Journal of Ethology

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 195–199 | Cite as

Maintenance of pair bond during the non-reproductive season in a monogamous pipefish Corythoichthys haematopterus

  • Atsushi Sogabe
  • Yasunobu Yanagisawa
Short Communication


During the non-reproductive season, male and female Corythoichthys haematopterus came to a particular site every early morning and performed a series of displays, called greetings, for a few minutes. After exchanging greetings, they had no further interactions during the daytime. This behavioural pattern was basically the same as that observed during the reproductive season. All greeting pairs bred in the following reproductive season if both members were present. These results indicate that mate fidelity of this pipefish is very high and that daily greetings lasting only a few minutes were enough to maintain pair bond all year around.


Corythoichthys haematopterus Greeting Monogamy Non-reproductive season Pair bond Syngnathidae 



We thank members of the UWA Marine Institute for their assistance with our fieldwork and S. Yabuta for useful information on the subject. T.W. Miller and M. Inoue kindly read an early draft of the manuscript.


  1. Barlow GW (1984) Patterns of monogamy among teleost fishes. Arch Fisch Wiss 35:75–123Google Scholar
  2. Black JM (1996) Introduction: pair bonds and partnerships. In: Black JM (ed) Partnerships in birds: the study of monogamy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–20Google Scholar
  3. Bull CM (2000) Monogamy in lizards. Behav Process 51:7–20. doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00115-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Driscoll JW, Driscoll JL (1988) Pair behavior and spacing in butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae). Environ Biol Fishes 22:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fricke HW (1986) Pair swimming and mutual partner guarding in monogamous butterflyfish (Pisces, Chaetodontidae): a joint advertisement for territory. Ethology 73:307–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gronell AM (1984) Courtship, spawning and social organization of the pipefish, Corythoichthys intestinalis (Pisces: Syngnathidae) with notes on twocongeneric species. Z Tierpsychol 65:1–24Google Scholar
  7. Gunnarsson TG, Gill JA, Sigurbjornsson T, Sutherland WJ (2004) Pair bond: arrival synchrony in migratory birds. Nature 431:646. doi: 10.1038/431646a PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hall ML (1999) The importance of pair duration and biparental care to reproductive success in the monogamous Australian magpie-lark. Aust J Zool 47:439–454. doi: 10.1071/ZO99037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hogstad O (1992) Mate protection in alpha pairs of wintering willow tits, Parus montanus. Anim Behav 43:323–328. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80227-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hogstad O (1995) Alarm calling by willow tits, Parus montanus, as mate investment. Anim Behav 49:221–225. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80170-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kellam JS (2003) Pair bond maintenance at roost sites by pileated woodpeckers during autumn. Wilson Bull 115:186–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kleiman D (1977) Monogamy in mammals. Q Rev Biol 52:39–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Masonjones HD, Lewis SM (1996) Courtship behavior in the dwarf seahorse, Hippocampus zosterae. Copeia 1996:634–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Matsumoto K, Yanagisawa Y (2001) Monogamy and sex role reversal in the pipefish Corythoichthys haematopterus. Anim Behav 61:163–170. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1550 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Reichard UH, Boesch C (2003) Monogamy: mating strategies and partnerships in birds, humans, and other mammals. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Scott DK (1980) Functional aspects of the pair bond in Bewick’s swans (Cygnus columbianus bewickii). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:323–327. doi: 10.1007/BF00300673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sogabe A, Yanagisawa Y (2007) The function of daily greetings in a monogamous pipefish Corythoichthys haematopterus. J Fish Biol 71:585–595. doi: 10.1111/j.1095.8649.2007.01523.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sogabe A, Matsumoto K, Yanagisawa Y (2007) Mate change reduces the reproductive rate of males in a monogamous pipefish Corythoichthys haematopterus. Ethology 113:764–771. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01370.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Takegaki T (2001) Pairing behavior and parental care in the mound-building goby: tactics in monogamous mating. In: Kuwamura T, Karino K (eds) Social behavior of fishes, vol 1. Kaiyusha Publ, Tokyo, pp 115–152Google Scholar
  20. Vincent ACJ (1995) A role for daily greetings in maintaining seahorse pair bonds. Anim Behav 49:258–260. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472 (95)80178-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vincent ACJ, Sadler LM (1995) Faithful pair bonds in wild seahorses, Hippocampus whitei. Anim Behav 50:1557–1569. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80011-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Watanabe S, Watanabe Y, Okiyama M (1997) Monogamous mating and conventional sex roles in Hippichthys penicillus (Syngnathidae) under laboratory conditions. Ichthyol Res 44:306–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Whiteman EA, Côté IM (2004) Monogamy in marine fishes. Biol Rev 79:351–375. doi: 10.1017/S1464793103006304 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wickler W, Seibt U (1981) Monogamy in crustacean and man. Z Tierpsychol 57:215–234Google Scholar
  25. Wittenberger JF, Tilson RL (1980) The evolution of monogamy: hypotheses and evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:197–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Woods CMC, Martin-Smith KM (2004) Visible implant fluorescent Elastomer tagging of the big-bellied seahorse, Hippocampus abdominalis. Fish Res 66:363–371. doi: 10.1016/S0165-7836(03)00183-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yabuta S (2007) Social groupings in 18 species of butterflyfish and pair bond weakening during the nonreproductive season. Ichthyol Res 54:207–210. doi: 10.1007/s10228-006-0391-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society and Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Science and EngineeringEhime UniversityMatsuyamaJapan
  2. 2.Department of BiologyEhime UniversityMatsuyamaJapan

Personalised recommendations