Advertisement

Variations in generation of vegetable, fruit and flower market waste and effects on biogas production, exergy and energy contents

  • V. Mozhiarasi
  • C. J. Speier
  • P. M. Benish Rose
  • M. M. Mondal
  • S. Pragadeesh
  • D. Weichgrebe
  • S. V. SrinivasanEmail author
REGIONAL CASE STUDY
  • 54 Downloads

Abstract

In India, large quantities of centrally generated wastes from vegetable, fruit and flower wholesale markets (VFF) are mostly disposed without treatment at open dumpsites. To implement sustainable waste treatment system including an adapted substrate management for Indian cities, detailed information on temporal mass and compositional fluctuations of VFF are fundamental. This article investigates the sources, extent and influence of fluctuating VFF characteristics, and examines its impact on biogas production and energy potentials. A comprehensive analysis of VFF in the city of Chennai revealed strong fluctuations of individual waste component shares of 34.5–142.9% (vegetables), 40.5–185.9% (fruits) and 33.0–244.9% (flowers) throughout the monitored year. Waste amounts occur independently of fresh vegetable, fruit and flower amounts entering the urban area. Specific biogas yields (SBY) of VFF varied from 403.7 to 570.5 mLN/g oDM during the analysis period of 4 months. A comparative analysis between calculated and measured SBY revealed that measured SBY are on average 9.7–22.4% lower, partly due to unfavourable C/N ratios. Despite fluctuations in VFF composition, monthly variations in theoretically available energy contents are not particularly pronounced if an adapted substrate management is applied for anaerobic treatment of VFF.

Keywords

Anaerobic digestion Specific biogas yield Vegetable market waste Substrate management Energy efficiency 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and the Indian Department of Science and Technology (DST) under the Indo-German Science and Technology Centre (IGSTC) (Grant number 01DQ15007A) under the 2 + 2 Project “RESERVES—Resource and energy reliability by co-digestion of veg-market and slaughterhouse waste”.

References

  1. 1.
    UN (2015) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, United Nations (UN), Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (ST/ESA/SER.A/366)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The World Bank (2016) World Development Indicators. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/ reports.aspx?source = 2&series = SP.URB.TOTL. IN.ZS&country=#. Accessed 22 July 2018
  3. 3.
    Joseph K, Rajendiran S, Senthilnathan R, Rakesh M (2012) Integrated approach to solid waste management in Chennai: an Indian metro city. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 14:75–84.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-012-0046-0 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Annepu R (2012) Sustainable Solid Waste Management in India. Columbia University, Earth Engineering Center. http://www.seas.columbia.edu/earth/wtert/sofos/Sustainable%20Solid%20Waste%20Management%20in%20India_Final.pdf. Accessed 05 January 2018
  5. 5.
    PIB (2016) ‘Solid waste management rules revised after 16 years; rules now extend to urban and industrial areas’: Javadekar. April 05, 2016. Retrieved from: Press Information Bureau (PIB), Ministry of Environment and Forests, India. http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=138591. Accessed 06 Jan 2018
  6. 6.
    Gupta N, Yadav KK, Kumar V (2015) A review on current status of municipal solid waste management in India. J Environ Sci 37:206–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.01.034 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Speier CJ, Mondal MM, Weichgrebe D (2018) Data reliability of solid waste analysis in Asia’s newly industrialised countries. Int J Environ Waste Manag 22(1/2/3/4):124–146.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWM.2018.10014700 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Speier CJ, Mondal MM, Weichgrebe D (2018) Evaluation of compositional characteristics of organic waste shares in municipal solid waste in fast-growing metropolitan cities of India. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 20(4):2150–2162.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0757-y Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ghosh A, Debnath B, Ghosh SK, Das B, Sarkar JP (2018) Sustainability analysis of organic fraction of municipal solid waste conversion techniques for efficient resource recovery in India through case studies. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20(4):1969–1985.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0721-x Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) (2016) Leading producers of fresh vegetables worldwide in 2014 (in million metric tons). http://faostat3.fao.org. Accessed 16 Mar 2017
  11. 11.
    Sachdeva S, Sachdev T, Sachdeva R (2013) Increasing Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Challenges and Opportunities. Indian J Community Med 38(4):192–197.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.120146 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Emerson Climate Technologies (2013) The Food Wastage & Cold Storage Infrastructure Relationship In India. http://www2.emerson.com/SiteCollectionImages/ variations/ENIN/News/Report_layout_ReducRe.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2018
  13. 13.
    Narnaware SL, Srivastava NSL, Vahora S (2017) Gasification: an alternative solution for energy recovery and utilization of vegetable market waste. Waste Manag Res 35(3):276–284.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X16679257 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jha AK, Sharma C, Singh N, Ramesh R, Purvaja R, Gupta PK (2008) Greenhouse gas emissions from municipal solid waste management in Indian mega-cities: a case study of Chennai landfill sites. Chemosphere 71(4):750–758.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.10.024 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kumar S, Bhattacharyya JK, Chakrabarti AV, Devotta T, Akolkar A (2009) Assessment of the status of municipal solid waste management in metro cities, state capitals, class I cities, and class II towns in India: An insight. Waste Manag 29:883–895.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.04.011 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Patil VS, Deshmukh HV (2015) Anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste for Biogas generation: a review. Int Res J Environ Sci 4(6):80–83Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mohanakrishna G, Goud RK, Mohan SV, Sarma PN (2009) Enhancing biohydrogen production through sewage supplementation of composite vegetable based market waste. Int J Hydrogen Energy 25:533–541.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.11.002 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Paraskeva P, Diamadopoulos E (2006) Technologies for olive mill waste water (OMW) treatment: a review. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 81(9):1475–1485.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1553 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Alvarez J, Mace S, Llabres P (2000) Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives. Biores Technol 74:3–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-8524(00)00023-7 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bouallagui H, Touhami Y, Cheikh R, Hamdi M (2005) Bioreactor performance in anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable waste. Biochem Process 40(3):989–995.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.03.007 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saghouri M, Mansoori Y, Rohani A, Khodaparast MHH, Sheikhdavoodi MJ (2018) Modelling and evaluation of anaerobic digestion process of tomato processing wastes for biogas generation. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 20(1):561–567.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0622-4 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Alvarez R, Riden G (2008) Semi-continuous co-digestion of solid slaughterhouse waste, manure, and fruit and vegetable waste. Renew Energy 33(4):726–734.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2007.05.001 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aydn GA, Kocasoy G (2011) Investigation of Appropriate initial composition and aeration method for co-composting of yard waste and market wastes. J Environ Sci Health Part B 38(2):221–231.  https://doi.org/10.1081/PFC-120018451 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Byer PH, Hoang CP, Nguyen TTT, Chopra S, Maclaren V, Haight M (2006) Household, hotel and market waste audits for composting in Vietnam and Laos. Waste Manag Res 24:465–472.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X06068067 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mohan SV, Mohanakrishna G, Goud RK, Sarma PN (2009) Acidogenic fermentation of vegetable based market waste to harness biohydrogen with simultaneous stabilization. Biores Technol 100(12):3061–3068.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.059 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shah Z, Jani YM, Khan F (2014) Evaluation of organic wastes for composting. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 45(3):309–320.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2013.861909 Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Suthar S (2009) Vermicomposting of vegetable-market solid waste using Eisenia fetida: Impact of bulking material on earthworm growth and decomposition rate. Ecol Eng 35:914–920.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.12.019 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Scano EA, Asquer C, Pistis A, Ortu L, Demontis V, Cocco D (2014) Biogas from anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes: experimental results on pilot-scale and preliminary performance evaluation of a full-scale power plant. Energy Convers Manag 77:22–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.09.004 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Anhuradha S, Vijayagopal V, Radha P, Ramanujam R (2007) Kinetic studies and anaerobic co-digestion of vegetable market waste and sewage sludge. Clean 35(2):197–199.  https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.200600014 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Voegeli Y, Zurbrügg C (2008) Decentralised anaerobic digestion of kitchen and market waste in developing countries—“state-of-the-art” in south India. In: Proceedings Venice 2008, second international symposium on energy from biomass and waste, 17–20 November 2008, Venice, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bouallagui H, Lahdheb H, Romdan EB, Rachdi B, Hamdi M (2009) Improvement of fruit and vegetable waste anaerobic digestion performance and stability with co-substrates addition. J Environ Manag 90:1844–1849.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.002 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Das A, Mondal C (2013) Studies on the utilization of fruit and vegetable waste for generation of biogas. Int J Eng Sci 3(9):24–32Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Marouani L, Bouallagui H, Ben CR, Hamdi M (2002) Biomethanation of green wastes of wholesale market of Tunis. In: Proceedings of international symposium on environmental pollution control and waste management 7–10 January 2002, Tunis (EPCOWM’2002). pp. 318–323Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Puyuelo B, Ponsá S, Geat T, Sánchez A (2011) Determining C/N ratios for typical organic wastes using biodegradable fractions. Chemosphere 85(4):653–659.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.07.014 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Anjum M, Khalid A, Mahmood T, Arshad M (2012) Anaerobic co-digestion of municipal solid organic waste with melon residues to enhance biodegradability and biogas production. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 14:388–395.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-012-0082-9 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hawkes DL (1980) Factors affecting net energy production from mesophilic anaerobic digestion. In: Stratford DA, Wheatley BI, Hughes DE (eds) Anaerobic Digestion. In: Proceedings of the first international symposium on anaerobic digestion. Applied Science Publishers, London, pp 131–150Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Alvarez JA, Otero L, Lema JM (2010) A methodology for optimising feed composition for anaerobic co-digestion of agro-industrial wastes. Biores Technol 101(4):1153–1158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.061 Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Samadi MT, Leili M, Alizadeh HHA, Godini K, Ahmadi F (2016) Increasing Methane Production by Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Slaughterhouse with Fruit and Vegetable Wastes. Avicenna J Environ Health Eng 3(2):1–6.  https://doi.org/10.5812/ajehe.8541 Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yoruklu HC, Korkmaz E, Demir NM, Ozkaya B, Demir A (2017) The impact of pretreatment and inoculum to substrate ratio on methane potential of organic wastes from various origins. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20(2):800–809.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0641-1 Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nayono SE, Gallert C, Winter J (2010) Co-digestion of press water and food waste in a bio-waste digester for improvement of biogas production. Biores Technol 101(18):6998–7004.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.123 Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Anjum M, Khalid A, Qadeer S, Mianda R (2017) Synergistic effect of co-digestion to enhance anaerobic degradation of catering waste and orange peel for biogas production. Waste Manag Res 35(9):967–977.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X17715904 Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Buendía IM, Fernández FJ, Villasenor J, Rodríguez L (2009) Feasibility of anaerobic co-digestion as a treatment option of meat industry wastes. Biores Technol 100:1903–1909.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.10.013 Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    World population review (2018) Chennai population 2018. http://worldpopulationreview.com/world-cities/chennai-population/. Accessed 24 July 2018
  44. 44.
    Greater Chennai Corporation (2018) Solid Waste Management. http://www.chennaicorporation.gov.in/departments/solid-waste-management/index.htm. Accessed 29 July 2018
  45. 45.
    Murugesan V, Amarnath J (2015) Control of greenhouse gas emissions by energy recovery from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste through Bio Methanation process. Int J Chem Tech Res 8(3):1168–1174Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    National Horticultural Board (2018) NHB Interactive: Monthwise Annual Price and Arrival report. http://nhb.gov.in/OnlineClient/MonthwiseAnnualPriceandArrivalReport.aspx?enc=3ZOO8K5CzcdC/Yq6HcdIxJ4o5jmAcGG5QGUXX3BlAP4. Accessed 06 June 2018Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    LAGA (2016) LAGA-Methodensammlung – Abfalluntersuchung. Version 3.0. Stand: 14. Oktober 2016.Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft AbfallGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Weichgrebe D, Speier C, Mondal M (2017) Scientific approach for municipal solid waste characterization. In: Goel S (ed) Advances in solid and hazardous waste management, 1st edn. Capital Publishing Company, New Delhi, pp 63–96Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water & wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    ASTM (2014) Standard test methods for determination of carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen in analysis samples of coal and carbon in analysis samples of coal and coke. ASTM D5373. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72(1–2):248–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Frings CS, Dunn RT (1970) A colorimetric method for determination of total serum lipids based on the sulpho-phospho-vanillin reaction. Amer J Clin Pathol 53(1):89–91Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28(3):350–356.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017 Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74(10):3583–3597.  https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    VDI-Guideline 4630 (2006) Fermentation of organic materials. Characterization of substrate, sampling, collection of material data, fermentation tests. Beuth Verlag GmbH, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    APHA (1992) APHA Method 4500-H: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ay S (2017) Methodenentwicklung und Bewertung zur Charakterisierung des anaeroben Abbauverhaltens organischer Stoffe. Dissertation. Publications of the Institute of Sanitary Engineering and Waste Management (ISAH), Leibniz University Hannover. Book 157. Hannover, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Keymer U (1999) Beispielhafte Berechnung der theoretischen Gasausbeute in Biogasanlagen. Jahresbericht 1999, Bayrische Landesanstalt für Betriebswirtschaft und Agrarstruktur pp. 22–24Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Baserga U (1998) Landwirtschaftliche Co-Vergärungs-Biogasanlagen, Biogas aus organischen Reststoffen und Energiegras. FAT, Nr. 512Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Weiland P (2001) Grundlagen der Methangärung – Biologie und Substrate. In: Biogas als regenerative Energie, Stand und Perspektiven, VDI-Bericht 1620. VDI Verlag, DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    ATV-DVWK-M363 (2002) Herkunft, Aufbereitung und Verwertung von Biogas. ATV-DVKW, Hennef (ISBN: 3936514119)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    DLG (1997) DLG-Futterwerttabellen Wiederkäuer, 7th edn. DLG e.V. DLG-Verlag, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Buswell AM, Müller HF (1952) Mechanism of methane fermentation. J Ind Eng Chem 44(3):550–552.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50507a033 Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Boyle WC (1977) Energy recovery from sanitary landfills—a review. In: Microbial energy conversion the proceedings of a seminar sponsored by the UN Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) and the Ministry for Research and Technology of the Federal Republic of Germany Held in Göttingen, October 1976, pp 119–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-021791-8.50019-6
  65. 65.
    Hahne E (2010) Technische Thermodynamik: Einführung und Anwendung. Oldenbourg, Boston (ISBN: 3486592319)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Demirbas A (1997) Calculation of higher heating values of biomass fuels. Fuel 76(5):431–434.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(97)85520-2 Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Demirbas A (2001) Relationships between lignin contents and heating values of biomass. Energy Convers Manag 42(2):183–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(00)00050-9 Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Szargut J, Egzergia P (2007) Oradnikobliczania I stosowania, WidawnictwoPolitechnikiShlaskej, Gliwice 2007. Substance. State. Molecular mass. Enthalpy of devaluation. Standard chemical exergyGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Eboh FC, Ahlstrom P, Richards T (2016) Estimating the specific chemical exergy of municipal solid waste. Energy Sci Eng 4(3):217–231.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.121 Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Liu G, Zhang R, Mashad HME, Dong R (2009) Effect of feed to inoculum ratios on biogas yields of food and green wastes. Biores Technol 100(21):5103–5108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.081 Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Maile I, Muzenda E, Mbohwa C (2016) Biogas production from anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable waste from Johannesburg market. In: 7th international conference on biology, environment and chemistry, 98:100–104.  https://doi.org/10.7763/IPCBEE.2016.V98.15
  72. 72.
    Safar KM, Bux MR, Aslam UM, Muhammad BK, Ahmed MS (2018) Analysis of the feasibility of fruit and vegetable wastes for methane yield using different substrate to inoculum ratios at Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0799-1
  73. 73.
    Weichgrebe D (2015) Kompendium Biogas. Habilitation. Publications of the Institute of Sanitary Engineering and Waste Management (ISAH), Leibniz University Hannover. Book 155, HannoverGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Yadvika S, Sreekrishnan TR, Kohli S, Rana V (2004) Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques––a review. Biores Technol 95(1):1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.010 Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Dioha IJ, Ikeme CH, Nafi’u T, Soba NI, Yusuf MBS (2013) Effect of carbon to nitrogen ratio on biogas production. Int Res J Nat Sci 1(3):1–10Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Department of Health, United Kingdom (2013) Nutrient analysis of fruit and vegetables—summary report. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/167942/Nutrient_analysis_of_fruit_and_vegetables_-_Summary_Report.pdf. Accessed 24 July 2018
  77. 77.
    Callaghan FJ, Wase DAJ, Thayanity K, Forster CF (2002) Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure. Biomass Bioenergy 22(1):71–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00057-5 Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Pages-Diaz J, Pereda-Reyes I, Taherzadeh MJ, Sarvari-Horvath I, Lundin M (2014) Anaerobic co-digestion of solid slaughterhouse wastes with agro-residues: synergistic and antagonistic interactions determined in batch digestion assays. Chem Eng J 245:89–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.02.008 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Science and Engineering DivisionCentral Leather Research InstituteChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Leibniz Universität HannoverInstitute of Sanitary Engineering and Waste Management (ISAH)HannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations