Advertisement

Journal of Ethology

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 305–307 | Cite as

A new record of amphisexual care in an insect with exclusive paternal care: Rhynocoris tristis (Heteroptera: Reduviidae)

  • Christy A. Beal
  • Douglas W. Tallamy
Article

Abstract

We describe the first record of amphisexual care in an insect with uniparental male care. Male Rhynocoris tristis are noted for aggressively guarding multiple egg masses. When a male is unable or unwilling to guard eggs, a female that has previously contributed eggs returns to the egg mass and defends it until the eggs hatch. We compared the frequency and intensity of parental aggression in both sexes and found no difference in either form of guarding behavior. Evidence of amphisexual care in R. tristis provides an opportunity to quantify the cost of care in both sexes within a single species.

Keywords

Heteroptera Rhynocoris tristis Reduviidae Facultative care Amphisexual care Paternal care 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Lisa Thomas for encouraging us to continue her work on Rhynocoris tristis after she left science, Dr. Cyprian Ebong for facilitating our studies at the Namulonge Agricultural and Animal Production Research Institute, Uganda, and the University of Delaware Research Expeditions fund for financing our trip to Uganda.

References

  1. Balshine-Earn S, Earn DJD (1997) An evolutionary model of parental care in St. Peter’s fish. J Theor Biol 184:423–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourne GR (1998) Amphisexual parental behavior of a terrestrial breeding frog Eleutherodactylus johnstonei in Guyana. Behav Ecol 9:1–7Google Scholar
  3. Dawkins R, Carlisle TR (1976) Parental investment, mate desertion and a fallacy. Nature 262:131–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gross MR, Sargent RC (1985) The evolution of male and female parental care in fishes. Am Zool 25:807–822Google Scholar
  5. Kaitala A, Mappes J (1992) Evolution of parental care in insects. Luonnon Tutkija 96:158–162Google Scholar
  6. Machado G, Oliveira PS (1998) Reproductive biology of the neotropical harvestman (Goniosoma longipes) (Arachnida, Opiliones: Gonyleptidae): mating and oviposition behaviour, brood mortality, and parental care. J Zool 246:359–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Manica A, Johnstone RA (2004) The evolution of paternal care with overlapping broods. Am Nat 164:517–530CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Maynard Smith J (1977) Parental investment: a prospective analysis. Anim Behav 25:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Odhiambo TR (1959) An account of parental care in Rhinocoris albopilosus Signoret (Hemiptera-Heteroptera: Reduviidae), with notes on life history. Proc R Entomol Soc London Ser A 34:175–185Google Scholar
  10. Queller DC (1997) Why do females care more than males? Proc R Soc Biol Sci B 264:1555–1557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ridley M (1978) Paternal care. Anim Behav 26:904–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tallamy DW (2001) Evolution of exclusive paternal care in arthropods. Ann Rev Entomol 46:139–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tallamy DW, Wood TK (1986) Convergence patterns in subsocial insects. Ann Rev Entomol 31:369–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Thomas L (1994) The evolution of parental care in assassin bugs. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, Queens College, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. Thomas LK, Manica A (2003) Filial cannibalism in an assassin bug. Anim Behav 66:205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Thomas LK, Manica A (2005) Intrasexual competition and mate choice in assassin bugs with uniparental male and female care. Anim Behav 69:275–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell BC (eds) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago, pp 1871–1971Google Scholar
  18. Wade M, Shuster S (2002) The evolution of parental care in the context of sexual selection: a critical reassessment of parental investment theory. Am Nat 160:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wells KD (1981) Parental behavior of male and female frogs. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW (eds) Natural selection and social behavior. Chiron, New York, pp 184–197Google Scholar
  20. Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  21. Zeh DW, Smith RL (1985) Paternal investment by terrestrial arthropods. Am Zool 25:785–805Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society and Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Entomology and Wildlife EcologyUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations