Advertisement

Possible use of gypsum waste from ceramics industry as semi-reinforcing filler in epoxidized natural rubber composites

  • Kumarjyoti Roy
  • Subhas Chandra Debnath
  • Naresh D. Bansod
  • Aphiwat Pongwisuthiruchte
  • Thanakorn Wasanapiarnpong
  • Pranut PotiyarajEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

In recent years, the incorrect disposal of industrial solid wastes is one of the main reasons for serious environmental pollution. The appropriate recycle of these waste materials in commercial purpose is the key way to protect the environment. In the present study, the suitability of gypsum waste (GW) from ceramics factory as a filler in epoxidized natural rubber (ENR) was explored. Most importantly, the properties of ENR/GW composites were compared with those of ENR composites filled with most widely used non-reinforcing filler calcium carbonate (CaCO3). In both ENR/GW and ENR/CaCO3 composites, the values of torque difference, hardness and tensile modulus increased steadily with increasing filler content. However, at same filler loading level, the mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties of ENR/GW composites were better as compared to those of ENR/CaCO3 composites. ENR/GW composite also exhibited considerably higher thermal stability as compared to either unfilled ENR or ENR/CaCO3 composite. As a whole, GW could be used as a cost-effective semi-reinforcing filler in ENR composites.

Keywords

Rubber Gypsum waste Waste management Filler Mechanical properties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

One of the authors, Kumarjyoti Roy, would like to thank Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund, Chulalongkorn University, for senior postdoctoral fellowship assistance.

References

  1. 1.
    Ismail H, Nasaruddin MN, Ishiaku US (1999) White rice husk ash filled natural rubber compounds: the effect of multifunctional additive and silane coupling agents. Polym Test 18:287–298.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9418(98)00030-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chuayjuljit S, Imvittaya A, Na-Ranong N, Potiyaraj P (2002) Effects of particle size and amount of carbon black and calcium carbonate on curing characteristics and dynamic mechanical properties of natural rubber. J Metals Mater Miner 12:51–57Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Intiya W, Thepsuwan U, Sirisinha C, Sae-Oui P (2017) Possible use of sludge ash as filler in natural rubber. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 19:774–781.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-016-0480-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thongsang S, Sombatsompop N, Ansarifars A (2008) Effect of fly ash silica and precipitated silica fillers on the viscosity, cure, and viscoelastic properties of natural rubber. Polym Adv Technol 19:1296–1304.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.1129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mishra S, Shimpi NG (2005) Comparison of nano CaCO3 and fly ash filled with styrene butadiene rubber on mechanical and thermal properties. J Sci Ind Res 64:744–751Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alkadasi NAN, Hundiwale DG, Kapadi UR (2004) Effect of coupling agent on the mechanical properties of fly ash–filled polybutadiene rubber. J Appl Polym Sci 91:1322–1328.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.13280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sombatsompop N, Thongsang S, Markpin T, Wimolmala E (2004) Fly ash particles and precipitated silica as fillers in rubbers. I. Untreated fillers in natural rubber and styrene–butadiene rubber compounds. J Appl Polym Sci 93:2119–2130.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.20693 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thongsang S, Worakhan W, Wimolmala E, Sombatsompop N (2012) Dynamic mechanical analysis and tribological properties of NR vulcanizates with fly ash/precipitated silica hybrid filler. Tribol Int 53:134–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2012.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahmed K, Nizami SS, Raza NZ (2013) Characteristics of natural rubber hybrid composites based on marble sludge/carbon black and marble sludge/rice husk derived silica. J Ind Eng Chem 19:1169–1176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2012.12.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ahmed K, Nizami SS, Riza NZ (2014) Reinforcement of natural rubber hybrid composites based on marble sludge/Silica and marble sludge/rice husk derived silica. J Adv Res 5:165–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2013.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sae-oui P, Sirisinha C, Thaptong P (2009) Utilization of limestone dust waste as filler in natural rubber. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 11:166–171.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-008-0230-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sae-oui P, Rakdee C, Thanmathorn P (2002) Use of rice husk ash as filler in natural rubber vulcanizates in comparison with other commercial fillers. J Polym Sci 83:2485–2493.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.10249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sereda L, Visconte LL, Nunes RCB, Furtado CRG, Riande E (2003) Effect of silica and rice husk ash fillers on the modulus of polysiloxane networks. J Appl Polym Sci 90:421–429.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.12645 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Da Costa HM, Visconte LLY, Nunes RCB, Furtado CRG (2003) Rice-husk-ash-filled natural rubber. II. Partial replacement of commercial fillers and the effect on the vulcanization process. J Appl Polym Sci 87:1405–1413.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.11514 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pongdong W, Kummerlöwe C, Vennemann N, Thitithammawong A, Nakason C (2018) A comparative study of rice husk ash and siliceous earth as reinforcing fillers in epoxidized natural rubber composites. Polym Compos 39:414–426.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.23951 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moulin L, Da Silva S, Bounaceur A, Herblot M, Soudais Y (2017) Assessment of recovered carbon black obtained by waste tires steam water thermolysis: an industrial application. Waste Biomass Valor 8:2757–2770.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9822-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Taverna ME, Tassara O, Morán J, Sponton M, Frontini P, Nicolau V, Estenoz D (2019) Effect of kraft lignin from hardwood on viscoelastic, thermal, mechanical and aging performance of high pressure laminates. Waste Biomass Valor 10:585–597.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-0088-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yangthong H, Wisunthorn S, Pichaiyut S, Nakason C (2019) Novel epoxidized natural rubber composites with geopolymers from fly ash waste. Waste Manag 87:148–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Panitchakarn P, Wikranvanich J, Phisalaphong M (2019) Synthesis and characterization of natural rubber/coal fly ash composites via latex aqueous microdispersion. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 21:134–144.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0774-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Şaşmaz S, Karaağaç B, Uyanık N (2019) Utilization of chrome-tanned leather wastes in natural rubber and styrene-butadiene rubber blends. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 21:166–175.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0775-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    de Paiva FFG, de Maria VPK, Torres GB, Dognani G, Santos RJ, Cabrera FC, Job AE (2019) Sugarcane bagasse fiber as semi-reinforcement filler in natural rubber composite sandals. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 21:326–335.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0801-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nawi AM, Badarulzaman NA (2015) Effect of plaster of paris waste and sintering temperatures on physical properties of pottery. Proc CIRP 26:752–755.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.08.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Radulović D, Terzić A, Andrić L (2017) The construction and ceramics industry waste gypsum valorization possibilities. In: Lee B, Gadow R, Mitic V (eds) Proceedings of the IV advanced ceramics and applications conference, Atlantis Press, Paris, pp 475–491Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Godinho-Castro AP, Testolin RC, Janke L, Corrêa AXR, Radetski CM (2012) Incorporation of gypsum waste in ceramic block production: proposal for a minimal battery of tests to evaluate technical and environmental viability of this recycling process. Waste Manag 32:153–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.08.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Asakura H (2015) Sulfate and organic matter concentration in relation to hydrogen sulphide generation at inert solid waste landfill site–Limit value for gypsum. Waste Manag 43:328–334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.06.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ko JH, Xu Q, Jang YC (2015) Emissions and control of hydrogen sulfide at landfills: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Techol 45:2043–2083.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2015.1010427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tounchuen K, Buggakupta W, Panpa W (2014) Characteristics of automotive glass waste-containing gypsum bodies made from used plaster mould. Key Eng Mater 608:91–96.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.608.91 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee S, Xu Q, Booth M, Townsend TG, Chadik P, Bitton G (2006) Reduced sulfur compounds in gas from construction and demolition debris landfills. Waste Manag 26:526–533.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    He R, Xia FF, Bai Y, Wang J, Shen DS (2012) Mechanism of H2S removal during landfill stabilization in waste biocover soil, an alterative landfill cover. J Hazard Mater 217–218:67–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.02.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Plaza C, Xu QY, Townsend T, Bitton G, Booth M (2007) Evaluation of alternative landfill cover soils for attenuating hydrogen sulfide from construction and demolition (C&D) debris landfills. J Environ Manage 84:314–322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xu QY, Townsend T, Reinhart D (2010) Attenuation of hydrogen sulfide at construction and demolition debris landfills using alternative cover materials. Waste Manag 30:660–666.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.10.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Flynn B (1998) Invisible threat: odors & landfill gas from C&D waste. Waste Age 29:91–97Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Edwards S, Alharthi R, Ghaly AE (2011) Removal of hydrogen sulfide from water. Am J Environ Sci 7:295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ahmed A, Soliman AM, El Naggar MH, Kamei T (2015) An assessment of geo-environmental properties for utilization of recycled gypsum in earthwork projects. Soils Found 55:1139–1147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ngamsurat S, Boonkerd K, Leela-adisorn U, Potiyaraj P (2011) Curing characteristics of natural rubber filled with gypsum. Energy Procedia 9:452–458.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.09.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Roy K, Debnath SC, Pongwisuthiruchte A, Pranut Potiyaraj (2019) Natural rubber/microcrystalline cellulose composites with epoxidized natural rubber as compatibilizer. Rubber Chem Technol.  https://doi.org/10.5254/rct.19.81533 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sierra JDM, Lafita C, Gabaldón C, Spanjers H, van Lier JB (2017) Trace metals supplementation in anaerobic membrane bioreactors treating highly saline phenolic wastewater. Bioresour Technol 234:106–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ismail H, Shaari SM (2010) Curing characteristics, tensile properties and morphology of palm ash/halloysite nanotubes/ethylene-propylene-diene monomer (EPDM) hybrid composites. Polym Test 29:872–878.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Roy K, Potiyaraj P (2018) Development of high performance microcrystalline cellulose based natural rubber composites using maleated natural rubber as compatibilizer. Cellulose 25:1077–1087.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1613-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ismail H, Ahmad HS (2013) The properties of acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber (NBR) composite with halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) and silica or carbon black. Polym Plast Technol Eng 52:1175–1182.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559.2013.769577 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ahmed K, Nizami SS, Raza NZ, Mahmood K (2012) Mechanical, swelling, and thermal aging properties of marble sludge-natural rubber composites. Int J Ind Chem 3:21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Roy K, Debnath SC, Pranut Potiyaraj (2019) A critical review on the utilization of various reinforcement modifiers in filled rubber composites. J Elastom Plast.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0095244319835869 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yang S, Zhou Y, Zhang P, Cai Z, Li Y, Fan H (2017) Preparation of high performance NBR/HNTs nanocomposites using an electron transferring interaction method. Appl Surf Sci 425:758–764.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Krishnamurthy S, Balakrishnan P (2019) Dynamic mechanical behavior, solvent resistance and thermal degradation of nitrile rubber composites with carbon black-halloysite nanotube hybrid fillers. Polym Compos.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.25101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science, Faculty of ScienceChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryUniversity of KalyaniKalyaniIndia

Personalised recommendations