Journal of Ethology

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 93–98 | Cite as

Different female mating rates in different populations do not reflect the benefits the females gain from polyandry in the adzuki bean beetle

  • Gen SakuraiEmail author
  • Eiiti Kasuya


The question why females in many species mate with several males (polyandry) has engaged the interest of evolutionary biologists for many years, and many studies have been conducted on the nature of the benefits that the females gain from polyandry. To understand the variation of female mating rates among species and populations it is indispensable to test the prediction that females of more polyandrous populations experience larger fitness benefit than those of less polyandrous populations. We compared the fitness components of two strains of the adzuki bean beetle Callosobruchus chinensis that have genetically different female mating rates. We measured the number of hatched eggs of once-copulated females and twice-copulated females in each strain. The statistical interaction for the number of hatched eggs between the number of matings and strains was determined. The increase in the number of hatched eggs is larger for the lower mating-rate strain than for the higher mating rate strain. This means that females of the lower mating-rate strain would have larger fitness gain from polyandry than those of the higher mating-rate strain. The actual mating rates of females did not reflect female interests in adzuki bean beetles, suggesting they are affected by sexual conflict.


Sexual conflict Mating rate Polyandry Multiple mating Population Adzuki been beetle 



Professor Tetsukazu Yahara provided valuable advice and criticism throughout the study. Professor Takahisa Miyatake and Doctor Tomohiro Harano provided laboratory strains of the adzuki bean beetle for this study, and valuable advice. Takashi Kuriwada made comments on the manuscript. This study was in part supported by a Grant-in-Aid of Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Nos. 16370013 and 16370045) to Eiiti Kasuya. We would like to thank our colleagues at the Laboratory of Ecology, Kyushu University for help and encouragement.


  1. Arnqvist G, Nilsson T (2000) The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim Behav 60:145-164. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1446 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368Google Scholar
  4. Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1998) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic , San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapman T, Arnqvist G, Bangham J, Rowe L (2003) Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol 18:41–47. doi: 10.1016/S0169–5347(02)00004–6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gwynne DT (1997) The evolution of edible ‘sperm sacs’ and other forms of courtship feeding in crickets, katydids and their kin (Orthoptera: Ensifera). In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 110–129Google Scholar
  7. Harano T, Miyatake T (2005) Heritable variation in polyandry in Callosobruchus chinensis. Anim Behav 70:299–304. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.10.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harano T, Yasui Y, Miyatake T (2006) Direct effects of polyandry on female fitness in Callosobruchus chinensis. Anim Behav 71:539–548. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.05.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harano T, Miyatake T (2006) Interpopulation variation in female re-mating is attributable to female and male effects in Callosobruchus chinensis. J Ethol (in press). doi: 10.1007/s10164-006-0204-8
  10. Hosken DJ, Stockley P (2003) Benefits of polyandry: a life history perspective. Evol Biol 33:173–194Google Scholar
  11. Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 75:21–64. doi: 10.1017/S0006323199005423 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kasuya E (2001) Mann–Whitney U test when variances are unequal. Anim Behav 61:1247–1249. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2001.1691 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miyatake T, Matsumura F (2004) Intra-specific variation in female re-mating in Callosobruchus chinensis and C. maculatus. J Insect Physiol 50:403–408. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2004.02.007 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Newcomer SD, Zeh JA, Zeh DW (1999) Genetic benefits enhance the reproductive success of polyandrous females. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:10236–10241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Parker GA (1979) Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insect. Academic, New York, pp 123–166Google Scholar
  16. R Development Core Team (2006) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  17. Ridley M (1988) Mating frequency and fecundity in insects. Biol Rev 63:509–549Google Scholar
  18. Rönn J, Katvala M, Arnqvist G (2006) The costs of mating and egg production in Callosobruchus seed beetles. Anim Behav 72:335–342. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.10.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Torres-Vila LM, Rodíguez-Molina MC, Jennions MD (2004) Polyandry and fecundity in the Lepidoptera: can methodological and conceptual approaches bias outcomes? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:315–324. doi: 10.1007/s00265-003-0712-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tregenza T, Wedell N (1998) Benefits of multiple mates in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Evolution 52:1726–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tregenza T, Wedell N (2002) Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature 415:71–73. doi: 10.1038/415071a PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Utida S (1941a) Studies on experimental population of the azuki bean weevil, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.). I. Mem Coll Agr, Kyoto Imp Univer 48:1–31Google Scholar
  23. Utida S (1941b) Studies on experimental population of the azuki bean weevil, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.). IV. Mem Coll Agr, Kyoto Imp Univer 51:1–26Google Scholar
  24. Vahed K (1998) The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies. Biol Rev 73:43–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yanagi S, Miyatake T (2003) Costs of mating and egg production in female Callosobruchus chinensis. J Insect Physiol 49:823-827. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1910 (03)00119-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yasui Y (1997) A “good-sperm” model can explain the evolution of costly multiple mating by females. Am Nat 149:573–584. doi: 10.1086/286006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yasui Y (1998) The ‘genetic benefits’ of female multiple mating reconsidered. Trends Ecol Evol 13:246–250. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01383–4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zeh JA, Zeh DW (1996) The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1711–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zeh JA, Zeh DW (1997) The evolution of polyandry II: post-copulatory defences against genetic incompatibility. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:69–75. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society and Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceKyushu-UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations