Vinyl 2010 — nearing the target date

Original Article


For almost 10 years, Vinyl 2010 has provided original approaches to technical, environmental, and political problems relating to poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) material cycles and waste management. On the one hand, PVC has outstanding qualities in a wide range of applications; on the other hand, concerns about potential impacts attributed to production, additives, and waste management led to calls for PVC-specific regulations and mandatory substitution in certain applications. Considering the entire life cycle of PVC products, the industry proposed a comprehensive set of measures rendering production cleaner, eliminating controversial additives, and promoting responsible management of waste, favoring recycling. Vinyl 2010 can now be regarded as a highly successful example of applying voluntary commitments instead of the more usual command and control approach from regulatory authorities.

Key words

Life cycle PVC Recycling Sustainability Voluntary commitment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Argus in association with University Rostock (1999) The behaviour of PVC in landfill. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Plinke E, Wenk N, Wolff G, Castiglione D, Palmark M (2000) Mechanical recycling of PVC wastes. Study for DG XI of the European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tukker A, de Groot H, Simons L, Wiegersma S (1999) Chemical recycling of plastics waste (PVC and other resins). TNO, DelftGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown KA, Holland MR, Boyd RA, Thresh S, Jones H, Ogilvie SM (2000) Economic evaluation of PVC waste management. AEA Technology, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    European Commission (2000) Green Paper: Environmental issues of PVC. The Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    EVCM (1995) ECVM industry charter for the production of VCM and PVC (suspension process). The Council, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    EVCM (1998) Industry charter for the production of emulsion PVC. The Council, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bühl R (2002) Progress in PVC feedstock recycling. In: Proceedings of the Brighton PVC Conference. London, UK, pp 373–381Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rijpkema LPM (2000) MSWC salt residues: survey of technologies for treatment. TNO R2000/317, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    The Association of Cities and Regions for Recycling (2004) Good practices guide on waste plastics recycling — a guide by and for local and regional authorities. ACRR. Available at: (accessed 29 March, 2010)
  11. 11.
    APPRICOD (2006) Towards sustainable plastic construction and demolition waste management in Europe. APPRICOD, available at: (accessed 29 March, 2010)
  12. 12.
    Coates PD, Weston S, Morton R (2004) Material and products from UK-sourced PVC-rich waste. WRAP, BanburyGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sevenster A (2008) Eco-profiles and environmental declarations for PVC. Plast Rubber Compos 37(9–10):403–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mechanical recycling of PVC wastes. Study for DG XI of the European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ANEC / BEUC position on Voluntary environmental agreements October 2006. European Consumer Voice in Standardisation, The European Consumers’ OrganisationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vinyl 2010BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations