Advertisement

Feasibility study of using poplar wastes as sand in cement mortars

  • Chafika Djelal
  • Jonathan PageEmail author
  • Hassina Kada
  • Yannick Vanhove
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

An experimental investigation was undertaken to evaluate the potential use of poplar by-products in cement mortars. Two by-products from poplar processing were studied: sawdust (from sawing wood) and milled fibres (from wood waste obtained during cutting). Poplar fibres and sawdust were incorporated into mortars as sand volume substitution with rates ranging from 0 to 100%. Before introduction into the mortar, poplar aggregates were characterized (morphology and water absorption). It appeared that these wood aggregates absorb very quickly a large amount of water (up to 200%). The introduction of these poplar by-products has significant effects on the composite properties in both fresh and hardened states. It was noted that the workability of the mixtures with the poplar wood varies with the substitution rate. The inhibition of cement setting with poplar sawdust is characterized by maturity tests and affects the mechanical properties of mortars. In addition, increasing the poplar aggregates content causes a continuous increase of the material porosity, which leads to a decrease in density. Besides, it appears that the incorporation of poplar aggregates into mortars also decrease their thermal conductivities, which would help to reduce building heat losses. A significant decrease in the mechanical properties of poplar-based mortars was also noted, related to the rate of fibres or sawdust introduced into mixtures. The hydration disturbances, the high internal porosity of the wood particles and their low density can explain these lower mechanical strengths. However, despite these disturbances, the valorisation of poplar wood by-products remains possible in cementitious materials for the manufacture of concrete masonry blocks.

Keywords

Poplar by-products Cement-based composites Workability Calorimetry Porosity Thermal conductivity Mechanical properties 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Nord-Pas-de-Calais Regional Council for financing this study. We are also grateful to the ASBOIS Company, BIALLAIS quarries and HOLCIM cement works in Lumbres for all their support throughout this research project.

References

  1. 1.
    Trouy-Triboulot MC, Triboulot P (2012) Matériaux bois—structures et caractéristiques, Tech. Ing. 36. https://www.techniques-ingenieur.fr/res/pdf/encyclopedia/42824210-c925.pdf
  2. 2.
    Guinard L, Deroubaix G, Roux M-L, Levet A-L, Quint V (2015) Evaluation du gisement de déchets bois et son positionnement dans la filière bois/bois énergie. ADEME, Angers. https://www.ademe.fr/sites/default/files/assets/documents/evaluation-gisement-bois-201505-synthese.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2018
  3. 3.
    CRPF (2006) Schéma Régional de Gestion Sylvicole. Centre Régional de la Propriété Forestière, Nord Pas-de-Calais Picardie, Amiens. https://hautsdefrance.cnpf.fr/data/450056_srgs_nord_pas_de_calais_tome_1_1.pdf
  4. 4.
    Ashori A, Tabarsa T, Amosi F (2012) Evaluation of using waste timber railway sleepers in wood–cement composite materials. Constr Build Mater 27:126–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mohammed BS, Abdullahi M, Hoong CK (2014) Statistical models for concrete containing wood chipping as partial replacement to fine aggregate. Constr Build Mater 55:13–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Semple KE, Cunningham RB, Evans PD (2007) Manufacture of wood-cement composites from Acacia Mangium: mechanistic study of compounds improving the compatibility of Acacia Mangium heartwood with Portland cement. Wood Fiber Sci 36:250–259Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dawood ET, Ramli M (2012) Properties of high-strength flowable mortar reinforced with palm fibers. ISRN Civ Eng 2012:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/718549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ndong Engone JG, Vanhove Y, Djelal C, Kada H (2018) Optimizing mortar extrusion using poplar wood sawdust for masonry building block. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:3769–3780.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1323-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aziz MA, Paramasivam P, Lee SL (1981) Prospects for natural fibre reinforced concretes in construction. Int J Cem Compos Lightweight Concr. 3:123–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0262-5075(81)90006-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Page J, Khadraoui F, Boutouil M, Gomina M (2017) Multi-physical properties of a structural concrete incorporating short flax fibers. Constr Build Mater 140:344–353.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chafei S, Khadraoui F, Boutouil M, Gomina M (2015) Effect of flax fibers treatments on the rheological and the mechanical behavior of a cement composite. Constr Build Mater 79:229–235.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Page J, Sonebi M, Amziane S (2017) Design and multi-physical properties of a new hybrid hemp-flax composite material. Constr Build Mater 139:502–512.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mohamed MAS, Ghorbel E, Wardeh G (2010) Valorization of micro-cellulose fibers in self-compacting concrete. Constr Build Mater 24:2473–2480.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Page J, Khadraoui F, Gomina M, Boutouil M (2019) Influence of different surface treatments on the water absorption capacity of flax fibres: rheology of fresh reinforced-mortars and mechanical properties in the hardened state. Constr Build Mater 199:424–434.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sauvat N, Sell R, Mougel E, Zoulalian A (1999) A study of ordinary Portland cement hydration with wood by isothermal calorimetry. Holzforschung 53:104–108.  https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.1999.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wei YM, Guang Zhou Y, Tomita B (2000) Hydration behavior of wood cement-based composite I: evaluation of wood species effects on compatibility and strength with ordinary portland cement. J Wood Sci 46:296–302.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00766220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Defo M, Cloutier A, Riedl B (2004) Wood-cement compatibility of some Eastern Canadian woods by isothermal calorimetry. For Prod J. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201301032988. Accessed 6 Mar 2019
  18. 18.
    Govin A, Peschard A, Guyonnet R (2006) Modification of cement hydration at early ages by natural and heated wood. Cem Concr Compos 28:12–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wei YM, Tomita B, Hiramatsu Y, Miyatake A, Fujii T (2002) Study of hydration behaviors of wood-cement mixtures: compatibility of cement mixed with wood fiber strand obtained by the water-vapor explosion process. J Wood Sci 48:365–373.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00770695 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wei YM, Tomita B, Hiramatsu Y, Miyatake A, Fujii T, Fujii T, Yoshinaga S (2003) Hydration behavior and compressive strength of cement mixed with exploded wood fiber strand obtained by the water-vapor explosion process. J Wood Sci 49:317–326.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-002-0479-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frybort S, Mauritz R, Teischinger A, Müller U (2008) Cement bonded composites—a mechanical review. BioResources 3:602–626Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Al Rim K, Ledhem A, Douzane O, Dheilly RM, Queneudec M (1999) Influence of the proportion of wood on the thermal and mechanical performances of clay-cement-wood composites. Cem Concr Compos 21:269–276.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0958-9465(99)00008-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ndong Engone JG, Djelal C, Xing X, Vanhove Y, Kada H (2014) Study of the influence of wood aggregates on sand mortar extrudability. In: Proceedings of the international conference on advances in civil, structural and mechanical engineering - CSM 2014, Birmingham, UK, pp 150–154.  https://doi.org/10.15224/978-1-63248-012-5-105
  24. 24.
    Savastano H, Turner A, Mercer C, Soboyejo WO (2006) Mechanical behavior of cement-based materials reinforced with sisal fibers. J Mater Sci 41:6938–6948.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0218-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khorami M, Ganjian E (2011) Comparing flexural behaviour of fibre–cement composites reinforced bagasse: wheat and eucalyptus. Constr Build Mater 25:3661–3667.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bederina M, Marmoret L, Mezreb K, Khenfer MM, Bali A, Quéneudec M (2007) Effect of the addition of wood shavings on thermal conductivity of sand concretes: experimental study and modelling. Constr Build Mater 21:662–668.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Belhadj B, Bederina M, Montrelay N, Houessou J, Quéneudec M (2014) Effect of substitution of wood shavings by barley straws on the physico-mechanical properties of lightweight sand concrete. Constr Build Mater 66:247–258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xing Z, Djelal C, Vanhove Y, Kada H (2015) Wood waste in concrete blocks made by vibrocompression. Environ Process 2:223–232.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-015-0104-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pacheco-Torgal F, Jalali S (2011) Cementitious building materials reinforced with vegetable fibres: a review. Constr Build Mater 25:575–581.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dupain R, Saint-Arroman J-C (2009) Granulats, sols, ciments et bétons—Caractérisation des matériaux de génie civil par les essais de laboratoire. Casteilla, ParisGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Le Ngoc Huyen T, Queneudec T’Kint M, Remond C, Chabbert B, Dheilly RM (2011) Saccharification of Miscanthus x giganteus, incorporation of lignocellulosic by-product in cementitious matrix. C R Biol 334:837.e1–837.e11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2011.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Savastano H, Warden PG, Coutts RSP (2003) Mechanically pulped sisal as reinforcement in cementitious matrices. Cem Concr Compos 25:311–319.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00055-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kada-Benameur H, Wirquin E, Duthoit B (2000) Determination of apparent activation energy of concrete by isothermal calorimetry. Cem Concr Res 30:301–305.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00250-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Goudjil N, Vanhove Y, Djelal C, Kada H (2012) Electro-osmosis applied for formwork removal of concrete. J Adv Concr Technol 10:301–312.  https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.10.301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pereira C, Jorge FC, Ferreira JMF (2005) Adsorption of cations from a cement suspension onto lignocellulosic substrates and its influence on cement setting. J Wood Chem Technol 25:231–244.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02773810500366672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sedan D (2007) Etude des interactions physico-chimiques aux interfaces fibres de chanvre/ciment—Influence sur les propriétés mécaniques du composite. PhD Thesis, Université de Limoges. http://epublications.unilim.fr/theses/2007/sedan-david/sedan-david.pdf
  37. 37.
    Neville AM (2011) Properties of concrete, 5th edn. Pearson, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Arliguie G, Hornain H (2007) Association française de génie civil, Laboratoire Matériaux et durabilité des constructions (Toulouse). GranDuBé: grandeurs associées à la durabilité des bétons, Presses de l’école nationale des ponts et chaussées, ParisGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Turgut P, Murat Algin H (2007) Limestone dust and wood sawdust as brick material. Build Environ 42:3399–3403.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.08.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Savastano H, Warden PG, Coutts RSP (2000) Brazilian waste fibres as reinforcement for cement-based composites. Cem Concr Compos 22:379–384.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(00)00034-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hosseinpourpia R, Varshoee A, Soltani M, Hosseini P, Ziaei Tabari H (2012) Production of waste bio-fiber cement-based composites reinforced with nano-SiO2 particles as a substitute for asbestos cement composites. Constr Build Mater 31:105–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Amziane S, Arnaud L (2013) Bio-aggregate-based building materials—applications to hemp concretes. Wiley-ISTE, London. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781118576809. Accessed 20 Oct 2014
  43. 43.
    Walker R, Pavía S (2014) Moisture transfer and thermal properties of hemp–lime concretes. Constr Build Mater 64:270–276.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nguyen T-T, Picandet V, Amziane S, Baley C (2009) Influence of compactness and hemp hurd characteristics on the mechanical properties of lime and hemp concrete. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 13:1039–1050.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2009.9693171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Savastano H, Santos SF, Radonjic M, Soboyejo WO (2009) Fracture and fatigue of natural fiber-reinforced cementitious composites. Cem Concr Compos 31:232–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire de Génie Civil et géo-Environnement (LGCgE)Université d’Artois, EA 4515BéthuneFrance

Personalised recommendations