Renewable hydrocarbons through biomass hydropyrolysis process: challenges and opportunities

  • Bhavya Balagurumurthy
  • Twinkle S. Oza
  • Thallada Bhaskar
  • Dilip Kumar Adhikari
REVIEW

Abstract

Considering the current issues of carbon control and the desire to become less dependent on imported oil, the utilization of renewable hydrocarbons for the reduction of CO2 emission and production of liquid synthetic fuels/chemicals has been proposed by researchers worldwide. Efforts to make chemicals/fuels from renewable resources have escalated over the past few years. Biomass-based renewable hydrocarbons are considered to be one of the sources with the highest potential to contribute to the energy needs of modern society for both developed and developing economies worldwide. Fast pyrolysis is becoming an important thermal route to convert biomass to liquid fuels; however, the raw bio-oils obtained have a number of negative properties such as high acidity, high water content, and variable viscosity over time. To overcome this problem and produce bio-oil of good quality, process of ‘hyropyrolysis’ has been developed. The scope for using pyrolysis under hydrogen pressure and also by process of hydropyrolysis followed by in situ hydroconversion of vapors to give oils with much lower oxygen contents has been reviewed.

Keywords

Renewable hydrocarbons Biomass Bio-oil Hydropyrolysis Bio-fuels 

References

  1. 1.
    Huber GW, Iborra S, Corma A (2006) Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: chemistry, catalysts and engineering. Chem Rev 106:4044–4098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Klass DL (2004) In: Cleveland CJ (ed) Encyclopedia of energy, vol 1. Elsevier, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Klass DL (1998) Biomass for renewable energy, fuels and chemicals. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wyman CE, Decker SR, Himmel ME, Brady JW, Skopec CE, Viikari L (2005) In: Dumitriu S (ed) Polysaccharides. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wyman CE, Hinman ND (1990) Ethanol fundamentals of production from renewable feedstocks and use as a transportation fuel. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 24/25:735Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wyman CE (1994) Alternative fuels from biomass and their impact on carbon dioxide accumulation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 45/46:897Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tyson KS (1993) Fuel cycle evaluations of biomass-ethanol and reformulated gasoline. National renewable energy laboratory, Golden (Report No. NREL/TP-263-2950, DE94000227)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lynd LR, Cushman JH, Nichols RJ, Wyman CE (1991) Fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass. Science 251:1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stocker M (2008) Biofuels and biomass-to-liquid fuels in the biorefinery: catalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass using porous materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 47:9200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bhaskar T, Bhavya B, Singh R, Viswanath Naik D, Kumar A, Bhagwan Goyal H (2011) Thermochemical conversion of biomass to biofuels. In: Pandey A, Larroche C, Ricke SC, Dussap C-G, Gnansounou E (eds.) Biofuels. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 51–77Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marker TL, Felix LG, Linck MB, Roberts MJ (2012) Integrated hydropyrolysis and hydroconversion (IH2) for the direct production of gasoline and diesel fuels or blending components from biomass. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 31:191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guell AJ, Li CZ, Herod AA, Stokes BJ, Hancocks P, Kandiyot R (1993) Effect of H2-pressure on the structures of bio-oils from the mild hydropyrolysis of biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 5:155–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pindoria RV, Lim J-Y, Hawkes JE, Lazaro M-J, Herod AA, Kandiyoti R (1997) Structural characterization of biomass pyrolysis tars/oils from eucalyptus wood waste: effect of H2 pressure and sample configuration. Fuel 76:1013–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pindoria RV, Megaritis A, Herod AA, Kandiyoti R (1998) A two-stage fixed-bed reactor for direct hydrotreatment of volatiles from the hydropyrolysis of biomass: effect of catalyst temperature, pressure and catalyst ageing time on product characteristics. Fuel 77:1715–1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pindoria RV, Chatzakis IN, Lim JY, Herod AA, Dugwell DR, Kandiyoti R (1999) Hydropyrolysis of sugar cane bagasse: effect of sample configuration on bio-oil yields and structures from two bench-scale reactors. Fuel 78:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Putun AE, Gercel HF, Kockar OM, Ege O, Snape CE, Putun E (1996) Oil production from an arid-land plant: fixed-bed pyrolysis and hydropyrolysis of Euphorbia rigida. Fuel 75:1307–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Putun AE, Kockar OM, Yorgun S, Gercel HF, Andresen J, Snape CE, Putun E (1996) Fixed-bed pyrolysis and hydropyrolysis of sunflower bagasse: product yields and compositions. Fuel Process Technol 46:49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rocha JD, Luengo CA, Snape CE (1999) The scope for generating bio-oils with relatively low oxygen contents via hydropyrolysis. Org Geochem 30:1527–1534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gerçel HF, Putun AE, Putun Ersan (2002) Hydropyrolysis of extracted Euphorbia rigida in a well-swept fixed-bed tubular reactor. Energy Sources 24:423–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Onaya O, Gaines AF, Kockar OM, Adams M, Tyagi TR, Snape CE (2006) Comparison of the generation of oil by the extraction and the hydropyrolysis of biomass. Fuel 85:382–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marker TL, Felix LG, Linck MB, Meyer HS, Leppin D (2010) Production of methane involves hydropyrolyzing biomass using deoxygenating catalyst, hydroconverting hydropyrolsysis product using hydroconversion catalyst, cooling and introducing product into water-gas shift reactor, and separating methane. US Patent 2010251615-A1Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marker TL, Felix LG, Linck MB (2010) Producing liquid product, comprises hydropyrolyzing biomass to form e.g. hydropyrolysis liquid and char, removing char, hydroconverting liquid to e.g. gaseous mixture and steam reforming to form hydrogen, and introducing hydrogen to reactor. US patent 2010256428-A1; WO2010117437-A1Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marker TL, Felix LG, Linck MB (2010) Producing liquid products from biomass, comprises introducing biomass and molecular hydrogen into reactor vessel, producing e.g. carbon dioxide, removing char from liquid, hydroconverting liquid and steam reforming gaseous mixture. US Patent 2010251600-A1; WO2010117436-A1Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Agrawal M, Agrawal R, Singh NR (2009) Production of liquid hydrocarbons from biomass that contains carbon by forming hydrogen from carbon-free energy source, and pyrolizing biomass in presence of hydrogen to form bio-oil comprising alkanes, alkenes and/or hydrocarbons. US Patent 2009082604-A1; WO2009029660-A2; WO2009029660-A3Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Agrawal R, Singh NR (2009) Production of liquid hydrocarbon such as alkanes, and alkenes from biomass, involves hydropyrolizing biomass with gaseous exhaust stream formed from gasification or reforming of carbon containing moiety. US Patent 2009084666-A1Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Centi G, Lanzafame P, Perathoner S (2011) Analysis of the alternative routes in the catalytic transformation of lignocellulosic materials. Catal Today 167:14–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bhavya Balagurumurthy
    • 1
  • Twinkle S. Oza
    • 2
  • Thallada Bhaskar
    • 1
  • Dilip Kumar Adhikari
    • 1
  1. 1.Bio-Fuels Division (BFD)CSIR-Indian Institute of Petroleum (CSIR-IIP)DehradunIndia
  2. 2.Birla Institute of TechnologyPilaniIndia

Personalised recommendations