Journal of Ethology

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 207–212

Workers of the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata do not perceive their queen across a wire mesh partition

  • A. Sumana
  • Sujata A. Deshpande
  • Anindita Bhadra
  • Raghavendra Gadagkar
Article

Abstract

Queens of primitively eusocial wasps generally have active and behaviourally dominant queens who use physical aggression to suppress worker reproduction. Although a Ropalidia marginata queen is strikingly docile and behaviourally non-dominant, she is completely successful in maintaining reproductive monopoly. R. marginata queens must achieve such reproductive monopoly by some means other than overt physical aggression. Upon loss or removal of the queen, one of the workers (referred to as the potential queen) becomes extremely aggressive and will eventually go on to become the next queen of the colony, if the original queen is not returned. The fact that potential queens are not discernible in the presence of the queen but become obvious within minutes after removal of the queen raises the question of how workers in general and the potential queens in particular, perceive the presence or absence of their queens. Here, we have conducted experiments in which we separate half of the workers from their queen by a wire mesh screen and study their behavioural response to such separation. We demonstrate that the presence of the queen is not perceived across the wire mesh screen, which suggests that if the queen uses a pheromone to signal her presence, then that pheromone is not very volatile.

Keywords

Ropalidia marginata Primitively eusocial wasp Potential queen Dominance behaviour Non-volatile pheromone 

References

  1. Bhadra A, Iyer PL, Sumana A, Deshpande SA, Ghosh S, Gadagkar R (2007) How do workers of the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata detect the presence of their queens? J Theore Biol 246:574–582. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.01.007 Google Scholar
  2. Chandrashekara K, Gadagkar R (1991) Behavioural castes, dominance and division of labour in a primitively eusocial wasp. Ethology 87:269–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cuvillier-Hot V, Cobb M, Malosse C, Peeters C (2001) Sex, age and ovarian activity affect cuticular hydrocarbons in Diacamma ceylonense, a queenless ant. J Insect Physiol 47:485–493. doi:10.1016/S0022-1910(00)00137-2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dani FR, Jones GR, Turillazzi S (1992) Abdomen stroking behaviour and its possible functions in Polistes dominulus (Christ) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Behav Proc 28:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dapporto L, Fondelli L, Turillazzi S (2006) Nestmate recognition and identification of cuticular hydrocarbons composition in the swarm founding paper wasp Ropalidia opifex. Biochem Sys Eco 34:617–625. doi:10.1016/j.bse.2006.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Biseau J-C, Passera L, Daloze D, Aron S (2004) Ovarian activity correlates with extreme changes in cuticular hydrocarbon profile in the highly polygynous ant Linepithema humile. J Insect Physiol 50:585–593. doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2004.04.005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deshpande SA, Sumana A, Surbeck M, Gadagkar R (2006) Wasp who would be queen: a comparative study of two primitively eusocial species. Curr Sci 91(3):332–336Google Scholar
  8. D’Ettorre P, Heinze J, Schulz C, Francke W, Ayasse M (2004) Does she smell like a queen? Chemoreception of a cuticular hydrocarbon signal in the ant Pachycondyla inversa. J Exp Biol 207:1085–1091. doi:10.1242/jeb.00865PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dietemann V, Peeters C, Liebig J, Thivet V, Hölldobler B (2003) Cuticular hydrocarbons mediate discrimination of reproductives and nonreproductives in the ant Myrmecia gulosa. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 100(18):10341–10346. doi:10.1073_pnas.1834281100Google Scholar
  10. Dietemann V, Liebig J, Hölldobler B, Peeters C (2005) Changes in the cuticular hydrocarbons of incipient reproductives correlate with triggering of worker policing in the bulldog ant Myrmecia gulosa. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:486–496. doi:10.1007/s00265-005-0939-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Downing HA, Jeanne RL (1985) Communication of status in the social wasp Polistes fuscatus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Z Tierpsychol 67:78–96Google Scholar
  12. Endler A, Liebig J, Hölldobler B (2006) Queen fertility, egg marking and colony size in the ant Camponotus floridanus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:490–499. doi:10.1007/s00265-005-0073-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fletcher DJC, Ross KG (1985) Regulation of reproduction in eusocial hymenoptera. Ann Rev Entomol 30:319–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gadagkar R (2001) The social biology of Ropalidia marginata: toward understanding the evolution of eusociality. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Gobin B, Billen J, Peeters C (1999) Policing behaviour towards virgin egg layers in a polygynous ponerine ant. Anim Behav 58:1117–1122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hannonen M, Sledge MF, Turillazzi S, Sundström L (2002) Queen reproduction, chemical signalling and worker behaviour in polygyne colonies of the ant Formica fusca. Anim Behav 64:477–485. doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.4001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heinze J, Stengl B, Sledge MF (2002) Worker rank, reproductive status and cuticular hydrocarbon signature in the ant Pachycondyla cf. inversa. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:59–65. doi:10.1007/s00265-002-0491-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kardile SP, Gadagkar R (2002) Docile sitters and active fighters in paper wasps: a tale of two queens. Naturwissenschaften 89:176–179. doi:10.1007/s00114-002-0306-2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klobuchar EA, Deslippe RJ (2002) A queen pheromone induces workers to kill sexual larvae in colonies of the red imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Naturwissenschaften 89:302–304. doi:10.1007/s00114-002-0331-1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liebig J, Peeters C, Hölldobler B (1999) Worker policing limits the number of reproductives in a ponerine ant. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1865–1870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liebig J, Peeters C, Oldham NJ, Markstädter C, Hölldobler B (2000) Are variations in cuticular hydrocarbons of queens and workers a reliable signal of fertility in the ant Harpegnathos saltator? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:4124–4131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Monnin T, Malosse C, Peeters C (1998) Solid-phase microextraction and cuticular hydrocarbon differences related to reproductive activity in queenless ant Dinoponera quadriceps. J Chem Ecol 24:473–490. doi:10.1023/A:1022360718870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Premnath S, Sinha A, Gadagkar R (1996) Dominance relationships in the establishment of reproductive division of labour in a primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:125–132. doi:10.1007/s002650050274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reeve HK (1991) Polistes In: Ross KG, Matthews RW (eds) The social biology of wasps. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 99–148Google Scholar
  25. Sledge MF, Boscaro F, Turillazzi S (2001a) Cuticular hydrocarbons and reproductive status in the social wasp Polistes dominulus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:401–409. doi:10.1007/s002650000311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sledge MF, Peeters C, Crewe RM (2001b) Reproductive division of labour without dominance interactions in the queenless ponerine ant Pachycondyla (Ophthalmopone) berthoudi. Insectes Sociaux 48:67–73. doi:10.1007/PL00001748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sumana A, Gadagkar R (2001) The structure of dominance hierarchies in the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata. Ethol Ecol Evol 13:273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sumana A, Gadagkar R (2003) Ropalidia marginata–a primitively eusocial wasp society headed by behaviourally non-dominant queens. Curr Sci 84(11):1464–1468Google Scholar
  29. Tibbetts EA (2002) Visual signals of individual identity in the wasp Polistes fuscatus. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1423–1428. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tibbetts EA, Dale J (2004) A socially enforced signal of quality in a paper wasp. Nature 432:218–222. doi:10.1038/nature02949PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tsuji K, Egashira K, Hölldobler B (1999) Regulation of worker reproduction by direct physical contact in the ant Diacamma sp. from Japan. Anim Behav 58:337–343. doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Turillazzi S, Sledge MF, Dapporto L, Landi M, Fanelli D, Fondelli L, Zanetti P, Dani FR (2004) Epicuticular lipids and fertility in primitively social wasps (Hymenoptera: Stenogastrinae). Physiol Entomol 29:464–471. doi:10.1111/j.0307–6962.2004.00418.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Turillazzi S, Dapporto L, Pansolli C, Boulay R, Dani FR, Moneti G, Pieraccini G (2006) Habitually used hibernation sites of paper wasps are marked with venom and cuticular peptides. Curr Biol 16 (14):R530–R531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Hooser CA, Gamboa GJ, Fishwild TG (2002) The function of the abdominal stroking in the paper wasp Polistes fuscatus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Ethol Ecol Evol 14:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. West-Eberhard MJ (1969) The social biology of polistine wasps. Misc Publ Mus Zool Univ Mich 140:1–101Google Scholar
  36. West-Eberhard MJ (1977) The establishment of reproductive dominance in social wasp colonies. In: Proceedings of the 8th international congress international union study of social insects, Wageningen, pp 223–227Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society and Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Sumana
    • 1
  • Sujata A. Deshpande
    • 1
  • Anindita Bhadra
    • 1
  • Raghavendra Gadagkar
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Ecological SciencesIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Evolutionary and Organismal Biology UnitJawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific ResearchBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations