Advertisement

Short-term outcomes of the over-the-scope clip proctology system for rectovaginal fistula repair: a prospective study

  • Yiwei Tong
  • Bertrand Trilling
  • Pierre-Yves Sage
  • Edouard Girard
  • Jean-Luc FaucheronEmail author
Original Article
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The over-the-scope clip proctology system is rather new and information regarding its use for the closure of anorectal fistulas is scarce. No study has been designed to focus exclusively on its application in the treatment of rectovaginal fistulas. The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of the clip for rectovaginal fistula repair.

Methods

From September 2014 to November 2017, consecutive patients underwent a rectovaginal fistula repair using the over-the-scope clip proctology system and were enrolled in a non-randomized prospective monocentric study. The primary outcome was fistula healing at 8 months. Secondary outcomes included assessment of morbidity and timing of rectovaginal fistula recurrence.

Results

There were 16 patients with a median age of 40.1 years. The most common causes of rectovaginal fistula were adverse events following proctectomy or pelvic radiotherapy (6 patients), obstetric trauma (5 patients) and inflammatory bowel disease (3 patients). Most participants had undergone at least two previous surgical interventions before the clipping procedure. 11 patients had a temporary diverting stoma at time of the clipping procedure. Successful primary healing of the fistula was observed in 7 (43.7%) patients. Short-term complications were rare and included pain, which occurred in 4 patients, and spontaneous clip detachment, which occurred in 2 patients. Most recurrences appeared shortly after the procedure, with a median delay of 45 days (range 16–217).

Conclusions

We demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and reproducibility of the Over-The-Scope Clip Proctology system in rectovaginal fistula repair for the patients selected. Further trials should be designed, incorporating comparisons to well-established techniques, a longer follow-up period, and a larger cohort.

Keyword

Rectovaginal fistula OTSC proctology system Surgery 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Wolters Kluwer and Editage for language, grammar, and terminology checking.

Funding

None.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Jean-Luc Faucheron has a consulting agreement with AMI, Covidien, Medtronic, Ethicon, MSD, Legrand, and Johnson & Johnson Beauté Santé France. This has had no impact on the results of this study. Yiwei Tong, Bertrand Trilling, Pierre-Yves Sage, and Edouard Girard declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Tsang CB, Rothenberger DA (1997) Rectovaginal fistulas. Therapeutic options. Surg Clin North Am 77:95–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Browning A, Whiteside S (2015) Characteristics, management, and outcomes of repair of rectovaginal fistula among 1100 consecutive cases of female genital tract fistula in Ethiopia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 131:70–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Corte H, Maggiori L, Treton X et al (2015) Rectovaginal fistula: What is the optimal strategy? An analysis of 79 patients undergoing 286 procedures. Ann Surg 262:855–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kirschniak A, Subotova N, Zieker D et al (2011) The Over-The-Scope Clip (OTSC) for the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding, perforations, and fistulas. Surg Endosc 25:2901–2905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weiland T, Fehlker M, Gottwald T et al (2013) Performance of the OTSC System in the endoscopic closure of iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforations: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 27:2258–2274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keren D, Eyal O, Sroka G et al (2015) Over-the-Scope Clip (OTSC) system for sleeve gastrectomy leaks. Obes Surg 25:1358–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Magdeburg R, Kaehler G (2016) Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in humans: feasibility and safety of transgastric closure using the OTSC system. Surg Endosc 30:73–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Winder JS, Kulaylat AN, Schubart JR et al (2016) Management of non-acute gastrointestinal defects using the over-the-scope clips (OTSCs): a retrospective single-institution experience. Surg Endosc 30:2251–2258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Niland B, Brock A (2017) Over-the-scope clip for endoscopic closure of gastrogastric fistulae. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13:15–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prosst RL, Joos AK, Ehni W et al (2015) Prospective pilot study of anorectal fistula closure with the OTSC Proctology. Colorectal Dis 17:81–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mennigen R, Laukotter M, Senninger N et al (2015) The OTSC(®) proctology clip system for the closure of refractory anal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol 19:241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marinello F, Kraft M, Ridaura N et al (2018) Treatment of fistula-in-ano with OTSC(®) proctology clip device: short-term results. Cir Esp 96:369–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gautier M, Godeberge P, Ganansia R et al (2015) Easy clip to treat anal fistula tracts: a word of caution. Int J Colorectal Dis 30:621–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dubois A, Carrier G, Pereira B et al (2015) Therapeutic management of complex anal fistulas by installing a nitinol closure clip: study protocol of a multicentric randomised controlled trial—FISCLOSE. BMJ Open 5(12):e009884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB et al (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374:1105–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prosst RL, Joos AK (2016) Short-term outcomes of a novel endoscopic clipping device for closure of the internal opening in 100 anorectal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol 20:753–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gottgens KW, Smeets RR, Stassen LP et al (2014) The disappointing quality of published studies on operative techniques for rectovaginal fistulas: a blueprint for a prospective multi-institutional study. Dis Colon Rectum 57:888–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kniery KR, Johnson EK, Steele SR (2015) Operative considerations for rectovaginal fistulas. World J Gastrointest Surg 7:133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yiwei Tong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bertrand Trilling
    • 1
    • 3
  • Pierre-Yves Sage
    • 1
  • Edouard Girard
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jean-Luc Faucheron
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Colorectal Unit, Department of SurgeryMichallon University HospitalGrenoble cedexFrance
  2. 2.School of MedicineShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  3. 3.University Grenoble AlpsGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations