The Masked ABR (mABR): a New Measurement Method for the Auditory Brainstem Response
- 209 Downloads
The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is relatively non-invasive, and in many species, the only practical way to assess auditory sensitivity. The two main methods for measuring ABR are using either transients or tone bursts as a stimulus. The transient stimulus produces strong neural responses that contain no frequency information. In contrast, tone bursts stimulate only a small part of the auditory system, eliciting weaker neural responses but supplying frequency information. Furthermore, short tone bursts become less and less frequency specific with increasing stimulus wavelength, making them unsuitable for testing low-frequency hearing. Here, we develop a method that can measure sensitivity to both low and high-frequency stimuli. The method is based on masking of a transient response by long-duration sinusoids. The measurement system is developed as a highly portable system that runs on battery power. It has been used in a variety of animals in our lab and in the field, including squid (Mooney et al. in J Exp Biol 213: 3748–3759, 2010), lungfish (Christensen-Dalsgaard et al. in J Neurophys 105: 1992–2004, 2011b), alligators (Bierman et al. in J Exp Biol 217: 1094–1107, 2014), and mink (Brandt et al. in J Exp Biol 216: 3542–3550, 2013). Here, we present data recorded from Tokay geckos and compare the results with tone burst ABR measurements. This method produces results comparable to tone burst stimulations at higher frequencies (above 1 kHz) but has several advantages: it is relatively insensitive to fluctuations in neural signal level, it allows measurements at very low frequencies, it allows constant monitoring of the state of the animal, and can be used to measure directional hearing.
KeywordsABR masking low frequency gecko
This study was supported by the Danish National Science Foundation [grant DFF1323-00132] and the Carlsberg Foundation grants to J.C.D.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Brandt C, Andersen T, Christensen-Dalsgaard J (2008) Demonstration of a portable system for auditory brain stem recordings based on pure tone masking difference. In: Dau T, Buchholz JM, Harte JM, Christiansen TU (eds) Auditory signal processing in hearing-impaired listeners. 1st International symposium on auditory and audiological research. Centertryk, Copenhagen, pp 241–247Google Scholar
- Burkard RF, Don M (1997) The auditory brainstem response. In: Burkard RF, Don M, Eggermont JJ (eds) Auditory evoked potentials. Basic principles and clinical applications. Lippincott Williams &Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 229–253Google Scholar
- Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Manley GA (2013) The malleable middle ear: an underappreciated player in the evolution of hearing in vertebrates. In: Köppl C, Manley GA, Fay RR, Popper A (eds) Insights from comparative hearing research. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research. Springer, New York, pp 157–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Brandt C, Willis KL, Christensen CB, Ketten D, Edds-Walton P, Fay RR, Madsen PT & Carr CE (2012) specialization for underwater hearing by the tympanic middle ear of the turtle, Trachemys scripta elegans. Proc Roy Soc B 279: 2816–2824Google Scholar