Advertisement

Comment on “A systematic review of minimally invasive surgery for retrorectal tumors”

  • I. J. Y. Wee
  • J. C.-Y. Ngu
Correspondence
  • 6 Downloads

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Mullaney TG, Lightner AL, Johnston M, Kelley SR, Larson DW, Dozois EJ (2018) A systematic review of minimally invasive surgery for retrorectal tumors. Tech Coloproctol 22(4):255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nissen T, Wynn R (2014) The clinical case report: a review of its merits and limitations. BMC Res Notes 7:264-CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baek SK, Hwang GS, Vinci A, Jafari MD, Jafari F, Moghadamyeghaneh Z et al (2016) Retrorectal tumors: a comprehensive literature review. World J Surg 40(8):2001–2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schlichtemeier S, Tou S, Parks R, Engel A (2018) Less is more: re-evaluating systematic reviews. Colorectal Dis 20(8):662–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P (2010) The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, OntarioGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yong Loo Lin School of MedicineNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryChangi General HospitalSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations