Advertisement

Neural ITD Sensitivity and Temporal Coding with Cochlear Implants in an Animal Model of Early-Onset Deafness

  • Yoojin ChungEmail author
  • Brian D. Buechel
  • Woongsang Sunwoo
  • Joseph D. Wagner
  • Bertrand Delgutte
Research Article

Abstract

Users of cochlear implant (CI) face challenges in everyday situations such as understanding conversations in noise, even with CIs in both ears. These challenges are related to difficulties with tasks that require fine temporal processing such as discrimination of pulse rates or interaural time differences (ITD), a major cue for sound localization. The degradation in temporal processing and ITD sensitivity are especially acute in those who lost hearing in early childhood. Here, we characterized temporal coding and ITD sensitivity of single neurons in a novel animal model of early-onset deafness. Rabbits were deafened as neonates and deprived of auditory stimulation until they reached adult age when single-unit recordings from the auditory midbrain were made chronically using an unanesthetized preparation. The results are compared to measurements from adult-deafened rabbits with normal auditory development to understand the effect of early-onset deafness on neural temporal coding and ITD sensitivity. Neurons in the inferior colliculus (IC) of early-deafened rabbits were less likely to show sustained, excitatory responses to pulse train stimulation and more likely to show suppressive responses compared to neurons in adult-deaf animals. Fewer neurons showed synchronized responses to pulse trains at any rate in the early-deaf group. In addition, fewer neurons showed significant ITD sensitivity in their overall firing rate in the early-deaf group compared to adult-deaf animals. Neural ITD discrimination thresholds in the early-deaf group were poorer than thresholds in adult-deaf group, especially at high pulse rates. The overall degradation in neural ITD sensitivity is consistent with the difficulties encountered by human CI users with early-onset hearing loss. These results lay the groundwork for investigating whether the degradations in temporal coding and ITD sensitivity observed in early-deaf animals can be reversed by appropriate CI stimulation during development.

Keywords

cochlear implant inferior colliculus interaural time difference temporal coding binaural hearing early-onset deafness auditory deprivation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grants R01 DC005775 and P30 DC005209. We thank Ken Hancock, Camille Shaw, Alice Gelman, Stephanie Ventura, and Marie Ortega for technical assistance. We thank M. Charles Liberman, Leslie Liberman, and Melissa McKinnon for valuable advice and assistance on processing of temporal bones and Pooja Balaram for advice on processing of brain tissue.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Y. Chung, B.D. Buechel, W. Sunwoo, J.D. Wagner, and B. Delgutte have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Babalian AL, Ryugo DK, Rouiller EM (2003) Discharge properties of identified cochlear nucleus neurons and auditory nerve fibers in response to repetitive electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. Exp Brain Res 153:452–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beitel RE, Vollmer M, Raggio MW, Schreiner CE (2011) Behavioral training enhances cortical temporal processing in neonatally deafened juvenile cats. J Neurophysiol 106:944–959CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bock GR, Webster WR (1974) Spontaneous activity of single units in the inferior colliculus of anesthetized and unanesthetized cats. Brain Res 76:150–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brand A, Behrend O, Marquardt T, McAlpine D, Grothe B (2002) Precise inhibition is essential for microsecond interaural time difference coding. Nature 417:543–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buechel BD, Hancock KE, Chung Y, Delgutte B (2018) Improved neural coding of ITD with bilateral cochlear implants by introducing short inter-pulse intervals. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 19:681–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Busby PA, Tong YC, Clark GM (1993) Electrode position, repetition rate, and speech perception by early- and late-deafened cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 93:1058–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cant NB, Benson CG (2006) Organization of the inferior colliculus of the gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus): differences in distribution of projections from the cochlear nuclei and the superior olivary complex. J Comp Neurol 495:511–528CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Chambers AR, Resnik J, Yuan Y, Whitton JP, Edge AS, Liberman MC, Polley DB (2016) Central gain restores auditory processing following near-complete cochlear denervation. Neuron 89:867–879CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Chung Y, Hancock KE, Nam SI, Delgutte B (2014) Coding of electric pulse trains presented through cochlear implants in the auditory midbrain of awake rabbit: comparison with anesthetized preparations. J Neurosci 34:218–231CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Chung Y, Hancock KE, Delgutte B (2016) Neural coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants in unanesthetized rabbits. J Neurosci 36:5520–5531CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark GM (1969) Responses of cells in the superior olivary complex of the cat to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. Exp Neurol 24:124–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cosentino S, Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, Parkinson W, Bierer JA (2016) Rate discrimination, gap detection and ranking of temporal pitch in cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 17:371–382CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Day ML, Koka K, Delgutte B (2012) Neural encoding of sound source location in the presence of a concurrent, spatially separated source. J Neurophysiol 108:2612–2628CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Devore S, Delgutte B (2010) Effects of reverberation on the directional sensitivity of auditory neurons across the tonotopic axis: influences of interaural time and level differences. J Neurosci 30:7826–7837CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Fallon JB, Irvine DR, Shepherd RK (2009) Cochlear implant use following neonatal deafness influences the cochleotopic organization of the primary auditory cortex in cats. J Comp Neurol 512:101–114CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Fitzpatrick DC, Kuwada S, Batra R (2000) Neural sensitivity to interaural time differences: beyond the Jeffress model. J Neurosci 20:1605–1615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Ricketts TA, Labadie RF, Haynes DS (2007) Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear 28:524–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hancock KE, Delgutte B (2004) A physiologically based model of interaural time difference discrimination. J Neurosci 24:7110–7117CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Hancock KE, Noel V, Ryugo DK, Delgutte B (2010) Neural coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants: effects of congenital deafness. J Neurosci 30:14068–14079CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Hancock KE, Chung Y, Delgutte B (2012) Neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of binaurally coherent jitter. J Neurophysiol 108:714–728CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Hancock KE, Chung Y, Delgutte B (2013) Congenital and prolonged adult-onset deafness cause distinct degradations in neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 14:393–411CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Hardie NA, Shepherd RK (1999) Sensorineural hearing loss during development: morphological and physiological response of the cochlea and auditory brainstem. Hear Res 128:147–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hartley DE, Vongpaisal T, Xu J, Shepherd RK, King AJ, Isaiah A (2010) Bilateral cochlear implantation in the ferret: a novel animal model for behavioral studies. J Neurosci Methods 190:214–228CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Heffer LF, Fallon JB (2008) A novel stimulus artifact removal technique for high-rate electrical stimulation. J Neurosci Methods 170:277–284CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Ihlefeld A, Carlyon RP, Kan A, Churchill TH, Litovsky RY (2015) Limitations on monaural and binaural temporal processing in bilateral cochlear implant listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 16:641–652CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Ishiyama G, Geiger C, Lopez IA, Ishiyama A (2011) Spiral and vestibular ganglion estimates in archival temporal bones obtained by design based stereology and Abercrombie methods. J Neurosci Methods 196:76–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson LA, Della Santina CC, Wang X (2016) Selective neuronal activation by cochlear implant stimulation in auditory cortex of awake primate. J Neurosci 36:12468–12484CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Kan A, Litovsky RY (2015) Binaural hearing with electrical stimulation. Hear Res 322:127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kong YY, Deeks JM, Axon PR, Carlyon RP (2009) Limits of temporal pitch in cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 125:1649–1657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuwada S, Stanford TR, Batra R (1987) Interaural phase-sensitive units in the inferior colliculus of the unanesthetized rabbit: effects of changing frequency. J Neurophysiol 57:1338–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kuwada S, Batra R, Stanford TR (1989) Monaural and binaural response properties of neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rabbit: effects of sodium pentobarbital. J Neurophysiol 61:269–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laback B, Egger K, Majdak P (2015) Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants. Hear Res 322:138–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lazard DS, Vincent C, Venail F, van de Heyning P, Truy E, Sterkers O, Skarzynski PH, Skarzynski H, Schauwers K, O'Leary S, Mawman D, Maat B, Kleine-Punte A, Huber AM, Green K, Govaerts PJ, Fraysse B, Dowell R, Dillier N, Burke E, Beynon A, Bergeron F, Başkent D, Artières F, Blamey PJ (2012) Pre-, per- and postoperative factors affecting performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: a new conceptual model over time. PLoS One 7:e48739CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Leake PA, Hradek GT, Rebscher SJ, Snyder RL (1991) Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation induces selective survival of spiral ganglion neurons in neonatally deafened cats. Hear Res 54:251–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leake PA, Snyder RL, Hradek GT, Rebscher SJ (1992) Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats: effects of intensity and stimulating electrode location. Hear Res 64:99–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leake PA, Hradek GT, Snyder RL (1999) Chronic electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant promotes survival of spiral ganglion neurons after neonatal deafness. J Comp Neurol 412:543–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leao RN, Berntson A, Forsythe ID, Walmsley B (2004) Reduced low-voltage activated K+ conductances and enhanced central excitability in a congenitally deaf (dn/dn) mouse. J Physiol 559:25–33CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Leao RN, Naves MM, Leao KE, Walmsley B (2006) Altered sodium currents in auditory neurons of congenitally deaf mice. Eur J Neurosci 24:1137–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Litovsky RY, Jones GL, Agrawal S, van Hoesel R (2010) Effect of age at onset of deafness on binaural sensitivity in electric hearing in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 127:400–414CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. O'Neil JN, Limb CJ, Baker CA, Ryugo DK (2010) Bilateral effects of unilateral cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf cats. J Comp Neurol 518:2382–2404CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. O'Neil JN, Connelly CJ, Limb CJ, Ryugo DK (2011) Synaptic morphology and the influence of auditory experience. Hear Res 279:118–130CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Qiu C, Salvi R, Ding D, Burkard R (2000) Inner hair cell loss leads to enhanced response amplitudes in auditory cortex of unanesthetized chinchillas: evidence for increased system gain. Hear Res 139:153–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Resnick JM, O'Brien GE, Rubinstein JT (2018) Simulated auditory nerve axon demyelination alters sensitivity and response timing to extracellular stimulation. Hear Res 361:121–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Resnik J, Polley DB (2017) Fast-spiking GABA circuit dynamics in the auditory cortex predict recovery of sensory processing following peripheral nerve damage. Elife 6:e21452CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Ryugo DK, Kretzmer EA, Niparko JK (2005) Restoration of auditory nerve synapses in cats by cochlear implants. Science 310:1490–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ryugo DK, Baker CA, Montey KL, Chang LY, Coco A, Fallon JB, Shepherd RK (2010) Synaptic plasticity after chemical deafening and electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. J Comp Neurol 518:1046–1063CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Salvi R, Sun W, Ding D, Chen GD, Lobarinas E, Wang J, Radziwon K, Auerbach BD (2016) Inner hair cell loss disrupts hearing and cochlear function leading to sensory deprivation and enhanced central auditory gain. Front Neurosci 10:621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shackleton TM, Skottun BC, Arnott RH, Palmer AR (2003) Interaural time difference discrimination thresholds for single neurons in the inferior colliculus of Guinea pigs. J Neurosci 23:716–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shepherd RK, Javel E (1997) Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status. Hear Res 108:112–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shepherd RK, Baxi JH, Hardie NA (1999) Response of inferior colliculus neurons to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in neonatally deafened cats. J Neurophysiol 82:1363–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Simpson AJ, Fitter MJ (1973) What is the best index of detectability. Psychol Bull 80:481–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith ZM, Delgutte B (2007) Sensitivity to interaural time differences in the inferior colliculus with bilateral cochlear implants. J Neurosci 27:6740–6750CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Snyder RL, Rebscher SJ, Cao KL, Leake PA, Kelly K (1990) Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I: expansion of central representation. Hear Res 50:7–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Snyder R, Leake P, Rebscher S, Beitel R (1995) Temporal resolution of neurons in cat inferior colliculus to intracochlear electrical stimulation: effects of neonatal deafening and chronic stimulation. J Neurophysiol 73:449–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Takesian AE, Kotak VC, Sanes DH (2009) Developmental hearing loss disrupts synaptic inhibition: implications for auditory processing. Future Neurol 4:331–349CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Tillein J, Hubka P, Syed E, Hartmann R, Engel AK, Kral A (2010) Cortical representation of interaural time difference in congenital deafness. Cereb Cortex 20:492–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tirko NN, Ryugo DK (2012) Synaptic plasticity in the medial superior olive of hearing, deaf, and cochlear-implanted cats. J Comp Neurol 520:2202–2217CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Tong YC, Busby PA, Clark GM (1988) Perceptual studies on cochlear implant patients with early onset of profound hearing impairment prior to normal development of auditory, speech, and language skills. J Acoust Soc Am 84:951–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Torterolo P, Falconi A, Morales-Cobas G, Velluti RA (2002) Inferior colliculus unitary activity in wakefulness, sleep and under barbiturates. Brain Res 935:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Townshend B, Cotter N, Van Compernolle D, White RL (1987) Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 82:106–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vollmer M (2018) Neural processing of acoustic and electric interaural time differences in normal-hearing gerbils. J Neurosci 38:6949–6966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vollmer M, Snyder RL, Leake PA, Beitel RE, Moore CM, Rebscher SJ (1999) Temporal properties of chronic cochlear electrical stimulation determine temporal resolution of neurons in cat inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 82:2883–2902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vollmer M, Leake PA, Beitel RE, Rebscher SJ, Snyder RL (2005) Degradation of temporal resolution in the auditory midbrain after prolonged deafness is reversed by electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Neurophysiol 93:3339–3355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vollmer M, Beitel RE, Schreiner CE, Leake PA (2017) Passive stimulation and behavioral training differentially transform temporal processing in the inferior colliculus and primary auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 117:47–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. West MJ, Slomianka L, Gundersen HJ (1991) Unbiased stereological estimation of the total number of neurons in the subdivisions of the rat hippocampus using the optical fractionator. Anat Rec 231:482–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilson BS, Dorman MF (2008) Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future. Hear Res 242:3–21CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Zeng FG (2002) Temporal pitch in electric hearing. Hear Res 174:101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zurita P, Villa AE, de Ribaupierre Y, de Ribaupierre F, Rouiller EM (1994) Changes of single unit activity in the cat's auditory thalamus and cortex associated to different anesthetic conditions. Neurosci Res 19:303–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eaton-Peabody LaboratoriesMassachusetts Eye & EarBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of OtolaryngologyHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and TechnologyHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  4. 4.Department of OtolaryngologyGachon University Gil Medical CenterIncheonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations