Experimental Study of Vibrations of Gerbil Tympanic Membrane with Closed Middle Ear Cavity

  • Nima Maftoon
  • W. Robert J. Funnell
  • Sam J. Daniel
  • Willem F. Decraemer
Research Article

Abstract

The purpose of the present work is to investigate the spatial vibration pattern of the gerbil tympanic membrane (TM) as a function of frequency. In vivo vibration measurements were done at several locations on the pars flaccida and pars tensa, and along the manubrium, on surgically exposed gerbil TMs with closed middle ear cavities. A laser Doppler vibrometer was used to measure motions in response to audio frequency sine sweeps in the ear canal. Data are presented for two different pars flaccida conditions: naturally flat and retracted into the middle ear cavity. Resonance of the flat pars flaccida causes a minimum and a shallow maximum in the displacement magnitude of the manubrium and pars tensa at low frequencies. Compared with a flat pars flaccida, a retracted pars flaccida has much lower displacement magnitudes at low frequencies and does not affect the responses of the other points. All manubrial and pars tensa points show a broad resonance in the range of 1.6 to 2 kHz. Above this resonance, the displacement magnitudes of manubrial points, including the umbo, roll off with substantial irregularities. The manubrial points show an increasing displacement magnitude from the lateral process toward the umbo. Above 5 kHz, phase differences between points along the manubrium start to become more evident, which may indicate flexing of the tip of the manubrium or a change in the vibration mode of the malleus. At low frequencies, points on the posterior side of the pars tensa tend to show larger displacements than those on the anterior side. The simple low-frequency vibration pattern of the pars tensa becomes more complex at higher frequencies, with the breakup occurring at between 1.8 and 2.8 kHz. These observations will be important for the development and validation of middle ear finite-element models for the gerbil.

Keywords

middle ear pars tensa pars flaccida manubrium vibration pattern laser Doppler vibrometry 

References

  1. Alm P, Bloom G, Hellström S, Stenfors L, Widemar L (1983) Middle ear effusion caused by mechanical stimulation of the external auditory canal: an experimental study in the rat. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 96(1–2):91–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aziz PM, Sorensen HV, Van Der Spiegel J (2002) An overview of sigma-delta converters. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE 13(1):61–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bigelow DC, Swanson PB, Saunders JC (1996) The effect of tympanic membrane perforation size on umbo velocity in the rat. Laryngoscope 106(1):71–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheng JT, Aarnisalo AA, Harrington E, Hernandez-Montes MS, Furlong C, Merchant SN, Rosowski JJ (2010) Motion of the surface of the human tympanic membrane measured with stroboscopic holography. Hear Res 263(1–2):66–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen YE, Doan DE, Rubin DM, Saunders JC (1993) Middle-ear development. V: development of umbo sensitivity in the gerbil. Am J Otolaryngol 14(3):191–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Decraemer WF, Khanna SM, Funnell WR (1989) Interferometric measurement of the amplitude and phase of tympanic membrane vibrations in cat. Hear Res 38(1–2):1–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Decraemer WF, Khanna SM, Funnell WR (1991) Malleus vibration mode changes with frequency. Hear Res 54(2):305–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Decraemer WF, Khanna SM, Funnell WRJ (1994a) A method for determining three-dimensional vibration in the ear. Hear Res 77(1–2):19–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Decraemer WF, Khanna SM, Funnell WRJ (1994b) Bending of the manubrium in cat under normal sound stimulation. Proc Opt Imaging Tech Biomed 2329:74–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Decraemer, W. F., Khanna, S. M., & Funnell, W. R. J. (1999). Vibrations at a fine grid of points on the cat tympanic membrane measured with a heterodyne interferometer. EOS/SPIE International Symposia on Industrial Lasers and Inspection, Conference on Biomedical Laser and Metrology and Applications.Google Scholar
  11. Decraemer, W. F., de La Rochefoucauld, O., & Olson, E. S. (2011). Measurement of the three-dimensional vibration motion of the ossicular chain in the living gerbil. In C. A. Shera & E. S. Olson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Mechanics of Hearing Workshop 1403:528–533Google Scholar
  12. Dirckx JJJ, Decraemer WF, von Unge M, Larsson C (1998) Volume displacement of the gerbil eardrum pars flaccida as a function of middle ear pressure. Hear Res 118(1–2):35–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dirckx JJJ, Decraemer WF (2001) Effect of middle ear components on eardrum quasi-static deformation. Hear Res 157(1–2):124–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doyle WJ, Alper CM, Seroky JT (1999) Trans-mucosal inert gas exchange constants for the monkey middle ear. Auris Nasus Larynx 26(1):5–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doyle WJ, Seroky JT, Alper CM (1995) Gas exchange across the middle ear mucosa in monkeys: estimation of exchange rate. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121(8):887–892PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellaham, N. N., Akache, F., Funnell, W. R., & Daniel, S. J. (2007). Experimental study of the effects of drying on middle-ear vibrations in the gerbil. 30th Ann Conf Can Med Biol Eng SocGoogle Scholar
  17. Emgård P, Hellström S (1997) An animal model for external otitis. European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology 254(3):115–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eriksson P, Mattsson C, Hellstrom S (2003) First forty-eight hours of developing otitis media: an experimental study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 112(6):558–566PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Flisberg K, Ingelstedt S, Örtegren U (1963) On middle ear pressure. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 56(S182):43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fulghum RS, Marrow HG (1996) Experimental otitis media with Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 105(3):234–241PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Funnell WRJ (1983) On the undamped natural frequencies and mode shapes of a finite-element model of the cat eardrum. J Acoust Soc Am 73:1657–1661Google Scholar
  22. Funnell WRJ, Khanna SM, Decraemer WF (1992) On the degree of rigidity of the manubrium in a finite-element model of the cat eardrum. J Acoust Soc Am 91(4):2082–2090Google Scholar
  23. Funnell WRJ, Laszlo CA (1982) A critical review of experimental observations on ear-drum structure and function. ORL 44(4):181–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gea SLR, Decraemer WF, Funnell WRJ, Dirckx JJJ, Maier H (2009) Tympanic membrane boundary deformations derived from static displacements observed with computerized tomography in human and gerbil. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 11(1):1–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hellström S, Goldie P, Salén B, Stenfors L-E (1985) Mechanisms in middle ear effusion production caused by irritation of the external auditory canal. Am J Otolaryngol 6(3):220–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hiraide F, Eriksson H (1978) The effects of the vacuum on vascular permeability of the middle ear. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 85(1–6):10–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hiraide F, Paparella MM (1972) Vascular changes in middle ear effusions. Archives of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery 96(1):45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hutchings, M. (1987) The gerbil as an animal model of otitis media with effusion. J Physiol (London), 396:175Google Scholar
  29. Ishihara M (1989) Experimental study of vibration analysis in middle ear models by holographic interferometry. Effects of the cross-sectioned area of aditus on the vibration of tympanic membrane. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 92(5):726–735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Khanna SM, Tonndorf J (1972) Tympanic membrane vibrations in cats studied by time-averaged holography. J Acoust Soc Am 51:1904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kohllöffel LUE (1984) Notes on the comparative mechanics of hearing. III. On Shrapnell’s membrane. Hear Res 13(1):83–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Konrádsson KS, Ivarsson A, Bank G (1987) Computerized laser Doppler interferometric scanning of the vibrating tympanic membrane. Scand Audiol 16(3):159–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. de La Rochefoucauld O, Olson ES (2010) A sum of simple and complex motions on the eardrum and manubrium in gerbil. Hear Res 263(1–2):9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Larsson C, Dirckx JJJ, Bagger-Sjöbäck D, von Unge M (2005) Pars flaccida displacement pattern in otitis media with effusion in the gerbil. Otol Neurol 26(3):337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee C-Y, Rosowski JJ (2001) Effects of middle-ear static pressure on pars tensa and pars flaccida of gerbil ears. Hear Res 153(1–2):146–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maeta M (1991) Effects of the perforation of the tympanic membrane on its vibration—with special reference to an experimental study by holographic interferometry. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 94(2):231–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nambiar S (2010) An experimental study of middle-ear vibrations in gerbils. Master of Engineering thesis. McGill University, Montréal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  38. Okano K (1990) Influence of liquid volume in the middle ear on tympanic membrane vibration (experimental study by holographic interferometry). Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 93(11):1847–1855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Qin Z, Wood M, Rosowski JJ (2010) Measurement of conductive hearing loss in mice. Hear Res 263(1–2):93–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ravicz, M. E., & Rosowski, J. J. (1997) Sound-power collection by the auditory periphery of the Mongolian gerbil Meriones unguiculatus: III. Effect of variations in middle-ear volume. J Acoust Soc Am 10:2135Google Scholar
  41. Ravicz ME, Rosowski JJ, Voigt HF (1992) Sound-power collection by the auditory periphery of the Mongolian gerbil Meriones unguiculatus. I: middle-ear input impedance. J Acoust Soc Am 92(1):157–177Google Scholar
  42. Ravicz, M. E., Rosowski, J. J., & Voigt, H. F. (1996) Sound-power collection by the auditory periphery of the Mongolian gerbil Meriones unguiculatus. II. External-ear radiation impedance and power collection. J Acoust Soc Am 99:3044Google Scholar
  43. Rosowski JJ, Cheng JT, Ravicz ME, Hulli N, Hernandez-Montes M, Harrington E, Furlong C (2009) Computer-assisted time-averaged holograms of the motion of the surface of the mammalian tympanic membrane with sound stimuli of 0.4–25 kHz. Hear Res 253(1–2):83–96Google Scholar
  44. Rosowski JJ, Lee CY (2002) The effect of immobilizing the gerbil’s pars flaccida on the middle-ear’s response to static pressure. Hear Res 174(1–2):183–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosowski JJ, Ravicz ME, Teoh SW, Flandermeyer D (1999) Measurements of middle-ear function in the Mongolian gerbil, a specialized mammalian ear. Audiol Neuro-otol 4(3–4):129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rosowski JJ, Teoh SW, Flandermeyer DT (1997) The effect of the pars flaccida of the tympanic membrane on the ear’s sensitivity to sound. In: Lewis ER, Long GR, Lyon RF, Narins PM, Steele CR, Hect-Poiner E (eds) Diversity in auditory mechanics. World Scientific, New Jersey, pp 129–135Google Scholar
  47. Sadé J, Ar A (1997) Middle ear and auditory tube: middle ear clearance, gas exchange, and pressure regulation. Otolaryng Head Neck 116(4):499–524Google Scholar
  48. Stenfors L, Carlsöö B, Winblad B (1981) Structure and healing capacity of the rat tympanic membrane after eustachian tube occlusion. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 91(1–6):75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Suehiro M (1990) Effects of an increase or decrease in the middle ear pressure on tympanic membrane vibrations (experimental study by holographic interferometry). Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 93(3):398–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Teoh SW, Flandermeyer DT, Rosowski JJ (1997) Effects of pars flaccida on sound conduction in ears of Mongolian gerbil: acoustic and anatomical measurements. Hear Res 106(1–2):39–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tonndorf J, Khanna SM (1972) Tympanic-membrane vibrations in human cadaver ears studied by time-averaged holography. J Acoust Soc Am 52:1221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tos M, Poulsen G (1980) Attic retractions following secretory otitis. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 89(3–6):479–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. von Unge M, Decraemer W, Bagger-Sjöbäck D, Van den Berghe D (1997) Tympanic membrane changes in experimental purulent otitis media. Hear Res 106(1–2):123–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. von Unge M, Decraemer WF, Bagger-Sjöbäck D, Dirckx JJ (1993) Displacement of the gerbil tympanic membrane under static pressure variations measured with a real-time differential moiré interferometer. Hear Res 70(2):229–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Voss SE, Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN, Peake WT (2000) Acoustic responses of the human middle ear. Hear Res 150(1–2):43–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wada H, Ando M, Takeuchi M, Sugawara H, Koike T, Kobayashi T, Hozawa K et al (2002) Vibration measurement of the tympanic membrane of guinea pig temporal bones using time-averaged speckle pattern interferometry. J Acoust Soc Am 111:2189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zheng Y, Ohyama K, Hozawa K, Wada H, Takasaka T (1997) Effect of anesthetic agents and middle ear pressure application on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the gerbil. Hear Res 112(1–2):167–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nima Maftoon
    • 1
  • W. Robert J. Funnell
    • 1
    • 3
  • Sam J. Daniel
    • 2
    • 3
  • Willem F. Decraemer
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of BioMedical EngineeringMcGill UniversityMontréalCanada
  2. 2.Department of Pediatric SurgeryMcGill UniversityMontréalCanada
  3. 3.Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryMcGill UniversityMontréalCanada
  4. 4.Biomedical PhysicsUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations