Advertisement

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 123–132 | Cite as

Modification of sludge-based biochar and its application to phosphorus adsorption from aqueous solution

  • Zhiwei Li
  • Xuejiao Liu
  • Yin WangEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

Sludge-based biochar was first modified for the adsorption of phosphorus from aqueous solution. This study is to modify sludge-based biochar (SBC) via peroxidation with nitric acid and impregnation with ferrous ions to obtain a high adsorption capacity for phosphorus (P). The P adsorption capacity of the modified sludge biochar (M-SBC) was increased to 9.79 mg/g, a value almost 40 times higher than that of the original biochar. Among the adsorption parameters studied, pH was found to be particularly important to P adsorption. After modification, the point of zero charge of the M-SBC occurred at pH 6. The isotherms of P adsorption on M-SBC obeyed the Freundlich equation. An analysis of the adsorption thermodynamics indicated that the process of P adsorption on M-SBC was spontaneous and endothermic, increased the degree of disorder, and involved chemisorption. The main mechanisms of P adsorption were surface precipitation and electrostatic attraction.

Keywords

Sewage sludge Biochar Modification Phosphorus Adsorption 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the China–Japan Research Cooperative Program [Grant No. 2016YFE0118000], the Scientific and Technological Major Special Project of Tianjin City [Grant No. 16YFXTSF00420], and Frontier projects in the field of young talents, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences [Grant No. IUEQN201501].

Supplementary material

10163_2019_921_MOESM1_ESM.docx (318 kb)
Fig. S of Supplementary material. SEM images of SBC: (a) raw SBC, (b) peroxidized SBC, and (c) Fe-modified SBC (M-SBC) (DOCX 317 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Yuan H, Lu T, Zhao D, Huang H, Noriyuki K, Chen Y (2013) Influence of temperature on product distribution and biochar properties by municipal sludge pyrolysis. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 15:357–361Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dong B, Liu X, Dai L, Dai X (2013) Changes of heavy metal speciation during high-solid anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Biores Technol 131:152–158Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li J, Yu G, Xie S, Pan L, Li C, You F, Wang Y (2018) Immobilization of heavy metals in ceramsite produced from sewage sludge biochar. Sci Total Environ 628–629:131–140Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang X, Li C, Zhang B, Lin J, Chi Q, Wang Y (2016) Migration and risk assessment of heavy metals in sewage sludge during hydrothermal treatment combined with pyrolysis. Biores Technol 221:560–567Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lu T, Yuan H, Wang Y, Huang H, Chen Y (2015) Characteristic of heavy metals in biochar derived from sewage sludge. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 18:725–733Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang Q, Wang B, Lee X, Lehmann J, Gao B (2018) Sorption and desorption of Pb(II) to biochar as affected by oxidation and pH. Sci Total Environ 634:188–194Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang T, Wu J, Zhang Y, Liu J, Sui Z, Zhang H, Chen W-Y, Norris P, Pan W-P (2018) Increasing the chlorine active sites in the micropores of biochar for improved mercury adsorption. Fuel 229:60–67Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eberhardt TL, Min S-H (2008) Biosorbents prepared from wood particles treated with anionic polymer and iron salt: effect of particle size on phosphate adsorption. Biores Technol 99:626–630Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lalley J, Han C, Li X, Dionysiou DD, Nadagouda MN (2016) Phosphate adsorption using modified iron oxide-based sorbents in lake water: kinetics, equilibrium, and column tests. Chem Eng J 284:1386–1396Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rott E, Steinmetz H, Metzger JW (2018) Organophosphonates: a review on environmental relevance, biodegradability and removal in wastewater treatment plants. Sci Total Environ 615:1176–1191Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    De-Bashan LE, Bashan Y (2004) Recent advances in removing phosphorus from wastewater and its future use as fertilizer (1997–2003). Water Res 38:4222–4246Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Delaney P, McManamon C, Hanrahan JP, Copley MP, Holmes JD, Morris MA (2011) Development of chemically engineered porous metal oxides for phosphate removal. J Hazard Mater 185:382–391Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Du L, Chen Q, Liu P, Zhang X, Wang H, Zhou Q, Xu D, Wu Z (2017) Phosphorus removal performance and biological dephosphorization process in treating reclaimed water by Integrated Vertical-flow Constructed Wetlands (IVCWs). Biores Technol 243:204–211Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yan L-G, Xu Y-Y, Yu H-Q, Xin X-D, Wei Q, Du B (2010) Adsorption of phosphate from aqueous solution by hydroxy–aluminum, hydroxy–iron and hydroxy–iron–aluminum pillared bentonites. J Hazard Mater 179:244–250Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nidhi K, Hesterberg D, Martin JD (2005) XANES Investigation of phosphate sorption in single and binary systems of iron and aluminum oxide minerals. Environ Sci Technol 39:2152Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hristovski KD, Westerhoff PK, Möller T, Sylvester P (2009) Effect of synthesis conditions on nano-iron (hydr)oxide impregnated granulated activated carbon. Chem Eng J 146:237–243Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fan C, Zhang Y (2018) Adsorption isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics of nitrate and phosphate in binary systems on a novel adsorbent derived from corn stalks. J Geochem Explor 188:95–100Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Özacar M (2003) Adsorption of phosphate from aqueous solution onto alunite. Chemosphere 51:321Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lou L, Wu B, Wang L, Luo L, Xu X, Hou J, Xun B, Hu B, Chen Y (2011) Sorption and ecotoxicity of pentachlorophenol polluted sediment amended with rice-straw derived biochar. Biores Technol 102:4036–4041Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang J, Shen Z, Mei Z, Li S, Wang W (2011) Removal of phosphate by Fe-coordinated amino-functionalized 3D mesoporous silicates hybrid materials. J Environ Sci 23:199–205Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Trazzi PA, Leahy JJ, Hayes MHB, Kwapinski W (2016) Adsorption and desorption of phosphate on biochars. J Environ Chem Eng 4:37–46Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang L, Liu J, Guo X (2018) Investigation on mechanism of phosphate removal on carbonized sludge adsorbent. J Environ Sci 64:335–344Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hadi P, Xu M, Ning C, Sze C, Lin K, McKay G (2015) A critical review on preparation, characterization and utilization of sludge-derived activated carbons for wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J 260:895–906Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tang L, Yu J, Pang Y, Zeng G, Deng Y, Wang J, Ren X, Ye S, Peng B, Feng H (2018) Sustainable efficient adsorbent: alkali-acid modified magnetic biochar derived from sewage sludge for aqueous organic contaminant removal. Chem Eng J 336:160–169Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhou H, Jiang Z, Wei S (2013) A novel absorbent of nano-Fe loaded biomass char and its enhanced adsorption capacity for phosphate in water. J Chem 2013:1–9Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yin Q, Ren H, Wang R, Zhao Z (2018) Evaluation of nitrate and phosphate adsorption on Al-modified biochar: influence of Al content. Sci Total Environ 631–632:895–903Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mondal P, Balomajumder C, Mohanty B (2007) A laboratory study for the treatment of arsenic, iron, and manganese bearing ground water using Fe(3+) impregnated activated carbon: effects of shaking time, pH and temperature. J Hazard Mater 144:420–426Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ohura S, Harada H, Biswas BK, Kondo M, Ishikawa S, Kawakita H, Ohto K, Inoue K (2011) Phosphorus recovery from secondary effluent and side-stream liquid in a sewage treatment plant using zirconium-loaded saponified orange waste. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 13:293–297Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pace B, Munroe P, Marjo CE, Thomas P, Gong B, Shepherd J, Buss W, Joseph S (2018) The mechanisms and consequences of inorganic reactions during the production of ferrous sulphate enriched bamboo biochars. J Anal Appl Pyrol 131:101–112Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang Z, Shi M, Li J, Zheng Z (2014) Influence of moderate pre-oxidation treatment on the physical, chemical and phosphate adsorption properties of iron-containing activated carbon. J Environ Sci 26:519–528Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liu Y, Li K, Sun G (2010) Effect of precursor preoxidation on the structure of phenolic resin-based activated carbon spheres. J Phys Chem Solids 71:453–456Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cheng Y, Guo J, Huang Y, Liao Z, Xiang Z (2017) Ultrastable hydrogen evolution electrocatalyst derived from phosphide postmodified metal-organic frameworks. Nano Energy 35:115–120Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fang H, Cui Z, He G, Huang L, Chen M (2017) Phosphorus adsorption onto clay minerals and iron oxide with consideration of heterogeneous particle morphology. Sci Total Environ 605–606:357–367Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tran HN, You S-J, Hosseini-Bandegharaei A, Chao H-P (2017) Mistakes and inconsistencies regarding adsorption of contaminants from aqueous solutions: a critical review. Water Res 120:88–116Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Langmuir I (1916) The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids. Part I. Solids. J Am Chem Soc 38:2221–2295Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Freundlich H, Hatfield HS (1926) Colloid and capillary chemistry. Methuen and Co. Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Muniz G, Fierro V, Celzard A, Furdin G, Gonzalez-Sánchez G, Ballinas M (2009) Synthesis, characterization and performance in arsenic removal of iron-doped activated carbons prepared by impregnation with Fe(III) and Fe(II). J Hazard Mater 165:893–902Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Krishnan KA, Haridas A (2008) Removal of phosphate from aqueous solutions and sewage using natural and surface modified coir pith. J Hazard Mater 152:527–535Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chinoune K, Bentaleb K, Bouberka Z, Nadim A, Maschke U (2016) Adsorption of reactive dyes from aqueous solution by dirty bentonite. Appl Clay Sci 123:64–75Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kim D (2004) Adsorption characteristics of Fe(III) and Fe(III)–NTA complex on granular activated carbon. J Hazard Mater 106:67–84Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Luo X, Wu X, Reng Z, Min X, Xiao X, Luo J (2017) Enhancement of phosphate adsorption on zirconium hydroxide by ammonium modification. Ind Eng Chem Res 56:9419–9428Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Foo KY, Hameed BH (2012) Adsorption characteristics of industrial solid waste derived activated carbon prepared by microwave heating for methylene blue. Fuel Process Technol 99:103–109Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Peng F, He PW, Luo Y, Lu X, Liang Y, Fu J (2012) Adsorption of phosphate by biomass char deriving from fast pyrolysis of biomass waste. Clean Soil Air Water 40:493–498Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    El-Hendawy A-NA (2003) Influence of HNO3 oxidation on the structure and adsorptive properties of corncob-based activated carbon. Carbon 41:713–722Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lin J, Jiang B, Zhan Y (2018) Effect of pre-treatment of bentonite with sodium and calcium ions on phosphate adsorption onto zirconium-modified bentonite. J Environ Manage 217:183–195Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CAS Key Laboratory of Urban Pollutant Conversion, Institute of Urban EnvironmentChinese Academy of SciencesXiamenChina

Personalised recommendations