Accurate estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial for the detection of chronic kidney disease (CKD). In clinical practice, GFR is estimated from serum creatinine using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation or the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation instead of the time-consuming method of measured clearance for exogenous markers such as inulin. In the present study, the equations originally developed for a Caucasian population were tested in Japanese CKD patients, and modified with the Japanese coefficient determined by the data.
The abbreviated MDRD study and CG equations were tested in 248 Japanese CKD patients and compared with measured inulin clearance (Cin) and estimated GFR (eGFR). The Japanese coefficient was determined by minimizing the sum of squared errors between eGFR and Cin. Serum creatinine values of the enzyme method in the present study were calibrated to values of the noncompensated Jaffé method by adding 0.207 mg/dl, because the original MDRD study equation was determined by the data for serum creatinine values measured by the noncompensated Jaffé method. The abbreviated MDRD study equation modified with the Japanese coefficient was validated in another set of 269 CKD patients.
There was a significant discrepancy between measured Cin and eGFR by the 1.0 × MDRD or CG equations. The MDRD study equation modified with the Japanese coefficient (0.881 × MDRD) determined for Japanese CKD patients yielded lower mean difference and higher accuracy for GFR estimation. In particular, in Cin 30–59 ml/min per 1.73 m2, the mean difference was significantly smaller with the 0.881 × MDRD equation than that with the 1.0 × MDRD study equation (1.9 vs 7.9 ml/min per 1.73 m2; P <?0.01), and the accuracy was significantly higher, with 60% vs 39% of the points deviating within 15%, and 97% vs 87% of points within 50%, respectively (both P <?0.01). Validation with the different data set showed the correlation between eGFR and Cin was better with the 0.881 × MDRD equation than with the 1.0 × MDRD study equation. In Cin less than 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, the accuracy was significantly higher, with 85% vs 69% of the points deviating within 50% (P <?0.01), respectively. The mean difference was also significantly smaller (P <?0.01). However, GFR values calculated by the 0.881 × MDRD equation were still underestimated in the range of Cin over 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2.
Although the Japanese coefficient improves the accuracy of GFR estimation of the original MDRD study equation, a new equation is needed for more accurate estimation of GFR in Japanese patients with CKD stages 3 and 4.
National-Kidney-Foundation2002K/DOQI Clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification and stratificationAm J Kidney Dis39S1S266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levey, A, Eckardt, K, Tsukamoto, Y, Levin, A, Coresh, J, Rossert, J, et al. 2005Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)Kidney Int672089100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coresh, J, Astor, B, Greene, T, Eknoyan, G, Levey, A 2003Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and decreased kidney function in the adult US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyAm J Kidney Dis4112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levey, A, Bosch, J, Lewis, J, Green, T, Rogers, N, Roth, D 1999A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: A new prediction equationAnn Intern Med13046170PubMedGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J, Agodoa, L, Cheek, D, Green, T, Middleton, J, O'Connor, D, et al. 2001Comparison of cross-sectional renal function measurements in African-Americans with hypertensive nephrosclerosis and of primary formulas for estimating glomerular filtration rateAm J Kidney Dis3874453PubMedGoogle Scholar
Poggio, E, Wang, X, Greene, T, Van Lente, F, Hall, P 2005Performance of the modification of diet in renal disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations in the estimation of GFR in health and in chronic kidney diseaseJ Am Soc Nephrol1645966PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, A, Larson, T, Bergstralh, E, Slezak, J, Jacobsen, S, Cosio, F 2004Using serum creatinine to estimate glomerular filtration rate: accuracy in good health and in chronic kidney diseaseAnn Intern Med14192937PubMedGoogle Scholar
Orita, Y, Gejyo, F, Sakatsume, M, Shiigai, T, Maeda, Y, Imai, E, et al. 2005Estimation of glomerular filtration rate by inulin clearance: comparison with creatinine clearanceJpn J Nephrol4780412Google Scholar
Coresh, J, Astor, BC, McQuillan, G, Kusek, J, Greene, T, van Lente, F, Levery, AS 2002Calibration and random variation of the serum creatine assay as critical elements of using Equations to estimate glomerular filtration rateAm J Kidney Dis399202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Y, Zuo, L, Chen, J, Luo, Q, Yu, X, Li, Y, et al. 2006Modified glomerular filtration rate estimating equation for Chinese patients with chronic kidney diseaseJ Am Soc Nephrol17293744PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, GL, Miller, WG, Coresh, J, Fleming, J, Greenberg, N, Greene, T, et al. 2006Recommendations for improving serum cereatinine measurement: A report from the laboratory working group of the national kidney disease education programClin Chem52518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murthy, K, Stevens, L, Stark, P, Levey, A 2005Variation in the serum creatiine assay calibration: a practical application to glomerular filtration rate estimationKidney Int6818847PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuo, L, Ma, Y, Zhou, Y, Wang, M, Xu, G, Wang, H 2005Application of GFR-estimating equations in Chinese patients with chronic kidney diseaseAm J Kidney Dis4546372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jafer, T, Schmid, C, Levey, A 2005Serum creatinine as marker of of kidney function in south Asians: a study of reduced GFR in adults in PakistanJ Am Soc Nephrol1614139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Y, Han, K, Han, S, Kim, H, Cha, D 2005Characteristics of population with normal serum creatinine and impared renal function: the validation of a MDRD formula in a healthy general general populationClin Nephrol6325866PubMedGoogle Scholar
Mahajan, S, Mukhiya, G, Singh, R, Tiwari, S, Kalra, V, Bhowmik, D, et al. 2005Assessing glomerular filtration rate in healthy Indian adults: a comparison of various prediction equationsJ Nephrol1825761PubMedGoogle Scholar
Lee, R, Wang, Z, Heo, M, Ross, R, Janssen, I, Heymsfield, S 2000Total-body skeletal muscle mass: development and cross-validation of anthropometric prediction modelsAm J Clin Nutr72796803PubMedGoogle Scholar
Vickery, S, Stevens, P, Dalton, R, van Lante, F, Lamb, E 2006Does the ID-MS traceable MDRD equation work and is it suitable for use with compensated Jaffé and enzymatic creatinine assay?Nephrol Dial Transplant21243945PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froissart, M, Rossert, J, Jacquot, C, Paillard, M, Houillier, P 2005Predictive performance of the modification of diet in renal disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations for estimating renal functionJ Am Soc Nephrol1676373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrone, R, Steinman, T, Beck, G, Skibinski, C, Royal, H, Lawlor, M, Hunsicker, L 1990Utility of radioisotopic filtration markers in chronic renal insufficiency: simultaneous comparison of 125I-iothalamate, 160Yb-DPTA, 99mTC-DTPA and inulinAm J Kidney Dis1622435PubMedGoogle Scholar