Advertisement

Journal of Ethology

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 375–381 | Cite as

Seasonal and diurnal use of eight different call types by Indian peafowl (Pavo cristatus)

  • Mariko Takahashi
  • Toshikazu Hasegawa
Article

Abstract

The vocal displays of male Indian peafowl (Pavo cristatus) are thought to be sexually selected traits. To clarify the specific call types involved in breeding, as well as to provide basic information on the vocalisations of Indian peafowl, we conducted monthly daytime recordings in a large feral population in Japan. Based on 13,420 records, we identified seven different call types made only by males and six alarm calls uttered by both sexes. Furthermore, we found seasonal and diurnal changes in the calling activity of peafowl. Three of the male call types (keow, ka and hoot-call) were particularly important for breeding, as sexually mature males produced them only during the breeding season, in a similar diurnal pattern to other breeding behaviours. A digital video image relating to the article is available at http://www.momo-p.com/showdetail-e.php?movieid=momo061010ip01b.

Keywords

Call Breeding Indian peafowl Pavo cristatus Seasonality Sexual selection 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Hideyo Tsutsumi and the staff of Izu Cactus Park for providing facilities and information. We also thank two anonymous referees and Eri Honda-Sumi for their valuable suggestions aimed at improving this article.

References

  1. Beani L, Briganti F, Campanella G, Lupo C, Dessì-Fulgheri F (2000) Effect of androgens on structure and rate of crowing in the Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). Behaviour 137:417–435Google Scholar
  2. Galusha JG, Redd JM (1992) Population structure and daytime behavior of Indian peafowl (Pavo cristatus) on Protection island, Jefferson County, Washington. Pavo 30:75–86Google Scholar
  3. Galusha JG Jr, Hill LM Jr (1996) A study of the behaviour of Indian peacocks on Protection island, Jefferson County, Washington, USA. Pavo 34:23–31Google Scholar
  4. Hillgarth N (1984) Social organisation of wild peafowl in India. J World Pheasant Assoc 9:47–56Google Scholar
  5. Johnsingh AJT, Murali S (1978) The ecology and behaviour of the Indian peafowl (Pavo cristatus) Linn. of Injar. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 75:1069–1079Google Scholar
  6. Louchart A (2003) A true peafowl in Africa. S Afr J Sci 99:368–371Google Scholar
  7. Loyau A, Jalme MS, Sorci G (2005) Intra- and intersexual selection for multiple traits in the peacock (Pavo cristatus). Ethology 111:810–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Petrie M, Halliday T, Sanders C (1991) Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains. Anim Behav 41:323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Petrie M, Hall M, Halliday T, Budgey H, Pierpoint C (1992) Multiple mating in a lekking bird: why do peahens mate with more than one male and with the same male more than once? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31: 349-358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rands MRW, Ridley MW, Lelliotti AD (1984) The social organization of feral peafowl. Anim Behav 32: 830–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ridley MW, Lelliott AD, Rands MRW (1984) The courtship display of feral peafowl. World Pheasant Assoc 9:57–68Google Scholar
  12. Takahashi M, Arita H, Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M, Hasegawa T (2007) Peahens do not prefer peacocks with more elaborate trains. Anim Behav (in press) doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.10.004
  13. Yasmin S, Yahya HSA (1996) Correlates of mating success in Indian peafowl. Auk 113:490–492Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society and Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Arts and SciencesThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations