Input–Output Functions of Vestibular Afferent Responses to Air-Conducted Clicks in Rats
- 258 Downloads
Sound-evoked vestibular myogenic potentials recorded from the sternocleidomastoid muscles (the cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential or cVEMP) and the extraocular muscles (the ocular VEMP or oVEMP) have proven useful in clinical assessment of vestibular function. VEMPs are commonly interpreted as a test of saccular function, based on neurophysiological evidence showing activation of saccular afferents by intense acoustic click stimuli. However, recent neurophysiological studies suggest that the clicks used in clinical VEMP tests activate vestibular end organs other than the saccule. To provide the neural basis for interpreting clinical VEMP testing results, the present study examined the extent to which air-conducted clicks differentially activate the various vestibular end organs at several intensities and durations in Sprague–Dawley rats. Single unit recordings were made from 562 vestibular afferents that innervated the otoliths [inferior branch otolith (IO) and superior branch otolith (SO)], the anterior canal (AC), the horizontal canal (HC), and the posterior canal (PC). Clicks higher than 60 dB SL (re-auditory brainstem response threshold) activated both semicircular canal and otolith organ afferents. Clicks at or below 60 dB SL, however, activated only otolith organ afferents. Longer duration clicks evoked larger responses in AC, HC, and SO afferents, but not in IO afferents. Intra-axonal recording and labeling confirmed that sound sensitive vestibular afferents innervated the horizontal and anterior canal cristae as well as the saccular and utricular maculae. Interestingly, all sound sensitive afferents are calyx-bearing fibers. These results demonstrate stimulus-dependent acoustic activation of both semicircular canals and otolith organs, and suggest that sound activation of vestibular end organs other than the saccule should not be ruled out when designing and interpreting clinical VEMP tests.
Keywordsvestibular sound VEMP single unit recording rat saccule semicircular canal
This study is supported by NIH R01DC012060 (HZ), NIH R01DC008585 (WZ), and R01DC006685 (RDR).
None of the authors have any conflicts of interests.
- Goldberg JM, Wilson VJ, Cullen KE, Angelaki DE, Broussard DM, Buttnwe-Ennever JA, Fukushima K, Minor LB (2012) Clinical manifestation of peripheral vestibular dysfunction. In the vestibular system: a sixth sense. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 495–524Google Scholar
- Luis L, Costa J, Vaz Garcia F, Valls-Solé J, Brandt T, Schneider E (2013a) Spontaneous plugging of the horizontal semicircular canal with reversible canal dysfunction and recovery of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Otol. Neurotol 34:743–747Google Scholar
- Luis L, Zhu H, Costa J, Valls-Solé J, Brandt T, Zhou W, Schneider E (2013b) Reply to the commentary on Luis et al. “Spontaneous plugging of the horizontal semicircular canal with reversible canal dysfunction and recovery of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials”. Otol Neurotol (in press)Google Scholar
- Tullio P (1929) Das Ohr und die Entstehung der Sprache und Schrift. Urban & Schwarzenberg, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Zhu H, Tang X, Wei W, Mustain M, Zhou W (2011b) Air-conducted short tone bursts-evoked vestibular responses in rats. Society for Neuroscience, Program No. 579.05/FF12 Neuroscience Meeting Planner, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Zhu H, Tang X, Mustain M, Zhou W (2012) Air-conducted click-evoked responses in the vestibular nuclei of rats. Program No. 574.10/II2 Neuroscience Meeting Planner. New Orleans, Society for NeuroscienceGoogle Scholar