1993:1028–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aragón P, López P, Martín J (2000) Size-dependent chemosensory responses to familiar and unfamiliar conspecific faecal pellets by the Iberian rock-lizard, Lacerta monticola. Ethology 106:1115–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aragón P, López P, Martín J (2001) Chemosensory discrimination of familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics by lizards: implications of field spatial relationships between males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:128–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baird TA (2004) Reproductive coloration in female collared lizards, Crotaphytus collaris, stimulates courtship by males. Herpetologica 60:337–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baird TA, Sloan CL, Timanus DK (2001) Intra- and inter-seasonal variation in the socio-spatial behavior of adult male collared lizards, Crotaphytus collaris (Reptilia, Crotaphytidae). Ethology 107:15–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barbosa D, Desfilis E, Carretero MA, Font E (2005) Chemical stimuli mediate species recognition in Podarcis wall lizards. Amphib-reptil 26:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berry K (1974) The ecology and social behavior of the chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus obesus Baird. Univ Calif Publ Zool 101:1–60Google Scholar
  11. Bull CM, Griffin CL, Johnston GR (1999) Olfactory discrimination in scat-piling lizards. Behav Ecol 10:136–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burger J (1991) Response to prey chemical cues by hatchling pine snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus): effects of incubation temperature and experience. J Chem Ecol 17:1069–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burghardt G (1970) Chemical perception in reptiles. In: Johnston JW Jr, Moulton DG, Turk A (eds) Advances in Chemoreception, vol 1., Communication by chemical signals. Meredith Corp, New York, pp 241–308Google Scholar
  14. Carpenter CC (1975) The ecology and social behavior of the chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus obesus Baird. Copeia 1975:388–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins JT (1993) Amphibians and reptiles in Kansas, 3rd edn. The University of Kansas Natural History Museum, LawrenceGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooper WE Jr (1989) Absence of prey odor discrimination by Iguanid and Agamid lizards in applicator tests. Copeia 1989:472–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cooper WE Jr (1990) Chemical detection of predators by a lizard, the broad-headed skink (Eumeces laticeps). J Exp Zool 256:162–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cooper WE Jr (1998) Evaluation of swab and related tests as a bioassay for assessing responses by squamate reptiles to chemical stimuli. J Chem Ecol 24:841–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cooper WE Jr, Pérez-Mellado V (2002) Pheromonal discriminations of sex, reproductive condition, and species by the lacertid lizard Podarcis hispanica. J Exp Zool 292:523–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cooper WE Jr, DePerno CS, Fox SF (1996) Prey chemical discrimination and strike-induced chemosensory searching in lizards: their absence in a crotaphytid lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) and a proposal for research in zoos. Zoo Biol 15:239–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cooper WE Jr, Ferguson GW, Habegger JJ (2001) Responses to animal and plant chemicals by several iguanian insectivores and the tuatara, Sphenodon punctatus. J Herpetol 35:255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cowles RB, Phelan RL (1958) Olfaction in rattlesnakes. Copeia 1958:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dial BE, Schwenk K (1996) Olfaction and predator detection in Coleonyx brevis (Squamata: Eublepharidae), with comments on the functional significance of buccal pulsing in geckos. J Exp Zool 27:415–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Duvall D (1979) Western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis) chemical signals: I. Conspecific discriminations and release of species-typical visual display. J Exp Zool 210:321–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duvall D (1981) Western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis) chemical signals. II. A replication with naturally breeding adults and a test of the Cowles and Phelan hypothesis of rattlesnake olfaction. J Exp Zool 218:351–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Duvall D, Graves BM, Carpenter GC (1987) Visual and chemical composite signaling effects of Sceloporus fecal boli. Copeia 1987:1028–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Escobar CA, Labra A, Niemeyer HM (2001) Chemical composition of precloacal secretions of Liolaemus lizards. J Chem Ecol 27:1677–1690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Evans LT (1961) Structure as related to behavior in the organization of populations of reptiles. In: Blair WF (ed) Vertebrate speciation. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 148–177Google Scholar
  29. Evans C (2003) Vomeronasal chemoreception in vertebrates: a study of the second nose. Imperial College Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Fitch HS (1956) An ecological study of the collared lizard (Crotaphytus collaris). Univ Kans Nat Hist Publ 8:213–274Google Scholar
  31. Gravelle K, Simon CA (1980) Field observations on the use of tongue-Jacobson’s organ system in two iguanid lizards, Sceloporus jarrovi and Anolis trinitatis. Copeia 1980:356–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hanley KA, Elliott ML, Stamps JA (1999) Chemical recognition of familiar vs. unfamiliar conspecifics by juvenile iguanid lizards, Ctenosaura similis. Ethology 105:641–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Head ML, Keogh JS, Doughty P (2005) Male southern water skinks (Eulamprus heatwolei) use both visual and chemical cues to detect female sexual receptivity. Acta Ethol 8:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hebets EA, Papaj DR (2005) Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:197–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Husak JF, Ackland EN (2003) Foraging mode of the reticulate collared lizard, Crotaphytus reticulatus. Southwest Nat 48:282–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Husak JF, McCoy JK, Fox SF, Baird TA (2004) Is coloration of juvenile male collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris) female mimicry? an experimental test. J Herpetol 38:156–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jackson JF (1990) Evidence for chemosensory-mediated predator avoidance in musk turtles. Copeia 1990:557–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jaeger RG, Gabor CR (1993) Intraspecific chemical communication by a territorial salamander via the postcloacal gland. Copeia 1993:1171–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Johnsen PB, Wellington JL (1982) Detection of glandular secretions by yearling alligators. Copeia 1982:705–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Krebs JR, Davies NB (1993) An introduction to behavioural ecology, 3rd edn. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  41. Labra A (2007) The peculiar case of an insectivorous iguanid lizard that detects chemical cues from prey. Chemoecology 17:103–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Labra A, Beltran S, Niemeyer HM (2001) Chemical exploratory behavior in the lizard Liolaemus bellii. J Herpetol 35:51–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Labra A, Escobar CA, Aguilar PM, Niemeyer HM (2002) Sources of pheromones in the lizard Liolaemus tenuis. Rev Chil Hist Nat 75:141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee JSF, Waldman B (2002) Communication by fecal chemosignals in an archaic frog Leiopelma hamiltoni. Copeia 2:679–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Léna JP, de Fraipont M (1998) Kin recognition in the common lizard. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. López P, Martín J (2005) Intersexual differences in chemical composition of precloacal gland secretions of the amphisbaenian Blanus cinerus. J Chem Ecol 31:2913–2921PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. López P, Aragón P, Martín J (1998) Iberian rock lizards (Lacerta monticola cyreni) assess conspecific information using composite signals from faecal pellets. Ethology 104:809–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. López P, Aragón P, Martín J (2003) Responses of female lizards, Lacerta monticola, to males’ chemical cues reflect their mating preference for older males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Macedonia JM, Husak JF, Brandt YM, Lappin AK, Baird TA (2004) Sexual dichromatism and color conspicuousness in three populations of collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris) from Oklahoma. J Herpetol 38:340–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Madison DM (1977) Chemical communication in amphibians and reptiles. In: Müller-Schwarze D, Mozell MM (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates. Plenum Press, New York, pp 135–168Google Scholar
  51. Maksimowich DS, Mathis A (2001) Pheromonal markers as indicators of parasite load: parasite-mediated behavior in salamanders (Plethodon angusticlavius). Acta Ethol 3:83–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mathis A (1990) Territorial salamanders assess sexual and competitive information using chemical signals. Anim Behav 40:953–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mullin SJ, Imbert H, Fish JM, Ervin EL, Fisher RN (2004) Snake (Colubridae: Thamnophis) predatory responses to chemical cues from native and introduced prey species. Southwest Nat 49:449–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Parcher SR (1974) Observations on the natural histories of six Malagasy Chameleontidae. Z Tierpsychol 34:500–523Google Scholar
  55. Simon CA, Moakley GP (1985) Chemoreception in Sceloporus jarrovi: does olfaction activate the vomeronasal system? Copeia 1985:239–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van Damme R, Quick K (2001) Use of predator chemical cues by three species of lacertid lizards (Lacerta bedriagae, Podarcis tiliguerta, and Podarcis sicula). J Herpetol 35:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Van Damme R, Bauwens D, Thoen C, Vanderstighelen D, Verheyen R (1995) Responses of naïve lizards to predator chemical cues. J Herpetol 29:38–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Weldon PJ, Brinkmeier WG, Fortunato H (1992) Gular pumping responses by juvenile American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis) to meat scents. Chem Senses 17:79–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society and Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of BiologyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations