Thermal processing of waste tires with heavy oil residue in the presence of Tayzhuzgen zeolite

  • Kairat BurkhanbekovEmail author
  • Yermek Aubakirov
  • Zheneta Tashmukhambetova
  • Tleutay Abildin


A thermal processing of waste tires in the presence of a natural zeolite catalyst from the “Tayzhuzgen” field (Eastern Kazakhstan) is detailed. The hydrogen sources utilized were heavy residues from oil refinement. The elemental and phase composition of the catalyst and its surface structure were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis. The waste tire sample was also studied by thermal gravimetric analysis. It was determined that the SiO2:Al2O3 ratio of 4.57:1 for the natural zeolite refers to clinoptilolite mineral. The use of the “Tayzhuzgen” zeolite in the thermal processing of waste tires has the following advantages, such as low process temperature, low amount of catalyst and high yield of liquid products compared to other published thermal catalytic methods. The composition of liquid products was found using gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection. It was concluded that the liquid product obtained by thermal catalytic processing of waste tires with heavy oil residue in the presence of the “Tayzhuzgen” zeolite, can be used not only as a fuel but also as a raw material for obtaining alkylbenzene compounds.


Waste tire Heavy oil residue Natural zeolite Clinoptilolite 



The work was supported by the Grant from the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan 4434/GF-4 “Resource-saving technologies of joint processing of solid fossil fuels and industrial-household wastes into liquid motor fuels”.

Supplementary material

10163_2018_825_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (86 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 85 KB)
10163_2018_825_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (75 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 74 KB)


  1. 1.
    Derakhshan Z, Ghaneian MT, Mahvi AH et al (2017) A new recycling technique for the waste tires reuse. Environ Res 158:462–469. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    de Sousa FDB, Scuracchio CH, Hu G-H, Hoppe S (2017) Devulcanization of waste tire rubber by microwaves. Polym Degrad Stab 138:169–181. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Czajczynska D, Krzyzynska R, Jouhara H, Spencer N (2017) Use of pyrolytic gas from waste tire as a fuel: a review. Energy 134:1121–1131. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kandasamy J, Gökalp I (2015) Pyrolysis, combustion, and steam gasification of various types of scrap tires for energy recovery. Energy Fuels 29:346–354. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sienkiewicz M, Janik H, Borzędowska-labuda K, Kucińska-lipka J (2017) Environmentally friendly polymer–rubber composites obtained from waste tyres: a review. J Clean Prod 147:560–571. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luo S, Feng Y (2017) The production of fuel oil and combustible gas by catalytic pyrolysis of waste tire using waste heat of blast-furnace slag. Energy Convers Manag 136:27–35. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ilkiliç C, Aydin H (2011) Fuel production from waste vehicle tires by catalytic pyrolysis and its application in a diesel engine. Fuel Process Technol 92:1129–1135. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Önenç S, Brebu M, Vasile C, Yanik J (2012) Copyrolysis of scrap tires with oily wastes. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 94:184–189. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Williams PT, Brindle AJ (2002) Catalytic pyrolysis of tyres: influence of catalyst temperature. Fuel 81:2425–2434. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ahoor AH, Zandi-Atashbar N (2014) Fuel production based on catalytic pyrolysis of waste tires as an optimized model. Energy Convers Manag 87:653–669. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Al-lal A, Bolonio D, Llamas A et al (2015) Desulfurization of pyrolysis fuels obtained from waste: lube oils, tires and plastics. Fuel 150:208–216. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Islam MR, Islam MN, Mustafi NN et al (2013) Thermal recycling of solid tire wastes for alternative liquid fuel: the first commercial step in Bangladesh. Procedia Eng 56:573–582. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Julius IOsayi, Sunny Iyuke SEO (2014) Biocrude production through pyrolysis of used tyres. J Catal 16:10. file:///C:/Users/VICENTE/Downloads/386371(2).pdfGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Williams PT (2013) Pyrolysis of waste tyres: a review. Waste Manag 33:1714–1728. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ucar S, Karagoz S, Ozkan AR, Yanik J (2005) Evaluation of two different scrap tires as hydrocarbon source by pyrolysis. Fuel 84:1884–1892. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    De Marco Rodriguez I, Laresgoiti MF, Cabrero MA et al (2001) Pyrolysis of scrap tyres. Fuel Process Technol 72:9–22. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Banar M, Özkan A, Akyildiz V et al (2015) Evaluation of solid product obtained from tire-derived fuel (TDF) pyrolysis as carbon black. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 17:125–134. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Money DM, Harrison G (1999) Liquefaction of scrap automobile tyres in different solvents and solvent mixes. Fuel 78:1729–1736. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boxiong S, Chunfei W, Cai L et al (2007) Pyrolysis of waste tyres: the influence of USY catalyst/tyre ratio on products. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 78:243–249. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Williams PT, Brindle AJ (2003) Fluidised bed pyrolysis and catalytic pyrolysis of scrap tyres. Environ Technol 24:921–929. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sister VG, Kosivtsov YY, Sul’man EM et al (2011) Effect of cobalt chloride on the physical and chemical properties of the solid residue from the pyrolysis of polymer tire cord. Theor Found Chem Eng 45:744–746. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Uçar S, Karagöz S, Yanik J et al (2005) Copyrolysis of scrap tires with waste lubricant oil. Fuel Process Technol 87:53–58. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tashmukhambetova ZK, Kairbekov ZK, Aubakirov EA et al (2016) Hydrogenation processing of carbon-containing wastes in a mixture with oil shale from the Kenderlyk deposit. Solid Fuel Chem 50:220–225. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kairbekov ZK, Aubakirov EA, Tashmukhambetova ZK et al (2015) Catalytic hydrogenation of rubber wastes. Chem Bull Kazn 1:90–95Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Aubakirov E, Tashmuhambetova Z, Kairbekov Z, Burkhanbekov K (2014) Thermal catalytic recycling of plastic wastes. Appl Mech Mater 618:136–139. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Danon B, Mkhize NM, van der Gryp P, Görgens JF (2015) Combined model-free and model-based devolatilisation kinetics of tyre rubbers. Thermochim Acta 601:45–53. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    López FA, El Hadad AA, Alguacil FJ et al (2013) Kinetics of the thermal degradation of granulated scrap tyres: a model-free analysis. Mater Sci 19:403–408. Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aparicio SML, Canafoglia ME, Ocsachoque MA et al (2016) Co–Rh modified natural zeolites as new catalytic materials to oxidize propane and naphthalene from emission sources. Open Chem. Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nasrollahzadeh M, Habibi D, Shahkarami Z, Bayat Y (2009) A general synthetic method for the formation of arylaminotetrazoles using natural natrolite zeolite as a new and reusable heterogeneous catalyst. Tetrahedron 65:10715–10719. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu B, Slocombe D, Alkinany M, Almegren H (2016) Advances in the study of coke formation over zeolite catalysts in the methanol-to-hydrocarbon process. Appl Petrochem Res. Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xu M, Mukarakate C, Robichaud DJ et al (2015) Elucidating zeolite deactivation mechanisms during biomass catalytic fast pyrolysis from model reactions and zeolite syntheses. Top Catal. Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kim S, Sasmaz E, Lauterbach J (2015) Applied catalysis B: environmental effect of Pt and Gd on coke formation and regeneration during JP-8 cracking over ZSM-5 catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ 168:212–219. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shao SS, Zhang HY, Shen DK, Xiao R (2016) Enhancement of hydrocarbon production and catalyst stability during catalytic conversion of biomass pyrolysis-derived compounds over hierarchical HZSM-5. RSC Adv 6:44313–44320. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Farneth WE, Gorte RJ (1995) Methods for characterizing zeolite acidity. Chem Rev 95:615–635. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Weitkamp J (2000) Zeolites and catalysis. Solid State Ion 131:175–188. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Junaid ASM, Rahman M, Yin H et al (2011) Natural zeolites for oilsands bitumen cracking: structure and acidity. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 144:148–157. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hernández MA, Rojas F, Lara VH (2000) Nitrogen-sorption characterization of the microporous structure of clinoptilolite-type zeolites. J Porous Mater 7:443–454. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sprynskyy M, Buszewski B, Terzyk AP, Namieśnik J (2006) Study of the selection mechanism of heavy metal (Pb2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, and Cd2+) adsorption on clinoptilolite. J Colloid Interface Sci 304:21–28. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pastvova J, Kaucky D, Moravkova J et al (2017) Effect of enhanced accessibility of acid sites in micromesoporous mordenite zeolites on hydroisomerization of n-hexane. ACS Catal 7:5781–5795. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physical Chemistry, Catalysis and Petrochemistry, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical TechnologyAl-Farabi Kazakh National UniversityAlmatyKazakhstan
  2. 2.Scientific Research Institute for New Chemical Technologies and MaterialsAlmatyKazakhstan
  3. 3.Nazarbayev Intellectual School of Physics and Mathematics in AlmatyAlmatyKazakhstan

Personalised recommendations