LowFrequency FiniteElement Modeling of the Gerbil Middle Ear
 585 Downloads
 29 Citations
Abstract
The gerbil is a popular species for experimental middleear research. The goal of this study is to develop a 3D finiteelement model to quantify the mechanics of the gerbil middle ear at low frequencies (up to about 1 kHz). The 3D reconstruction is based on a magnetic resonance imaging dataset with a voxel size of about 45 μm, and an xray microCT dataset with a voxel size of about 5.5 μm, supplemented by histological images. The eardrum model is based on moiré shape measurements. Each individual structure in the model was assumed to be homogeneous with isotropic, linear, and elastic material properties derived from a priori estimates in the literature. The behavior of the finiteelement model in response to a uniform acoustic pressure on the eardrum of 1 Pa is analyzed. Sensitivity tests are done to evaluate the significance of the various parameters in the finiteelement model. The Young’s modulus and the thickness of the pars tensa have the most significant effect on the load transfer between the eardrum and the ossicles and, along with the Young’s modulus of the pedicle and stapedial annular ligament, on the displacements of the stapes. Overall, the model demonstrates good agreement with lowfrequency experimental data. For example, (1) the maximum footplate displacement is about 35 nm; (2) the umbo/stapes displacement ratio is found to be about 3.5; (3) the motion of the stapes is predominantly pistonlike; and (4) the displacement pattern of the eardrum shows two points of maximum displacement, one in the posterior region and one in the anterior region. The effects of removing or stiffening the ligaments are comparable to those observed experimentally.
Keywords
finite element model gerbil low frequency mechanics middle ear pedicleIntroduction
The middle ear is the site of many infections and birth defects, among other problems. Middleear prostheses and noninvasive diagnostic tools are often unsatisfactory. In attempts to improve our understanding of middleear mechanics, many groups have conducted experimental work on mammalian middle ears. In particular, gerbils are becoming popular for middleear research, in part because they are inexpensive and their middleear structures are easily accessible.
Mathematical models are useful for helping with the interpretation of experimental data and for providing additional insight. Lumpedparameter models were the first ones used to study the middle ear. Although these models are able to replicate some experimental data, their parameters are not closely tied to anatomical or physiological data. Nowadays, finiteelement models are commonly used in middleear research. They are based on anatomical shapes, biological material properties, and realistic boundary conditions and loading conditions. The application of such models to middleear research was introduced by Funnell and Laszlo (1978).
A number of groups have since used the finiteelement method to study the mechanics of the eardrum and ossicles in humans (Wada et al. 1992; Beer et al. 1999; Bornitz et al. 1999; Prendergast et al. 1999; Koike et al. 2002; Sun et al. 2002) and in cats (Funnell and Laszlo 1978; Funnell et al. 1987; Ladak and Funnell 1996; Funnell et al. 2005). The geometries have generally been oversimplified and material properties have often been based on curve fitting. Although a number of experimental studies have been conducted on gerbil middle ears (von Unge et al. 1993; Rosowski et al. 1999; Olson and Cooper 2000; Dirckx and Decraemer 2001; Overstreet et al. 2003; Ravicz and Rosowski 2004), the only finiteelement model for the gerbil was a preliminary one presented by Funnell et al. (1999, 2000). The aim of this study is to present a detailed finiteelement model of the gerbil middle ear and to quantify its mechanics at low frequencies based on a priori materialproperty estimates from the literature. No attempt was made to match experimental measurements by adjusting model parameters. The geometry was defined accurately with the use of magnetic resonance imaging and xray microCT data, supplemented by histological images, and of moiré topography. Sensitivity tests were performed to evaluate the significance of certain parameters in the finiteelement model. The behavior of the model was compared with previous experimental measurements on gerbil middle ears.
Finiteelement model
Geometry and material properties
As in our previous gerbil model (Funnell et al. 1999, 2000), the ossicles were generated from magnetic resonance microscopy (MRM) images with a voxel size of about 45 μm, and the eardrum was based on images from phaseshift moiré topography. Because of its extremely small thickness, the stapes annular ligament (SAL) in this new model was based on xray microCT images with a voxel size of about 5.5 μm. Histological serial sections were used to supplement the MRM and microCT images. For example, histology was very helpful in defining the exact points of origin and insertion of the ligaments and their shapes.
In the absence of experimental measurements, the Poisson’s ratio was assumed to be 0.3. Although 0.3 is a reasonable value for bone, it might be argued that Poisson’s ratio should be close to 0.5 for soft tissues, because they are thought to be nearly incompressible. Values near 0.5, however, cause numerical problems for the finiteelement formulation used here. Increasing Poisson’s ratio to 0.4 for the soft tissues in this model produced displacement changes of less than 10%, consistent with previous modeling (e.g., Qi et al. 2004). This is also consistent with the theoretical relationship G = E/2(1 + ν) between Poisson’s ratio (ν), Young’s modulus (E), and the shear modulus (G), and the assumption that the annular ligament primarily operates in shear (Lynch et al. 1982). This relationship predicts that the effect of increasing Poisson’s ratio to 0.5 would be only about 15% for the annular ligament. The effects for the eardrum, mallear ligament, and incudal ligament would be expected to be smaller because their configurations do not lead to major constraints on volume changes.
Eardrum
The eardrum is represented by 1101 triangular thinshell elements. These elements include both bending and membrane (inplane) stiffnesses. The geometry of the eardrum is based on phaseshift moiré topography, a noncontacting optical method that can measure the precise 3D shape of an object (Dirckx and Decraemer 1989, 1990). The Young’s modulus of the pars tensa (PT) was set to 60 MPa, based on a recent study by Fay et al. (2005), who used theoretical methods to assess Young’s modulus values for cat and human eardrums. For an isotropic cat model, Fay et al. (2005) estimated ranges for the Young’s modulus of 30–60 MPa for the posterior region of the PT and 60–90 MPa for the anterior region, so the value of 60 MPa is consistent with our assumption of uniformity. The overall microstructure of the gerbil PT is similar to that of the human and cat PT, and therefore 60 MPa seems to be a reasonable estimate for the present model.
Given the lack of measurements on the mechanical properties of the pars flaccida (PF), Koike et al. (2002) assumed that the Young’s modulus of the PF is onethird of that of the PT. Using the same ratio, we set the Young’s modulus of the PF to 20 MPa. The PT and the PF were assigned uniform thicknesses of 7 and 24 μm, respectively, based on measurements by Kuypers et al. (2005).
The outer ends of the eardrum—where it meets the fibrocartilaginous ring—were fully clamped. In a finiteelement model analysis of the mustached bat, Van Wijhe et al. (2000) simulated forces applied to the fibrocartilaginous ring and observed that the ring was much more rigid than the eardrum, at least at low frequencies.
Ossicles
To simplify the model and speed up the simulations, we modeled the ossicles as hollow shells composed of triangular surface elements, rather than as solid bodies filled with volume elements. For a given amount of surface detail, the representation as hollow shells greatly reduces the number of degrees of freedom in the finiteelement solution by avoiding internal nodes. This is acceptable because the ossicles are assumed to behave like rigid structures, at least at low frequencies (Guinan and Peake 1967; Gundersen 1976), and because the mass distribution does not matter at frequencies low enough that inertial effects are negligible. The ossicles were represented with 4717 triangular shell elements.
The thicknesses of the shell elements for the ossicles were adapted to their geometries, based on direct measurements from the MRM images. In a slice that best showed the average shape of the solid structure, the approximate diameter was measured, and elements for that structure were given a thickness equal to about onethird of the diameter of the structure. In regions within a structure where the thickness changed considerably, different thicknesses were assigned. Thicknesses of 156, 63, and 10 μm were assigned to the malleus head, neck, and manubrium, respectively. The thicknesses assigned to the incus were 156 μm for the head, 50 μm for the long process, 21 μm for the lenticular plate, and 36 μm for the posterior process. The thicknesses assigned to the stapes were 42 μm for the head, 21 μm for both crura, and 31 μm for the footplate.
To ensure that the ossicles would behave rigidly, we tested a range of values for their Young’s modulus. A final value of 80 GPa was obtained, beyond which the displacements throughout the model would change by less than 3%. By comparison, in recent finiteelement models, the Young’s modulus for human ossicles was taken to be 14.1 GPa (Prendergast et al. 1999; Sun et al. 2002) based on Speirs et al. (1999), who measured the Young’s modulus of human ossicle allografts using axial compression; and 12 GPa (Koike et al. 2002) based on a review by Evans (1973).
The pedicle of the incus was the only part of the ossicles to be represented with volume elements. This decision was based on the work done by Funnell et al. (2005), who concluded that the pedicle may not be rigid and may play a major role in the motion between the incus and the stapes. As in their model, a Young’s modulus of 5 GPa was assigned to the pedicle based on the measurements of Mente and Lewis (1994). The pedicle had an average thickness of 30 μm and overall dimensions of 70 × 140 μm.
The ossicles are linked together by two synovial joints: the incudomallear joint and the incudostapedial joint. The incudomallear joint was not modeled in this study because it has been observed to be rigid at low frequencies (e.g., Guinan and Peake 1967; Gundersen 1976). With respect to the incudostapedial joint, Guinan and Peake (1967) and Decraemer and Khanna (2000) reported relative motion between the incus and stapes, but Funnell et al. (2005) concluded that this may be attributable mostly to the pedicle, rather than to the incudostapedial joint—a conclusion that was confirmed by Robles et al. (2006) in the chinchilla. The incudostapedial joint was therefore not modeled in this study.
In the gerbil, the manubrium of the malleus is tightly connected to the eardrum along its whole length (Oaks 1967). Therefore, the attachment of the eardrum to the manubrium is represented as a direct connection of the two parts of the model.
Ligaments and muscles
The AML, the PIL, and the SAL were represented with 288, 457, and 2549 volume elements, respectively. To date, no experimental measurements of the elastic properties of the middleear ligaments have been done. Other research groups have fitted their models to experimental data to determine the Young’s modulus of the ligaments (Prendergast et al. 1999; Koike et al. 2002; Sun et al. 2002). In this study, the Young’s moduli of the AML and of the PIL were set to 20 MPa as a reasonable value for dense connective tissue, as used in previous models from our laboratory (Ghosh and Funnell 1995; Funnell and Decraemer 1996; Ladak and Funnell 1996; Funnell et al. 1999, 2000). The AML is connected at one end to the anterior process of the malleus, and is clamped at the other end to represent its attachment to the cavity wall. The AML is about 180 μm in height and about 140 μm in length, and its width varies between about 170 and 230 μm. The PIL is composed of two distinct bundles: one medial and the other lateral to the posterior process of the incus. Each bundle is connected to the incus at one end, and is clamped at the other end to represent its attachment to the cavity wall. Each bundle has a somewhat trapezoidal shape. The medial bundle is about 150 μm in height and 100 μm in length, and its width varies between about 70 and 160 μm. The lateral bundle is about 160 μm in height and 50 μm in length, and its width varies between about 130 and 200 μm. The Young’s modulus of the SAL was set to 10 kPa, in line with vestibular sound pressure measurements by Lynch et al. (1982). This value was also used by Sun et al. (2002). The SAL follows the somewhat oval shape of the stapes footplate, with a large diameter of about 1 mm and a short diameter of about 750 μm. The ligament height varies between 50 and 170 μm and its thickness varies between 10 and 20 μm.
The animal and human experiments that we used for comparison with our model were done either under anesthesia or postmortem. Under such conditions, the muscles are in a relaxed state. The passive mechanical effects of the two middleear muscles (tensor tympani and stapedius) are negligible: Dirckx and Decraemer (2001) found that at very low frequencies the passive muscles do not play a significant role in controlling ossicular motion. The middleear muscles were therefore omitted from this model. (This omission might have a significant influence on the simulations presented below in the section on the ossicular lever ratio with the stiffnesses of the AML and/or PIL set to zero.)
Mesh resolution convergence
Finiteelement results depend in part on how fine a mesh is used to represent the geometry. The mesh resolution is defined in our software by an xy resolution (within slices) and a z resolution (the spacing between slices). As the mesh resolution increases, the computed displacements converge toward the exact solution for the model. However, the number of degrees of freedom also increases and strongly affects computation time. To determine an adequate mesh resolution for our model, we performed a series of runs by varying xy and z resolutions for every structure in the model, with smaller elements used where fine geometrical details need to be modeled. A mesh resolution corresponding to a total of 9208 elements was chosen for the complete final model, the computation time for each run being less than 13 min. Beyond that point, the computation time more than doubles but the displacements change by less than 3%.
Basic Model Results
Simulation results for the complete gerbil finiteelement model—subjected to a uniform lowfrequency sound pressure of 1 Pa applied to the eardrum—are presented in this section. Unless otherwise mentioned, the displacement values given are the magnitudes of the corresponding displacement vectors.
The footplate displacements are almost completely uniform. The difference between the maximum and minimum footplate displacements is only about 0.24%. This implies a pistonlike motion of the stapes, as shown in Figure 5. The transition from the rotational motion of the incus to the translational motion of the stapes apparently occurs in the flexible pedicle.
Sensitivity Analysis
Sensitivity tests attempt to distinguish between the highly influential parameters, whose values must be carefully chosen, and those whose values have little effect on the lowfrequency behavior of the model. The parameters investigated here were (1) the thicknesses of the pars flaccida and pars tensa (T _{ pf } and T _{ pt }, respectively) and (2) the Young’s moduli of the pars flaccida, pars tensa, stapedial annular ligament, anterior mallear ligament, posterior incudal ligament, and pedicle (Y _{ pf }, Y _{ pt }, Y _{ sal }, Y _{ aml }, Y _{ pil }, and Y _{ ped }, respectively). Effects on the footplate displacements will be examined first, followed by effects on the eardrum and umbo displacements. These displacements are measures of middleear output (footplate) and input (eardrum and umbo), and are commonly studied experimentally. The effects on the umbo/stapes ratio and the eardrum/umbo ratio will then be presented; these two ratios may be taken as measures of the ossicular lever ratio and of the load transfer between the eardrum and the manubrium, respectively. The effects of the AML and of the PIL on the axis of rotation of the ossicles will be examined. Finally, the effects of the shape of the eardrum on the overall behavior of the model will be presented.
Footplate displacements
Excluding Y _{ aml }, when the parameters are decreased by a factor of 10, the footplate displacements increase by 13% (Y _{ pil }) to 42% (Y _{ ped }). When the same parameters are increased by a factor of 3, footplate displacements decrease by 13% (Y _{ pil }) to 56% (T _{ pt }). For the Y _{ aml } parameter, footplate displacements increase by only 0.6% at a ratio of 0.1, and decrease by only 1.7% at a ratio of 3.
The stapes annular ligament (Y _{ sal }) has a greater influence on footplate displacements than the anterior mallear ligament (Y _{ aml }) and the posterior incudal ligament (Y _{ pil }). A question arises as to whether Y _{ aml } and Y _{ pil } may affect the axis of rotation without much affecting the footplate displacement. This will be discussed below.
In a 3D finiteelement model of a cat middle ear, Ghosh and Funnell (1995) represented the ossicles with a fixed axis of rotation and with a simple flexible connection between the incus and the stapes, providing a preliminary implementation of joint flexibility. They varied the incudostapedial joint stiffness from very small to very large values, and computed footplate displacements. For very low stiffnesses, the footplate displacement decreased because a very soft incudostapedial connection does not transmit force effectively. As the incudostapedial stiffness increased, footplate displacement reached a peak then dropped slightly and stabilized at a constant value.
To look for a similar phenomenon, we varied the stiffness of the pedicle (Y _{ ped }) to extreme values in our model. The results are consistent with those of Ghosh and Funnell (1995). The stapesdisplacement peak is at 100 MPa in the present model. As the stiffness decreases below 100 MPa, the footplate displacements approach zero because the pedicle becomes too soft to transmit forces well. As the stiffness increases above 100 MPa the footplate displacements again decrease, because the pedicle becomes too stiff to permit the transition from rotational motion to translational motion. The displacements reach a plateau at extremely high stiffnesses because the pedicle is so rigid that any further increase would have a negligible influence on footplate displacements. The peak here is much more prominent than that found by Ghosh and Funnell (1995).
Eardrum displacements
Four of the remaining six parameters (Y _{ ped }, Y _{ pf }, T _{ pf }, and Y _{ sal }) have relatively little effect on PT displacements: when they are decreased by a factor of 10, PT displacements increase by about 23%, 12%, 15%, and 24%, respectively; when they are increased by a factor of 3, PT displacements decrease by 26%, 16%, 21%, and 23%, respectively. The influence of the last two parameters (Y _{ aml } and Y _{ pil }) is negligible, with the displacements changing by 2% or less.
Umbo displacements
Ossicular lever ratio
When the SAL is stiffened, the stapes footplate displacements decrease more than the umbo displacements do, and the U/S ratio evidently increases. When the AML becomes less stiff, the malleus is less constrained and lateral motions appear. Lateral motions are not effective in transferring loads across the ossicles, so stapes footplate displacements decrease and the U/S ratio increases.
None of the other parameters had a significant effect on the U/S ratio.
Eardrum–manubrium load transfer
When T _{ pt } and Y _{ pt } are decreased by a factor of 10, the PT/U ratio increases by factors of about 28 and 2, respectively. When T _{ pt } and Y _{ pt } are increased by a factor of 5, the PT/U ratio decreases by about 27% and 23%, respectively. For the other six parameters, the changes in the PT/U ratio are smaller and in the opposite direction. As the eardrum becomes less stiff, it cannot displace the ossicles and the PT/U ratio increases. On the other hand, as the ossicular system becomes less stiff, the umbo displacements increase and the PT/U ratio decreases.
Axis of rotation

A: The AML and the PIL are kept intact.

B: The Young’s modulus of both the AML and the PIL are set to zero.

C: Only the Young’s modulus of the AML is set to zero.

D: Only the Young’s modulus of the PIL is set to zero.

E: Only the Young’s modulus of the AML is increased by a factor of 10.

F: Only the Young’s modulus of the PIL is increased by a factor of 10.
In case A, we can see (as described previously) that the apparent axis of rotation passes through the AML and the PIL.
When both the AML and the PIL have a Young’s modulus of zero (case B), the axis of rotation is shifted to the left and completely outside the figure. The parallel contour lines indicate the direction of the axis of rotation. Footplate and umbo displacements increase by about 46% and 29%, respectively. The U/S ratio decreases by about 12%.
When the Young’s modulus of the AML is set to zero (case C), the anterior end of the axis of rotation is shifted to the left of the AML, and the axis still passes through the PIL. Footplate displacements decrease by only about 3%, and umbo displacements increase by about 7%. The U/S ratio is increased by about 10%.
In case D, when the Young’s modulus of the PIL is set to zero, the posterior end of the axis of rotation is shifted slightly to the right of the PIL (clearly by a lesser amount than in case C), and the axis still passes through the AML. Footplate and umbo displacements both increase by about 18%. The U/S ratio is almost unchanged.
When the Young’s modulus of the AML is stiffened (case E), the axis of rotation is shifted slightly to the right at both ends. Footplate and umbo displacements both decrease by about 65%. The U/S ratio decreases by about 1.5%.
When the PIL is stiffened (case F), the anterior end of the axis of rotation is shifted considerably to the left of the AML. Footplate and umbo displacements are decreased to 0.7% and 1.3% of their initial values, respectively, and the U/S ratio is increased by about a factor of 2.

When the AML is cut, there is a large axis change but a relatively small change in the ossicular ratio (about 10%).

When the PIL is cut, there is a very small axis change and no change in the ossicular ratio.

When the AML is stiffened, there is practically no change in the axis or in the ossicular ratio.

When the PIL is stiffened, there is a large axis change but only a moderate change in the ossicular ratio (by a factor of 2).
Eardrum shape
Funnell and Laszlo (1978) developed a finiteelement model of the cat eardrum with a rudimentary middleear representation. The shape of the eardrum was defined by a normalized radiusofcurvature parameter. They varied the depth of the cone of the eardrum and the degree of curvature, and showed that the shape of the eardrum has a significant influence on middleear mechanics. The effects of eardrum shape were also demonstrated in models by Funnell and Decraemer (1996). In this section, we provide preliminary results on the effects of changing the eardrum shape of our model by presenting just one additional eardrum shape. The new shape was obtained by iterative Laplacian smoothing: each node on the eardrum is moved in turn to the position that is the average of the positions of all the nodes to which it is connected. The same process is repeated until none of the nodes moves more than some threshold amount.
Comparison with Experimental Measurements
To validate our model, we compared its behavior with experimental data. The model has no inertial or damping terms and is therefore applicable to low acoustic frequencies.
Eardrum measurements
Von Unge et al. (1993) measured the displacement patterns of the gerbil eardrum under quasistatic pressures with a realtime moiré interferometer. Two points of maximum displacement were reported: one in the anterior part, slightly superior to the umbo, and one in the posterior part, somewhat more superiorly. The larger of the two was in the posterior region. These findings are consistent with the results from our eardrum model (Fig. 4) with respect to the positions of the points of maximum displacement. In terms of the displacements themselves, our model values (for low acoustic frequencies) are expected differ from the experimental results because of viscoelastic effects in the quasistatic measurements, and because the experimental pressures were very high and the measured displacements were thus nonlinear.
Ossicular measurements
Although a number of studies have produced experimental measurements on gerbil middle ears, few have included responses below 1 kHz. Ravicz and Rosowski (2004), Overstreet and Ruggero (2002), and Overstreet et al. (2003) dealt exclusively with highfrequency responses. Rosowski et al. (1999), Olson and Cooper (2000), and Ravicz and Rosowski (2004) looked at both low and high frequencies.
Rosowski et al. (1999) and Ravicz and Rosowski (2004) used a probetube microphone and a laser Doppler vibrometer to measure stapes displacements at the posterior crus. The laser beam was focused at an angle of between 30 and 45° relative to the direction of pistonlike stapes translation. A cosine correction was used to adjust all laser measurements to a value consistent with the supposed direction of translation. Olson and Cooper (2000) used an interferometer to measure the stapes vibrations at specified points on the footplate.
Only Rosowski et al. (1999) measured displacements at, or at least near, the umbo. To date, no measurements of gerbil eardrum vibrations have been made.
Our umbo displacement differs from that of Rosowski et al. (1999) by about 43%. Our footplate displacement differs from those of Rosowski et al. (1999) and Olson and Cooper (2000) by approximately 33% and 27%, respectively, and is almost identical to the value obtained by Ravicz and Rosowski (2004).
The ratio of umbo displacement to stapes footplate displacement (U/S) gives an indication of the ossicular lever ratio, which is one of the factors often used to define the energytransfer mechanism of the middle ear. Rosowski et al. (1999) reported an ossicular lever ratio of about 3.5. In our model, the ratio is 3.0. Keeping in mind the variability of the experimental data, this agrees quite well with their value. The value of 3.5 is outside the range of values seen in Figure 9 for different model parameters. As noted above, none of the parameters have a strong effect on U/S, but varying the geometry of the ossicles and ligaments presumably would.
Ligament measurements
The apparent axis of rotation observed in our model is similar to the classical description given in the literature for low frequencies, namely, passing from the AML to the PIL.
Nakajima et al. (2004) determined the effects both of stiffening and of removing the AML and the PIL in fresh human ossicles. Soundinduced umbo and stapes velocities were measured by laser vibrometry. Stiffening of the AML resulted in a decrease in umbo and stapes displacements by a factor of 2 or less. In our model, the umbo and stapes displacements decreased by 65%. No experimental studies have included the effects of stiffening the PIL.
Experimental removal of the AML resulted in an increase in umbo displacements of less than 60% and a change in footplate displacements of less than 30%. Removal of the PIL resulted in an increase in umbo displacements of less than 40% and a change in footplate displacements of less than 15%. In our model, when the stiffness of the AML was set to zero, the umbo displacements increased by only 7% and the stapes footplate displacements decreased by only 3%. When the stiffness of the PIL was set to zero, the umbo and stapes displacements both increased by 18%. If the middleear muscles were added to the model, these changes would presumably be smaller.
Nakajima et al. (2004) concluded that removal of either the AML or the PIL affects ossicular motion only minimally at low frequencies. Large and complex changes were reported, however, when both the AML and the PIL were removed. These results are qualitatively consistent with our findings.
Discussion
A finiteelement model of the gerbil middle ear was developed. The behavior of this model in response to a lowfrequency sound pressure of 1 Pa was analyzed. Sensitivity tests were performed to evaluate the significance of the different parameters in the finiteelement model. To validate the model, we compared our results with experimental data from the literature.
The Young’s modulus and the thickness of the PT had the greatest effect on PT displacements and, along with the Young’s moduli of the pedicle and the SAL, on umbo and stapes displacements. The Young’s moduli of the PIL and the AML had the least effect on the model. The ossicular lever ratio (umbo/stapes ratio) was relatively insensitive to all parameters. The coupling between the eardrum and the manubrium (PT/umbo ratio) was found to be highly affected by the PT parameters, and to a lesser extent by the thickness of the PF and by the Young’s moduli of the pedicle and the SAL. Finally, the shape of the eardrum was shown to have an effect on the displacements of the middleear components, and on the displacement profile of the eardrum itself.
Overall, our finiteelement model demonstrates good agreement with experimental data. The displacement pattern of the PT in our model is similar in shape to profiles measured experimentally (Von Unge et al. 1993). The umbo and stapes displacements, as well as the ossicular displacement ratio, compare satisfactorily with lowfrequency measurements from Rosowski et al. (1999), Olson and Cooper (2000), and Ravicz and Rosowski (2004). The ossicular axis of rotation extended from the AML to the PIL, corresponding to the classical description, and the motion of the stapes is pistonlike, in agreement with the lowfrequency observations of Decraemer et al. (2005).
The axis of rotation was influenced by the AML when it was cut, by the PIL when it was stiffened, and when they were both cut. The corresponding changes in ossicular displacements are comparable to those of Nakajima et al. (2004).
The umbo and stapes displacements decreased by 65% when the Young’s modulus of the AML was increased by a factor of 10. This is comparable to the findings in human models by AbouKhalil et al. (2001) and Huber et al. (2003).
The present model is a step toward detailed quantitative models that can be validated against the considerable body of experimental data on the gerbil middle ear, and in turn can help explain those data.
Several enhancements should be undertaken to improve the model. (1) Inertial and damping properties should be included in the model to permit simulations at higher frequencies. This would allow comparison with the nonpistonlike stapes motion observed by Decraemer et al. (2005). (2) The study should be extended to nonlinear analysis. The large (nonlinear) displacements could be compared with recent moiré data from Decraemer’s laboratory (Decraemer et al. 2003; Dirckx and Decraemer 2003). (3) In our study, the periphery of the eardrum was assumed to be fixed. If an explicit representation of the fibrocartilaginous ring (including the smooth muscle cells) were included in the model, the behavior of the model could be compared with the results of studies in which the physiological effects of the smooth muscle were investigated through the administration of drugs known to relax or contract smooth muscle (Yang and Henson 2002). (4) The study of the effects of different eardrum shapes should be extended. (5) A more thorough representation of the pedicle, the incudomallear and incudostapedial joints, the stapedius and tensor tympani muscles, and the ligament/bone connections would serve to improve our understanding of ossicular motion. One specific area to be clarified is whether the connection of the anterior process of the malleus to the wall of the middleear air cavity is bony, as observed by Rosowski et al. (1999), or ligamentous as suggested by our histological and MRM data. (6) Orthotropic material properties for the eardrum should be investigated and the resulting behavior compared with the isotropic case.
Displacement measurements on the gerbil eardrum need to be made to validate this model properly, and measurements of displacement vectors at multiple locations on the ossicles would also be helpful.
Notes
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada). We thank M.M. Henson and O.W. Henson Jr., (UNC–Chapel Hill) and the Center for In Vivo Microscopy (Duke University) for the data used for the MRMbased model. We also thank W.F. Decraemer (University of Antwerp, Belgium) for the xray microCT and moiré data, and M. von Unge (Karolinska Institute, Sweden) for the histological serial sections. Finally, we thank J. Lauzière for editing the manuscript.
References
 AbouKhalil S, Funnell WRJ, Zeitouni AG, Schloss MD, Rappaport J (2001) Finiteelement modeling of anterior mallear ligament fixation. Toronto, Eastern Section Meeting, Triological Soc.Google Scholar
 Beer HJ, Bornitz M, Hardtke HJ, Schmidt R, Hofmann G, Vogel U, Zahnert T, Hüttenbrink KB. Modelling of components of the human middle ear and simulation of their dynamic behavior. Audiol. Neurootol. 4:156–162, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Bornitz M, Zahnert T, Hardtke HJ, Hüttenbrink KB. Identification of parameters for the middle ear model. Audiol. Neurootol. 4:163–169, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Decraemer WF, Khanna SM. Three dimensional vibration of the ossicular chain in the cat. Vibration measurements by laser techniques: advances and applications, Proc. SPIE 4072:401–411, 2000.Google Scholar
 Decraemer WF, Gea SLR, Dirckx JJJ (2003) Threedimensional displacement of the gerbil ossicular chain under static pressure changes. 26th ARO MidWinter Mtg.Google Scholar
 Decraemer WF, Khanna SM, de la Rochefoucauld O, Dong W, Olson ES (2005) Is the scala vestibuli pressure influenced by nonpiston like stapes motion components? An experimental approach. Auditory mechanisms: processes and models. Portland (OR), Proc. Ninth International Mechanics of Hearing Workshop, 119–120.Google Scholar
 Dirckx JJJ, Decraemer WF. Phase shift moiré apparatus for automatic 3D surface measurement. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 60: 3698–3701, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Dirckx JJJ, Decraemer WF. Automatic calibration method for phase shift shadow moiré interferometry. Appl. Opt. 29:1474–1476, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Dirckx JJJ, Decraemer WF. Effect of middle ear components on eardrum quasistatic deformation. Hear. Res. 157:124–137, 2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Dirckx JJJ, Decraemer WF (2003) Pressure induced eardrum deformation at progressive stages of middle ear dissection. 26th ARO MidWinter Mtg.Google Scholar
 Evans FG (1973) Mechanical Properties of Bone. Springfield, IL, Charles Thomas, p. 35.Google Scholar
 Fay J, Puria S, Decraemer WF, Steele C. Three approaches for estimating the elastic modulus of the tympanic membrane. J. Biomech. 38:1807–1815, 2005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Funnell WRJ, Laszlo CA. Modeling of the cat eardrum as a thin shell using the finiteelement method. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63:1461–1467, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Funnell WRJ, Decraemer WF (1996) Finiteelement modelling of the cat middle ear with elastically suspended malleus and incus. 19th ARO MidWinter Meeting.Google Scholar
 Funnell WRJ, Decraemer WF, Khanna SM. On the damped frequency response of a finiteelement model of the cat eardrum. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81:1851–1859, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Funnell WRJ, Decraemer WF, von Unge M, Dirckx JJJ (1999) Finiteelement modelling of the gerbil eardrum and middle ear. 22nd ARO MidWinter Meeting.Google Scholar
 Funnell WRJ, Decraemer WF, von Unge M, Dirckx JJJ (2000) Finiteelement modelling of the gerbil eardrum and middle ear. 22nd ARO MidWinter Meeting.Google Scholar
 Funnell WRJ, Siah TH, McKee MD, Daniel SJ, Decraemer WF. On the coupling between the incus and the stapes in the cat. J. Acoust. Res. Otol. 6:9–18, 2005.Google Scholar
 Ghosh SS, Funnell WRJ (1995) On the effects of incudostapedial joint flexibility in a finiteelement model of the cat middle ear. Proc. IEEE–EMBS 17th Annual Conference and 21st Can. Med. & Biol. Eng. Conf., Montreal, 1437–1438.Google Scholar
 Guinan JJ Jr., Peake WT. Middleear characteristics of anesthetized cats. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 41:1237–1261, 1967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Gundersen T. Holographic vibration analysis of the ossicular chain. Acta Otolaryngol. 82:16–25, 1976.Google Scholar
 Huber A, Koike T, Wada H, Nandapalan V, Fisch U. Fixation of the anterior mallear ligament: diagnosis and consequences for hearing results in stapes surgery. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 112:348–355, 2003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
 Koike T, Wada H, Kobayashi T. Modeling of the human middle ear using the finiteelement method. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111:1306–1317, 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Kuypers LC, Dirckx JJJ, Decraemer WF, Timmermans JP. Thickness of the gerbil tympanic membrane measured with confocal microscopy. Hear. Res. 209:42–52, 2005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Ladak HM, Funnell WRJ. Finiteelement modeling of the normal and surgically repaired cat middle ear. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100: 933–944, 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Lynch TJ, Nedzelnitsky V, Peake WT. Input impedance of the cochlea in cat. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72:108–130, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Mente PL, Lewis JL. Elastic modulus of calcified cartilage is an order of magnitude less than that of subchondral bone. J. Orthop. Res. 12:637–647, 1994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Nakajima HH, Peake WT, Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN (2004) Ossicular ligaments and the axis of rotation. 27th ARO MidWinter Meeting.Google Scholar
 Oaks E (1967) Structure and function of inflated middle ears of rodents. Ph.D. thesis, Yale University, New Haven.Google Scholar
 Olson E, Cooper N (2000) Stapes motion and scala vestibuli pressure in gerbil. 23rd ARO MidWinter Meeting.Google Scholar
 Overstreet EH, Ruggero MA. Development of wideband middleear transmission in the Mongolian gerbil. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111:261–270, 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Overstreet EH, Richter CP, Temchin AN, Cheatham MA, Ruggero MA. Highfrequency sensitivity of the mature gerbil cochlea and its development. Audiol. Neurootol. 8:19–27, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Prendergast PJ, Ferris P, Rice HJ, Blayney AW. Vibroacoustic modelling of the outer and middle ear using the finiteelement method. Audiol. Neurootol. 4:185–191, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Qi L, Mikhael CS, Funnell WRJ. Application of the Taguchi method to sensitivity analysis of a middleear finiteelement model. Proc. 28th Ann. Conf. Can. Med. Biol. Eng. Soc., 153–156, 2004Google Scholar
 Ravicz ME, Rosowski JJ (2004) Highfrequency sound transmission through the gerbil middle ear. 27th ARO MidWinter Meeting.Google Scholar
 Robles L, Temchin A, Fan YH, Cai H, Ruggero M (2006) Vibrations of the stapes and the long and lenticular processes of the incus in the chinchilla middle ear. 29th ARO MidWinter Meeting.Google Scholar
 Rosowski JJ, Ravicz ME, Teoh SW, Flandermeyer D. Measurements of middleear function in the Mongolian gerbil, a specialized mammalian ear. Audiol. NeuroOtol. 4(3–4):129–136, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Speirs AD, Hotz MA, Oxland TR, Hausler R, Nolte LP. Biomechanical properties of sterilized human auditory ossicles. J. Biomech. 32:485–491, 1999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Sun Q, Gan RZ, Chang KH, Dormer KJ. Computerintegrated finiteelement modeling of human middle ear. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 1:109–122, 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Van Wijhe RG, Funnell WRJ, Henson OW Jr., Henson MM. Development of a finiteelement model of the middle ear of the moustached bat. Proc. 26th Ann. Conf. Can. Med. Biol. Eng. Soc., 20–21, 2000.Google Scholar
 Von Unge M, Decraemer WF, BaggerSjöbäck D, Dirckx JJJ. Displacement of the gerbil tympanic membrane under static pressure variations measured with a realtime differential moiré interferometer. Hear. Res. 70:229–242, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Wada H, Metoki T, Kobayashi T. Analysis of dynamic behavior of human middle ear using a finiteelement method. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92:3157–3168, 1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Yang X, Henson OW Jr. Smooth muscle in the annulus fibrosus of the tympanic membrane: physiological effects on sound transmission in the gerbil. Hear. Res. 164:105–114, 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar