Reuse paint wastewater in the manufacture of cement bricks and tiles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Waste management is one of the most important and serious issues facing many developing countries. The main purpose of this research involves reusing wastewater generated by the paint industry in the manufacture of cement bricks and tiles, in addition to improving some mechanical properties of the cement bricks and tiles. Since large quantities of water are needed to produce bricks and tiles, this project focuses on using wastewater rather than supply clean water in the production of bricks and tiles. Different samples have been prepared and tested to evaluate the effect of using wastewater on the properties of the bricks and tiles formed. The bricks and tiles samples were tested for water absorption, ignitability, toxicity, and corrosivity. The concentrations of sulfide and cyanides in all samples were determined and compared to the prescribed limit identified by the U.S. EPA. The bricks samples were also tested for compressive strength, where the tiles samples were tested for bending strength and abrasion resistance. The tests results showed that there are no negative effects of using wastewater generated from the paint industry in the manufacture of the cement bricks and tiles, as well as it improves the mechanical properties of the bricks and tiles.

Keywords

Paint wastewater Cement bricks Cement tiles Pollution prevention and waste minimization 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. The authors would also like to thank Mr. Hassan El-Sheikh and the Egyptian Housing Building Research Center staff for their help in performing tests.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdel-Sabour MF, Rabie FH, Mostafa T, Hassan SA (2001) Impact of industrial wastewater disposal on surface water bodies in Mostord Area, North Greater Cairo. J Environ Sci 13(4):485–490Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mostafa M (2014) “Modeling of pollutant transport in the Nile Delta Egypt”. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    García VE, Pongrácz, Keiski R (2004). “Waste minimization in the chemical industry: from theory to practice”. In: Proceedings of the Waste Minimization and Resources Use Optimization Conference pp 93–106Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Phillips PS (2000) “Guide for Waste Minimization. Lecture material presented on the GSCE industrial ecology seminar”. University College Northampton, UK, pp 22–26Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    El-Shazly MA, Ezzat AH, Kamel MM (2010) appropriate technology for industrial wastewater treatment of paint industry. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 8(5):597–601Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), (1995). “Federal Facility Pollution Prevention Project Analysis: A Primer for Applying Life Cycle and Total Cost Assessment Concepts”, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Planning, Prevention, and Compliance Division federal Facilities Enforcement Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wahaab AB (2010) Stress management among artisans in construction industry in Nigeria. Glob J Res Eng 10(1):93–103Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Andrew DE, Lenore SC, Eugene WR, Arnold EG (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), (2006a). “Standard Specification for Concrete Building Brick”, ASTM C 55-06. Masonry Standards for the Building Industry, ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C 700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Egyptian Code of Practice (ECOP) (2005). “Wall and Floor Tiling”, Ministry of Housing and Urban Communities, Cairo, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Egyptian standard specifications (2005). “Cement Tiles”, No. 269, Cairo, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2006) “Standard Specification for Concrete Building Brick”, ASTM C 140-06. Masonry Standards for the Building Industry, ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), (1992). “Test Methods for Evaluationg Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods (SW-846)”, Method 1311, Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure. Accessed date 01 Feb 2013. http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/1311.pdf
  14. 14.
    American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), (2003). “Standard Test Methods for Flash Point by Pensky-Martens Closed Cup Tester”, ASTM Volume 05.01 Petroleum Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricants (I): C1234 D3710. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2004) “Total and amenable cyanide: distillation”. Method 9010C, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1996) “Titrimetric and manual spectrophotometric determinative methods for cyanide”. Method 9014, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), (1978). “Sulfide (Titrimetric, Iodine)”, Method 376.1, Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure. Accessed date 01 Feb 2013. http://www.caslab.com/EPA-Methods/PDF/EPA-Method-3761.pdf
  18. 18.
    Alqam M, Jamrah A, Daghlas H (2011) Utilization of cement incorporated with water treatment sludge. Jordan J Civil Eng 5(2):268–277Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Popov V, Itoh H, Mander U, Brebbia CA (2010) Waste management and the environment V. WIT Press 140(1743–3541):79–86Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations