Journal of Ethology

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 5–11

Synchronous diving behavior of Adélie penguins

  • Akinori Takahashi
  • Katsufumi Sato
  • Jun Nishikawa
  • Yutaka Watanuki
  • Yasuhiko Naito
Video Article

Abstract

Synchronizing behavior with other conspecifics has been suggested as serving a function of increased foraging efficiency. However, the potential costs associated with synchronization of behavior have rarely been studied. Adélie penguins Pygoscelis adeliae sometimes dive synchronously in small open waters surrounded by fast sea ice. We examined the diving behavior of three couples and one trio, which were observed to dive synchronously among groups of 12–47 birds for 1.7–4.5 h duration, with time-depth recorders. Timing of diving and surfacing differed slightly between individuals, and one bird tended to initiate diving earlier than the other. Although the duration of the dives differed only slightly between these birds, the maximum depth of the dives differed to a large extent, with one member tending to dive consistently deeper than the other bird in two out of the four cases. Vertical distances between tagged birds in the undulatory phases of the dives (presumed feeding time) were greater than those in the descent and ascent phases, suggesting independent foraging by group members. Duration of the undulatory phase of the dives tended to be shorter in deeper-diving individuals than the others in the synchronously diving group, suggesting a potential cost of reduced feeding time to synchronize diving and surfacing with other birds. A digital video image relating to the article is available at http://www.momo-p.com/showdetail-e.php?movieid=momo030605pa01a.

Keywords

Foraging behavior Group foraging Individual differences Synchrony 

References

  1. Ainley DG (1972) Flocking in Adélie penguins. Ibis 114:388–390Google Scholar
  2. Ainley DG (2002) The Adélie penguin: bellwether of climate change. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bannasch R, Wilson RP, Culik B (1994) Hydrodynamic aspects of design and attachment of a back-mounted device in penguins. J Exp Biol 194:83–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beauchamp G (1998) The effects of group size on mean food intake rate in birds. Biol Rev 73:449–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beauchamp G (2002) Higher-level evolution of intraspecific flock-feeding in birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:480–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bélisle M (1998) Foraging group size: models and a test with jaegers kleptoparasitizing terns. Ecology 79:1922–1938Google Scholar
  7. Cobley ND, Bell G (1998) Weddell seal (Leptonychotes weddellii) feeding on gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua). Mar Mamm Sci 14:881–883Google Scholar
  8. Conradt L, Roper TJ (2000) Activity synchrony and social cohesion: a fission-fusion model. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:2213–2218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Endo Y, Asari H, Watanuki Y, Kato A, Kuroki M, Nishikawa J (2002) Biological characteristics of euphausiids preyed upon by Adélie penguins in relation to sea ice condition in Lützow-Holm Bay, Antarctica. Polar Biol 25:730–738Google Scholar
  10. Götmark F, Winkler DW, Andersson M (1986) Flock-feeding on fish schools increases individual success in gulls. Nature 319:589–591PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hiruki LM, Schwartz MK, Boveng PL (1999) Hunting and social behaviour of leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) at Seal Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. J Zool 249:97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. McMahon BF, Evans RM (1992) Foraging strategies of American white pelicans. Behaviour 120:69–89Google Scholar
  14. Mori Y (1998) Optimal choice of foraging depth in divers. J Zool 245:279–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Naito Y (1997) Development of micro data tag for study of free-ranging marine animals. Mem Fac Fish Hokkaido Univ Spec Edn 44:31–34Google Scholar
  16. O’Brien DP (1987) Direct observations of the behavior of Euphausia superba and Euphausia crystallorophias (Crustacea: Euphausiacea) under pack ice during the Antarctic spring of 1985. J Crust Biol 7:437–448Google Scholar
  17. Rogers T, Bryden MM (1995) Predation of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) by leopard seals (Hyrurga leptonyx) in Prydz Bay, Antarctica. Can J Zool 73:1001–1004Google Scholar
  18. Ropert-Coudert Y, Kato A, Baudat J, Bost C-A, Le Maho Y, Naito Y (2001) Feeding strategies of free-ranging Adélie penguins Pygoscelis adeliae by multiple data recording. Polar Biol 24:460–466Google Scholar
  19. Ruckstuhl KE (1999) To synchronize or not to synchronize: a dilemma for young bighorn males? Behaviour 136:805–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saino N, Fasola M, Waiyaki E (1995) Do white pelicans Pelecanus onocrotalus benefit from foraging in flocks using synchronous feeding? Ibis 137:227–230Google Scholar
  21. Siegfried WR, Frost PGH, Kinahan JB, Cooper J (1975) Social behaviour of jackass penguins at sea. Zool Afr 10:87–100Google Scholar
  22. Todd FS (1988) Weddell seal preys on chinstrap penguin. Condor 90:249–250Google Scholar
  23. Tremblay Y, Cherel Y (1999) Synchronous underwater foraging behavior in penguins. Condor 101:179–185Google Scholar
  24. Watanuki Y, Kato A, Naito Y, Robertson G, Robinson S (1997) Diving and foraging behaviour of Adélie penguins in areas with and without fast sea-ice. Polar Biol 17:296–304Google Scholar
  25. Watanuki Y, Kato A, Sato K, Niizuma Y, Bost C-A, Le Maho Y, Naito Y (2002) Parental mass change and food provisioning in Adélie penguins rearing chicks in colonies with contrasting sea-ice conditions. Polar Biol 25:672–681Google Scholar
  26. Wilson RP (1995) Foraging ecology. In: Williams TD (ed) The penguins. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 81–106Google Scholar
  27. Wilson RP, Wilson M-P, McQuaid L (1986) Group size in foraging African penguins (Spheniscus demersus). Ethology 72:338–341Google Scholar
  28. Zar, J.H. (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, N.J.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society and Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akinori Takahashi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Katsufumi Sato
    • 2
  • Jun Nishikawa
    • 3
  • Yutaka Watanuki
    • 4
  • Yasuhiko Naito
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Polar ScienceThe Graduate University for Advanced StudiesTokyo 173–8515Japan
  2. 2.National Institute of Polar ResearchTokyo 173–8515Japan
  3. 3.Ocean Research InstituteThe University of TokyoTokyo 164–8639Japan
  4. 4.Laboratory of Animal Ecology, Graduate School of AgricultureHokkaido UniversitySapporo 060–8589Japan

Personalised recommendations