Utilization (recycling) of iron and steel industry by-product (GGBS) in concrete: strength and durability properties

REVIEW

Abstract

Due to exponential growing in urbanization and industrialization, byproducts from industries are becoming an increasing concern for recycling and waste management. Ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) is by-product from the blast-furnaces of iron and steel industries. GGBS is very useful in the design and development of high-quality cement paste/mortar and concrete. This paper covers the properties of GGBS, reaction mechanism, and its effect on strength and durability properties of concrete. Properties covered are sorptivity, microstructure, compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, flexural strength, permeability, sulfate resistance, freezing and thawing resistance, corrosion of concrete.

Keywords

Concrete Durability properties Strength properties GGBS Sorptivity 

References

  1. 1.
    ASTM C 989 (1999) Standard specification for ground granulated blast-furnace slag for use in concrete and mortars annual book of ASTM standards, american society for testing and materialsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Daube J, Bakker R (1986) Portland blast-furnace slag cement: a review. Blended Cem ASTM-STP 897:5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cheron M, Lardinois C (1968) Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, Tokyo, vol IV. pp 277–285Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elahi A, Basheer PAM, Nanukuttan SV, Khan OUZ (2010) Mechanical and durability properties of high performance concretes containing supplementary cementitious materials. Constr Build Mater 24(3):292–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Basheer PAM, Gilleece PRV, Long AE, McCarter WJ (2002) Monitoring electrical resistance of concretes containing alternative cementitious materials to assess their resistance to chloride penetration. Cement Concr Compos 24(5):437–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luo R, Cai Y, Wang C, Huang X (2003) Study of chloride binding and diffusion in GGBS concrete. Cem Concr Res 33(1):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gao JM, Qian CX, Liu HF, Wang B, Li L (2005) ITZ microstructure of concrete containing GGBS. Cem Concr Res 35(7):1299–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Binici H, Cagatay IH, Shah T, Kapur S (2008) Mineralogy of plain Portland and blended cement pastes. Build Environ 43(7):1318–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wainwright PJ, Rey N (2000) The influence of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) additions and time delay on the bleeding of concrete. Cement Concr Compos 22(4):253–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Babu KG, Kumar VSR (2000) Efficiency of GGBS in concrete. Cem Concr Res 30(7):1031–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Quillin K, Osborne G, Majumdar A, Singh B (2001) Effects of w/c ratio and curing conditions on strength development in BRECEM concretes. Cem Concr Res 31(4):627–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li G, Zhao X (2003) Properties of concrete incorporating fly ash and ground granulated blast-furnace slag. Cement Concr Compos 25(3):293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khatib JM, Hibbert JJ (2005) Selected engineering properties of concrete incorporating slag and metakaolin. Constr Build Mater 19(6):460–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Atis CD, Bilim C (2007) Wet and dry cured compressive strength of concrete containing ground granulated blast-furnace slag. Build Environ 42(8):3060–3065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hui-sheng S, Bi-wan X, Xiao-chen Z (2009) Influence of mineral admixtures on compressive strength, gas permeability and carbonation of high performance concrete. Constr Build Mater 23(5):1980–1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ujhelyi JE, Ibrahim AJ (1991) Hot weather concreting with hydraulic additives. Cem Concr Res 21(2–3):345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guo LP, Sun W, Zheng KR, Chen HJ, Liu B (2007) Study on the flexural fatigue performance and fractal mechanism of concrete with high proportions of ground granulated blast-furnace slag. Cem Concr Res 37(2):242–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jianyong L, Yan Y (2001) A study on creep and drying shrinkage of high performance concrete. Cem Concr Res 31(8):1203–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xu Y (1997) The influence of sulfates on chloride binding and pore solution chemistry. Cem Concr Res 27(12):1841–1850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang R, Yeih WC (1997) Assessment of chloride diffusion in high strength concrete using the accelerated ionic migration test. J Chin Inst Eng Taipei Taiwan Ser A/Chung-kuo Kung Ch’eng Hsuch K’an 20:39–45Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cheng A, Huang R, Wu JK, Chen CH (2005) Influence of GGBS on durability and corrosion behavior of reinforced concrete. Mater Chem Phys 93:404–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hooton RD, Titherington MP (2004) Chloride resistance of high-performance concretes subjected to accelerated curing. Cem Concr Res 34(9):1561–1567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fearson JPH (1986) Sulfate resistance of combination of Portland cement and granulated blast furnace slag, vol 2. ACI Special Publication SP-91, pp 1495–1524Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mangat PS, El-Khatib JM (1992) Influence of initial curing on sulfate resistance of blended cement concrete. Cem Concr Res 22(6):1089–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gollop RS, Taylor HFW (1996) Micro structural and micro analytical studies of sulfate attack. IV. Reactions of a slag cement paste with sodium and magnesium sulfate solutions. Cem Concr Res 26(7):1013–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cao HT, Bucea L, Ray A, Yozghatlian S (1997) The effect of cement composition and pH of environment on sulfate resistance of Portland cements and blended cements. Cem Concr Compos 19(2):161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Higgins DD (2003) Increased sulfate resistance of GGBS concrete in the presence of carbonate. Cement Concr Compos 25(8):913–919CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hogan FJ, Meusel JW (1981) Evaluation for durability and strength development of a ground granulated blast furnace slag. Cem Concr Aggreg 3(1):40–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kwon Y (2005) A study on the alkali-aggregate reaction in high-strength concrete with particular respect to the ground granulated blast-furnace slag effect. Cem Concr Res 35(7):1305–1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hester D, McNally C, Richardson M (2005) A study of the influence of slag alkali level on the alkali–silica reactivity of slag concrete. Constr Build Mater 19(9):661–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bouikni A, Swamy RN, Bali A (2009) Durability properties of concrete containing 50 % and 65 % slag. Constr Build Mater 23(8):2836–2845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li S, Roy DM (1986) Investigation of relations between porosity, pore structure and chloride diffusion of fly ash blended cement pastes. Cem Concr Res 16(5):749–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mangat PS, Molloy BT (1991) Influence of PFA, slag and microsilica on chloride induced corrosion of reinforcement in concrete. Cem Concr Res 21(5):819–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Al-Amoudi OSB, Rasheeduzzafar MM, Al-Mana AI (1993) Prediction of long-term corrosion resistance of plain and blended cement concretes. ACI Mater J 90(6):564–570Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Torii K, Sasatani T, Kawamura M (1995) Effects of fly ash, blast furnace slag, and silica fume on resistance of mortar to calcium chloride attack. In: Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag, and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete, SP-153, vol. 2. American Concrete Institute, pp 931–949Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jau WC, Tsay DS (1998) A study of the basic engineering properties of slag cement concrete and its resistance to sea water corrosion. Cem Concr Res 28(10):1363–1371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yeau KY, Kim EK (2005) An experimental study on corrosion resistance of concrete with ground granulate blast-furnace slag. Cem Concr Res 35(7):1391–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stark J (1997) Frost resistance with and without deicing salt—a purely physical problem, frost resistance of concrete. In: Proceedings of the International RILEM Workshop on Resistance of concrete to freezing and thawing with or without de-icing chemicals, Essen, Germany, pp 83–99Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Knaack U, Stark J (1997) Frost and frost-deicing salt resistance of super-sulfated cement concrete, frost resistance of concrete. In: Proceedings of the International RILEM Workshop on Resistance of concrete to freezing and thawing with or without de-icing chemicals, Essen, Germany, pp 139–146Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yuksel I, Bilir T, Ozkan O (2007) Durability of concrete incorporating non-ground blast furnace slag and bottom ash as fine aggregate. Build Environ 42(7):2651–2659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tasong WA, Wild S, Tilley RJD (1999) Mechanism by which ground granulated blast furnace slag prevents sulfate attack of lime stabilized kaolinite. Cem Concr Res 29(7):975–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Oner A, Akyuz S (2007) An experimental study on optimum usage of GGBS for the compressive strength of concrete. Cement Concr Compos 29(6):505–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringThapar UniversityPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations